Optimal versus orthogonal and equivalent-estimation design of blocked and split-plot experiments

Statistica Neerlandica

Volumn 60, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 361-378

  Goos, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

Author keywords

D optimal design; Equivalence of OLS and GLS; Generalized least squares; Ordinary least squares; Orthogonal blocking

Indexed keywords

EID: 33746371667     PISSN: 00390402     EISSN: 14679574     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9574.2006.00333.x     Document Type: Review

References (37)

1. ANBARI, F. T. and J. M. LUCAS (1994), Super-efficient designs:how to run your experiment for higher efficiency and lower cost, ASQC Technical Conference Transactions, 852-863.
2. ATKINSON, A. C. and A. N. DONEV (1989), The construction of exact D-optimum experimental designs with application to blocking response surface designs, Biometrika 76, 515-526.
3. BINGHAM, D. R. and R. R. SITTER (1999a), Some theoretical results for fractional factorial split-plot designs, Annals of Statistics 27, 1240-1255.
4. BINGHAM, D. and R. R. SITTER (1999b), Minimum-aberration two-level fractional factorial split-plot designs, Technometries 41, 62-70.
5. BINGHAM, D. R. and R. R. SITTER (2001), Design issues in fractional factorial split-plot designs, Journal of Quality Technology 33, 2-15.
6. BINGHAM, D. R., E. D. SCHOEN and R. R. SITTER (2004), Designing fractional factorial splitplot experiments with few whole-plot factors, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C 53, 325-339;
7. Corrigendum, 54, 955-958.
8. BOX, G. E. P. and J. S. HUNTER (1957), Multi-factor experimental designs for exploring response surfaces, Annals of Mathematical Statistics 28, 195-241.
9. COOK, R. D. and C. J. NACHTSHEIM (1989), Computer-aided blocking of factorial and response-surface designs, Technometrics 31, 339-346.
10. DONEV, A. N. (1989), Design of experiments with both mixture and qualitative factors, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B 51, 297-302.
11. DRAPER, N. R. and J. A. JOHN (1998), Response surface designs where levels of some factors are difficult to change, Australian and New-Zealand Journal of Statistics 40, 487-495.
12. GILMOUR, S. G. and P. GOOS (2006), Bayesian analysis of data from multi-stratum response surface designs, working paper 2006/005, Faculty of Applied Economics, Universiteit Antwerpen.
13. GILMOUR, S. G. and L. A. TRINCA (2000), Some practical advice on polynomial regression analysis fromblocked response surface designs. Communications in Statistics: Theory and Methods 29, 2157-2180.
14. GOOS, P. (2002), The optimal design of blocked and split-plot experiments, Springer, New York.
15. GOOS, P. and A. N. DONEV (2006a), Blocking response surface designs, to appear in Computational Statistics and Data Analysis.
16. GOOS, P. and A. N. DONEV (2006b), The D-optimal design of blocked experiments with mixture components, to appear in Journal of Quality Technology.
17. GOOS, P. and A. N. DONEV (2006c), D-optimal minimum support mixture designs in blocks, to appear in Metrika.
18. GOOS, P. and A. N. DONEV (2006d), Tailor-made split-plot mixture-process variable designs, Unpublished manuscript.
19. GOOS, P. and M. VANDEBROEK (2001a), D-optimal response surface designs in the presence of random block effects, Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 37, 433-453.
20. GOOS, P. and M. VANDEBROEK (2001b), Optimal split-plot designs, Journal of Quality Technology 33, 436-450
21. GOOS, P. and M. VANDEBROEK (2003a), D-optimal split-plot designs with given numbers and sizes of whole plots, Technometrics 45, 235-245.
22. GOOS, P. and M. VANDEBROEK (2003b), Estimating the intercept in an orthogonally blocked experiment, Communications in Statistics: Theory and Methods 33, 873-890.
23. GOOS, P. and M. VANDEBROEK (2004), Outperforming completely randomized designs, Journal of Quality Technology 36, 12-26.
24. GRASSHOFF, U. and R. SCHWABE (2003), On the analysis of paired observations, Statistics & Probability Letters 65, 7-12.
25. HUANG, P., D. CHEN and J. VOELKEL (1998), Minimum-aberration two-level split-plot designs, Technometrics 40, 314-326.
26. JOHN, P. W. M. (1984), Experiments with mixtures involving process variables, Technical Report 8, Center for Statistical Sciences, University of Texas, Austin, TX.
27. KHURI, A. I. (1992), Response surface models with random block effects, Technometrics 34, 26-37.
28. KOWALSKI, S. M., J. A. CORNELL and G. G. VINING (2002), Split-plot designs and estimation methods for mixture experiments with process variables, Technometrics 44, 72-79.
29. LETSINGER, J. D., R. H. MYERS and M. LENTNER (1996), Response surface methods for bi-randomization structures, Journal of Quality Technology 28, 381-397.
30. MEE, R. (2006), Optimal three-level designs for response surfaces in spherical experimental regions, Unpublished manuscript.
31. NIGAM, A. K. (1976), Corrections to blocking conditions for mixture experiments, Annals of Statistics 47, 1294-1295.
32. PARKER, P. A., S. M. KOWALSKI and G. G. VINING (2006a), Construction of balanced equivalent estimation second-order split-plot designs, Unpublished manuscript.
33. PARKER, P. A., S. M. KOWALSKI and G. G. VINING (2006b), Unbalanced and minimal point equivalent estimation second-order split-plot designs, Unpublished manuscript.
34. PRESCOTT, P. (2000), Projection designs for mixture experiments in orthogonal blocks, Communications in Statistics: Theory and Methods 29, 2229-2253.
35. TRINCA, L. A. and S. G. GILMOUR (2000), An algorithm for arranging response surface designs in small blocks, Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 33, 25-43.
36. TRINCA, L. A. and S. G. GILMOUR (2001), Multi-stratum response surface designs, Technometrics 43, 25-33.
37. VINING, G. G., S. M. KOWALSKI and MONTGOMERY D. C. (2005), Response surface designs within a split-plot structure, Journal of Quality Technology 37, 115-129.