Sexual selection can increase the effect of random genetic drift - a quantitative genetic model of polymorphism in oophaga pumilio, the strawberry poison-dart frog

Evolution

Volumn 64, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 1719-1728

  Tazzyman, Samuel J ^a   Iwasa, Yoh ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b KYUSHU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Aposematism; Poison dart frogs; Quantitative genetics; Random drift; Sexual selection; Speciation

Indexed keywords

APOSEMATISM; COLOR; FEMALE BEHAVIOR; FROG; GENETIC DRIFT; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; PHENOTYPE; POLYMORPHISM; POPULATION DYNAMICS; SEXUAL SELECTION; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY);

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COLOR; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; FROGS AND TOADS; GENETIC DRIFT; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; MALE; MATE CHOICE; PIGMENTATION; ANURA;

ANIMALS; ANURA; COLOR; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; GENETIC DRIFT; MALE; MATING PREFERENCE, ANIMAL; MODELS, GENETIC; PIGMENTATION; SELECTION, GENETIC; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION;

BOCAS DEL TORO; PANAMA [CENTRAL AMERICA];

ANURA; DENDROBATIDAE; FRAGARIA X ANANASSA;

EID: 77953904059     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00923.x     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Anderson R P, Handley C O. Dwarfism in insular sloths: biogeography, selection, and evolutionary rate. Evolution 2002, 56:1045-1058.
2. Barton N H, Turelli M. Natural and sexual selection on many loci. Genetics 1991, 127:229-255.
3. Blount J D, Speed M P, Ruxton G D, Stephens P A. Warning displays may function as honest signals of toxicity. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 2009, 276:871-877.
4. Broom M, Speed M P, Ruxton G D. Evolutionarily stable defence and signalling of that defence. J. Theor. Biol. 2006, 242:32-43.
5. Brust D G. Maternal brood care by Dendrobates-Pumilio-a frog that feeds its young. J. Herpetol. 1993, 27:96-98.
6. Coyne J A, Orr H A. Speciation 2004, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA
7. Daly J W, Myers C W. Toxicity of Panamanian poison frogs (Dendrobates)-some biological and chemical aspects. Science 1967, 156:970-973.
8. Darst C R, Cummings M E. Predator learning favours mimicry of a less-toxic model in poison frogs. Nature 2006, 440:208-211.
9. Darst C R, Cummings M E, Cannatella D C. A mechanism for diversity in warning signals: conspicuousness versus toxicity in poison frogs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103:5852-5857.
10. Gavrilets S. Evolution and speciation on holey adaptive landscapes. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1997, 12:307-312.
11. Gavrilets S. Fitness landscapes and the origin of species 2004, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ
12. Gerhardt H C, Huber F. Acoustic communication in insects and anurans: common problems and diverse solutions 2002, Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL
13. Grant T, Frost D R, Caldwell J P, Gagliardo R, Haddad C F B, Kok P J R, Means D B, Noonan B P, Schargel W E, Wheeler W C. Phylogenetic systematics of dart-poison frogs and their relatives (Amphibia: Athesphatanura: Dendrobatidae). Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 2006, 299:1-262.
14. Iwasa Y, Pomiankowski A. Continual change in mate preferences. Nature 1995, 377:420-422.
15. Iwasa Y, Pomiankowski A, Nee S. The evolution of costly mate preferences .2. The handicap principle. Evolution 1991, 45:1431-1442.
16. Lande R. Natural-selection and random genetic drift in phenotypic evolution. Evolution 1976, 30:314-334.
17. Lande R. Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1981, 78:3721-3725.
18. Maan M E, Cummings M E. Female preferences for aposematic signal components in a polymorphic poison frog. Evolution 2008, 62:2334-2345.
19. Mallet J, Joron M. Evolution of diversity in warning color and mimicry: polymorphisms, shifting balance, and speciation. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1999, 30:201-233.
20. Mead L S, Arnold S J. Quantitative genetic models of sexual selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2004, 19:264-271.
21. Nei M, Maruyama T, Wu C I. Models of evolution of reproductive isolation. Genetics 1983, 103:557-579.
22. Nichols R A, Butlin R K. Does runaway sexual selection work in finite populations. J. Evol. Biol. 1989, 2:299-313.
23. Noonan B P, Comeault A A. The role of predator selection on polymorphic aposematic poison frogs. Biol. Lett. 2009, 5:51-54.
24. Pomiankowski A, Iwasa Y. Evolution of multiple sexual preferences by fisher runaway process of sexual selection. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 1993, 253:173-181.
25. Pomiankowski A, Iwasa Y, Nee S. The evolution of costly mate preferences .1. Fisher and biased mutation. Evolution 1991, 45:1422-1430.
26. Reynolds R G, Fitzpatrick B M. Assortative mating in poison-dart frogs based on an ecologically important trait. Evolution 2007, 61:2253-2259.
27. Rudh A, Rogell B, Hoglund J. Non-gradual variation in colour morphs of the strawberry poison frog Dendrobates pumilio: genetic and geographical isolation suggest a role for selection in maintaining polymorphism. Mol. Ecol. 2007, 16:4284-4294.
28. Ruxton G D, Speed M P, Broom M. The importance of initial protection of conspicuous mutants for the coevolution of defense and aposematic signaling of the defense: a modeling study. Evolution 2007, 61:2165-2174.
29. Saporito R A, Zuercher R, Roberts M, Gerow K G, Donnelly M A. Experimental evidence for aposematism in the dendrobatid poison frog Oophaga pumilio. Copeia 2007, 4:1006-1011.
30. Savage J M. The Dendrobatid frogs of Central America. Copeia 1968, 4:745-776.
31. Siddiqi A, Cronin T W, Loew E R, Vorobyev M, Summers K. Interspecific and intraspecific views of color signals in the strawberry poison frog Dendrobates pumilio. J. Exp. Biol. 2004, 207:2471-2485.
32. Summers K, Bermingham E, Weigt L, McCafferty S. Phenotypic and genetic divergence in three species of dart-poison frogs with contrasting parental behavior. J. Hered. 1997, 88:8-13.
33. Summers K, Symula R, Clough M, Cronin T. Visual mate choice in poison frogs. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 1999, 266:2141-2145.
34. Summers K, Cronin T W, Kennedy T. Variation in spectral reflectance among populations of Dendrobates pumilio, the strawberry poison frog, in the Bocas del Toro Archipelago, Panama. J. Biogeogr. 2003, 30:35-53.
35. Summers K, Cronin T W, Kennedy T. Cross-breeding of distinct color morphs of the strawberry poison frog (Dendrobates pumilio) from the Bocas del Toro Archipelago, Panama. J. Herpetol. 2004, 38:1-8.
36. Uyeda J C, Arnold S J, Hohenlohe P A, Mead L S. Drift promotes speciation by sexual selection. Evolution 2009, 63:583-594.
37. Weygoldt P. Complex brood care and reproductive-behavior in captive poison-arrow frogs, Dendrobates pumilio O. Schmidt. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 1980, 7:329-332.
38. Weygoldt P. Evolution of parental care in dart poison frogs (Amphibia, Anura, Dendrobatidae). Z. Zool. Syst. Evolutsforsch. 1987, 25:51-67.
39. Wu C I. A stochastic simulation study on speciation by sexual selection. Evolution 1985, 39:66-82.