Outperforming Completely Randomized Designs

Journal of Quality Technology

Volumn 36, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 12-26

  Goos, Peter ^a,b   Vandebroek, Martina ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b Department of Applied Economics ^*  (Belgium)

Author keywords

D Optimality; Design of Experiments; G Optimality; Split Plot Designs

Indexed keywords

ATMOSPHERIC HUMIDITY; ERROR ANALYSIS; ESTIMATION; MATRIX ALGEBRA; NUMERICAL ANALYSIS; PRODUCT DESIGN; RANDOM PROCESSES; THERMAL EFFECTS; VECTORS;

DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS; OPTIMALITY; SPLIT-PLOT DESIGNS;

INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING;

EID: 0442279493     PISSN: 00224065     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00224065.2004.11980249     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. ANBARI, F. T. and LUCAS, J. M. (1994). "Super-Efficient Designs: How to Run Your Experiment for Higher Efficiency and Lower Cost". ASQC Technical Conference Transactions, pp. 852-863.
2. ATKINSON, A. C. and DONEV, A. N. (1989). "The Construction of Exact D-optimum Experimental Designs with Application to Blocking Response Surface Designs". Biometrika 76, pp. 515-526.
3. ATKINSON, A. C. and DONEV, A. N. (1992). Optimum Experimental Designs. Clarendon Press, Oxford U.K.
4. k-p × s Prototype Experiments". Technometrics 39, pp. 52-62.
5. Box, G. E. P. and JONES, S. P. (1992). "Split-Plot Designs for Robust Product Experimentation". Journal of Applied Statistics 19, pp. 3-26.
6. COOK, R. D. and NACHTSHEIM, C. J. (1989). "Computer-Aided Blocking of Factorial and Response-Surface Designs". Technometrics 31, pp. 339-346.
7. DAVISON, J. J. (1995). "Response Surface Designs and Analysis for Bi-Randomization Error Structures". Ph.D. dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA.
8. FEDOROV, V. V. (1972). Theory of Optimal Experiments. Academic Press, New York, NY.
9. GANJU, J. and LUCAS, J. M. (1997). "Bias in Test Statistics When Restrictions in Randomization are Caused by Factors". Communications in Statistics: Theory and Methods 26, pp. 47-63.
10. GANJU, J. and LUCAS, J. M. (1999). "Detecting Randomization Restrictions Caused by Factors". Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 81, pp. 129-140.
11. Goos, P. and VANDEBROEK, M. (2001a). "D-optimal Response Surface Designs in the Presence of Random Block Effects". Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 37, pp. 433-453.
12. Goos, P. and VANDEBROEK, M. (2001b). "Optimal Split-Plot Designs". Journal of Quality Technology 33, pp. 436-450.
13. Goos, P. and VANDEBROEK, M. (2003). "D-optimal Split-Plot Designs with Given Numbers and Sizes of Whole Plots". Technometrics 45, pp. 235-245.
14. k Factorial Experiments with Hard-to-Change and Easy-to-Change Factors". Journal of Quality Technology 34, pp. 411-421.
15. KEMPTHORNE, O. (1952). The Design and Analysis of Experiments. John Wiley, New York, NY.
16. KOWALSKI, S. M.; CORNELL, J. A; and VINING, G. G. (2002). "Split-Plot Designs and Estimation Methods for Mixture Experiments with Process Variables". Technometrics 44, pp. 72-79.
17. LETSINGER, J. D.; MYERS, R. H.; and LENTNER, M. (1996). "Response Surface Methods for Bi-randomization Structures". Journal of Quality Technology 28, pp. 381-397.
18. MITCHELL, T. J. (1974). "An Algorithm for the Construction of D-optimal Experimental Designs". Technometrics 16. pp. 203-210.
19. NELSON, L. S. (1985). "What Do Low F Ratios Tell You?" Journal of Quality Technology 17, pp. 237-238.
20. TRINCA, L. A. and GILMOUR, S. G. (2001). "Multi-stratum Response Surface Designs". Technometrics 43, pp. 25-33.
21. WEBB, D.; LUCAS, J. M.; and BORKOWSKI, J. J. (2004). "The Prediction Variance and Design Strategies for Factorial Experiments When Factors Are Not Reset". Journal of Quality Technology, to appear.