'What Would You Say if You Were Guilty?' Suspects' Strategies During a Hypothetical Behavior Analysis Interview Concerning a Serious Crime

Applied Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 60-70

  Masip, Jaume ^a   Herrero, Carmen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SALAMANCA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS INTERVIEW; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRIME; DECEPTION; FEMALE; GUILT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTERVIEW; LEGAL PROCEDURE; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 84872388950     PISSN: 08884080     EISSN: 10990720     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/acp.2872     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Aamodt, M., & Custer, H. (2006). Who can best catch a liar? A meta-analysis of individual differences in detecting deception. Forensic Examiner, 16, 6-11.
2. Alonso, H., Masip, J., & Garrido, E. (2009). La capacidad de los policías para detectar mentiras [Police officers' ability to detect lies]. Revista de Derecho Penal y Criminología, 2, 159-196.
3. Alonso, H., Masip, J., Garrido, E., & Herrero, C. (2009). El entrenamiento de los policías para detectar mentiras [Police officers' training to detect deception]. Estudios Penales y Criminológicos, 29, 7-60.
4. Blair, J. P., & McCamey, W. P. (2002). Detection of deception: An analysis of the Behavioral Analysis Interview technique. Illinois Law Enforcement Executive Forum, 2, 165-169.
5. Bond, C. F., & DePaulo, B. M. (2006). Accuracy of deception judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 214-234.
6. Camerer, C., Loewenstein, G., & Weber, M. (1989). The course of knowledge in economic settings: An experimental analysis. Journal of Political Economy, 97, 1232-1254.
7. Cassidy, M. F., & Buede, D. (2009). Does the accuracy of expert judgment comply with common sense: Caveat emptor. Management Decision, 47, 454-469.
8. Colwell, K., Hiscock-Anisman, C., Memon, A., Woods, D., & Michlik, P. (2006). Strategies of impression management among deceivers and truth-tellers: How liars attempt to convince. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 24, 31-38.
9. Culhane, S. E., Hosch, H. M., & Heck, C. (2008). Interrogation technique endorsement by current law enforcement, future law enforcement, and laypersons. Police Quarterly, 11, 366-386.
10. Garrido, E., Masip, J., & Herrero, C. (2004). Police officers' credibility judgments: Accuracy and estimated ability. International Journal of Psychology, 39, 254-275.
11. Gilovich, T., Savitsky, K., & Medvec, V. H. (1998). The illusion of transparency: Biased assessments of others' ability to read one's emotional states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 332-346.
12. Global Deception Research Team. (2006). A world of lies. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37, 60-74.
13. Hartwig, M., Granhag, P. A., & Strömwall, L. A. (2007). Guilty and innocent suspects' strategies during police interrogations. Psychology, Crime & Law, 13, 213-227.
14. Hartwig, M., Granhag, P. A., Strömwall, L. A., & Doering, N. (2010). Impression and information management: On the strategic self-regulation of innocent and guilty suspects. The Open Criminology Journal, 3, 10-16.
15. Hines, A., Colwell, K., Hiscock-Anisman, C., Garrett, E., Ansarra, R., & Montalvo, L. (2010). Impression management strategies of deceivers and honest reporters in an investigative interview. European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 2, 73-90.
16. Horvath, F., Blair, J. P., & Buckley, J. P. (2008). The Behavioral Analysis Interview: Clarifying the practice, theory and understanding of its use and effectiveness. International Journal of Police Science & Management, 10, 101-118.
17. Horvath, F., Jayne, B. C., & Buckley, J. (1994). Differentiation of truthful and deceptive criminal suspects in Behavior Analysis Interviews. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 39, 793-807.
18. Inbau, F. E., Reid, J. E., Buckley, J. P., & Jayne, B. C. (2004). Criminal interrogation and confessions (4th edn). Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers.
19. Kassin, S. M. (2005). On the psychology of confessions. Does innocence put innocents at risk? American Psychologist, 60, 215-228.
20. Kassin, S. M., & Norwick, R. J. (2004). Why suspects waive their Miranda rights: The power of innocence. Law and Human Behavior, 28, 211-221.
21. Kassin, S. M., Leo, R. A., Meissner, C. A., Richman, K. D., Colwell, L. H., Leach, A.-M., & La Fon, D. (2007). Police interviewing and interrogation: A self-report survey of police practices and beliefs. Law and Human Behavior, 31, 381-400.
22. Lerner, M. J. (1980). The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. New York: Plenum Press.
23. Liebliech, I., & Ninio, A. (1972). Detection of suppressed involvement with information through a forced number-guessing technique. Acta Psychologica, 36, 381-387.
24. Liebliech, I., Shaham, E., & Ninio, A. (1976). Effects of time stress and stimulus-response set size on the efficiency of detection of involvement with suppressed information through the use of the forced number-guessing technique. Acta Psychologica, 40, 75-84.
25. Liu, M., Granhag, P. A., Landström, S., Roos af Hjelmsäter, E., Strömwall, L., & Vrij, A. (2010). "Can you remember what was in your pocket when you were stung by a bee?": Eliciting cues to deception by asking the unanticipated. The Open Criminology Journal, 3, 31-36.
26. Masip, J., Barba, A., & Herrero, C. (2012). Behavior Analysis Interview and common sense. A study with novice and experienced officers. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 19, 21-34.
27. Masip, J., Herrero, C., Garrido, E., & Barba, A. (2011). Is the Behavior Analysis Interview just common sense? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25, 593-604.
28. Masip, J., Sporer, S. L., Garrido, E., & Herrero, C. (2005). The detection of deception with the Reality Monitoring approach: A review of the empirical evidence. Psychology, Crime, & Law, 11, 99-122.
29. Raskin, D. C., & Esplin, P. W. (1991). Statement validity assessment: Interview procedures and content analysis of children's statements of sexual abuse. Behavioral Assessment, 13, 265-291.
30. Reinhard, M. A., Dickhäuser, O., Marksteiner, T., & Sporer, S. L. (2011). The case of Pinocchio: Teachers' ability to detect deception. Social Psychology of Education, 14, 299-318.
31. Sporer, S. L. (2004). Reality monitoring and detection of deception. In P. A. Granhag & L. A. Strömwall (Eds.), Deception detection in forensic contexts (pp. 64-102). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
32. Strömwall, L. A., Granhag, P. A., & Hartwig, M. (2004). Practitioners' beliefs about deception. In P. A. Granhag y, L. A. Strömwall (Eds.), Deception detection in forensic contexts (pp. 229-250). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
33. Strömwall, L. A., Granhag, P. A., & Landström, S. (2007). Children's prepared and unprepared lies: Can adults see through their strategies? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21, 457-471.
34. Strömwall, L. A., Hartwig, M., & Granhag, P. A. (2006). To act truthfully: Nonverbal behavior and strategies during a police interrogation. Psychology, Crime & Law, 12, 207-219.
35. Vrij, A. (2008). Detecting lies and deceit: Pitfalls and opportunities. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
36. Vrij, A., Granhag, P. A., & Porter, S. (2010). Pitfalls and opportunities in nonverbal and verbal lie detection. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 11, 89-121.
37. Vrij, A., Mann, S., & Fisher, R. P. (2006). An empirical test of the Behavior Analysis Interview. Law and Human Behavior, 30, 329-345.
38. Vrij, A., Mann, S., Kristen, S., & Fisher, R. P. (2007). Cues to deception and ability to detect lies as a function of police interview styles. Law and Human Behavior, 31, 499-518.
39. Vrij, A., Mann, S., Leal, S., & Granhag, P. A. (2010). Getting into the minds of pairs of liars and truth tellers: An examination of their strategies. The Open Criminology Journal, 3, 17-22.