Is the behaviour analysis interview just common sense?

Applied Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 593-604

  Masip, Jaume ^a   Herrero, Carmen ^a   Garrido, Eugenio ^a   Barba, Alberto ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SALAMANCA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; BEHAVIOUR ANALYSIS INTERVIEW; COGNITION; COMMON SENSE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GUILT; HUMAN; LAW ENFORCEMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOLOGIC TEST; QUESTIONNAIRE; SOUND; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 79952091221     PISSN: 08884080     EISSN: 10990720     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/acp.1728     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Aamodt, M. G. (2008). Reducing misconceptions and false beliefs in police and criminal psychology. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35, 1231-1240.
2. Aamodt, M., & Custer, H. (2006). Who can best catch a liar? A meta-analysis of individual differences in detecting deception. Forensic Examiner, 16, 6-11.
3. Alonso, H., Masip, J., & Garrido, E. (2009). La capacidad de los policías para detectar mentiras [Police officers' ability to detect lies]. Revista de Derecho Penal y Criminología, 2, 159-196.
4. Blair, J. P., & Kooi, B. (2004). The gap between training and research in the detection of deception. International Journal of Police Science and Management, 6, 77-83.
5. Blair, J. P., & McCamey, W. P. (2002). Detection of deception: An analysis of the behavioral analysis interview technique. Illinois Law Enforcement Executive Forum, 2, 165-169.
6. Bond, C. F., & DePaulo, B. M. (2006). Accuracy of deception judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 214-234.
7. Bond, C. F., & DePaulo, B. M. (2008). Individual differences in judging deception: Accuracy and bias. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 477-492.
8. Bull, R. (1989). Can training enhance the detection of deception?. In J. C. Yuille (Ed.), Credibility assessment (pp. 83-99). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
9. Colwell, L. H., Miller, H. A., Lyons, P. M., & Miller, R. S. (2006). The training of law enforcement officers in detecting deception: A survey of current practices and suggestions for improving accuracy. Police Quarterly, 9, 275-290.
10. DePaulo, B. M., Lindsay, J. J., Malone, B. E., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K., & Cooper, H. (2003). Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 74-118.
11. Farr, R. M. (1981). On the nature of human nature and the science of behaviour. In P. Heelas, & A. Lock (Eds.), Indigenous psychologies: The anthropology of the self (pp.303-317). London: Academic Press.
12. Flagel, D. C., & Gendreau, P. (2008). Sense, common sense, and nonsense. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35, 1354-1361.
13. Garrido, E., & Masip, J. (1999). How good are police officers at spotting lies? Forensic Update, 58, 14-21.
14. Global Deception Research Team. (2006). A world of lies. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37, 60-74.
15. Granhag, P. A., & Hartwig, M. (2008). A new theoretical perspective on deception detection: On the psychology of instrumental mind-reading.Psychology, Crime, & Law, 14, 189-200.
16. Granhag, P. A., Strömwall, L., & Hartwig, M. (2007). The SUE technique: The way to interview to detect deception. Forensic Update, 88, 25-29.
17. Gregory, R. L. (2004). Common sense. In R. L. Gregory (Ed.), The Oxford companion to the mind (2nd ed., p. 193). New York: Oxford University Press.
18. Hartwig, M., Granhag, P. A., & Strömwall, L. A. (2007). Guilty and innocent suspects' strategies during police interrogations. Psychology, Crime & Law, 13, 213-227.
19. Hartwig, M., Granhag, P. A., Strömwall, L. A., & Kronkvist, O. (2006). Strategic use of evidence during police interviews: When training to detect deception works. Law and Human Behavior, 30, 603-619.
20. Hartwig, M., Granhag, P. A., Strömwall, L. A., & Vrij, A. (2005). Detecting deception via strategic disclosure of evidence. Law and Human Behavior, 29, 469-484.
21. Horvath, F., Jayne, B., & Buckley, J. (1994). Differentiation of truthful and deceptive criminal suspects in Behavior Analysis Interviews. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 39, 793-807.
22. Inbau, F. E., Reid, J. E., Buckley, J. P., & Jayne, B. C. (2004). Criminal interrogation and confessions (4th ed.) Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers.
23. Kassin, S. M. (2005). On the psychology of confessions. Does innocence put innocents at risk? American Psychologist, 60, 215-228.
24. Kassin, S. M. (2008). Confession evidence: Commonsense myths and misconceptions. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35, 1309-1322.
25. Kassin, S. M., & Fong, C. T. (1999). "I'm innocent!": Effects of training on judgments of truth and deception in the interrogation room. Law and Human Behavior, 23, 499-516.
26. Kassin, S. M., & Gudjonsson, G. H. (2004). The psychology of confessions: A review of the literature and issues. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5, 33-67.
27. Kassin, S. M., Leo, R. A., Meissner, C. A., Richman, K. D., Colwell, L. H., Leach, A.-M., et al. (2007). Police interviewing and interrogation: A self-report survey of police practices and beliefs. Law and Human Behavior, 31, 381-400.
28. Kassin, S. M., & Norwick, R. J. (2004). Why suspects waive their Miranda rights: The power of innocence. Law and Human Behavior, 28, 211-221.
29. Kelley, H. H. (1992). Common-sense psychology and scientific psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 1-23.
30. Lilienfeld, S. O., & Landfield, K. (2008). Science and pseudoscience in law enforcement. A user-friendly primer. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35, 1215-1230.
31. Mann, S., Vrij, A., & Bull, R. (2004). Detecting true lies: Police officers' ability to detect suspects' lies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 137-149.
32. Masip, J., & Garrido, E. (2006). La obtención de información mediante el interrogatorio del sospechoso [Obtaining information: Suspects' interrogations]. In E. Garrido, J. Masip, & C. Herrero (Eds.), Psicología jurídica (pp.339-380). Madrid: Pearson/Prentice hall.
33. Münsterberg, H. (1908). On the witness stand: Essays on psychology and crime. New York: Doubleday.
34. Porter, S., & ten Brinke, L. (2009). Dangerous decisions: A theoretical framework for understanding how judges assess credibility in the courtroom. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 14, 119-134.
35. Snook, B. (2008). Introduction to the special issue. Pseudoscientific policing practices and beliefs. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35, 1211-1214.
36. Spinney, L. (2008). Line-ups on trial. Nature, 453, 442-444.
37. Sporer, S. L., & Schwandt, B. (2006). Paraverbal indicators of deception: A meta-analytic synthesis. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 421-446.
38. Sporer, S. L., & Schwandt, B. (2007). Moderators of nonverbal indicators of deception. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 13, 1-34.
39. Stern, L. W. (1902). Zur Psychologie der Aussage [On the psychology of testimony]. Zeitschrift für die gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft, 22, 315-370.
40. Strömwall, L., Granhag, P. A., & Hartwig, M. (2004). Practitioners' beliefs about deception. In P. A. Granhag, & L. A. Strömwall (Eds.), Deception detection in forensic contexts (pp. 229-250). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
41. Szasz, T. (2007). Medicalizing quackery. The Freeman, 57, 22-27 (Retrieved November 30, 2009, from).
42. Vrij, A. (2005). Cooperation of liars and truth tellers. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 39-50.
43. Vrij, A. (2008). Detecting lies and deceit: Pitfalls and opportunities. Chichester: Wiley.
44. Vrij, A., Fisher, R., Mann, S., & Leal, S. (2006). Detecting deception by manipulating cognitive load. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 141-142.
45. Vrij, A., Leal, S., Granhag, P. A., Mann, S., Fisher, R., Hillman, J., et al. (2009). Outsmarting the liars: The benefit of asking unanticipated questions. Law and Human Behaviour, 33, 159-166.
46. Vrij, A., & Mann, S. (2005). Police use of nonverbal behavior as indicators of deception. In R. E. Riggio, & R. S. Feldman (Eds.), Applications of nonverbal communication (pp. 63-94). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
47. Vrij, A., Mann, S., & Fisher, R. P. (2006). An empirical test of the Behavior Analysis Interview. Law and Human Behavior, 30, 329-345.
48. Vrij, A., Mann, S., Fisher, R., Leal, S., Milne, R., & Bull, R. (2008). Increasing cognitive load to facilitate lie detection: The benefit of recalling an event in reverse order. Law and Human Behavior, 32, 253-265.