Construction of balanced equivalent estimation second-order split-plot designs

Technometrics

Volumn 49, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 56-65

  Parker, Peter A ^a   Kowalski, Scott M ^b   Vining, G Geoffrey ^c  

^a NASA LANGLEY RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

^b Minitab Inc   (United States)

^c VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Central composite design; Equivalent estimation design; Restricted randomization; Split plot design

Indexed keywords

CENTRAL COMPOSITE DESIGN; EQUIVALENT ESTIMATION DESIGN; RESTRICTED RANDOMIZATION; SPLIT-PLOT DESIGN (SPD);

COMPUTER SOFTWARE; LEAST SQUARES APPROXIMATIONS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; ROBUSTNESS (CONTROL SYSTEMS); STATISTICAL METHODS;

INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING;

EID: 33847741364     PISSN: 00401706     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1198/004017006000000462     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. q-r Split Plot Experiments," Journal of Quality Technology, 32, 39-56.
2. Box, G. E. P., and Draper, N. R. (1975), "Robust Designs," Biometrika, 62, 347-352.
3. Box, G. E. P., and Wilson, K. B. (1951), "On the Experimental Attainment of Optimum Conditions," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Ser. B, 13, 195-241.
4. DeLoach, R., Hill, J. S., and Tomek, W. G. (2001), "Practical Applications of Response Surface Methods in the National Transonic Facility," presented at the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics 39th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, AIAA 2001-0167, Reno, Nevada.
5. Draper, N. R. (1985), "Small Composite Designs," Technometrics, 21, 173-180.
6. Draper, N. R., and John, J. A. (1998), "Response Surface Designs Where Levels of Some Factors Are Difficult to Change," Australian and New Zealand Journal of Statistics, 40, 487-495.
7. Draper, N. R., and Lin, D. K. J. (1990), "Small Response Surface Designs," Technometrics, 32, 187-194.
8. Goos, P. (2002), The Optimal Design of Blocked and Split-Plot Experiments, New York: Springer-Verlag.
9. Goos, P., and Vandebroek, M. (2001), "Optimal Split-Plot Designs," Journal of Quality Technology, 33, 436-450.
10. _ (2003), "D-Optimal Split-Plot Designs With Given Numbers and Sizes of Whole Plots," Technometrics, 45, 235-245.
11. _ (2004), "Outperforming Completely Randomized Designs," Journal of Quality Technology, 36, 12-26.
12. Graybill, F. A. (1976), Theory and Application of the Linear Model, North Scituate, MA: Duxbury.
13. Hartley, H. O. (1959), "Small Composite Design for Quadratic Response Surfaces," Biometrika, 15, 611-624.
14. Kowalski, S. M. (2002), "24 Run Split-Plot Experiments for Robust Parameter Design," Journal of Quality Technology, 34, 399-410.
15. Letsinger, J. D., Myers, R. H., and Lentner, M. (1996), "Response Surface Methods for Bi-Randomization Structures," Journal of Quality Technology, 28, 381-397.
16. McElroy, F. W. (1967), "A Necessary and Sufficient Condition That Ordinary Least Squares Estimators Be Best Linear Unbiased," Journal of the American Statistical Association, 62, 1302-1304.
17. Montgomery, D. C. (2004), Design and Analysis of Experiments (6th ed.), New York: Wiley.
18. Myers, R. H., and Montgomery, D. C. (2002), Response Surface Methodology (2nd ed.), New York: Wiley.
19. Payne, F. M., Wyatt, G. W., Bogue, D. R., and Stoner, R. C. (2000), "High Reynolds Number Studies of a Boeing 777-200 High Lift Configuration in the NASA ARC 12-Foot Pressure Tunnel and NASA LaRC National Transonic Facility," presented in American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics 18th Applied Aerodynamics Conference, AIAA 2000-4220, Denver, CO.
20. Trinca, L. A., and Gilmour, S. G. (2001), "Multistratum Response Surface Designs," Technometrics, 43, 25-33.
21. Vining, G. G., and Kowalski, S. M. (2006), "Exact Inference for Response Surface Designs Within a Split-Plot Structure," submitted for publication.
22. Vining, G. G., Kowalski, S. M., and Montgomery, D. C. (2005), "Response Surface Designs Within a Split-Plot Structure," Journal of Quality Technology, 37, 115-129.