The case of Pinocchio: Teachers' ability to detect deception

Social Psychology of Education

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 299-318

  Reinhard, Marc André ^a   Dickhäuser, Oliver ^a   Marksteiner, Tamara ^a   Sporer, Siegfried L ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANNHEIM   (Germany)

^b JUSTUS LIEBIG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cheating; Detection of deception; Expertise; Lies; Teachers

Indexed keywords

EID: 80052473596     PISSN: 13812890     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11218-010-9148-5     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Aamodt M. G., Custer H. (2006) Who can best catch a liar? A meta-analysis of individual differences in detecting deception. Forensic Examiner 15: 6-11.
2. Akehurst L., Koehnken G., Vrij A., Bull R. (1996) Lay persons' and police officers' beliefs regarding deceptive behavior. Applied Cognitive Psychology 10: 461-471.
3. Apple W., Streeter L. A., Krauss R. M. (1979) Effects of pitch and speech rate on personal attributions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37: 715-727.
4. Bond C. F. et al (2006) A world of lies. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 37: 60-74.
5. Bond C. F., Kahler K. N., Paolicelli L. M. (1985) The miscommunication of deception: An adaptive perspective. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 21: 331-345.
6. Bond C. F., DePaulo M. B. (2006) Accuracy of deception judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Review 10: 214-234.
7. Bond C. F., Uysal A. (2007) On lie detection "wizards". Law and Human Behavior 31: 109-115.
8. Breuer M. M., Sporer S. L., Reinhard M.-A. (2005) Subjektive Indikatoren von Täuschung: Die Bedeutung der Täuschungssituation und Gelegenheit zur Vorbereitung [Subjective indicators of deception as a function of situation and opportunity for preparation]. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 36: 189-201.
9. DePaulo B. M., Lindsay J. J., Malone B. E., Muhlenbruck L., Charlton K., Cooper H. (2003) Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin 129: 74-118.
10. Donaldson W. (1992) Measuring recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 3: 275-277.
11. Donaldson W. (1993) Accuracy ofd' andA' as estimates of sensitivity. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 31: 271-274.
12. Ekman P., O'Sullivan M. (1991) Who can catch a liar?. American Psychologist 46: 913-920.
13. Ekman P., O'Sullivan M. O., Frank M. G. (1999) A few can catch a liar. Psychological Science 10: 263-266.
14. Evans E. D., Craig D. (1990) Teacher and student perceptions of academic cheating in middle and senior high schools. Journal of Educational Research 84: 44-52.
15. Forrest J. A., Feldman R. S., Tyler J. M. (2004) When accurate beliefs lead to beter lie detection. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 34: 764-780.
16. Frank M. G., Ekman P. (1997) The ability to detect deceit generalizes across different types of high-stake lies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 7(2): 1429-1439.
17. Frank M. G., Ekman P. (2004) Appearing truthful generalizes across different deception situations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 86: 486-495.
18. Franklyn-Stokes A., Newstead S. E. (1995) Undergraduate cheating: Who does what and why?. Studies in Higher Education 20: 159-173.
19. Goldsen R. K. (1960) What college students think. van Nostrand, Princeton, NJ.
20. Graham M. A., Monday J., O'Brien S., Steffen K. (1994) Cheating at small colleges: An examination of etudent and faculty attitudes and behaviors. Journal of College Student Development 35: 342-354.
21. Hartwig M., Granhag P. A., Stroemwall L. A., Andersson L. O. (2004) Suspicious minds: Criminals' ability to detect deception. Psychology, Crime, and Law 10: 83-95.
22. Heller, K. A. & Perleth, Ch. (2000). Kognitiver Faehigkeitstest fuer 4.-12. Klassen, Revision (KFT 4-12 + R) [Cognitive ability test for grades 4-12, revision]. Goettingen: Hogrefe.
23. Hocking J. E., Leathers D. G. (1980) Nonverbal indicators of deception: A new theoretical perspective. Communication Monographs 47: 119-131.
24. Koehnken G. (1990) Glaubwuerdigkeit [Credibility]. Psychologie Verlags Union, Muenchen.
25. Kraut R. E. (1978) Verbal and nonverbal cues in the perception of lying. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 36: 380-391.
26. MacMillan N. A., Creelman C. D. (2005) Detection theory: A user's guide. Cambridge University Press, New York.
27. Mann S., Vrij A., Bull R. (2004) Detecting true lies: Police officers' ability to detect suspects' lies. Journal of Applied Psychology 89: 137-149.
28. Masip J., Garrido E., Herrero C. (2009) Heuristic versus systematic processing of information in detecting deception: Questioning the truth bias. Psychological Reports 105: 11-36.
29. Meissner C. A., Kassin S. M. (2002) "He's guilty!": Investigator bias in judgments of truth and deception. Law and Human Behavior 26: 469-480.
30. O'Sullivan M. (2008) Home runs and humbugs: Comment on Bond and DePaulo (2008). Psychological Bulletin 134: 493-497.
31. O'Sullivan M., Ekman P. (2004) The wizards of deception detection. In: Granhag P. A., Stroemwall L. (eds) The detection of deception in forensic contexts. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, pp 269-286.
32. Rae G. (1976) Table of A'. Perceptual and Motor Skills 42: 98.
33. Reinhard M.-A., Burghardt K., Sporer S. L., Bursch S. E. (2002) Alltagsvorstellungen ueber inhaltliche Kennzeichen von Luegen [Lay persons' beliefs regarding content-related cues of deception]. Zeitschrift fuer Sozialpsychologie 33: 169-180.
34. Riggio R., Friedman H. S. (1983) Individual differences and cues to deception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 45: 899-915.
35. Schab F. (1991) Schooling without learning: Thirty years of cheating in high school. Adolescence 26: 839-848.
36. Sporer S. L. (2004) Reality monitoring and the detection of deception. In: Granhag P.-A., Stromwall L. Deception detection in forensic contexts. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 64-102.
37. Sporer S. L. (2007) Evaluating witness evidence: The fallacies of intuition. In: Engel C., Strack F. (eds) The impact of court procedure on the psychology of judicial decision making. Nomos Verlag, Baden-Baden, Germany, pp 111-150.
38. Sporer S. L., Schwandt B. (2006) Paraverbal indicators of deception: A meta-analytic synthesis. Applied Cognitive Psychology 20: 421-446.
39. Sporer S. L., Schwandt B. (2007) Moderators of nonverbal correlates of deception: A meta-analytic synthesis. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 13: 1-34.
40. Streeter L. A., Krauss R. M., Geller V., Olson C., Apple W. (1977) Pitch changes during attempted deception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 35: 345-350.
41. Stroemwall L. A., Granhag P. A. (2003) How to detect deception? Arresting the beliefs of police officers, prosecutors and judges. Psychology, Crime and Law 9: 19-36.
42. Vrij A. (2000) Detecting lies and deceit. The psychology of lying and the implications for professional practice. Wiley, Chichester.
43. Vrij A., Akehurst L., Brown L., Mann S. (2006) Detecting lies in young children, adolescents and adults. Applied Cognitive Psychology 20: 1225-1237.
44. Vrij A., Akehurst L., Knight S. (2006) Police officers', social workers', teachers' and the general public's beliefs about deception in children, adolescents and adults. Legal and Criminological Psychology 11: 297-312.
45. Whitley B. E. (1998) Factors associated with cheating among college students: A review. Research in Higher Education 39: 235-274.
46. Wild K.-P., Rost D.-H. (1995) Klassengröße und Genauigkeit von Schülerbeurteilungen [Class size and the accuracy of teacher's judgments of student's characteristics]. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie 17: 79-90.
47. Zuckerman M., Driver R. E. (1985) Telling lies: Verbal and nonverbal correlates of deception. In: Siegman A. W., Feldstein S. (eds) Multichannel integrations of nonverbal behavior. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 129-147.
48. Zuckerman M., DePaulo B. M., Rosenthal R. (1981) Verbal and nonverbal communication of deception. In: Berkowitz L. (ed.) Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 14). Academic Press, New York, pp 1-59.
49. Zuckerman M., Koester R., Driver R. E. (1981) Beliefs about cues associated with deception. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 6: 105-114.