New Horizons in Breast Imaging

Clinical Oncology

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 93-100

  Kilburn Toppin, F ^a   Barter, S J ^a  

^a CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Breast specific gamma imaging; Diffusion weighted imaging; Dual energy mammography; Elastography; Tomosynthesis

Indexed keywords

METHOXY ISOBUTYL ISONITRILE TECHNETIUM TC 99M;

ARTICLE; AUTOMATED WHOLE BREASE ULTRASOUND; BREAST CANCER; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONTRAST ENHANCED DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; DIGITAL BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS; ECHOGRAPHY; ELASTOGRAPHY; HUMAN; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ELASTOGRAPHY; MAMMOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCINTIGRAPHY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY;

EID: 84872375279     PISSN: 09366555     EISSN: 14332981     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2012.10.002     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Holloway C., Easson A., Escallon J., et al. Technology as a force for improved diagnosis and treatment of breast disease. Can J Surg 2010, 53(4):268-277.
2. Sree S.V., Ng E.Y., Acharya R.U., Faust O. Breast imaging: a survey. World J Clin Oncol 2011, 2(4):171-178.
3. Hall F.M. Transition to digital mammography. Radiology 2012, 262(1):374.
4. Helvie M.A. Digital mammography imaging: breast tomosynthesis and advanced applications. Radiol Clin North Am 2010, 48(5):917-929.
5. Fornvik D., Zackrisson S., Ljungberg O., et al. Breast tomosynthesis: accuracy of tumor measurement compared with digital mammography and ultrasonography. Acta Radiol 2010, 51:240-247.
6. Rafferty E, Nicklason L. FFDM vs FFDM with tomosynthesis for women with radiographically dense breasts: an enriched retrospective reader study. Radiological Society of North America Annual Meeting; 2011.
7. Sumkin J, Ganott M, Bandos A. Digital breast tomosynthesis vs supplemental diagnostic mammography images for the evaluation of noncalcified breast lesions. Radiological Society of North America Annual Meeting; 2011.
8. Kopans D., Gavenonis S., Halpern E., Moore R. Calcifications in the breast and digital breast tomosynthesis. Breast J 2011, 17(6):638-644.
9. Gur D., Abrams G.S., Chough D.M., et al. Digital breast tomosynthesis: observer performance study. Am J Roentgenol 2009, 193:586-591.
10. Wallis M.G., Moa E., Zanca F., Leifland K., Danielsson M. Two-view and single-view tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: high-resolution X-ray imaging observer study. Radiology 2012, 262(3):788-796.
11. Teertstra H.J., Loo C.E., van den Bosch M.A., et al. Breast tomosynthesis in clinical practice: initial results. Eur Radiol 2010, 20:16-24.
12. Tingberg A., Förnvik D., Mattsson S., Svahn T., Timberg P., Zackrisson S. Breast cancer screening with tomosynthesis-initial experiences. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2011, 147(1-2):180-183.
13. Michell M., Wasan R., Whelehan P., et al. Digital breast tomosynthesis: a comparison of the accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis, two-dimensional digital mammography and two-dimensional screening mammography (film-screen). Breast Cancer Res 2009, 11(Suppl. 2):O1.
14. Andersson I., Ikeda D., Zackrisson S. Breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: a comparison of breast cancer viability and BIRADS classification in a population for cancers with subtle mammographic findings. Eur Radiol 2008, 18:2817-2825.
15. Chan Heang-Ping, Wei Jun, Zhang Yiheng, Helvie M.A., Sahiner B., Hadjiiski L. Computer-aided detection of masses in digital tomosynthesis mammography: comparison of three approaches. Med Phys 2008, 35:4087.
16. Dromain C., Thibault F., Muller S., et al. Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical results. Eur Radiol 2011, 21(3):565-574.
17. Diekmann F., Freyer M., Diekmann S., et al. Evaluation of contrast-enhanced digital mammography. Eur J Radiol 2011, 78(1):112-121.
18. Schmitzberger F.F., Fallenberg E.M., Lawaczeck R., et al. Development of low-dose photon-counting contrast-enhanced tomosynthesis with spectral imaging. Radiology 2011, 259(2):558-564.
19. Fredenberg E., Hemmendorff M., Cederström B., Aslund M., Danielsson M. Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography with a photon-counting detector. Med Phys 2010, 37(5):2017-2029.
20. Norell B, Fredenberg E, Cederstrom B, Leifland K, Lundqvist M. Lesion characterization using spectral mammography. Proceedings of SPIE, Vol. 8313. Medical Imaging 2012. Physics of Medical Imaging.
21. Yi A., Cho N., Chang J.M., Koo H.R., La Yun B., Moon W.K. Sonoelastography for 1786 non-palpable breast masses: diagnostic value in the decision to biopsy. Eur Radiol 2012, 22(5):1033-1040.
22. Cosgrove D., Berg W.A., Doré C., et al. Shear wave elastography for breast masses is highly reproducible. Eur Radiol 2012, 22(5):1023-1032.
23. Berg W.A., Cosgrove D., Dore C., et al. Shear-wave elastography improves the specificity of breast US: the BE1 multinational study of 939 masses. Radiology 2012, 262:435-449.
24. Cho N., Jang M., Lyou C.Y., Park J.S., Choi H.Y., Moon W.K. Distinguishing benign from malignant masses at breast US: combined US elastography and color Doppler US - influence on radiologist accuracy. Radiology 2012, 262(1):80-90.
25. Lin X., Wang J., Han F., Fu J., Li A. Analysis of eighty-one cases with breast lesions using automated breast volume scanner and comparison with handheld ultrasound. Eur J Radiol 2012, 81(5):873-878.
26. Stöblen F., Landt S., Stelkens-Gebhardt R., Sehouli J., Rezai M., Kümmel S. First evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of an automated 3D ultrasound system in a breast screening setting. Anticancer Res 2011, 31(8):2569-2574.
27. Moon W.K., Shen Y.W., Huang C.S., Chiang L.R., Chang R.F. Computer-aided diagnosis for the classification of breast masses in automated whole breast ultrasound images. Ultrasound Med Biol 2011, 37(4):539-548.
28. Malayeri A.A., El Khouli R.H., Zaheer A., et al. Principles and applications of diffusion-weighted imaging in cancer detection, staging, and treatment follow-up. Radiographics 2011, 31(6):1773-1791.
29. Pereira F.P., Martins G., Carvalhaes de Oliveira R.de.V. Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging of the breast. Magn Reson Imaging Clin North Am 2011, 19(1):95-110.
30. Sonmez G., Cuce F., Mutlu H., et al. Value of diffusion-weighted MRI in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions. Wien Klin Wochenschr 2011, 123(21-22):655-661.
31. Sharma U., Danishad K.K., Seenu V., Jagannathan N. Longitudinal study of the assessment by MRI and diffusion-weighted imaging of tumor response in patients with locally advanced breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy. NMR Biomed 2009, 22(1):104-113.
32. Park S.H., Moon W.K., Cho N., et al. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging: pretreatment prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer. Radiology 2010, 257(1):56-63.
33. Mariappan Y.K., Glaser K.J., Ehman R.L. Magnetic resonance elastography: a review. Clin Anat 2010, 23(5):497-511.
34. Sinkus R., Siegmann K., Xydeas T., Tanter M., Claussen C., Fink M. MR elastography of breast lesions: understanding the solid/liquid duality can improve the specificity of contrast-enhanced MR mammography. Magn Reson Med 2007, 58(6):1135-1144.
35. Haddadin I.S., McIntosh A., Meisamy S., et al. Metabolite quantification and high-field MRS in breast cancer. NMR Biomed 2009, 22(1):65-76.
36. Huang W., Fisher P.R., Dulaimy K., Tudorica L.A., O'Hea B., Button T.M. Detection of breast malignancy: diagnostic MR protocol for improved specificity. Radiology 2004, 232(2):585-591.
37. Meisamy S., Bolan P.J., Baker E.H., et al. Adding in vivo quantitative 1H MR spectroscopy to improve diagnostic accuracy of breast MR imaging: preliminary results of observer performance study at 4.0 T. Radiology 2005, 236(2):465-475.
38. Tafreshi N.K., Kumar V., Morse D.L., Gatenby R.A. Molecular and functional imaging of breast cancer. Cancer Control 2010, 17(3):143-155.
39. Brem R.F., Michener K.H., Zawistowski G. Approaches to improving breast cancer diagnosis using a high resolution, breast specific gamma camera. Phys Med 2006, 21(Suppl. 1):17-19.
40. Hendrick R.E. Radiation doses and cancer risks from breast imaging studies. Radiology 2010, 257:246-253.
41. ICRP Radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals. Ann ICRP 1998, 28:1-126.
42. Fass L. Imaging and cancer: a review. Mol Oncol 2008, 2(2):115-152.
43. Berg W.A., Weinberg I.N., Narayanan D., et al. High-resolution fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with compression ('positron emission mammography') is highly accurate in depicting primary breast cancer. Breast J 2006, 12(4):309-323. Positron Emission Mammography Working Group.
44. Jordan V.C., Brodie A.M. Development and evolution of therapies targeted to the estrogen receptor for the treatment and prevention of breast cancer. Steroids 2007, 72(1):7-25.