Prediction during statistical learning, and implications for the implicit/explicit divide

Advances in Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 196-209

  Dale, Rick ^a   Duran, Nicholas D ^a   Morehead, J Ryan ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Computer mouse tracking; Consciousness; Dynamics; Implicit learning; Prediction; Serial reaction time; Statistical learning

Indexed keywords

EID: 84871807676     PISSN: 18951171     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5709/acp-0115-z     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390-412.
2. Ballard, D. H., Hayhoe, M. M., & Pelz, J. B. (1995). Memory representations in natural tasks. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7, 66-80.
3. Bar, M. (2009). The proactive brain: Memory for predictions. Philosophical Transactions, 364B, 1235.
4. Bieri, J. (1955). Cognitive complexity-simplicity and predictive behavior. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 263-268.
5. Botvinick, M., & Plaut, D. C. (2004). Doing without schema hierarchies: A recurrent connectionist approach to normal and impaired routine sequential action. Psychological Review, 111, 395-428.
6. Braver, T. S., Gray, J. R., & Burgess, G. C. (2007). Explaining the many varieties of working memory variation: Dual mechanisms of cognitive control. In A. Conway, C. Jarrold, M. Kane, A. Miyake, & J. Towse (Eds.), Variation in working memory (pp. 76-106). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
7. Bubic, A., von Cramon, D. Y., & Schubotz, R. I. (2010). Prediction, cognition, and the brain. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 4, 1-15.
8. Cleeremans, A., Destrebecqz, A., & Boyer, M. (1998). Implicit learning: News from the front. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 406-416.
9. Cleeremans, A., & Dienes, Z. (2008). Computational models of implicit learning. In R. Sun (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of computational psychology (pp. 396-421). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
10. Cleeremans, A., & Jiménez, L. (2002). Implicit learning and consciousness: A graded, dynamic perspective. In R. M. French & A. Cleeremans (Eds.), Implicit learning and consciousness (pp. 1-40). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
11. Cleeremans, A., & McClelland, J. L. (1991). Learning the structure of event sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 120, 235-253.
12. Clegg, B. A. (2005). Stimulus-specific sequence representation in serial reaction time tasks. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58A, 1087-1101.
13. Cohen, J. D., & Schooler, J. W. (1997). Scientific approaches to consciousness. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14. Conway, C. M., & Christiansen, M. H. (2005). Modality-constrained statistical learning of tactile, visual, and auditory sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 24-39.
15. Conway, C. M., & Christiansen, M. H. (2006). Statistical learning within and between modalities. Psychological Science, 17, 905-912.
16. Craik, K. (1943). The nature of explanation. Cambridge University Press.
17. Curran, T., & Keele, S. W. (1993). Attentional and nonattentional forms of sequence learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 189-202.
18. Dale, R., & Spivey, M. J. (2005). Categorical recurrence analysis of child language. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 530-535). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19. Destrebecqz, A., & Cleeremans, A. (2001). Can sequence learning be implicit? New evidence with the process dissociation procedure. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 343.
20. Destrebecqz, A., & Cleeremans, A. (2003). Temporal effects in sequence learning. In L. Jiménez (Ed.), Attention and implicit learning (pp. 181-213). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
21. Destrebecqz, A., & Cleeremans, A. (2005). Implicit learning in a prediction task: Neither abstract nor based on exemplars. Current Psychology Letters, 3(17), no pagination specified.
22. Duran, N. D., & Dale, R. (2009). Anticipatory arm placement in the statistical learning of position sequences. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 893-898). Amsterdam: Cognitive Science Society.
23. Elman, J. L. (1990). Finding structure in time. Cognitive Science, 14, 179-211.
24. Enns, J. T., & Lleras, A. (2008). What's next? New evidence for prediction in human vision. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 327-333.
25. Frensch, P. A., Lin, J., & Buchner, A. (1998). Learning versus behavioral expression of the learned: The effects of a secondary tone-counting task on implicit learning in the serial reaction task. Psychological Research, 61, 83-98.
26. Haggard, P., Clark, S., & Kalogeras, J. (2002). Voluntary action and conscious awareness. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 382-385.
27. Heyes, C. M., & Foster, C. L. (2002). Motor learning by observation: Evidence from a serial reaction time task. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55A, 593-607.
28. Hoffmann, J., Martin, C., & Schilling, A. (2003). Unique transitions between stimuli and responses in SRTtasks: Evidence for the primacy of response predictions. Psychological Research, 67, 160-173. doi:10.1007/s00426-002-0117-2
29. Hommel, B. (2009). Action control according to TEC(theory of event coding). Psychological Research, 73, 512-526. doi:10.1007/s00426-009-0234-2
30. Hunt, R. H., & Aslin, R. N. (2001). Statistical learning in a serial reaction time task: Access to separable statistical cues by individual learners. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 658-680.
31. Hurley, S. L. (2002). Consciousness in action. Harvard University Press.
32. Jamieson, R. K., & Mewhort, D. J. K. (2009). Applying an exemplar model to the serial reaction-time task: Anticipating from experience. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1757-1783. doi:10.1080/17470210802557637
33. Jeannerod, M. (2006). Motor cognition. Oxford University Press.
34. Jones, J., & Pashler, H. (2007). Is the mind inherently forward looking? Comparing prediction and retrodiction. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 295-300.
35. Keele, S. W., Ivry, R., Mayr, U., Hazeltine, E., & Heuer, H. (2003). The cognitive and neural architecture of sequence representation. Psychological Review, 110, 316-339.
36. Kirkham, N. Z., Slemmer, J. A., & Johnson, S. P. (2002). Visual statistical learning in infancy: Evidence for a domain general learning mechanism. Cognition, 83, B35-B42.
37. Kittur, A., Chi, H., & Suh, B. (2008). Crowdsourcing user studies with Mechanical Turk. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human-factors in Computing Systems CHI 2008 (pp. 453-456). Florence, Italy: ACM Press.
38. Kveraga, K., Ghuman, A. S., & Bar, M. (2007). Top-down predictions in the cognitive brain. Brain and Cognition, 65, 145-168. doi:10.1016/j.bandc. 2007.06.007
39. Land, M. F., & Furneaux, S. (1997). The knowledge base of the oculomotor system. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 352, 1231-1239.
40. Marcus, D. J., Karatekin, C., & Markiewicz, S. (2006). Oculomotor evidence of sequence learning on the serial reaction time task. Memory & Cognition, 34, 420-432.
41. Marcus, G. F., Vijayan, S., Bandi Rao, S., & Vishton, P. M. (1999). Rule learning by seven-month-old infants. Science, 283(5398), 77-80.
42. Mayr, U. (1996). Spatial attention and implicit sequence learning: Evidence for independent learning of spatial and nonspatial sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 350-364.
43. McClelland, J. L. (1979). On the time relations of mental processes: An examination of systems of processes in cascade. Psychological Review, 86, 287-330.
44. Miller, R. R., Barnet, R. C., & Grahame, N. J. (1995). Assessment of the Rescorla-Wagner model. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 363-386.
45. Misyak, J. B., Christiansen, M. H., & Tomblin, J. B. (2009). Statistical learning of nonadjacencies predicts on-line processing of long-distance dependencies in natural language. In N. T. Taatgen & H. van Rijn (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 177-182). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
46. Moisello, C., Crupi, D., Tunik, E., Quartarone, A., Bove, M., Tononi, G., & Ghilardi, M. (2009). The serial reaction time task revisited: A study on motor sequence learning with an arm-reaching task. Experimental Brain Research, 194, 143-155. doi:10.1007/s00221-008-1681-5
47. Morsella, E. (2005). The function of phenomenal states: Supramodular interaction theory. Psychological Review, 112, 1000-1021.
48. Neisser, U. (1976). Cognition and reality. San Francisco: WHFreeman.
49. Nissen, M. J., & Bullemer, P. (1987). Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 1-32. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(87)90002-8
50. Perruchet, P., & Amorim, M. A. (1992). Conscious knowledge and changes in performance in sequence learning: Evidence against dissociation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 785-800.
51. Perruchet, P., & Pacton, S. (2006). Implicit learning and statistical learning: One phenomenon, two approaches. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 233-238.
52. Perruchet, P., & Vinter, A. (1998). PARSER: A model for word segmentation. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 246-263.
53. Proulx, T., & Heine, S. J. (2009). Connections from Kafka: Exposure to meaning threats improves implicit learning of an artificial grammar. Psychological Science, 20, 1125-1131.
54. Ramscar, M., Yarlett, D., Dye, M., Denny, K., & Thorpe, K. (2010). Feature-Label-Order effects and their implications for symbolic learning. Cognitive Science, 34, 909-957.
55. Rao, R. P., & Sejnowski, T. J. (2003). Self-organizing neural systems based on predictive learning. Philosophical Transactions: Mathematical, Physical, and Engineering Sciences, 361, 1149-1175.
56. Reber, A. S. (1967). Implicit learning of artificial grammars. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6, 855-863.
57. Reber, A. S. (1989). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 219-235.
58. Reber, A. S. (1992). An evolutionary context for the cognitive unconscious. Philosophical Psychology, 5, 33-51.
59. Rescorla, R. A., & Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning: A symposium (pp. 64-69). New York: Appleton.
60. Reynolds, J. R., Zacks, J. M., & Braver, T. S. (2007). A computational model of event segmentation from perceptual prediction. Cognitive Science, 31, 613-643.
61. Saffran, J. R. (2003). Statistical language learning: Mechanisms and constraints. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 110-114.
62. Saffran, J. R., Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. L. (1996). Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science, 274, 1926-1928.
63. Sarrazin, J. C., Cleeremans, A., & Haggard, P. (2008). How do we know what we are doing? Time, intention, and awareness of action. Consciousness and Cognition, 17, 602-615.
64. Schubotz, R. I. (2007). Prediction of external events with our motor system: Towards a new framework. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 211-218.
65. Schvaneveldt, R. W., & Gomez, R. L. (1998). Attention and probabilistic sequence learning. Psychological Research, 61, 175-190.
66. Seidenberg, M. S. (1999). Do infants learn grammar with algebra or statistics? Science, 284, 434-435.
67. Shelhamer, M., & Joiner, W. M. (2003). Saccades exhibit abrupt transition between reactive and predictive, predictive saccade sequences have long-term correlations. Journal of Neurophysiology, 90, 2763-2769.
68. Snow, R., O'Connor, B., Jurafsky, D., & Ng, A. Y. (2008). Cheap and fast but is it good? Evaluating non-expert annotations for natural language tasks. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP 2008).
69. Song, J. H., & Nakayama, K. (2009). Hidden cognitive states revealed in choice reaching tasks. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 360-366.
70. Sorokin, A., & Forsyth, D. (June, 2008). Utility data annotation with Amazon Mechanical Turk. Paper presented at the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW '08). doi:10.1109/CVPRW.2008.4562953
71. Spivey, M. J., Grosjean, M., & Knoblich, G. (2005). Continuous attraction toward phonological competitors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 10393-10398.
72. Stadler, M. A. (1989). On learning complex procedural knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 1061-1069.
73. Sutton, R. S., & Barto, A. G. (1998). Reinforcement learning: An introduction. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 9, 1054-1054.
74. Turk-Browne, N. B., Scholl, B. J., Johnson, M. K., & Chun, M. M. (2010). Implicit perceptual anticipation triggered by statistical learning. Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 11177-11187.
75. Van Orden, G. C., & Holden, J. G. (2002). Intentional contents and self-control. Ecological Psychology, 14, 87-109.
76. Wegner, D. M. (2003). The mind's best trick: How we experience conscious will. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 65-69.
77. Willingham, D. B. (1999). Implicit motor sequence learning is not purely perceptual. Memory & Cognition, 27, 561-572.
78. Willingham, D. B., & Goedert-Eschmann, K. (1999). The relation between implicit and explicit learning: Evidence for parallel development. Psychological Science, 10, 531-534. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00201
79. Willingham, D. B., Nissen, M. J., & Bullemer, P. (1989). On the development of procedural knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 1047-1060.
80. Wolpert, D. M., & Flanagan, J. R. (2001). Motor prediction. Current Biology, 11, 729-732.