A split-plot experiment with factor-dependent whole-plot sizes

Journal of Quality Technology

Volumn 43, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 66-79

  Schoen, Eric ^a,b   Bradley, Jonespeter ^b,c   Goos, Peter ^b,d  

^a TNO   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

^c SAS INSTITUTE INC   (United States)

^d ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Coordinate Exchange Algorithm; D Optimum Designs; Point Exchange Algorithm; Restricted Randomization

Indexed keywords

MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD; STATISTICAL PROCESS CONTROL; VISCOSITY MEASUREMENT;

COORDINATE-EXCHANGE ALGORITHM; D-OPTIMUM DESIGN; DESIGNED EXPERIMENTS; GENERALIZED LEAST SQUARE; POINT-EXCHANGE ALGORITHM; RESTRICTED MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD; RESTRICTED RANDOMIZATION; SPLIT PLOT EXPERIMENTS;

VISCOSITY;

EID: 79951913696     PISSN: 00224065     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00224065.2011.11917846     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Almini, A. A.; Kulahci, M.; and Montgomery, D. C. (2009). "Checking the Adequacy of Fit of Models from Split- Plot Designs". Journal of Quality Technology 41, pp. 272- 284.
2. Bingham, D.; Schoen, E.; and Sitter, R. (2004). "Designing Fractional Factorial Split-Plot Experiments with Few Whole-Plot Factors". Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series C 53, pp. 325-339. (Pubitemid 38597507)
3. "Corrigendum". Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series C 54, pp. 955-958.
4. Bisgaard, S. (2000). "The Design and Analysis of 2k?p × 2q?r Split-Plot Experiments". Journal of Quality Technology 32, pp. 39-56.
5. Cook, R. and Nachtsheim, C. (1989). "Computer-Aided Blocking of Factorial and Response-Surface Designs". Technometrics 31, pp. 339-346.
6. Cornell, J. A. (2002). Experiments with Mixtures: Designs, Models, and the Analysis of Mixture Data, 3d edition. New York, NY: Wiley.
7. Gilmour, S. G. and Goos, P. (2009). "Analysis of Data from Nonorthogonal Multi-Stratum Designs in Industrial Experiments". Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series C 58, pp. 467-484.
8. Goos, P. (2002). The Optimal Design of Blocked and Split- Plot Experiments. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
9. Goos, P.; Langhans, I.; and Vandebroek, M. (2006). "Practical Inference from Industrial Split-Plot Experiments". Journal of Quality Technology 38, pp. 162-179.
10. Goos, P. and Vandebroek, M. (2003). "D-Optimal Split- Plot Designs with Given Numbers and Sizes of Whole Plots". Technometrics 25, pp. 235-245.
11. Jones, B. and Goos, P. (2007). "A Candidate-Set-Free Algorithm for Generating D-Optimal Split-Plot Designs". Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series C 56, pp. 347-364.
12. Jones, B. and Nachtsheim, C. (2009). "Split-Plot Designs: What, Why and How". Journal of Quality Technology 41, pp. 340-361.
13. Kowalski, S. M.; Cornell, J. A.; and Vining, G. G. (2002). "Split-Plot Designs and Estimation Methods for Mixture Experiments with Process Variables". Technometrics 44, pp. 72-79. (Pubitemid 34255514)
14. Letsinger, J. D.; Myers, R. H.; and Lentner, M. (1996). "Response Surface Methods for Bi-Randomization Structures". Journal of Quality Technology 28, pp. 381-397. (Pubitemid 126588614)
15. Littell, R. C.; Milliken, G. A.; Stroup, W. W.; and Wolfinger, R. D. (1996). SAS System for Mixed Models. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
16. Parker, P.; Kowalski, S. M.; and Vining, G. G. (2007). "Construction of Balanced Equivalent Estimation Second- Order Split-Plot Designs". Technometrics 49, pp. 56-65. (Pubitemid 46373234)
17. Schoen, E. D. (1999). "Designing Fractional Two-Level Experiments with Nested Error Structures". Journal of Applied Statistics 26, pp. 495-508.
18. Trinca, L. and Gilmour, S. G. (2001). "Multistratum Response Surface Designs". Technometrics 43, pp. 25-33. (Pubitemid 32159950)
19. Vining, G. G.; Kowalski, S. M.; and Montgomery, D. C. (2005). "Response Surface Designs Within a Split-Plot Structure". Journal of Quality Technology 37, pp. 115-129. (Pubitemid 40609979)
20. Webb, D. F.; Lucas, J. M.; and Borkowski, J. J. (2004). "Factorial Experiments when Factor Levels Are Not Necessarily Reset". Journal of Quality Technology 36, pp. 1-11.