Creating an individualised learning situation using scaffolding in a tangible electronic series completion task

Educational and Child Psychology

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 85-100

  Henning, Julia R ^b   Verhaegh, Janneke ^b   Resing, Wilma C M ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Dynamic assessment; Electronic tangible interface; Scaffolding; Series completion

Indexed keywords

EID: 84871419342     PISSN: 02671611     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Brush, T. & Saye, J.W. (2002). A summary of research exploring hard and soft scaffolding for teachers and students using a multimedia supported learning environment. The Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 1(2), 1-12.
2. Campione, J.C. & Brown A.L. (1987). Linking dynamic assessment with school achievement. In C.S. Lidz (Ed.), Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluating learning potential (pp.82-115). New York: The Guilford Press.
3. Elliott, J.G. (2003). Dynamic assessment in educational settings: Realising potential. Educational Review, 55, 15-32.
4. Elliott, J.G., Grigorenko, E.G. & Resing, W.C.M. (2010). Dynamic assessment: The need for a dynamic approach. In B. McGaw, P. Peterson & E. Baker (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of education, Volume 3 (3rd ed., pp.220-225). New York: Elsevier.
5. Fabio, R.A. (2005). Dynamic assessment of intelligence is a better reply to adaptive behaviour and cognitive plasticity. The Journal of General Psychology, 132, 41-64. (Pubitemid 40166980)
6. Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. London: Sage.
7. Fisch, S.M. (2005). Making educational computer games 'educational'. Interaction Design and Children 2005 Conference (pp.56-61), New York: ACM Press.
8. Granott, N. (2005). Scaffolding dynamically towards change. Previous and new perspectives. New Ideas in Psychology, 23, 140-151. (Pubitemid 44350076)
9. Jeltova, I. Birney, D., Fredine, N., Jarvin, L., Sternberg, R.J., Grigorenko, E. L. (2007). Dynamic assessment as a process-oriented assessment in educational settings. Advances in Speech-Language Pathology, 9, 1-13.
10. Kao, M., Lehman, J., & Cennamo, K. (1996). Scaffolding in hypermedia assisted instruction: An example of integration. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Indianapolis.
11. Lumpe, A.T. & Butler, K. (2002). The information seeking strategies of high school science students. Research in Science Education, 32, 549-556.
12. Malone, T.W. & Lepper, M.R. (1987). Making learning fun: A taxonomy of intrinsic motivations for learning. Aptitude, Learning and Instruction, 3, 223-253.
13. Renninger, K.A. & Granott, N. (2005). The process of scaffolding in learning and development. New Ideas in Psychology, 23, 111-114. (Pubitemid 44350078)
14. Resing, W.C.M. (2000). Assessing the learning potential for inductive reasoning in young children. In C.S. Lidz & J.G. Elliott (Eds.), Advances in cognition and educational practice. Vol 6. Dynamic Assessment: Prevailing models and applications (pp.229-262). New York: Elsevier.
15. Resing, W.C.M., De Jong, F.J., Bosma, T. & Tunteler, E. (2009). Learning during dynamic testing: Variability in strategy use by indigenous and ethnic minority children. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 8, 22-37.
16. Resing, W.C.M., & Elliott, J.G. (in press). Dynamic testing with tangible electronics: Measuring children's change in strategy use with a series completion task. British Journal of Educational Psychology.
17. Serious Toys (2009). www.serioustoys.com.
18. Simon, H.A., & Kotovsky, K. (1963). Human acquisition of concepts for sequential patterns. Psychological Review, 70(6), 534-546.
19. Sternberg, R.J. & Gardner, M.K. (1983). Unities in inductive reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 112, 80-116.
20. Sternberg, R.J. & Grigorenko, E.L. (2002). Dynamic testing: The nature and measurement of learning potential. New York: Cambridge University Press.
21. Verhaegh, J., Fontijn, W.F.J., Aarts, E., Boer, L. & Van de Wouw, D. (2009). Creating a development support bubble for children. In M. Tscheligi et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of 3rd European Conference on Ambient Intelligence, AmI 2009, LNCS 5859 (pp.186-195), 2009. Springer-Verlag Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany.
22. Verhaegh, J., Fontijn, W.F.J., Aarts, E., Boer, L. & Van de Wouw, D. (2011). A development support bubble for children. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Smart Environments, 3(1), 27-35.
23. Verhaegh, J., Fontijn, W.F.J. & Hoonhout, H.C.M. (2007). TagTiles: Optimal challenge in educational electronics. In Proceedings of the 1st international Conference on Tangible and Embedded interaction (pp.187-190), New York: ACM Press. (Pubitemid 47482768)
24. Verhaegh, J., Fontijn, W.F.J. & Resing, W.C.M. (in prep.). Testing children's IQ with an electronic board: High correlation between intelligence test scores and electronic board task performance.
25. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
26. Wood, D. & Wood, H. (1996). Vygotsky, tutoring and learning. Oxford Review of Education, 22, 5-16. (Pubitemid 126509477)