Exact inference for response surface designs within a split-plot structure

Journal of Quality Technology

Volumn 40, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 394-406

  Vining, G Geoffrey ^a,c   Kowalski, Scott M ^b  

^a VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Minitab Inc   (United States)

^c Department of Statistics ^*

Author keywords

Central composite designs; Design of experiments; Response surface methodology; Split plot experiments

Indexed keywords

DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION;

CENTRAL COMPOSITE DESIGNS; COMPLETELY RANDOMIZED DESIGNS; ORDINARY LEAST SQUARES ESTIMATES; RESPONSE SURFACE DESIGNS; RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY; RESTRICTED MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATORS; SECOND ORDER RESPONSE SURFACES; SPLIT PLOT EXPERIMENTS;

SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 54249142731     PISSN: 00224065     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00224065.2008.11917745     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. DRAPER, N. R. and JOHN, J. A. (1998). "Response Surface Designs Where Levels of Some Factors Are Difficult to Change". Australian and New Zealand Journal of Statistics 40, pp. 487-495.
2. GOOS, P. (2002). The Optimal Design of Blocked and Split-Plot Experiments. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY.
3. GOOS, P.; LANGHANS, I.; and VANDEBROEK, M. (2006). "Practical Inference from Industrial Split-Plot Experiments". Journal of Quality Technology 38, pp. 162-179.
4. GOOS, P. and VANDEBROEK, M. (2001). "Optimal Split-Plot Designs". Journal of Quality Technology 33, pp. 436-450.
5. GOOS, P. and VANDEBROEK, M. (2003). "D-Optimal Split-Plot Designs with Given Numbers and Sizes of Whole Plots". Technometrics 45, pp. 235-245.
6. GOOS, P. and VANDEBROEK, M. (2004). "Outperforming Completely Randomized Designs". Journal of Quality Technology 36, pp. 12-26.
7. KENWARD, M. G. and ROGER, J. H. (1997). "Small Sample Inference for Fixed Effects from Restricted Maximum Like-lihood". Biometrics 53, pp. 983-997.
8. KOWALSKI, S. M.; CORNELL, J. A.; and VINING, G. G. (2002). "Mixture Experiments with Process Variables under Restricted Randomization". Technometrics 44, pp. 72-79.
9. LETSINGER, J. D.; MYERS, R. H.; and LENTNER, M. (1996). "Response Surface Methods for Bi-Randomization Structures" . Journal of Quality Technology 28, pp. 381-397.
10. MONTGOMERY, D. C.; PECK, E. A.; and VINING, G. G. (2006). Introduction to Linear Regression Analysis, 3rd edition. John Wiley, New York, NY (to appear).
11. MYERS, R. H. (1990). Classical and Modern Regression with Applications, 2nd edition. Duxbury, Boston, MA.
12. PARKER, P. A.; KOWALSKI, S. M.; and VINING, G. G. (2006). "Classes of Split-Plot Response Surface Designs for Equivalent Estimation". Quality and Reliability Engineering International 22, pp. 291-305.
13. PARKER, P. A.; KOWALSKI, S. M.; and VINING, G. G. (2007). "Construction of Balanced Equivalent Estimation Split-Plot Designs". Technometrics 49, pp. 56-65.
14. SATTERTHWAITE, F. E. (1946). "An Approximate Distribution of Estimates of Variance Components". Biometrika Bulletin 2, pp. 110-112.
15. TRINCA, L. A. and GILMOUR, S. G. (2001). "Multistratum Response Surface Designs". Technometrics 43, pp. 25-33.
16. VINING, G. G. and KOWALSKI, S. M. (2008). "Derivations for Exact Inference for Split-Plot Response Surface Designs". Technical Report #08-02, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA.
17. VINING, G. G.; KOWALSKI, S. M.; and MONTGOMERY, D. C. (2005). "Response Surface Designs within a Split-Plot Structure." Journal of Quality Technology 37, pp. 115-129.