Influence of vertical misfit of titanium and zirconia frameworks on peri-implant strain

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 529-536

  Abduo, Jaafar ^a   Swain, Michael ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Computer numeric controlled milling; Computer aided design computer assisted manufacture; Distortion; Framework fit; Strain gauge

Indexed keywords

DENTAL ALLOY; TITANIUM; ZIRCONIUM; ZIRCONIUM OXIDE;

ARTICLE; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL PROCEDURE; DIMENSIONAL MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; HUMAN; JAW; MECHANICAL TORSION; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PROSTHESIS; TOOTH IMPLANT; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ALVEOLAR PROCESS; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL ALLOYS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; DIMENSIONAL MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; HUMANS; PROSTHESIS FITTING; TITANIUM; TORSION, MECHANICAL; ZIRCONIUM;

EID: 84871690978     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Taylor TD. Prosthodontic problems and limitations associated with osseointegration. J Prosthet Dent 1998;79: 74-78.
2. Schwarz MS. Mechanical complications of dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11: 156-158.
3. Skalak R. Biomechanical considerations in osseointegrated prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 1983;49: 843-848.
4. Brånemark PI. Osseointegration and its experimental background. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50: 399-410.
5. Carr AB. Comparison of impression techniques for a two-implant 15-degree divergent model. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;7: 468-475.
6. Del’Acqua MA, Arioli-Filho JN, Compagnoni MA, Mollo Fde A Jr. Accuracy of impression and pouring techniques for an implant-supported prosthesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008;23: 226-236.
7. Romero GG, Engelmeier R, Powers JM, Canterbury AA. Accuracy of three corrective techniques for implant bar fabrication. J Prosthet Dent 2000;84: 602-607.
8. Takahashi T, Gunne J. Fit of implant frameworks: An in vitro comparison between two fabrication techniques. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89: 256-260.
9. Sartori IA, Ribeiro RF, Francischone CE, de Mattos Mda G. In vitro comparative analysis of the fit of gold alloy or commercially pure titanium implant-supported prostheses before and after electroerosion. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92: 132-138.
10. Jemt T. Failures and complications in 391 consecutively inserted fixed prostheses supported by Brånemark implants in edentulous jaws: A study of treatment from the time of prosthesis placement to the first annual checkup. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991;6: 270-276.
11. Karl M, Rosch S, Graef F, Taylor TD, Heckmann SM. Strain situation after fixation of three-unit ceramic veneered implant superstructures. Implant Dent 2005;14: 157-165.
12. Karl M, Winter W, Taylor TD, Heckmann SM. In vitro study on passive fit in implant-supported 5-unit fixed partial dentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19: 30-37.
13. Sahin S, Cehreli MC. The significance of passive framework fit in implant prosthodontics: Current status. Implant Dent 2001;10: 85-92.
14. Ortorp A, Jemt T, Back T, Jalevik T. Comparisons of precision of fit between cast and CNC-milled titanium implant frameworks for the edentulous mandible. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16: 194-200.
15. Ortorp A, Jemt T. CNC-milled titanium frameworks supported by implants in the edentulous jaw: A 10-year comparative clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2012 Mar;14(1): 88-99. Epub 2009 Aug 17.
16. Abduo J, Lyons K, Waddell N, Bennani V, Swain M. A comparison of fit of CNC-milled titanium and zirconia frameworks to implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2011 Mar 17. [Epub ahead of print]
17. Ichim I, Swain M, Kieser JA. Mandibular biomechanics and development of the human chin. J Dent Res 2006;85: 638-642.
18. Ichim I, Swain MV, Kieser JA. Mandibular stiffness in humans: Numerical predictions. J Biomech 2006;39: 1903-1913.
19. Lekholm U, Zarb GA. Patient selection and preparation. In: Brånemark PI, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T (eds). Tissue-Integrated Prostheses: Osseointegration in Clinical Dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence, 1985: 199.
20. Ishigaki S, Nakano T, Yamada S, Nakamura T, Takashima F. Biomechanical stress in bone surrounding an implant under simulated chewing. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14: 97-102.
21. Duyck J, Ronold HJ, Van Oosterwyck H, Naert I, Vander Sloten J, Ellingsen JE. The influence of static and dynamic loading on marginal bone reactions around osseointegrated implants: An animal experimental study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12: 207-218.
22. White GE. Osseointegrated Dental Technology. Chicago: Quintessence, 1993: 95-129.
23. Clelland NL, Papazoglou E, Carr AB, Gilat A. Comparison of strains transferred to a bone simulant among implant overdenture bars with various levels of misfit. J Prosthodont 1995;4: 243-250.
24. Hegde R, Lemons JE, Broome JC, McCracken MS. Validation of strain gauges as a method of measuring precision of fit of implant bars. Implant Dent 2009;18: 151-161.
25. Millington ND, Leung T. Inaccurate fit of implant superstructure. Part 1: Stresses generated on the superstructure relative to the size of fit discrepancy. Int J Prosthodont 1995;8: 511-516.
26. Lindstrom H, Preiskel H. The implant-supported telescopic prosthesis: A biomechanical analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001; 16: 34-42.
27. Abreu RT, Spazzin AO, Noritomi PY, Consani RLX, Mesquita MF. Influence of material of overdenture-retaining bar with vertical misfit on three-dimensional stress distribution. J Prosthodont 2010;19: 425-431.
28. Natali AN, Pavan PG, Ruggero AL. Evaluation of stress induced in peri-implant bone tissue by misfit in multi-implant prosthesis. Dent Mater 2006;22: 388-395.
29. Kunii J, Hotta Y, Tamaki Y, et al. Effect of sintering on the marginal and internal fit of CAD/CAM-fabricated zirconia frameworks. Dent Mater J 2007;26: 820-826.
30. Winter W, Mohrle S, Holst S, Karl M. Bone loading caused by different types of misfits of implant-supported fixed dental prostheses: A three-dimensional finite element analysis based on experimental results. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010;25: 947-952.
31. al-Turki LE, Chai J, Lautenschlager EP, Hutten MC. Changes in prosthetic screw stability because of misfit of implant-supported prostheses. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15: 38-42.
32. Carr AB, Gerard DA, Larsen PE. The response of bone in primates around unloaded dental implants supporting prostheses with different levels of fit. J Prosthet Dent 1996;76: 500-509.
33. Jemt T, Lekholm U, Johansson CB. Bone response to implantsupported frameworks with differing degrees of misfit preload: In vivo study in rabbits. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2000;2: 129-137.
34. Frost HM. Perspectives: Bone’s mechanical usage windows. Bone Miner 1992;19: 257-271.
35. Kunavisarut C, Lang LA, Stoner BR, Felton DA. Finite element analysis on dental implant-supported prostheses without passive fit. J Prosthodont 2002;11: 30-40.
36. Jansen VK, Conrads G, Richter EJ. Microbial leakage and marginal fit of the implant-abutment interface. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12: 527-540.