Chance, time allocation, and the evolution of adaptively flexible sex role behavior

Integrative and Comparative Biology

Volumn 45, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 931-944

  Gowaty, Patricia Adair ^a   Hubbell, Stephen P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 30744473180     PISSN: 15407063     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/icb/45.5.931     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (41)

1. Altmann, J. 1997. Mate choice and intrasexual reproductive competition: Contributions that go beyond acquiring more mates. In P. A. Gowaty (ed.), Feminism and evolutionary biology: Boundaries, intersections, and frontiers, pp. 320-333. Chapman and Hall, New York.
2. Andersson, M. 1994. Sexual selection. Princeton University Press. Princeton.
3. Bateman, A. J. 1948. Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity 2:349-368.
4. Chapman, T., D. M. Neubaum, M. F. Wolfner, and L. Partridge. 2000. The role of male accessory gland protein Acp36DE in sperm competition in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B-Biol. Sci. 267:1097-1105.
5. Chapman, T. and L. Partridge. 1996. Female fitness in Drosophila melanogaster: An interaction between the effect of nutrition and of encounter rate with males. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B-Biol. Sci. 263:755-759.
6. Clutton-Brock, T. H. and G. A. Parker. 1992. Potential reproductive rates and the operation of sexual selection. Quart. Rev. Biol. 67:437-456.
7. Darwin, C. 1859. The origin of species by means of natural selection. John Murray, London.
8. Darwin, C. 1871. The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. John Murray, London.
9. Dill, L. M., A. V. Hedrick, and A. Fraser. 1999. Male mating strategies under predation risk: Do females call the shots? Behav. Ecol. 10:452-461.
10. Drickamer, L. C., P. A. Gowaty, and D. M. Wagner. 2003. Free mutual mate preferences in house mice affect reproductive success and offspring performance. Anim. Behav. 65:105-114.
11. Eberhard, W. G. 1996. Female control: Sexual selection by cryptic female choice. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
12. Finke, O. M. 1982. Lifetime mating success in a natural population of the damselfly, Enallagma hageni (Walsh) (Odonata: Coenagrionidae). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 10:293-302.
13. Godin, J. G. J. and S. E. Briggs. 1996. Female mate choice under predation risk in the guppy. Anim. Behav. 51:117-130.
14. Gong, A. 1997. The effects of predator exposure on the female choice of guppies (Poecilla reticulata) from a high-predation population. Behaviour 134:373-389.
15. Gowaty, P. A. 1997. Sexual dialectics, sexual selection, and variation in mating behavior. In P. A. Gowaty (ed.), Feminism and evolutionary biology: boundaries, intersections, and frontiers, pp. 351-384. Chapman Hall, New York.
16. Gowaty, P. A. 2003. Power asymmetries between the sexes, mate preferences, and components of fitness. In C. Travis (ed.), Women, evolution, and rape, pp. 61-86. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
17. Gowaty, P. A. 2004. Sex roles, contests for the control of reproduction, and sexual selection. In P. M. Kappeler and C. P. van Schaik (eds.), Sexual selection in primates: New and comparative perspectives, pp. 163-221. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
18. Gowaty, P. A., L. C. Drickamer, and S.-S. Holmes. 2003. Male house mice produce fewer offspring with lower viability and poorer performance when mated with females they do not prefer. Anim. Behav. 65:95-103.
19. Gowaty, P. A., R. Steinechen, and W. W. Anderson. 2004. Indiscriminate females and choosy males: Within- and between-species variation in Drosophila. Evolution 57:2037-2045.
20. Gowaty, P. A., R. Steinichen, and W. W. Anderson. 2002. Mutual interest between the sexes and reproductive success in Drosphila pseudoobscura. Evolution 56:2537-2540.
21. Gwynne, D. T. 1984. Sexual selection and sexual differences in mormon crickets (Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae, Anabrus-Simplex). Evolution 38:1011-1022.
22. Gwynne, D. T. 1985. Role reversal in katydids: Habitat influences reproductive behavior (Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae, Metaballus Sp). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 16:355-361.
23. Hedrick, A. V. and L. M. Dill. 1993. Mate choice by female crickets is influenced by predation risk. Anim. Behav. 46:193-196.
24. Holling, C. S. 1959. Some characteristics of simple types of predation and parasitism. Canad. Entomol. 91:385-398.
25. Hubbell, S. P. and L. K. Johnson. 1987. Environmental variance in lifetime mating success, mate choice, and sexual selection. Am. Nat. 130:91-112.
26. Itzkowitz, M. and M. Haley. 1999. Are males with more attractive resources more selective in their mate preferences? A test in a polygynous species. Behav. Ecol. 10:366-371.
27. Johnson, L. K. and S. P. Hubbell. 1984. Male choice: Experimental demonstration in a Brentid weevil. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 15:183-188.
28. Mackenzie, A., J. D. Reynolds, V. J. Brown, and W. J. Sutherland. 1995. Variation in male mating success on leks. Am. Nat. 145:633-652.
29. Parker, G. A., R. R. Baker, and V. G. F. Smith. 1972. The origin and evolution of gamete dimorphism and the male-female phenomenon. J. Theoret. Biol. 36:529-553.
30. Parker, G. A. and L. W. Simmons. 1996. Parental investment and the control of sexual selection: Predicting the direction of sexual competition. Proc. R. Soc. London. B:315-321.
31. Ryan, K. K. and J. Altmann. 2001. Selection for male choice based primarily on mate compatibility in the oldfield mouse, Peromyscus polionotus rhoadsi. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 50:436-440.
32. Shuster, S. M. and M. J. Wade. 2003. Mating systems and strategies. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
33. Simmons, L. W. 1995. Relative parental expenditure, potential reproductive rates, and the control of sexual selection in katydids. Am. Nat. 145:797-808.
34. Sutherland, W. J. 1985a. Chance can produce a sex difference in variance in mating success and account for Bateman's data. Anim. Behav. 33:1349-1352.
35. Sutherland, W. J. 1985b. Measures of sexual selection. In R. Dawkins and M. Ridley (eds.), Oxfords surveys in evolutionary biology, pp. 90-101. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
36. Sutherland, W. J. 1987. Random and deterministic componsents of variance in mating success. In J. W. Bradbury and M. B. Andersson (eds.), Sexual selection: Testing the alternatives, pp. 209-219. John Wiley & Sons Limited, New York.
37. Tang-Martinez, Z. and T. B. Ryder. 2005. The problem with paradigms: Bateman's worldview as a case study. Integr. Comp. Biol. 45:821-830.
38. Trivers, R. L. 1972. Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man, pp. 136-179. Aldine, Chicago.
39. Wedekind, C. 1999. Pathogen-driven sexual selection and the evolution of health. In S. C. Stearns (ed.), Evolution in health and disease, pp. 102-107. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
40. West-Eberhard. 2003. Developmental plasticity and evolution. Oxford University Press, New York, New York.
41. Williams, G. C. 1966. Adaptation and natural selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton.