All's well that begins Wells: Celebrating 60 years of Animal Behaviour and 36 years of research on anuran social behaviour

Animal Behaviour

Volumn 85, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 5-18

  Bee, Mark A ^a   Schwartz, Joshua J ^b   Summers, Kyle ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b PACE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Aggression; Anuran; Call timing; Chorus; Energetics; Mate choice; Parental care; Social behaviour

Indexed keywords

AGGRESSION; BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY; BIOENERGETICS; CALLING BEHAVIOR; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; FROG; MATE CHOICE; PARENTAL CARE; RESEARCH WORK; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; TOAD;

AMPHIBIA; ANIMALIA; ANURA; VERTEBRATA;

EID: 84872286711     PISSN: 00033472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.10.031     Document Type: Article

References (278)

1. Akre K.L., Ryan M.J. Complexity increases working memory for mating signals. Current Biology 2010, 20:502-505.
2. Akre K.L., Farris H.E., Lea A.M., Page R.A., Ryan M.J. Signal perception in frogs and bats and the evolution of mating signals. Science 2011, 333:751-752.
3. Alcock J. Animal Behaviour: an Evolutionary Approach 1975, Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts. 1st edn.
4. Alcock J. Animal Behaviour: an Evolutionary Approach 2005, Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts. 8th edn.
5. Alexander R.D. Natural selection and specialized chorusing behavior in acoustical insects. Insects, Science and Society 1975, 35-77. Academic Press, New York. D. Pimentel (Ed.).
6. Andersson M. Sexual Selection 1994, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
7. Arak A. Sexual selection by male-male competition in natterjack toad choruses. Nature 1983, 306:261-262.
8. Arak A. Callers and satellites in the natterjack toad: evolutionarily stable decision rules. Animal Behaviour 1988, 36:416-432.
9. Arch V.S., Grafe T.U., Narins P.M. Ultrasonic signalling by a Bornean frog. Biology Letters 2008, 4:19-22.
10. Arch V.S., Grafe T.U., Gridi-Papp M., Narins P.M. Pure ultrasonic communication in an endemic Bornean frog. PLoS ONE 2009, 4. e5413.
11. Bates M.E., Cropp B.F., Gonchar M., Knowles J., Simmons J.A., Simmons A.M. Spatial location influences vocal interactions in bullfrog choruses. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2010, 127:2664-2677.
12. Baugh A.T., Akre K.L., Ryan M.J. Categorical perception of a natural, multivariate signal: mating call recognition in túngara frogs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. 2008, 105:8985-8988.
13. Bee M.A. Territorial male bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana) do not assess fighting ability based on size-related variation in acoustic signals. Behavioral Ecology 2002, 13:109-124.
14. Bee M.A. Experience-based plasticity of acoustically evoked aggression in a territorial frog. Journal of Comparative Physiology A 2003, 189:485-496.
15. Bee M.A. A test of the 'dear enemy effect' in the strawberry dart-poison frog (Dendrobates pumilio). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 2003, 54:601-610.
16. Bee M.A. Within-individual variation in bullfrog vocalizations: implications for a vocally mediated social recognition system. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2004, 116:3770-3781.
17. Bee M.A. Sound source perception in anuran amphibians. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 2012, 22:301-310.
18. Bee M.A., Bowling A.C. Socially mediated pitch alteration by territorial male bullfrogs, Rana catesbeiana. Journal of Herpetology 2002, 36:140-143.
19. Bee M.A., Gerhardt H.C. Neighbour-stranger discrimination by territorial male bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana): I. Acoustic basis. Animal Behaviour 2001, 62:1129-1140.
20. Bee M.A., Gerhardt H.C. Habituation as a mechanism of reduced aggression between neighboring territorial male bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana). Journal of Comparative Psychology 2001, 115:68-82.
21. Bee M.A., Gerhardt H.C. Neighbour-stranger discrimination by territorial male bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana): II. Perceptual basis. Animal Behaviour 2001, 62:1141-1150.
22. Bee M.A., Gerhardt H.C. Individual voice recognition in a territorial frog (Rana catesbeiana). Proceedings of the Royal Society B 2002, 269:1443-1448.
23. Bee M.A., Perrill S.A. Responses to conspecific advertisement calls in the green frog (Rana clamitans) and their role in male-male communication. Behaviour 1996, 133:283-301.
24. Bee M.A., Perrill S.A., Owen P.C. Size assessment in simulated territorial encounters between male green frogs (Rana clamitans). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 1999, 45:177-184.
25. Bee M.A., Perrill S.A., Owen P.C. Male green frogs lower the pitch of acoustic signals in defense of territories: a possible dishonest signal of size?. Behavioral Ecology 2000, 11:169-177.
26. Bee M.A., Kozich C.E., Blackwell K.J., Gerhardt H.C. Individual variation in advertisement calls of territorial male green frogs, Rana clamitans: implications for individual discrimination. Ethology 2001, 107:65-84.
27. Bee M.A., Cook J.M., Love E.K., O'Bryan L.R., Pettitt B.A., Schrode K., Vélez A. Assessing acoustic signal variability and the potential for sexual selection and social recognition in boreal chorus frogs (Pseudacris maculata). Ethology 2010, 116:564-576.
28. Bee, M. A., Suyesh, R. & Biju, S. D. In press. The vocal repertoire of Pseudophilautus kani, a shrub frog (Anura: Rhacophoridae) from the Western Ghats of India. Bioacoustics.
29. Beecher M.D. Evolution of parent-offspring recognition in swallows. Contemporary Issues in Comparative Psychology 1989, 360-380. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts. D.A. Dewsbury (Ed.).
30. Beecher M.D. Signalling systems for individual recognition: an information theory approach. Animal Behaviour 1989, 38:248-261.
31. Beecher M.D. Successes and failures of parent-offspring recognition systems in animals. Kin Recognition 1991, 94-124. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. P.G. Hepper (Ed.).
32. Bevier C.R. Biochemical correlates of calling activity in Neotropical frogs. Physiological Zoology 1995, 68:1118-1142.
33. Bevier, C. R. 1995b. Physiological constraints on calling activity in Neotropical frogs. Ph.D. thesis, University of Connecticut.
34. Bevier C.R. Breeding activity and chorus tenure of two Neotropical hylid frogs. Herpetologica 1997, 53:297-311.
35. Bickford D.P. Differential parental care behaviors of arboreal and terrestrial microhylid frogs from Papua New Guinea. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 2004, 55:402-409.
36. Boake C.R.B. Repeatability: its role in evolutionary studies of mating behavior. Evolutionary Ecology 1989, 3:173-182.
37. Bogert C.M. The influence of sounds on the behavior of amphibians and reptiles. Animal Sounds and Communication 1960, 137-320. American Institute of Biological Sciences, Washington, D.C. W.E. Lanyon, W.N. Tavolga (Eds.).
38. Bosch J., Márquez R. Female preference function related to precedence effect in an amphibian anuran (Alytes cisternasii): tests with non-overlapping calls. Behavioral Ecology 2002, 13:149-153.
39. Bourne G.R., Collins A.C., Holder A.M., McCarthy C.L. Vocal communication and reproductive behavior of the frog Colostethus beebei in Guyana. Journal of Herpetology 2001, 35:272-281.
40. Bradbury J.W., Vehrencamp S.L. Principles of Animal Communication 1998, Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
41. Brenowitz E.A. Neighbor call amplitude influences aggressive behavior and intermale spacing in choruses of the Pacific treefrog (Hyla regilla). Ethology 1989, 83:69-79.
42. Brenowitz E.A., Rose G.J. Behavioral plasticity mediates aggression in choruses of the Pacific treefrog. Animal Behaviour 1994, 47:633-641.
43. Brenowitz E.A., Rose G.J. Female choice and plasticity of male calling behaviour in the Pacific treefrog. Animal Behaviour 1999, 57:1337-1342.
44. Brizzi R., Delfino G., Pellegrini R. Specialized mucous glands and their possible adaptive role in the males of some species of Rana (Amphibia, Anura). Journal of Morphology 2002, 254:328-341.
45. Brown J.L. The Evolution of Behavior 1975, Norton, New York.
46. Brown J.L., Orians G.H. Spacing patterns in mobile animals. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 1970, 1:239-262.
47. Brown J.L., Twomey E., Morales V., Summers K. Phytotelm size in relation to parental care and mating strategies in two species of Peruvian poison frogs. Behaviour 2008, 145:1139-1165.
48. Brown J.L., Morales V., Summers K. Tactical reproductive parasitism via larval cannibalism in Peruvian poison frogs. Biology Letters 2009, 5:148-151.
49. Brown J.L., Morales V., Summers K. A key ecological trait drove the evolution of biparental care and monogamy in an amphibian. American Naturalist 2010, 175:436-446.
50. Brown J.L., Maan M.E., Cummings M.E., Summers K. Evidence for selection on coloration in a Panamanian poison frog: a coalescent-based approach. Journal of Biogeography 2010, 37:891-901.
51. Brush J.S., Narins P.M. Chorus dynamics of a Neotropical amphibian assemblage: comparison of computer-simulation and natural behavior. Animal Behaviour 1989, 37:33-44.
52. Burmeister S.S., Ophir A.G., Ryan M.J., Wilczynski W. Information transfer during cricket frog contests. Animal Behaviour 2002, 64:715-725.
53. Burrowes P.A. Parental care and sexual selection in the Puerto Rican cave-dwelling frog, Eleutherodactylus cooki. Herpetologica 2000, 56:375-386.
54. Bush S.L., Bell D.J. Courtship and female competition in the Majorcan midwife toad, Alytes muletensis. Ethology 1997, 103:292-303.
55. Byrne P.G., Keogh J.S. Terrestrial toadlets use chemosignals to recognize conspecifics, locate mates and strategically adjust calling behaviour. Animal Behaviour 2007, 74:1155-1162.
56. Byrne P.G., Roberts J.D. Evolutionary causes and consequences of sequential polyandry in anuran amphibians. Biological Reviews 2012, 87:209-228.
57. Caldwell J.P. Pair bonding in spotted poison frogs. Nature 1997, 385:211.
58. Chen Y.H., Cheng W.C., Yu H.T., Kam Y.C. Genetic relationship between offspring and guardian adults of a rhacophorid frog and its care effort in response to paternal share. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 2011, 65:2329-2339.
59. Cheng W.C., Kam Y.C. Paternal care and egg survivorship in a low nest-attendance rhacophorid frog. Zoological Studies 2010, 49:304-310.
60. Cherry M.I. Sexual selection in the raucous toad, Bufo rangeri. Animal Behaviour 1993, 45:359-373.
61. Clutton-Brock T.H. The Evolution of Parental Care 1991, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
62. Cook C.L., Ferguson J.W.H., Telford S.R. Adaptive male parental care in the giant bullfrog, Pyxicephalus adspersus. Journal of Herpetology 2001, 35:310-315.
63. Crook J.H. Social Behaviour in Birds and Mammals: Essays on the Social Ethology of Animals and Man 1970, Academic Press, London.
64. Crump M.L. Cannibalism in amphibians. Cannibalism: Ecology and Evolution Among Diverse Taxa 1992, 256-276. Oxford University Press, Oxford. B.J. Crespi, M.A. Elgar (Eds.).
65. Crump M.L. Parental care among the Amphibia. Advances in the Study of Behavior 1996, 25:109-144.
66. Cummings M.E., Bernal X.E., Reynaga R., Rand A.S., Ryan M.J. Visual sensitivity to a conspicuous male cue varies by reproductive state in Physalaemus pustulosus females. Journal of Experimental Biology 2008, 211:1203-1210.
67. Dapper A.L., Baugh A.T., Ryan M.J. The sounds of silence as an alarm cue in túngara frogs, Physalaemus pustulosus. Biotropica 2011, 43:380-385.
68. Davies N.B. Sexual conflict and the polygamy threshold. Animal Behaviour 1989, 38:226-234.
69. Davies N.B., Halliday T.R. Optimal mate selection in the toad, Bufo bufo. Nature 1977, 269:56-58.
70. Davies N.B., Halliday T.R. Deep croaks and fighting assessment in toads Bufo bufo. Nature 1978, 274:683-685.
71. Davies N.B., Halliday T.R. Competitive mate searching in male common toads, Bufo bufo. Animal Behaviour 1979, 27:1253-1267.
72. Davies N.B., Krebs J.R., West S.A. An Introduction to Behavioural Ecology 2012, Wiley-Blackwell, West Sussex. 4th edn.
73. Davis J.W.F., Odonald P. Sexual selection for a handicap: a critical analysis of Zahavi's model. Journal of Theoretical Biology 1976, 57:345-354.
74. Davis M.S. Acoustically mediated neighbor recognition in the North American bullfrog, Rana catesbeiana. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 1987, 21:185-190.
75. Delia, J. 2011. Parental effects and environmentally cued hatching: an embryonic response to parental care quality in a Neotropical glassfrog, M.S. thesis, East Carolina University.
76. Drewes R.C. A phylogenetic analysis of the Hyperoliidae (Anura): treefrogs of Africa, Madagascar and the Seychelles Islands. Occasional Papers of the California Academy of Sciences 1984, 139:1-70.
77. Duellman W.E., Trueb L. The Biology of Amphibians 1994, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland.
78. Dyson M.L., Passmore N.I. Two-choice phonotaxis in Hyperolius marmoratus (Anura: Hyperoliidae): the effect of temporal variation in presented stimuli. Animal Behaviour 1988, 36:648-652.
79. Dyson M.L., Passmore N.I. The combined effect of intensity and the temporal relationship of stimuli on phonotaxis in female painted reed frogs Hyperolius marmoratus. Animal Behaviour 1988, 36:1555-1556.
80. Emerson S.B. Male advertisement calls: behavioral variation and physiological processes. Anuran Communication 2001, 36-44. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C. M.J. Ryan (Ed.).
81. Emlen S.T. Lek organization and mating strategies in the bullfrog. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 1976, 1:283-313.
82. Emlen S.T., Oring L.W. Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science 1977, 197:215-223.
83. Feng A.S., Narins P.M. Ultrasonic communication in concave-eared torrent frogs (Amolops tormotus). Journal of Comparative Physiology A 2008, 194:159-167.
84. Feng A.S., Narins P.M., Xu C.H., Lin W.Y., Yu Z.L., Qiu Q., Xu Z.M., Shen J.X. Ultrasonic communication in frogs. Nature 2006, 440:333-336.
85. Feng A.S., Arch V.S., Yu Z.L., Yu X.J., Xu Z.M., Shen J.X. Neighbor-stranger discrimination in concave-eared torrent frogs, Odorrana tormota. Ethology 2009, 115:851-856.
86. Fretwell S.D., Lucas H.L. On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds. I. Theoretical development. Acta Biotheoretica 1970, 19:16-36.
87. Fricke C., Bretman A., Chapman T. Sexual conflict. Evolutionary Behavioral Ecology 2010, 400-415. Oxford University Press, Oxford. D.F. Westneat, C.W. Fox (Eds.).
88. Friedl T.W.P. Individual male calling pattern and male mating success in the European treefrog (Hyla arborea): is there evidence for directional or stabilizing selection on male calling behaviour?. Ethology 2006, 112:116-126.
89. Friedl T.W.P., Klump G.M. Sexual selection in the lek-breeding European treefrog: body size, chorus attendance, random mating and good genes. Animal Behaviour 2005, 70:1141-1154.
90. Frost D.R., Grant T., Faivovich J., Bain R.H., Haas A., Haddad C.F.B., De Sa R.O., Channing A., Wilkinson M., Donnellan S.C., et al. The amphibian tree of life. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 2006, 297:8-370.
91. Gasser H., Amézquita A., Hödl W. Who is calling? Intraspecific call variation in the aromobatid frog Allobates femoralis. Ethology 2009, 115:596-607.
92. Gentner T.Q., Margoliash D. Neuronal populations and single cells representing learned auditory objects. Nature 2003, 424:669-674.
93. Gerhardt H.C. Acoustic properties used in call recognition by frogs and toads. The Evolution of the Amphibian Auditory System 1988, 455-483. J. Wiley, New York. B. Fritzsch, M.J. Ryan, W. Wilczynski, T.E. Hetherington, W. Walkowiak (Eds.).
94. Gerhardt H.C. Female mate choice in treefrogs: static and dynamic acoustic criteria. Animal Behaviour 1991, 42:615-635.
95. Gerhardt H.C. The evolution of vocalization in frogs and toads. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 1994, 25:293-324.
96. Gerhardt H.C., Huber F. Acoustic Communication in Insects and Anurans: Common Problems and Diverse Solutions 2002, Chicago University Press, Chicago.
97. Gerhardt H.C., Diekamp B., Ptacek M. Inter-male spacing in choruses of the spring peeper, Pseudacris (Hyla) crucifer. Animal Behaviour 1989, 38:1012-1024.
98. Given M.F. Vocalizations and acoustic interactions of the carpenter frog, Rana virgatipes. Herpetologica 1987, 43:467-481.
99. Given M.F. Frequency alteration of the advertisement call in the carpenter frog, Rana virgatipes. Herpetologica 1999, 55:304-317.
100. Gomez-Mestre, I., Pyron, R. A. & Wiens, J. J. In press. Phylogenetic analyses reveal unexpected patterns in the evolution of reproductive modes in frogs. Evolution.
101. Goutte S., Kime N.M., Argo T.F., Ryan M.J. Calling strategies of male túngara frogs in response to dynamic playback. Behaviour 2010, 147:65-83.
102. Grafe T.U. Graded aggressive calls in the African painted reed frog Hyperolius marmoratus (Hyperoliidae). Ethology 1995, 101:67-81.
103. Grafe T.U. The function of call alternation in the African reed frog (Hyperolius marmoratus): precise call timing prevents auditory masking. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 1996, 38:149-158.
104. Grafe T.U. Costs and benefits of mate choice in the lek-breeding reed frog, Hyperolius marmoratus. Animal Behaviour 1997, 53:1103-1117.
105. Grafe T.U. Synchronized interdigitated calling in the Kuvangu running frog, Kassina kuvangensis. Animal Behaviour 2003, 66:127-136.
106. Grafe T.U. Anuran choruses as communication networks. Animal Communication Networks 2005, 277-299. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. P.K. McGregor (Ed.).
107. Greenfield M.D. Sexual selection and the evolution of advertisement signals. Perspectives in Ethology. Vol. 12: Communication 1997, 145-177. Plenum, New York. M.D. Beecher, D.H. Owings, N. Thompson (Eds.).
108. Greenfield M.D., Rand A.S. Frogs have rules: selective attention algorithms regulate chorusing in Physalaemus pustulosus (Leptodactylidae). Ethology 2000, 106:331-347.
109. Gridi-Papp M., Rand A.S., Ryan M.J. Animal communication: complex call production in the túngara frog. Nature 2006, 441:38.
110. Haddad C.F.B., Prado C.P.A. Reproductive modes in frogs and their unexpected diversity in the Atlantic forest of Brazil. Bioscience 2005, 55:207-217.
111. Hayes, M. P. 1991. A study of clutch attendance in the Neotropical frog Centrolenella fleischmanni (Anura: Centrolenidae), Ph.D. thesis, University of Miami.
112. Heying H.E. Social and reproductive behaviour in the Madagascan poison frog, Mantella laevigata, with comparisons to the dendrobatids. Animal Behaviour 2001, 61:567-577.
113. Höbel G. Variation in signal timing behavior: implications for male attractiveness and sexual selection. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 2011, 65:1283-1294.
114. Höbel G., Gerhardt H.C. Sources of selection on signal timing in a tree frog. Ethology 2007, 113:973-982.
115. Hödl W., Amézquita A. Visual signaling in anuran amphibians. Anuran Communication 2001, 121-141. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C. M.J. Ryan (Ed.).
116. Howard R.D. Influence of male-defended oviposition sites on early embryo mortality in bullfrogs. Ecology 1978, 59:789-798.
117. Howard R.D. Evolution of mating strategies in bullfrogs, Rana catesbeiana. Evolution 1978, 32:850-871.
118. Howard R.D. Mating behavior and mating success in wood frogs, Rana sylvatica. Animal Behaviour 1980, 28:705-716.
119. Howard R.D., Palmer J.G. Female choice in Bufo americanus: effects of dominant frequency and call order. Copeia 1995, 1995:212-217.
120. Howard R.D., Young J.R. Individual variation in male vocal traits and female mating preferences in Bufo americanus. Animal Behaviour 1998, 55:1165-1179.
121. Humfeld S.C. Intersexual dynamics mediate the expression of satellite mating tactics: unattractive males and parallel preferences. Animal Behaviour 2008, 75:205-215.
122. Humfeld S.C., Marshall V.T., Bee M.A. Context-dependent plasticity of aggressive signalling in a dynamic social environment. Animal Behaviour 2009, 78:915-924.
123. Jennions M.D., Backwell P.R.Y., Passmore N.I. Repeatability of mate choice: the effect of size in the African painted reed frog, Hyperolius marmoratus. Animal Behaviour 1995, 49:181-186.
124. Jones D.L., Ratnam R. Blind location and separation of callers in a natural chorus using a microphone array. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2009, 126:895-910.
125. Kiss A.C.I., de Carvalho J.E., Navas C.A., Gomes F.R. Seasonal metabolic changes in a year-round reproductively active subtropical tree-frog (Hypsiboas prasinus). Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology A 2009, 152:182-188.
126. Kluge A.G. The life history, social organization, and parental behavior of Hyla rosenbergi Boulenger, a nest-building gladiator frog. Miscellaneous Publications Museum of Zoology University of Michigan 1981, 160:1-170.
127. Klump G.M., Gerhardt H.C. Use of non-arbitrary acoustic criteria in mate choice by female gray tree frogs. Nature 1987, 326:286-288.
128. Klump G.M., Gerhardt H.C. Mechanisms and function of call-timing in male-male interactions in frogs. Playback and Studies of Animal Communication 1992, 153-174. Plenum, New York. P.K. McGregor (Ed.).
129. Kok P.J.R., Ernst R. A new species of Allobates (Anura: Aromobatidae: Allobatinae) exhibiting a novel reproductive behaviour. Zootaxa 2007, 1555:21-38.
130. Krause J., Lusseau D., James R. Animal social networks: an introduction. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 2009, 63:967-973.
131. Krebs J.R., Davies N.B. An Introduction to Behavioural Ecology 1993, Blackwell, Malden, Massachusetts.
132. Lardner B., bin Lakim M. Tree-hole frogs exploit resonance effects. Nature 2002, 420:475.
133. Leary C.J. Hormones and acoustic communication in anuran amphibians. Integrative and Comparative Biology 2009, 49:452-470.
134. Leary C.J., Garcia A.M., Knapp R. Stress hormone is implicated in satellite-caller associations and sexual selection in the Great Plains toad. American Naturalist 2006, 168:431-440.
135. Lesbarrères D., Lodé T. Variations in male calls and responses to an unfamiliar advertisement call in a territorial breeding anuran, Rana dalmatina: evidence for a 'dear enemy' effect. Ethology Ecology & Evolution 2002, 14:287-295.
136. Littlejohn M.J., Martin A.A. Acoustic interaction between two species of leptodactylid frogs. Animal Behaviour 1969, 17:785-791.
137. Littlejohn M.J., Harrison P.A., Mac Nally R.C. Interspecific acoustic interactions in sympatric populations of Ranidella signifera and R. parinsignifera (Anura: Leptodactylidae). The Biology of Australian Frogs and Reptiles 1985, 287-296. Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales, Sydney. G. Grigg, R. Shine, H. Ehrman (Eds.).
138. Maan M.E., Cummings M.E. Female preferences for aposematic signal components in a polymorphic poison frog. Evolution 2008, 62:2334-2345.
139. Maan M.E., Cummings M.E. Sexual dimorphism and directional sexual selection on aposematic signals in a poison frog. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. 2009, 106:19072-19077.
140. McCauley S.J., Bouchard S.S., Farina B.J., Isvaran K., Quader S., Wood D.M., St Mary C.M. Energetic dynamics and anuran breeding phenology: insights from a dynamic game. Behavioral Ecology 2000, 11:429-436.
141. Mac Nally, R. C. 1982. Ecological, behavioural, and energy dynamics of two sympatric species of Ranidella (Anura), Ph.D. thesis, University of Melbourne.
142. Marler C.A., Ryan M.J. Energetic constraints and steroid hormone correlates of male calling behaviour in the túngara frog. Journal of Zoology 1996, 240:397-409.
143. Marsh R.L., Taigen T.L. Properties enhancing aerobic capacity of calling muscles in gray tree frogs Hyla versicolor. American Journal of Physiology 1987, 252:R786-R793.
144. Marshall V.T., Gerhardt H.C. A precedence effect underlies preferences for calls with leading pulses in the grey treefrog, Hyla versicolor. Animal Behaviour 2010, 80:139-145.
145. Marshall V.T., Humfeld S.C., Bee M.A. Plasticity of aggressive signalling and its evolution in male spring peepers, Pseudacris crucifer. Animal Behaviour 2003, 65:1223-1234.
146. Martin W.F. Evolution of vocalization in the genus Bufo. Evolution in the Genus Bufo 1972, 279-309. University of Texas Press, Austin. W.F. Blair (Ed.).
147. Mello C., Nottebohm F., Clayton D. Repeated exposure to one song leads to a rapid and persistent decline in an immediate-early genes response to that song in zebra finch telencephalon. Journal of Neuroscience 1995, 15:6919-6925.
148. Mizumoto T., Aihara I., Otsuka T., Takeda R., Aihara K., Okuno H.G. Sound imaging of nocturnal animal calls in their natural habitat. Journal of Comparative Physiology A 2011, 197:915-921.
149. Mock D.W., Parker G.A. The Evolution of Signling Rivalry 1997, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
150. Moore F.L., Boyd S.K., Kelley D.B. Historical perspective: hormonal regulation of behaviors in amphibians. Hormones and Behavior 2005, 48:373-383.
151. Murphy C.G. Determinants of chorus tenure in barking treefrogs (Hyla gratiosa). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 1994, 34:285-294.
152. Narins P.M. Behavioral refractory period in Neotropical treefrogs. Journal of Comparative Physiology 1982, 148:337-344.
153. Narins P.M., Hödl W., Grabul D.S. Bimodal signal requisite for agonistic behavior in a dart-poison frog, Epipedobates femoralis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. 2003, 100:577-580.
154. Narins P.M., Grabul D.S., Soma K.K., Gaucher P., Hödl W. Cross-modal integration in a dart-poison frog. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. 2005, 102:2425-2429.
155. Nussbaum R.A., Schultz D.L. Coevolution of parental care and egg size. American Naturalist 1989, 133:591-603.
156. Orians G.H. On the evolution of mating systems in birds and mammals. American Naturalist 1969, 103:589-603.
157. Otte D. Effects and functions in the evolution of signalling systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 1974, 5:385-417.
158. Owen P.C., Gordon N.M. The effect of perceived intruder proximity and resident body size on the aggressive responses of male green frogs, Rana clamitans (Anura: Ranidae). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 2005, 58:446-455.
159. Parker G.A. Behavioural ecology: natural history as science. Essays in Animal Behaviour: Celebrating 50 Years of Animal Behaviour 2006, 23-56. Elsevier, Amsterdam. J.R. Lucas, L.W. Simmons (Eds.).
160. Pearl C.A., Cervantes M., Chan M., Ho U., Shoji R., Thomas E.O. Evidence for a mate-attracting chemosignal in the dwarf African clawed frog Hymenochirus. Hormones and Behavior 2000, 38:67-74.
161. Perrill S.A., Gerhardt H.C., Daniel R. Sexual parasitism in the green tree frog (Hyla cinerea). Science 1978, 200:1179-1180.
162. Perry J.C., Roitberg B.D. Trophic egg laying: hypotheses and tests. Oikos 2006, 112:706-714.
163. Pettitt, B. A. 2012. Paternal effects in relation to acoustically mediated mate choice in a Neotropical frog, Ph.D. thesis, University of Minnesota.
164. Phelps S.M., Rand A.S., Ryan M.J. The mixed-species chorus as public information: túngara frogs eavesdrop on a heterospecific. Behavioral Ecology 2007, 18:108-114.
165. Prado C.P.A., Uetanabaro M., Haddad C.F.B. Description of a new reproductive mode in Leptodactylus (Anura, Leptodactylidae), with a review of the reproductive specialization toward terrestriality in the genus. Copeia 2002, 2002:1128-1133.
166. Pröhl H. Variation in male calling behaviour and relation to male mating success in the strawberry poison frog (Dendrobates pumilio). Ethology 2003, 109:273-290.
167. Pröhl H., Hödl W. Parental investment, potential reproductive rates, and mating system in the strawberry dart-poison frog, Dendrobates pumilio. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 1999, 46:215-220.
168. Pyron R.A., Wiens J.J. A large-scale phylogeny of Amphibia including over 2800 species, and a revised classification of extant frogs, salamanders, and caecilians. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 2011, 61:543-583.
169. Rabb G. Evolutionary aspects of the reproductive behavior of frogs. Evolutionary Biology of the Anurans 1973, 213-227. University of Missouri Press, Columbia. J.L. Vial (Ed.).
170. Reinhold K. Variation of acoustic courtship signals in insects and amphibians: no evidence for bimodality, but identical dependence on duration. Ethology 2009, 115:134-140.
171. Ressel S.J. Ultrastructural properties of muscles used for call production in Neotropical frogs. Physiological Zoology 1996, 69:952-973.
172. Ressel S.J. Ultrastructural design of anuran muscles used for call production in relation to the thermal environment of a species. Journal of Experimental Biology 2001, 204:1445-1457.
173. Reynolds J.D., Goodwin N.B., Freckleton R.P. Evolutionary transitions in parental care and live bearing in vertebrates. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B 2002, 357:269-281.
174. Reynolds R.G., Fitzpatrick B.M. Assortative mating in poison-dart frogs based on an ecologically important trait. Evolution 2007, 61:2253-2259.
175. Richards-Zawacki C.L., Cummings M.E. Intraspecific reproductive character displacement in a polymorphic poison dart frog, Dendrobates pumilio. Evolution 2011, 65:259-267.
176. Richards-Zawacki C.L., Wang I.J., Summers K. Mate choice and the genetic basis for colour variation in a polymorphic dart frog: inferences from a wild pedigree. Molecular Ecology 2012, 21:3879-3892.
177. Roberts J.D., Byrne P.G. Polyandry, sperm competition and the evolution of anuran amphibians. Advances in the Study of Behavior 2011, 43:1-53.
178. Robertson J.G.M. Male territoriality, fighting and assessment of fighting ability in the Australian frog Uperoleia rugosa. Animal Behaviour 1986, 34:763-772.
179. Robertson J.G.M. Female choice increases fertilization success in the Australian frog, Uperoleia laevigata. Animal Behaviour 1990, 39:639-645.
180. Rogowitz G.L., Candelaria C.L., Denizard L.E., Melendez L.J. Seasonal reproduction of a Neotropical frog, the cave coqui (Eleutherodactylus cooki). Copeia 2001, 2001:542-547.
181. Ron S.R. The evolution of female mate choice for complex calls in túngara frogs. Animal Behaviour 2008, 76:1783-1794.
182. Rose G.J., Brenowitz E.A. Aggressive thresholds of male Pacific treefrogs for advertisement calls vary with amplitude of neighbors' calls. Ethology 1991, 89:244-252.
183. Rose G.J., Brenowitz E.A. Plasticity of aggressive thresholds in Hyla regilla: discrete accommodation to encounter calls. Animal Behaviour 1997, 53:353-361.
184. Rowe L., Houle D. The lek paradox and the capture of genetic variance by condition dependent traits. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 1996, 263:1415-1421.
185. Ryan M.J. The Túngara Frog: a Study in Sexual Selection and Communication 1985, Chicago University Press, Chicago.
186. Ryan M.J. Synchronized calling in a treefrog (Smilisca sila): short behavioral latencies and implications for neural pathways involved in call perception and production. Brain Behavior and Evolution 1986, 29:196-206.
187. Ryan M.J. Sexual selection, receiver biases, and the evolution of sex differences. Science 1998, 281:1999-2003.
188. Ryan M.J. Anuran Communication 2001, Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C.
189. Ryan M.J., Rand A.S. The sensory basis of sexual selection for complex calls in the túngara frog, Physalaemus pustulosus (sexual selection for sensory exploitation). Evolution 1990, 44:305-314.
190. Ryan M.J., Keddy-Hector A. Directional patterns of female mate choice and the role of sensory biases. American Naturalist, Supplement 1992, 139:S4-S35.
191. Ryan M.J., Rand A.S. Sexual selection and signal evolution: the ghost of biases past. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B 1993, 340:187-195.
192. Ryan M.J., Rand A.S. Female responses to ancestral advertisement calls in túngara frogs. Science 1995, 269:390-392.
193. Ryan M.J., Rand A.S. Phylogenetic influence on mating call preferences in female túngara frogs, Physalaemus pustulosus. Animal Behaviour 1999, 57:945-956.
194. Ryan M.J., Fox J.H., Wilczynski W., Rand A.S. Sexual selection for sensory exploitation in the frog Physalaemus pustulosus. Nature 1990, 343:66-67.
195. Salthe S.N., Mecham J.S. Reproductive and courtship patterns. Physiology of the Amphibia. Vol. 2 1974, 309-521. Academic Press, New York. B. Lofts (Ed.).
196. Schulte L.M., Yeager J., Schulte R., Veith M., Werner P., Beck L.A., Lotters S. The smell of success: choice of larval rearing sites by means of chemical cues in a Peruvian poison frog. Animal Behaviour 2011, 81:1147-1154.
197. Schwartz J.J. Graded aggressive calls of the spring peeper, Pseudacris crucifer. Herpetologica 1989, 45:172-181.
198. Schwartz J.J. Why stop calling? A study of unison bout singing in a Neotropical treefrog. Animal Behaviour 1991, 42:565-577.
199. Schwartz J.J. Male calling behavior, female discrimination and acoustic interference in the Neotropical treefrog Hyla microcephala under realistic acoustic conditions. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 1993, 32:401-414.
200. Schwartz J.J. Call monitoring and interactive playback systems in the study of acoustic interactions among male anurans. Anuran Communication 2001, 183-204. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C. M.J. Ryan (Ed.).
201. Schwartz, J. J. & Bee, M. A. In press. Anuran acoustic signal production in noisy environments. In: Animal Communication and Noise (Ed. by H. Brumm). New York: Springer.
202. Schwartz J.J., Wells K.D. The influence of background noise on the behavior of a Neotropical treefrog, Hyla ebraccata. Herpetologica 1983, 39:121-129.
203. Schwartz J.J., Wells K.D. An experimental study of acoustic interference between two species of Neotropical treefrogs. Animal Behaviour 1983, 31:181-190.
204. Schwartz J.J., Wells K.D. Intraspecific and interspecific vocal behavior of the Neotropical treefrog Hyla microcephala. Copeia 1985, 1985:27-38.
205. Schwartz J.J., Ressel S.J., Bevier C.R. Carbohydrate and calling: depletion of muscle glycogen and the chorusing dynamics of the Neotropical treefrog Hyla microcephala. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 1995, 37:125-135.
206. Schwartz J.J., Buchanan B.W., Gerhardt H.C. Acoustic interactions among male gray treefrogs, Hyla versicolor, in a chorus setting. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 2002, 53:9-19.
207. Searcy W.A., Nowicki S. The Evolution of Animal Communication: Reliability and Deception in Signaling Systems 2005, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
208. Shaw K. Phylogenetic tests of the sensory exploitation model of sexual selection. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 1995, 10:117-120.
209. Shine R. Propagule size and parental care: the 'safe harbor' hypothesis. Journal of Theoretical Biology 1978, 75:417-424.
210. Simmons A.M., Simmons J.A., Bates M.E. Analyzing acoustic interactions in natural bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana) choruses. Journal of Comparative Psychology 2008, 122:274-282.
211. Simon M.P. The ecology of parental care in a terrestrial breeding frog from New Guinea. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 1983, 14:61-67.
212. Smith J.M. Sexual selection and the handicap principle. Journal of Theoretical Biology 1976, 57:239-242.
213. Smith M.J., Roberts J.D. Call structure may affect male mating success in the quacking frog Crinia georgiana (Anura: Myobatrachidae). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 2003, 53:221-226.
214. Stewart M.M., Rand A.S. Vocalizations and the defense of retreat sites by male and female frogs, Eleutherodactylus coqui. Copeia 1991, 1991:1013-1024.
215. Stoddard P.K. Vocal recognition of neighbors by territorial passerines. Ecology and Evolution of Acoustic Communication in Birds 1996, 356-374. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York. D.E. Kroodsma, E.H. Miller (Eds.).
216. Stynoski J.L. Discrimination of offspring by indirect recognition in an egg-feeding dendrobatid frog, Oophaga pumilio. Animal Behaviour 2009, 78:1351-1356.
217. Sullivan B.K. Male mating behavior in the Great Plains toad (Bufo cognatus). Animal Behaviour 1982, 30:930-931.
218. Sullivan B.K. Sexual selection in the Great Plains toad (Bufo cognatus). Behaviour 1983, 84:258-264.
219. Sullivan B.K. Sexual selection in Woodhouse's toad (Bufo woodhousei). II. Female choice. Animal Behaviour 1983, 31:1011-1017.
220. Sullivan B.K. Sexual selection and mating system variation in anuran amphibians of the Arizona-Sonoran desert. Great Basin Naturalist 1985, 45:688-696.
221. Sullivan B.K. Intra-populational variation in the intensity of sexual selection in breeding aggregations of Woodhouse's toad (Bufo woodhousei). Journal of Herpetology 1986, 20:88-90.
222. Sullivan B.K. Sexual selection in Woodhouse's toad (Bufo woodhousei). III. Seasonal variation in male mating success. Animal Behaviour 1987, 35:912-919.
223. Sullivan B.K. Mating system variation in Woodhouse's toad (Bufo woodhousii). Ethology 1989, 83:60-68.
224. Sullivan B.K. Book Review: The Ecology and Behavior of Amphibians, by Kentwood D. Wells. Animal Behaviour 2008, 76:249-251.
225. Sullivan B.K., Kwiatkowski M.A. Courtship displays in anurans and lizards: theoretical and empirical contributions to our understanding of costs and selection on males due to female choice. Functional Ecology 2007, 21:666-675.
226. Sullivan B.K., Ryan M.J., Verrell P.A. Female choice and mating system structure. Amphibian Biology. Vol. 2: Social Behaviour 1995, 469-517. Surrey Beatty, New York. H. Heatwole, B.K. Sullivan (Eds.).
227. Summers K. Sexual selection and intra-female competition in the green poison-dart frog, Dendrobates auratus. Animal Behaviour 1989, 37:797-805.
228. Summers K. Paternal care and the cost of polygyny in the green dart-poison frog. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 1990, 27:307-313.
229. Summers K. Mating strategies in two species of dart-poison frogs: a comparative study. Animal Behaviour 1992, 43:907-919.
230. Summers K. Dart-poison frogs and the control of sexual selection. Ethology 1992, 91:89-107.
231. Summers K., Earn D.J.D. The cost of polygyny and the evolution of female care in poison frogs. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 1999, 66:515-538.
232. Summers K., Bermingham E., Weigt L., McCafferty S. Phenotypic and genetic divergence in three species of dart-poison frogs with contrasting parental behavior. Journal of Heredity 1997, 88:8-13.
233. Summers K., Symula R., Clough M., Cronin T. Visual mate choice in poison frogs. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 1999, 266:2141-2145.
234. Summers K., McKeon C.S., Heying H. The evolution of parental care and egg size: a comparative analysis in frogs. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 2006, 273:687-692.
235. Summers K., McKeon C.S., Heying H., Hall J., Patrick W. Social and environmental influences on egg size evolution in frogs. Journal of Zoology 2007, 271:225-232.
236. Sun J.W.C., Narins P.A. Anthropogenic sounds differentially affect amphibian call rate. Biological Conservation 2005, 121:419-427.
237. Tárano Z., Herrera E.A. Female preferences for call traits and male mating success in the Neotropical frog Physalaemus enesefae. Ethology 2003, 109:121-134.
238. Taylor R.C., Buchanan B.W., Doherty J.L. Sexual selection in the squirrel treefrog Hyla squirella: the role of multimodal cue assessment in female choice. Animal Behaviour 2007, 74:1753-1763.
239. Taylor R.C., Klein B.A., Stein J., Ryan M.J. Faux frogs: multimodal signalling and the value of robotics in animal behaviour. Animal Behaviour 2008, 76:1089-1097.
240. Taylor R.C., Klein B.A., Stein J., Ryan M.J. Multimodal signal variation in space and time: how important is matching a signal with its signaler?. Journal of Experimental Biology 2011, 214:815-820.
241. Tazzyman S.J., Iwasa Y. Sexual selection can increase the effect of random genetic drift: a quantitative genetic model of polymorphism in Oophaga pumilio, the strawberry poison-dart frog. Evolution 2010, 64:1719-1728.
242. Temeles E.J. The role of neighbors in territorial systems: when are they dear enemies?. Animal Behaviour 1994, 47:339-350.
243. Thompson, R. L. 1992. Reproductive behaviors and larval natural history of the Jamaican brown frog, Osteopilus brunneus (Hylidae), M.S. thesis, University of Florida.
244. Townsend D.S. The costs of male parental care and its evolution in a Neotropical frog. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 1986, 19:187-195.
245. Townsend D.S., Stewart M.M., Pough F.H. Male parental care and its adaptive significance in a Neotropical frog. Animal Behaviour 1984, 32:421-431.
246. Trivers R.L. Parental investment and sexual selection. Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man: 1871-1971 1972, 136-179. Aldine, Chicago. B.G. Campbell (Ed.).
247. Vélez, A., Schwartz, J. J. & Bee, M. A. In press. Anuran acoustic signal perception in noisy environments. In: Animal Communication and Noise (Ed. by H. Brumm). New York: Springer.
248. Vockenhuber E.A., Hödl W., Amézquita A. Glassy fathers do matter: egg attendance enhances embryonic survivorship in the glass frog Hyalinobatrachium valerioi. Journal of Herpetology 2009, 43:340-344.
249. Wabnitz P.A., Bowie J.H., Tyler M.J., Wallace J.C., Smith B.P. Animal behaviour: aquatic sex pheromone from a male tree frog. Nature 1999, 401:444-445.
250. Wagner W.E. Fighting, assessment, and frequency alteration in Blanchard's cricket frog. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 1989, 25:429-436.
251. Wagner W.E. Graded aggressive signals in Blanchard's cricket frog: vocal responses to opponent proximity and size. Animal Behaviour 1989, 38:1025-1038.
252. Wagner W.E. Deceptive or honest signaling of fighting ability: a test of alternative hypotheses for the function of changes in call dominant frequency by male cricket frogs. Animal Behaviour 1992, 44:449-462.
253. Wagner W.E., Sullivan B.K. Sexual selection in the Gulf Coast toad, Bufo valliceps: female choice based on variable characters. Animal Behaviour 1995, 49:305-319.
254. Warkentin K.M. Environmentally cued hatching across taxa: embryos respond to risk and opportunity. Integrative and Comparative Biology 2011, 51:14-25.
255. Warkentin K.M. Plasticity of hatching in amphibians: evolution, trade-offs, cues and mechanisms. Integrative and Comparative Biology 2011, 51:111-127.
256. Welch A.M., Semlitsch R.D., Gerhardt H.C. Call duration as an indicator of genetic quality in male gray treefrogs. Science 1998, 280:1928-1930.
257. Wells K.D. Multiple egg clutches in the green frog (Rana clamitans). Herpetologica 1976, 32:85-87.
258. Wells K.D. The social behaviour of anuran amphibians. Animal Behaviour 1977, 25:666-693.
259. Wells K.D. Territoriality and male mating success in green frog (Rana clamitans). Ecology 1977, 58:750-762.
260. Wells K.D. Territoriality in the green frog (Rana clamitans): vocalizations and agonistic behaviour. Animal Behaviour 1978, 26:1051-1063.
261. Wells K.D. Courtship and parental behavior in a Panamanian poison-arrow frog (Dendrobates auratus). Herpetologica 1978, 34:148-155.
262. Wells K.D. Behavioral ecology and social organization of a dendrobatid frog (Colostethus inguinalis). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 1980, 6:199-209.
263. Wells K.D. Parental behavior of male and female frogs. Natural Selection and Social Behavior 1981, 184-197. Chiron Press, New York. R.D. Alexander, D.W. Tinkle (Eds.).
264. Wells K.D. Vocal communication in a Neotropical treefrog, Hyla ebraccata: responses of males to graded aggressive calls. Copeia 1989, 1989:461-466.
265. Wells K.D. Mating systems of frogs and toads: a citation-classic commentary on The Social Behaviour of Anuran Amphibians by Wells, K. D. Current Contents/Agriculture Biology & Environmental Sciences 1991, 46:10.
266. Wells K.D. The Ecology and Behavior of Amphibians 2007, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
267. Wells K.D., Bevier C.R. Contrasting patterns of energy substrate use in two species of frogs that breed in cold weather. Herpetologica 1997, 53:70-80.
268. Wells K.D., Schwartz J.J. The behavioral ecology of anuran communication. Hearing and Sound Communication in Amphibians 2007, 44-86. Springer, New York. P.M. Narins, A.S. Feng, R.R. Fay, A.N. Popper (Eds.).
269. Wells K.D., Taigen T.L. The effect of social interactions on calling energetics in the gray treefrog (Hyla versicolor). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 1986, 19:9-18.
270. Wells K.D., Taigen T.L. Calling energetics of a Neotropical treefrog, Hyla microcephala. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 1989, 25:13-22.
271. West-Eberhard M.J. Sexual selection, social competition, and speciation. Quarterly Review of Biology 1983, 58:155-183.
272. Wilczynski W., Brenowitz E.A. Acoustic cues mediate inter-male spacing in a Neotropical frog. Animal Behaviour 1988, 36:1054-1063.
273. Wilczynski W., Rand A.S., Ryan M.J. Evolution of calls and auditory tuning in the Physalaemus pustulosus species group. Brain Behavior and Evolution 2001, 58:137-151.
274. Williams G.C. Adaptation and Natural Selection 1966, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
275. Wilson E.O. Sociobiology: the New Synthesis 1975, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
276. Zahavi A. Mate selection: a selection for a handicap. Journal of Theoretical Biology 1975, 53:205-214.
277. Zahavi A. The cost of honesty (further remarks on the handicap principle). Journal of Theoretical Biology 1977, 67:603-605.
278. Zelick R., Narins P.M. Characterization of the advertisement call oscillator in the frog Eleutherodactylus coqui. Journal of Comparative Physiology A 1985, 156:223-229.