Who is Calling? Intraspecific Call variation in the aromobatid frog allobates femoralis

Ethology

Volumn 115, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 596-607

  Gasser, Herbert ^a   Amézquita, Adolfo ^b   Hödl, Walter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^b UNIVERSIDAD DE LOS ANDES   (Colombia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUDITORY CUE; BEHAVIORAL RESPONSE; CALLING BEHAVIOR; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; FROG; HABITUATION; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; INTRASPECIFIC INTERACTION; INTRASPECIFIC VARIATION; MALE BEHAVIOR; RECOGNITION;

ANURA; EPIPEDOBATES FEMORALIS;

EID: 65649098453     PISSN: 01791613     EISSN: 14390310     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2009.01639.x     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Amézquita, A., Castellanos, L. Hödl, W. 2005 : Auditory matching of male Epipedobates femoralis (Anura: Dendrobatidae) under field conditions. Anim. Behav. 70, 1377 1386. (Pubitemid 41739803)
2. Amézquita, A., Hödl, W., Lima, A., Castellanos, L., Erdtmann, L. De Araújo, M. C. 2006 : Masking interference and the evolution of the acoustic communication system of the Amazonian frog Epipedobates femoralis. Evolution 60, 1874 1887.
3. Bee, M. A. 2003 : A test of the "dear enemy effect" in the strawberry dart-poison frog (Dendrobates pumilio). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 54, 601 610. (Pubitemid 37261496)
4. Bee, M. A. Gerhardt, H. C. 2001a : Neighbour-stranger discrimination by territorial male bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana): I. Acoustic basis. Anim. Behav. 62, 1129 1140. (Pubitemid 34068004)
5. Bee, M. A. Gerhardt, H. C. 2001b : Neighbour-stranger discrimination by territorial male bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana): II. Perceptual basis. Anim. Behav. 62, 1141 1150. (Pubitemid 34068005)
6. Bee, M. A. Gerhardt, H. C. 2002 : Individual voice recognition in a territorial frog (Rana catesbeiana). Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269, 1443 1448. (Pubitemid 34267923)
7. Bee, M. A., Kozich, C. E., Blackwell, K. J. Gerhardt, H. C. 2001 : Individually distinct advertisement calls of territorial male green frogs, Rana clamitans: Implications for individual discrimination. Ethology 107, 65 84. (Pubitemid 32113891)
8. Beecher, M. D. 1989 : Signalling systems for individual recognition: an information theory approach. Anim. Behav. 38, 248 261.
9. Bourne, G. R., Collins, A. C., Holder, A. M. McCarthy, C. L. 2001 : Vocal communication and reproductive behavior of the frog Colostethus beebei in Guyana. J. Herpetol. 34, 272 281. (Pubitemid 32532949)
10. Briefer, E., Aubin, T., Lehongre, K. Rybak, F. 2008 : How to identify dear enemies: the group signature in the complex song of the skylark Alauda arvensis. J. Exp. Biol. 211, 317 326.
11. Charif, R. A., Mitchell, S. Clark, C. W. 1995 : Canary 1.1.2 User's Manual. Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology, Ithaca, NY.
12. Cocroft, R. B. Ryan, M. J. 1995 : Patterns of advertisement call evolution in toads and chorus frogs. Anim. Behav. 49, 283 303.
13. Davis, M. S. 1987 : Acoustically mediated neighbour recognition in the North American bullfrog, Rana catesbeiana. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 21, 185 190.
14. Donnelly, M. A., Guyer, C., Jutterock, J. E. Alford, R. A. 1994 : Techniques for marking amphibians. In : Measuring and Monitoring Biological Diversity. Standard Methods for Amphibians (Heyer, R. W., Donnelly, M. A., McDiarmid, R. W., Hayek, L.-A. C. Foster, M. S., Eds Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, pp. 277 284.
15. Falls, J. B. 1982 : Individual recognition by sounds in birds. In : Acoustic Communication in Birds (Kroodsma, D. E. Miller, E. H., Eds Academic Press, New York, pp. 237 278.
16. Fisher, J. 1954 : Evolution and bird sociality. In : Evolution as a Process (Huxley, J., Hardy, A. C. Ford, E. B., Eds Allen & Unwin, London, pp. 71 83.
17. Fitzpatrick, M. J. Gray, D. A. 2001 : Divergence between the courtship songs of the field crickets Gryllus texensis and Gryllus rubens (Orthoptera, Gryllidae). Ethology 107, 1075 1085. (Pubitemid 34060542)
18. Friedl, T. W. P. Klump, G. M. 2002 : The vocal behaviour of male European treefrogs (Hyla arborea): Implications for inter- and intrasexual selection. Behaviour 139, 113 136. (Pubitemid 36374520)
19. Gerhardt, C. H. 1988 : Acoustic properties used in call recognition by frogs and toads. In : The Evolution of the Amphibian Auditory System (Fritzsch, B., Ryan, M. J., Wilczynski, W., Hetherington, T. E. Walkowiak, W., Eds John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 455 479.
20. Gerhardt, C. H. 1991 : Female mate choice in treefrogs: static and dynamic acoustic criteria. Anim. Behav. 42, 615 635.
21. Gerhardt, C. H. Huber, F. 2002 : Acoustic Communication in Insects and Anurans. Common Problems and Diverse Solutions. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.
22. Getty, T. 1987 : Dear enemies and the prisoner's dilemma: why should territorial neighbors form defensive coalitions? Am. Zool. 27, 327 336.
23. Gottsberger, B. Gruber, E. 2004 : Temporal partitioning of reproductive activity in a Neotropical anuran community. J. Trop. Ecol. 20, 271 280. (Pubitemid 38681803)
24. Hair, J. F., Andersen, R. E., Tatham, R. L. Black, W. C. 1995 : Multivariate Data Analysis, 4th edn. Prentice-Hall International, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
25. Hödl, W. 1987 : Dendrobates femoralis (Dendrobatidae): a handy fellow for frog biacoustics. In : Proceedings of 4th Ordinary General Meeting of the Societas Europea Herpetologica (Van Gelder, J. J., Strijbosch, H. Bergers, P. J. M., Eds Faculty of Sciences Nijmegen, Nijmegen, pp. 201 204.
26. Hödl, W., Amézquita, A. Narins, P. M. 2004 : The rôle of call frequency and the auditory papillae in phonotactic behavior in male Dart-poison frog Epipedobates femoralis (Dendrobatidae). J. Comp. Physiol. A 190, 823 829. (Pubitemid 39520734)
27. Howard, R. D. Young, J. R. 1998 : Individual variation in male vocal traits and female mating preferences in Bufo americanus. Anim. Behav. 55, 1165 1179. (Pubitemid 28258151)
28. Hyman, J. 2005 : Seasonal variation in response to neighbors and strangers by a territorial songbird. Ethology 111, 951 961. (Pubitemid 41413703)
29. Jaeger, R. G. 1981 : Dear enemy recognition and the costs of aggression between salamanders. Am. Nat. 117, 962 974.
30. Jouventin, P., Aubin, T. Lengagne, T. 1999 : Finding a parent in a king penguin colony: the acoustic system of individual recognition. Anim. Behav. 57, 1175 1183. (Pubitemid 29285351)
31. Kaib, M., Franke, S., Francke, W. Brandl, R. 2002 : Cuticular hydrocarbons in a termite: phenotypes and a neighbour-stranger effect. Physiol. Entomol. 27, 189 198.
32. Kime, N. M., Turner, W. R. Ryan, M. J. 2000 : The transmission of advertisement calls in Central American frogs. Behav. Ecol. 11, 71 83. (Pubitemid 30146977)
33. Langen, T. A., Tripet, F. Nonacs, P. 2000 The red and the black: habituation and the dear-enemy phenomenon in two desert Pheidole ants. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 48, 285 292.
34. Leiser, J. K. 2003 : When are neighbours 'dear enemies' and when are they not? The responses of territorial male variegated pupfish, Cyprinodon variegatus, to neighbours, strangers and heterospecifics Anim. Behav. 65, 453 462. (Pubitemid 36524201)
35. Lesbarrères, D. Lodé, T. 2002 : Variations in male calls and responses to an unfamiliar advertisement call in a territorial breeding anuran, Rana dalmatina: evidence for a "dear enemy" effect. Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 14, 287 295. (Pubitemid 36161701)
36. Lescure, J. Marty, C. 2000 : Atlas des Amphibians de Guyane. Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris.
37. Marler, C. A. Moore, M. C. 1989 : Time and energy costs of aggression in testosterone-implanted free-living male Mountain Spiny Lizards (Sceloporus jarrovi). Physiol. Zool. 62, 1334 1350.
38. Narins, P. M., Hödl, W. Grabul, D. S. 2003 : Bimodal signal requisite for agonistic behavior in a dart-poison frog, Epipedobates femoralis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100, 577 580. (Pubitemid 36126094)
39. Nelson, D. A. Marler, P. 1990 : The perception of birdsong and an ecological concept of signal space. In : Comparative Perception. Volume II: Complex Signals (Stebbins, W. C. Berkley, M. A., Eds J. Wiley, New York, pp. 443 478.
40. Owen, P. C. Perrill, S. A. 1998 : Habituation in the green frog, Rana clamitans. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 44, 209 213. (Pubitemid 29000584)
41. Pröhl, H. 2003 : Variation in male calling behaviour and relation to male mating success in the Strawberry Poison Frog (Dendrobates pumilio). Ethology 109, 273 290. (Pubitemid 36551339)
42. Pröhl, H., Hagemann, S., Karsch, J. Höbel, G. 2007 : Geographic variation in male sexual signals in Strawberry Poison Frogs (Dendrobates pumilio). Ethology 113, 825 837. (Pubitemid 47274534)
43. Qualls, C. P. Jaeger, R. G. 1991 : The dear enemy recognition in Anolis carolinensis. J. Herpetol. 25, 361 363.
44. Riechert, S. E. 1988 : The energetic costs of fighting. Am. Zool. 28, 477 884.
45. Robisson, P., Aubin, T. Bremond, J.-C. 1993 : Individuality in the voice of the Emperor Penguin Aptenodytes forsteri: adaptation to a noisy environment. Ethology 94, 279 290.
46. Roithmair, M. E. 1992 : Territoriality and male mating success in the dart-poison frog, Epipedobates femoralis (Dendrobatidae, Anura). Ethology 92, 331 343.
47. Rosell, F. Bjørkøyli, T. 2002 : A test of the dear enemy phenomenon in the Eurasian beaver. Anim. Behav. 63, 1073 1078.
48. Searcy, W. A. Nowicki, S. 2005 : The Evolution of Animal Communication. Reliability and Deception in Signaling Systems. Monographs in Behavior and Ecology. Princeton Univ. Press, New Jersey.
49. Silverstone, P. A. 1976 : A revision of the poison-arrow frogs of the genus Phyllobates Bibron in Sagra (family Dendrobatidae). Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, Science Bulletin 27, 1 53.
50. Skierczyński, M., Czarnecka, K. M. Osiejuk, T. S. 2007 : Neighbour-stranger song discrimination in territorial ortolan bunting Emberiza hortulana males. J. Avian Biol. 38, 415 420. (Pubitemid 47013514)
51. Sokal, R. R. Rohlf, F. J. 2000 : Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research, 3rd edn. W. H. Freeman and Company, New York.
52. Sousa-Lima, R. S., Paglia, A. P. Da Fonseca, G. A. B. 2002 : Signature information and individual recognition in the isolation calls of Amazonian manatees, Trichechus inunguis (Mammalia: Sirenia). Anim. Behav. 63, 301 310.
53. Stoddard, P. K. 1996 : Vocal recognition of neighbors by territorial passerines. In : Ecology and Evolution of Acoustic Communication in Birds (Kroodsma, D. E. Miller, E. H., Eds Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca, pp. 356 374.
54. Stoddard, P. K., Beecher, M. D., Horning, C. L. Willis, M. S. 1990 : Strong neighbor-stranger discrimination in song sparrows. Condor 92, 1051 1056.
55. Temeles, E. J. 1994 : The role of neighbours in territorial systems: when are they 'dear enemies'?. Anim. Behav. 47, 339 350. (Pubitemid 2033941)
56. Wells, K. D. 1977 : The social behaviour of anuran amphibians. Anim. Behav. 25, 666 693. (Pubitemid 8192182)
57. Wollerman, L. 1999 : Acoustic interference limits call detection in a Neotropical frog Hyla ebraccata. Anim. Behav. 57, 529 536. (Pubitemid 29245130)
58. Ydenberg, R. C., Giraldeau, L.-A. Falls, B. J. 1988 : Neighbours, strangers, and the asymmetric war of attrition. Anim. Behav. 36, 343 347.