Univariate and multivariate models of positive and negative networks: Liking, disliking, and bully-victim relationships

Social Networks

Volumn 34, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 645-657

  Huitsing, Gijs ^a   van Duijn, Marijtje A J ^a   Snijders, Tom A B ^a,b   Wang, Peng ^c   Sainio, Miia ^d   Salmivalli, Christina ^d,e   Veenstra, René ^a,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

^e UNIVERSITY OF STAVANGER   (Norway)

Author keywords

Bully victim relationships; Dislike; Exponential random graph models; Like

Indexed keywords

EID: 84872372384     PISSN: 03788733     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.socnet.2012.08.001     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Arseneault L., Bowes L., Shakoor S. Bullying victimization in youths and mental health problem: 'much ado about nothing'?. Psychological Medicine 2009, 40:717-729.
2. Asher S.R., McDonald K.L. The behavioral basis of acceptance, rejection, and perceived popularity. Handbook of Peer Interactions, Relationships, and Groups 2009, 232-248. Guilford, New York. K.H. Rubin, W.M. Bukowski, B. Laursen (Eds.).
3. Cairns R.B., Cairns B.D., Neckerman H.J., Gest S.D., Gariépy J.L. Social networks and aggressive behavior: peer support or peer rejection. Developmental Psychology 1988, 24:815-823.
4. Card N.A. Antipathetic relationships in child and adolescent development: a meta-analytic review and recommendations for an emerging area of study. Developmental Psychology 2010, 46:516-529.
5. Card N.A., Hodges E.V.E. Shared targets for aggression by early adolescent friends. Developmental Psychology 2006, 42:1327-1338.
6. Card N.A., Stucky B.D., Sawalani G.M., Little T.D. Direct and indirect aggression during childhood and adolescence: a meta-analytic review of gender differences, intercorrelations, and relations to maladjustment. Child Development 2008, 79:1185-1229.
7. Cartwright D., Harary F. Structural balance: a generalization of Heider's theory. Psychological Review 1956, 63:277-293.
8. Davis J.A. Clustering and hierarchy in interpersonal relations: testing two graph theoretical models on 742 sociomatrices. American Sociological Review 1970, 35:843-851.
9. De Nooy W. The sign of affection: balance-theoretic models and incomplete signed digraphs. Social Networks 1999, 21:269-286.
10. Dijkstra J.K., Lindenberg S., Veenstra R. Same-gender and cross-gender peer acceptance and peer rejection and their relation to bullying and helping among preadolescents: comparing predictions from gender-homophily and goal-framing approaches. Developmental Psychology 2007, 43:1377-1389.
11. Dishion T.J., Tipsord J.M. Peer contagion in child and adolescent social and emotional development. Annual Review of Psychology 2011, 62:189-214.
12. Doreian P., Krackhardt D. Pre-transitive balance mechanisms for signed networks. Journal of Mathematical Sociology 2001, 25:43-67.
13. Ellwardt L., Labianca G., Wittek R. Who are the objects of positive and negative gossip at work? A social network perspective on workplace gossip. Social Networks 2012, 34:193-205.
14. Espelage D.L., Green H.D., Wasserman S. Statistical analysis of friendship patterns and bullying behaviors among youth. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development 2007, 118:61-75.
15. Farmer T.W., Xie H. Aggression and school social dynamics: the good, the bad, and the ordinary. Journal of School Psychology 2007, 45:461-478.
16. Feld S.L., Elmore R. Patterns of sociometric choices: transitivity reconsidered. Social Psychology Quarterly 1982, 45:77-85.
17. Fox C.L., Boulton M.J. Friendship as a moderator of the relationship between social skills problems and peer victimisation. Aggressive Behavior 2006, 32:110-121.
18. Grosser T.J., Lopez-Kidwell V., Labianca G. A social network analysis of positive and negative gossip in organizational life. Group & Organization Management 2010, 35:177-212.
19. Hawker D.S.J., Boulton M.J. Twenty years' research on peer victimization and psychosocial maladjustment: a meta-analytic review of cross-sectional studies. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 2000, 41:441-455.
20. Hawley P.H. The ontogenesis of social dominance: a strategy-based evolutionary perspective. Developmental Review 1999, 19:97-132.
21. Heider F. Attitudes and cognitive organization. Journal of Psychology 1946, 21:107-112.
22. Hodges E.V.E., Boivin M., Vitaro F., Bukowski W.M. The power of friendship: protection against an escalating cycle of peer victimization. Developmental Psychology 1999, 35:94-101.
23. Holland P.W., Leinhardt S. Transitivity in structural models of small groups. Comparative Group Studies 1971, 2:107-124.
24. Huitsing, G., Veenstra, R. Bullying in classrooms: participant roles from a social network perspective. Aggressive Behavior, , in press. doi:10.1002/ab.21438.
25. Huitsing, G., Veenstra, R., Sainio, M., Salmivalli, C. It must be me or it could be them. The impact of the social network position of bullies and victims on victims' adjustment. Social Networks, , in press. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2010.07.002.
26. Hummon N.P., Doreian P. Some dynamics of social balance processes: bringing Heider back into balance theory. Social Networks 2003, 25:17-49.
27. Juvonen J., Gross E.F. The rejected and the bullied: lessons about social misfits from developmental psychology. The Social Outcast: Ostracism, Social Exclusion, Rejection, and Bullying 2005, 155-170. Psychology Press, New York. K.D. Williams, J.P. Forgas, W. Von Hippel (Eds.).
28. Kärnä A., Voeten M., Little T.D., Poskiparta E., Kaljonen A., Salmivalli C. A large-scale evaluation of the KiVa anti-bullying program. Child Development 2011, 82:311-330.
29. Labianca G., Brass D.J. Exploring the social ledger: negative relationships and negative asymmetry in social networks in organizations. Academy of Management Review 2006, 31:596-614.
30. László Z., Pál J. How negative networks are forming and changing in time? Theoretical overview and empirical analysis in two high-school classes. Review of Sociology 2010, 20:69-95.
31. Lazega E., Pattison P.E. Multiplexity, generalized exchange and cooperation in organizations: a case study. Social Networks 1999, 21:67-90.
32. Lubbers M.J., Snijders T.A.B. A comparison of various approaches to the exponential random graph model: a reanalysis of 102 student networks in school classes. Social Networks 2007, 29:489-507.
33. Maccoby E.E. The Two Sexes. Growing up Apart, Coming Together 1998, Belknap, Cambridge, MA.
34. Mikami A.Y., Lerner M.D., Lun J. Social context influences on children's rejection by their peers. Child Development Perspectives 2010, 4:123-130.
35. Newcomb T.M. The Acquaintance Process 1961, Holt, Rinehard, and Winston, New York.
36. Newcomb A.F., Bukowski W.M., Pattee L. Children's peer relations: a meta-analytic review of popular, rejected, neglected, controversial, and average sociometric status. Psychological Bulletin 1993, 113:99-128.
37. Olweus D. Bullying at School: What We Know and What We Can Do 1993, Blackwell, Malden, MA.
38. Olweus D. The Revised Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire 1996, Research Center for Health Promotion (HEMIL Center), University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
39. Pattison P., Wasserman S. Logit models and logistic regressions for social networks: II. Multivariate relations. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 1999, 52:169-193.
40. Rasbash J., Browne W., Goldstein H., Yang M., Plewis I., Healy M., et al. A User's Guide to MLwiN 2000, Institute of Education, London.
41. Robins G., Pattison P., Kalish Y., Lusher D. An introduction to exponential random graph (p*) models for social networks. Social Networks 2007, 29:173-191.
42. Robins G.L., Snijders T.A.B., Wang P., Handcock M., Pattison P. Recent developments in exponential random graph (p*) models for social networks. Social Networks 2007, 29:192-215.
43. Robins G., Pattison P., Wang P. Closure, connectivity and degree distributions: exponential random graph (p*) models for directed social networks. Social Networks 2009, 31:105-117.
44. Rubin K.H., Bukowski W.M., Laursen B. Handbook of Peer Interactions, Relationships, and Groups 2009, Guilford Press, New York.
45. Sainio M., Veenstra R., Huitsing G., Salmivalli C. Victims and their defenders: a dyadic approach. International Journal of Behavioral Development 2011, 35:144-151.
46. Salmivalli C. Bullying and the peer group: a review. Aggression and Violent Behavior 2010, 15:112-120.
47. Salmivalli C., Lagerspetz K., Björkqvist K., österman K., Kaukiainen A. Bullying as a group process: participant roles and their relations to social status within the group. Aggressive Behavior 1996, 22:1-15.
48. Salmivalli C., Huttunen A., Lagerspetz K.M.J. Peer networks and bullying in schools. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 1997, 38:305-312.
49. Sijtsema J.J., Veenstra R., Lindenberg S., Salmivalli C. Empirical test of bullies' status goals: assessing direct goals, aggression, and prestige. Aggressive Behavior 2009, 35:57-67.
50. Sijtsema J.J., Lindenberg S.M., Veenstra R. Do they get what they want or are they stuck with what they can get? Testing homophily against default selection for friendships of highly aggressive boys. The TRAILS study. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 2010, 38:803-813.
51. Snijders T.A.B. Markov chain Monte Carlo estimation of exponential random graph models. Journal of Social Structure 2002, 3:1-41.
52. Snijders T.A.B., Pattison P.E., Robins G.L., Handcock M.S. New specifications for exponential random graph models. Sociological Methodology 2006, 36:99-153.
53. Veenstra R., Steglich C.E.G. Actor-based model for network and behavior dynamics: a tool to examine selection and influence processes. Handbook of Developmental Research Methods 2012, 598-618. Guilford, New York. B. Laursen, T.D. Little, N.A. Card (Eds.).
54. Veenstra R., Lindenberg S., Zijlstra B.J.H., De Winter A.F., Verhulst F.C., Ormel J. The dyadic nature of bullying and victimization: testing a dual perspective theory. Child Development 2007, 78:1843-1854.
55. Wang P., Robins G., Pattison P. PNet, Program for the Simulation and Estimation of Exponential Random Graph (p*) Models (Computer Software) 2009, Department of Psychology, School of Behavioral Science, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
56. Wasserman S., Faust K. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications 1994, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
57. Witkow M.R., Bellmore A.D., Nishina A., Juvonen J., Graham S. Mutual antipathies during early adolescence: more than just rejection. International Journal of Behavioral Development 2005, 29:209-218.
58. Witvliet M., Olthof T., Hoeksma J.B., Goossens F.A., Smits M.S.I., Koot H.M. Peer group affiliation of children: the role of perceived popularity, likeability, and behavioral similarity in bullying. Social Development 2010, 19:285-303.
59. Zijlstra B.J.H., Veenstra R., Van Duijn M.A.J. A multilevel p2 model with covariates for the analysis of binary bully-victim network data in multiple classrooms. Modeling Dyadic and Interdependent Data in Developmental and Behavioral Sciences 2008, 369-386. Routledge, New York. N.A. Card, J.P. Selig, T.D. Little (Eds.).