An algorithm for finding D-E equivalent-estimation second-order split-plot designs

Journal of Quality Technology

Volumn 44, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 363-374

  Jones, Bradley ^a,b   Goos, Peter ^b,c  

^a SAS INSTITUTE INC   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

^c ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Coordinate exchange algorithm; D optimality; Equivalent estimation; Generalized least squares; Ordinary least squares; Restricted maximum likelihood estimation (REML); Split plot design

Indexed keywords

ESTIMATION; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD;

COORDINATE-EXCHANGE ALGORITHM; D-OPTIMALITY; GENERALIZED LEAST SQUARE; ORDINARY LEAST SQUARES; RESTRICTED MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION; SPLIT PLOT DESIGNS;

MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION;

EID: 84872318296     PISSN: 00224065     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00224065.2012.11917906     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Almimi, A. A.; Kulahci, M.; and Montgomery, D. C. (2009). "Checking the Adequacy of Fit of Models from Split-Plot Designs". Journal of Quality Technology 41, pp. 272-284.
2. Bingham, D. R.; Schoen, E. D.; and Sitter, R. R. (2004). "Designing Fractional Factorial Split-Plot Experiments with Few Whole-Plot Factors". Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series C 53, pp. 325-339. "Corrigendum". Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series C 54, pp. 955-958.
3. Bingham, D. R. and Sitter, R. R. (1999). "Minimum-Aberration Two-Level Fractional Factorial Split-Plot Designs". Technometrics 41, pp. 62-70.
4. Brent, R. P. (1973). Algorithms for Minimization without Derivatives. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
5. Gilmour, S. G. and Goos, P. (2009). "Analysis of Data from Nonorthogonal Multi-Stratum Designs in Industrial Experiments". Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series C 58, pp. 467-484.
6. Goos, P. (2006)."Optimal Versus Orthogonal and Equivalent-Estimation Design of Blocked and Split-Plot Experiments". Statistica Neerlandica 60, pp. 361-378.
7. Goos, P. and Jones, B. (2011). Design of Experiments: A Case Study Approach. New York, NY: Wiley.
8. Goos, P.; Langhans, I.; and Vandebroek, M. (2006). "Practical Inference from Industrial Split-Plot Designs". Journal of Quality Technology 38, pp. 162-179.
9. Goos, P. and Vandebroek, M. (2001). "Optimal Split-Plot Designs". Journal of Quality Technology 33, pp. 436-450.
10. Goos, P. and Vandebroek, M. (2003). "D-Optimal Split-Plot Designs with Given Numbers and Sizes of Whole Plots". Technometrics 45, pp. 235-245.
11. Goos, P. and Vandebroek, M. (2004). "Outperforming Completely Randomized Designs".Journal of Quality Technology 36, pp. 12-26.
12. Huang, P.; Chen, D.; and Voelkel, J. (1998). "Minimum-Aberration Two-Level Split-Plot Designs". Technometrics 40, pp. 314-326.
13. Jones, B. and Goos, P. (2007). "A Candidate-Set-Free Algorithm for Generating D-Optimal Split-Plot Designs". Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series C 56, pp. 347-364.
14. Jones, B. and Goos, P. (2009). "D-Optimal Design of Split-Split-Plot Experiments". Biometrika 96, pp. 67-82.
15. Jones, B. and Goos, P. (2012). "I-Optimal Versus D-Optimal Split-Plot Response Surface Designs". Journal of Quality Technology 44, pp. 85-101.
16. Jones, B. and Nachtsheim, C. J. (2011). "Efficient Designs with Minimal Aliasing". Technometrics 53, pp. 62-71.
17. Kulahci, M. and Bisgaard, S. (2005). "The Use of Plackett-Burman Designs to Construct Split-Plot Designs". Technometrics 47, pp. 495-501.
18. Letsinger, J. D.; Myers, R. H.; and Lentner, M. (1996). "Response Surface Methods for Bi-Randomization Structures". Journal of Quality Technology 28, pp. 381-397.
19. Macharia, H. and Goos, P. (2010). "D-Optimal and DEfficient Equivalent-Estimation Second-Order Split-Plot Designs". Journal of Quality Technology 42, pp. 358-372.
20. McElroy, F. W. (1967). "A Necessary and Sufficient Condition that Ordinary Least Squares Estimators Be Best Linear Unbiased". Journal of the American Statistical Association 62, pp. 1302-1304.
21. Parker, P. A.; Kowalski, S. M.; and Vining, G. G. (2006). "Classes of Split-Plot Response Surface Designs for Equivalent Estimation". Quality and Reliability Engineering International 22, pp. 291-305.
22. Parker, P. A.; Kowalski, S. M.; and Vining, G. G. (2007a). "Construction of Balanced Equivalent Estimation Second-Order Split-Plot Designs". Technometrics 49, pp. 56-65.
23. Parker, P. A.; Kowalski, S. M.; and Vining, G. G. (2007b). "Unbalanced and Minimal Point Equivalent Estimation Second-Order Split-Plot Designs". Journal of Quality Technology 39, pp. 376-388.
24. Rodr'iguez, M.; Jones, B.; Borror, C. M.; and Montgomery, D. C. (2010). "Generating and Assessing Exact G-Optimal Designs". Journal of Quality Technology 42, pp. 1-18.
25. Schoen, E.; Jones, B.; and Goos, P. (2011). "A Split-Plot Experiment with Factor-Dependent Whole-Plot Sizes". Journal of Quality Technology 43, pp. 66-79.
26. Searle, S. R.; Casella, G.; and McCulloch, C. E. (1992). Variance Component Estimation. New York, NY: Academic Press.
27. Trinca, L. A. and Gilmour, S. G. (2001). "Multi-Stratum Response Surface Designs". Technometrics 43, pp. 25-33.
28. Vining, G. G. and Kowalski, S. M. (2008). "Exact Inference for Response Surface Designs Within a Split-Plot Structure". Journal of Quality Technology 40, pp. 394-406.
29. Vining, G. G.; Kowalski, S. M.; and Montgomery, D. C. (2005). "Response Surface Designs within a Split-Plot Structure". Journal of Quality Technology 37, pp. 115-129.