Impression management strategies of deceivers and honest reporters in an investigative interview

European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 73-90

  Hines, Amber ^a   Colwell, Kevin ^a   Hiscock Anisman, Cheryl ^b   Garrett, Erika ^a   Ansarra, Ryan ^a   Montalvo, Larissa ^a  

^a SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Credibility; Deception; Interrogation; Testimony; Verbal communication

Indexed keywords

EID: 79960725148     PISSN: 18891861     EISSN: 19894007     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Ansarra, R., Colwell, K., Hiscock-Anisman, C., Hines, A., Cole, L., & Kondor, S. (2009). Augmenting ACID with affective details to assess credibility. Manuscript under review.
2. Arce, R., & Farina, F. (2005). Psychological evidence in court on statement credibility, psychological injury, and malingering: The Global Evaluation System (GES). Papeles del Psicólogo, 26, 59-77.
3. Colwell, K., Hiscock, C. K., & Memon, A. (2002). Interviewing techniques and the assessment of statement credibility. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 287-300.
4. Colwell, K., Hiscock-Anisman, C., Memon, A., Woods, D., & Michlik, P. M. (2006). Strategies of impression management among deceivers and truth-tellers: How liars attempt to convince. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 24, 31-38.
5. Colwell, K., Hiscock-Anisman, C., Memon, A., Rachel, A., & Colwell, L. H. (2007). Vividness and spontaneity of statement detail characteristics as predictors of witness credibility. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 25, 5-30.
6. Colwell, K., Hiscock-Anisman, C., Memon, A., Taylor, L., & Prewett, J. (2008). Assessment Criteria Indicative of Deception (ACID): An integrated system of investigative interviewing and detecting deception. Journal of Investigative Psychology & Offender Profiling, 4(3), 167-180.
7. Geiselman, R. E., & Fisher, R. P. (1989). The cognitive interview technique for victims and witnesses of crimes. In D. C. Raskin, Psychological methods in criminal investigation and evidence (pp. 191-215). New York: Springer Publishing Co.
8. Hartwig, M., Granhag, P.G., Stromwall, L.A., & Doering, N. (2009 manuscript in press). Impression and information management: On the strategic self-regulation of innocent and guilty suspects. Open Criminology.
9. Hartwig, M., Granhag, P. A., Stromwall, L. A., & Kronkvist, O. (2006). Strategic use of evidence during police interviews: When training to detect deception. Law and Human Behavior, 30, 603-619.
10. Johnson, M. K. (1988). Reality monitoring: An experimental phenomenological approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 117, 390-394.
11. Johnson, M. K., & Raye, C. L. (1981). Reality monitoring. Psychological Review, 88, 67-85.
12. McCornack, S. A. (1992). Information manipulation theory. Communication Monographs, 59, 1-16.
13. Porter, S., & Yuille, J. C. (1996). The language of deceit: An investigation of the verbal clues to deception in the interrogation context. Law and Human Behavior, 20, 443-459.
14. Vrij, A. (2006). Detecting deception in legal contexts. In A. Heaton-Armstrong, E. Shepherd, G. Gudjonsson, & D. Wolchover (Eds.), Witness testimony: Psychological, investigative, and evidential perspectives (pp. 23-42). New York: Oxford University Press.
15. Vrij, A., Leal, S., Granhag, P., Mann, S., Fisher, R., Hillman, J., & Sperry, K. (2009). Outsmarting the liars: The benefit of asking unanticipated questions. Law and Human Behavior, 33(2), 159-166.
16. Vrij, A., & Mann, S. (2006). Criteria-Based Content Analysis: An empirical test of its underlying processes. Psychology, Crime, and Law, 12, 337-349.
17. Vrij, A., Mann, S., Fisher, R., Leal, S., Milne, R., & Bull, R. (2008). Increasing cognitive load to facilitate lie detection: The benefit of recalling an event in reverse order. Law and Human Behavior, 32(3), 253-265.