Calling strategies of male túngara frogs in response to dynamic playback

Behaviour

Volumn 147, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 65-83

  Goutte, S ^a   Kime, N M ^b   Argo IV, T F ^c   Ryan, M J ^d,e  

^a ECOLE NORMALE SUPÉRIEURE   (France)

^b EDGEWOOD COLLEGE   (United States)

^c The University of Texas at Austin   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^e SMITHSONIAN TROPICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Panama)

Author keywords

Acoustic behaviour; Animal communication; Dynamic playback; Evoked vocal response; Frog calls; Interactive playback; T ngara frog

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA; ANURA; PHYSALAEMUS PUSTULOSUS;

EID: 75449107759     PISSN: 00057959     EISSN: 1568539X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1163/000579509X12483520922205     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Bernal, X.E., Akre, K.L., Baugh, A.T., Rand, A.S. & Ryan, M.J. (2009). Female and male behavioural response to advertisement calls of variable complexity in túngara frogs, Physalaemus pustulosus.-Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 63: 1269-1279.
2. Bernal, X.E., Page, R.A., Rand, A.S. & Ryan, M.J. (2007). Cues for eavesdroppers: do frog calls indicate prey density and quality?-Am. Nat. 169: 412-415.
3. Bosch, J., Rand, A.S. & Ryan, M.J. (2002). Response to variation in chuck frequency by male and female túngara frogs.-Herpetologica 58: 95-103.
4. Bucher, T.L., Ryan, M.J. & Bartholomew, G.W. (1982). Oxygen consumption during resting, calling and nest building in the frog Physalaemus pustulosus.-Physiol. Zool. 55: 10-22.
5. Catchpole, C. & Slater, P. (1995). Bird song: biological themes and variations.-Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
6. Dabelsteen, T. & McGregor, P. (1996). Dynamic acoustic communication and interactive playback.-In: Ecology and evolution of acoustic communication in birds (Kroodsma, D.E. & Miller, E.H., eds.). Comstock, Ithaca, NY, p. 398-408.
7. Gerhardt, H.C. & Huber, F. (2002). Acoustic communication in insects and anurans.-University of Chicago Press. Chicago, IL.
8. Greenfield, M.D. (2002). Signalers and receivers, mechanisms and evolution of arthropod communication.-Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
9. Greenfield, M.D. & Rand, A.S. (2000). Frogs have rules: selective attention algorithms regulate chorusing in Physalaemus pustulosus (Leptodactylidae).-Ethology 106: 331-347.
10. Gridi-Papp, M., Rand, A.S. & Ryan, M.J. (2006). Complex call production in túngara frogs.-Nature 441: 38.
11. Hurd, P.L. & Enquist, M. (2005). A strategic taxonomy of biological communication.-Anim. Behav. 70: 1155-1170.
12. Jennions, M.D. & Backwell, P.R.Y. (1992). Chorus size influences on the anti-predator response of a neotropical frog.-Anim. Behav. 44: 990-992.
13. Langemann, V., Tavares, J.P., Peake, T.M. & McGregor, P.K. (2000). Response of great tits to escalating patterns of playback.-Behaviour 137: 451-471.
14. McGregor, P. (2000). Playback experiments: design and analysis.-Acta Ethol. 3: 3-8.
15. Mennil, D.J. & Ratcliff, L.M. (2000). A field test of Syrinx sound analysis software in interactive playback.-Bioacoustics 11: 77-86.
16. Ord, T. & Evans, C. (2002). Interactive video playback and opponent assessment in lizards.-Behav. Process. 59: 55-65. (Pubitemid 34886648)
17. Otter, K.,McGregor, P.K., Terry, A.M.R., Burford, F.R., Peake, T.M. & Dabelsteen, T. (1999). Do female great tits (Parus major) assess males by eavesdropping? A field study using interactive song playback.-Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. 266: 1305-1309.
18. Pauly, G.B., Bernal, X.E., Rand, A.S. & Ryan, M.J. (2006). The vocal sac increases call rate in the túngara frog, Physalaemus pustulosus.-Physiol. Biochem. Zool. 79: 708-719.
19. Phelps, S.M., Rand, A.S. & Ryan, M.J. (2007). The mixed-species chorus as public information: túngara frogs eavesdrop on a heterospecific.-Behav. Ecol. 18: 108-114.
20. Rand, A.S. & Ryan, M.J. (1981). The adaptive significance of a complex vocal repertoire in a Neotropical frog.-Z. Tierpsychol. 57: 209-214.
21. Rosenthal, G., Evans, C. & Miller, W. (1996). Female preference for dynamic traits in the green swordtail, Xiphophorus helleri.-Anim. Behav. 51: 811-820.
22. Ryan, M.J. (1985). The túngara frog, a study in sexual selection and communication.-University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
23. Ryan, M.J. (ed.) (2001). Anuran communication.-Smithsonian Institution Press,Washington, DC.
24. Ryan, M.J. & Rand, A.S. (1998). Evoked vocal responses in male túngara frogs: preexisting biases in male responses?-Anim. Behav. 56: 1509-1516.
25. Ryan, M.J. & Rand, A.S. (2003). Mate recognition in túngara frogs: a review of some studies of brain, behaviour, and evolution.-Acta Zool. Sin. 49: 713-726.
26. Sakata, J.T. & Brainard, M.S. (2006). Real-time contributions of auditory feedback to avian vocal motor control.-J. Neurosci. 38: 9619-9628.
27. Schmidt, R., Kunc, H., Amrhein, V. & Naguib, M. (2006). Responses to interactive playback predict future pairing success in nightingales.-Anim. Behav. 72: 1355-1362.
28. Schwartz, J.J. (1994). Male advertisement and female choice in frogs: recent findings and new approaches to the study of communication in a dynamic acoustic environment.-Amer. Zool. 34: 616-624.
29. Schwartz, J.J. (2001). Call monitoring and interactive playback systems in the study of acoustic interactions among male anurans.-In: Anuran communication. (Ryan, M.J., ed.), Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, p. 183-204.
30. Schwartz, J.J., Buchanan, B.W., Gerhardt, H.C. (2002). Acoustic interactions among male gray treefrogs, Hyla versicolor, in a chorus setting.-Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 53: 9-19