Pre-transitive balance mechanisms for signed networks

Journal of Mathematical Sociology

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 43-67

  Doreian, Patrick ^a   Krackhardt, David ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^b CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035648263     PISSN: 0022250X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0022250X.2001.9990244     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Allessio, J. C. (1990). A synthesis and formalization of Heiderian balance and social exchange theory. Social Forces, 68: 1267-1285.
2. Cartwright, D. and Harary, F. (1956). Structural balance: A generalization of Heider's theory. Psychological Review, 63: 277-292.
3. Crano, W. D. and Cooper, R. E. (1973). Examination of Newcomb's extension of structural balance theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27: 344-353.
4. Davis, J. A. (1979). The Davis/Holland/Leinhardt studies: An overview. In P. W. Holland and S. Leinhardt (Eds.), Perspectives on Social Network Research (pp. 51-62). New York: Academic Press.
5. Davis, J. A. and Leinhardt, S. (1972). The structure of positive interpersonal relationships in small groups. In Sociological Theories in Progress (Vol. 2, pp. 218-251). New York: Houghton Mifflin.
6. Doreian, P., Kapuscinski, R., Krackhardt, D. and Szczypula, J. (1996). A brief history of balance through time. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 21: 113-131.
7. Doreian, P. and Mrvar, A. (1996). A partitioning approach to structural balance. Social Networks, 18: 149-168.
8. Feld, S. L. and Elmore, R. (1982). Patterns of sociometric choices: Transitivity reconsidered. Social Psychology Quarterly, 45: 77-85.
9. Freeman, L. C. (1992). The sociological conception of "group": An empirical test of two models. American Journal of Sociology, 98: 152-166.
10. Hallinan, M. (1974). The Structure of Positive Sentiment. New York: Elsevier.
11. Hallinan, M. (1982). Cognitive balance and differential popularity in social networks. Social Psychology Quarterly, 45: 86-90.
12. Heider, F. (1946). Attitudes and cognitive organization. Journal of Psychology, 21: 107-112.
13. Holland, P. W. and Leinhardt, S. (1971). Transitivity in structural models of small groups. Comparative Group Studies, 2: 107-123.
14. Hummell H. J. and Sodeur, W. (1990). Evaluating models of change in triadic sociometric structures. In J. Weesie and H. Flap (Eds.), Social Networks Through Time (pp. 281-305). Utrecht: ISOR.
15. Hummon, N. P. and Doreian, P. (2000). Dynamics of social balance processes. University of Pittsburgh.
16. Johnsen, E. C. (1988). Structure and process. Agreement models for friendship formation. Social Networks, 8: 257-306.
17. Krackhardt, D. (1988). Predicting with networks: Nonparametric multiple regression analysis of dyadic data. Social Networks, 10: 359-381.
18. Nagasawa, R. and Little, R. D. (1983). Formal theory of balance revisited. Sociological Perspectives, 26: 51-69.
19. Newcomb, T. M. (1961). The Acquaintance Process. New York: Holt, Rinehard and Winston.
20. Newcomb, T. M. (1968). Interpersonal balance. In R. Abelson, E. Aronson, W. McGuire, T. Newcomb, M. Rosenberg and O. Tannenbaum (Eds.), Theories of Cognitive Consistency: A Source Book. Chicago: Rand McNally.
21. Nordile, P. H. (1958). A Longitudinal Study of Interpersonal Attraction in a Natural Group Setting. PhD thesis, University of Michigan.
22. Opp, K.-D. (1984). Balance theory: Progress and stagnation of a social psychological theory. Philosophy of Social Science, 14: 27-49.
23. Rapoport, A. (1963). Mathematical models of social interaction. In R. D. Luce, R. Bush and E. Galanter (Eds.), Handbook of Mathematical Psychology, 493-579. New York: Wiley.
24. Sinijders, T. A. (1997). Stochastic actor-oriented models for network change. In P. Doreian and F. Stokman (Eds.), Evolution of Social Networks (Ch. 9, pp. 185-208). New York: Gordon and Breach.
25. Stokman, F. N. and Zeggelink, E. (1996). Self-organizing networks. In W. B. G. Liebrand and D. M. Messick (Eds.), Frontiers in Social Dilemmas Research (pp. 385-418). Berlin: Springer.
26. van de Bunt, G. G. (1999). Friends by Choice. Amsterdam: Thesis Publishers.
27. Zeggelink, E. (1993). Strangers into Friends. Amesterdam: Thesis Publishers.