Sonoelastography for 1786 non-palpable breast masses: Diagnostic value in the decision to biopsy

European Radiology

Volumn 22, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 1033-1040

  Yi, Ann ^a   Cho, Nariya ^a   Chang, Jung Min ^a   Koo, Hye Ryoung ^a   Yun, Bo La ^a   Moon, Woo Kyung ^a  

^a Seoul National University Hospital   (South Korea)

Author keywords

B mode ultrasound; Biopsies; Breast; Neoplasm; Sonoelastography

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CARCINOMA; BREAST TUMOR; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; ECHOGRAPHY; ELASTICITY; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; INVASIVE LUNG CARCINOMA; INVASIVE PAPILLARY CARCINOMA; LYMPHOMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MELANOMA; METAPLASTIC CARCINOMA; MUCINOUS CARCINOMA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIODIAGNOSIS; SECRETORY CARCINOMA; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SONOELASTOGRAPHY; TUBULAR CARCINOMA; ADULT; AGED; BIOPSY; DECISION MAKING; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; ELASTOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; PALPATION; PREVALENCE; PROGNOSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SOUTH KOREA; STATISTICS; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

ADULT; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOPSY; BREAST NEOPLASMS; DECISION MAKING; ELASTICITY IMAGING TECHNIQUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PALPATION; PREVALENCE; PROGNOSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; REPUBLIC OF KOREA; RISK ASSESSMENT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY;

EID: 84861529896     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: 14321084     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-011-2341-x     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Krouskop TA, Wheeler TM, Kallel F et al (1998) Elastic moduli of breast and prostate tissues under compression. Ultrason Imaging 20:260-274 (Pubitemid 29168827)
2. Itoh A, Ueno E, Tohno E et al (2006) Breast disease: clinical application of US elastography for diagnosis. Radiology 239:341-350
3. Zhi H, Ou B, Luo BM et al (2007) Comparison of ultrasound elastography, mammography, and sonography in the diagnosis of solid breast lesions. J Ultrasound Med 26:807-815 (Pubitemid 46870348)
4. Cho N, MoonWK, Park JS et al (2008) Nonpalpable breast masses: evaluation by US elastography. Korean J Radiol 9:111-118
5. Tardivon A, El Khoury C, Thibault F et al (2007) Elastography of the breast: a prospective study of 122 lesions [in French]. J Radiol 88:657-662 (Pubitemid 46868105)
6. Thomas A, Fischer T, Frey H et al (2006) Real-time Elastography - an advanced method of ultrasound: first results in 108 patients with breast lesions. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 28:335-340 (Pubitemid 44409062)
7. Zhu QL, Jiang YX, Liu JB et al (2008) Real-time ultrasound elastography: its potential role in assessment of breast lesions. Ultrasound Med Biol 34:1232-1238
8. Tan SM, Teh HS, Mancer JF et al (2008) Improving B mode ultrasound evaluation of breast lesions with real-time ultrasound elastography - a clinical approach. Breast 17:252-257 (Pubitemid 351729151)
9. Sohn YM, Kim MJ, Kim EK et al (2009) Sonographic elastography combined with conventional sonography how much is it helpful for diagnostic performance? J Ultrasound Med 26:807-815
10. Raza S, Odulate A, Ong EM et al (2010) Using real-time tissue elastography for breast lesion evaluation: our initial experience. J Ultrasound Med 29:551-563
11. Yerli H, Yilmaz T, Kaskati T et al (2011) Qualitative and semiquantitative evaluations of solid breast lesions by sonoelastography. J Ultrasound Med 30:179-186
12. Berg WA, Blume JD, Cormack JB et al (2008) Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer. JAMA 299:2151-2163 (Pubitemid 351679706)
13. Feig SA (2005) Current status of screening US. In: Feig SA (ed) 2005 Syllabus: categorical course in diagnostic radiology-breast imaging. Radiological Society of North America, Oak Brook, pp 143-154
14. American College of Radiology (2003) Breast imaging reporting and data system-Ultrasound (BI-RADS®). American College of Radiology, Reston
15. Athanasiou A, Tardivon A, Tanter M et al (2010) Breast lesions: quantitative elastography with supersonic shear imaging - preliminary results. Radiology 256:297
16. Varas X, Leborgne JH, Leborgne F et al (2002) Revisiting the mammographic follow-up of BI-RADS category 3 lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179:691-695 (Pubitemid 34919583)
17. Cho N, Moon WK, Chang JM et al (2011) Sonoelastographic lesion stiffness: preoperative predictor of the presence of an invasive focus in nonpalpable DCIS diagnosed at US-guided needle biopsy. Eur Radiol 21:1618-1627