Dynamic assessment in educational settings: Realising potential

Educational Review

Volumn 55, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 15-32

  Elliott, Julian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SUNDERLAND   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037301512     PISSN: 00131911     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00131910303253     Document Type: Article

References (92)

1. ADEY, P. & SHAYER, M. (1994) Really raising standards: cognitive intervention and academic achievement (London, Routledge).
2. BECKMANN, J. F. (2001) Zur validierung des Konstrukts des intellektuellen Veranderungspotentials [On validation of the concept of intellectual change potential] (Berlin, Logos).
3. BECKMANN, J. F. & GUTHKE, J. (1995) Complex problem solving, intelligence and learning ability, in: P. A. FRENSCH & J. FUNKE (Eds) Complex Problem Solving: The European Perspective (Hillsdale, NJ, Erlbaum).
4. BLAGG, N., BALLINGER, M. & GARDNER, R. (1988) Somerset thinking skills course handbook (+ 6 modules) (Oxford, Blackwell).
5. BROWN, A. L. & FRENCH, L. A. (1979) The zone of potential development: implications for intelligence testing in the year 2000, Intelligence, 3, pp. 255-273.
6. BUCHEL, F. P. & SCHARNHORST, U. (1993) The Learning Potential Assessment Device (LPAD): Discussion of theoretical and methodological problems, in: J. H. M. HAMERS, K. SIJTSMA & A. J. M. RUIJSSENAARS (Eds) Learning Potential Assessment (Amsterdam, Swets & Zeitlinger).
7. BUCHEL, F. P. SCHLATTER, C. & SCHARNHORST, U. (1997) Training and assessment of analogical reasoning in students with severe learning difficulties, Educational and Child Psychology, 14, pp. 109-120.
8. BUDOFF, M. (1968) Learning potential as a supplementary testing procedure, in: J. HELLMUTH (Ed.) Learning Disorders, Volume 3 (Seattle, WA, Special Child).
9. BUDOFF, M. (1987) The validity of learning potential assessment, in: C. S. LIDZ (Ed.) Dynamic Assessment: An Interactional Approach to evaluating learning potential (New York, Guilford Press).
10. CARLSON, J.S. & WIEDL, K.H. (2000) The Validity of Dynamic Assessment, in: C. S. LIDZ & J. G. ELLIOTT (Eds) Dynamic Assessment: Prevailing models and applications (New York, Elsevier).
11. DEUTSCH, R. & REYNOLDS, Y. (2000) The use of dynamic assessment by educational psychologists in the UK, Educational Psychology in Practice, 16, pp. 311-331.
12. ELLIOTT, J. G. (2000a) Dynamic assessment in educational contexts: purpose and promise, in: C. LIDZ & J. G. ELLIOTT (Eds) Dynamic Assessment: Prevailing models and applications (New York, J.A.I. Press).
13. ELLIOTT, J. G. (2000b) The psychological assessment of children with learning difficulties, British Journal of Special Education, 27, pp. 59-66.
14. ELLIOTT, J. G. (2001) All testing is dynamic: a response to Sternberg and Grigorenko. Issues in Education, 7, pp. 185-191.
15. ELLIOTT, J. G. & LAUCHLAN, F. (1997) Assessing Potential-the search for the philosopher's stone? Educational and Child Psychology, 14, pp. 6-16.
16. ELLIOTT, J. G. & LAUCHLAN, F. (2000) Some perceptions of the links between educational psychologists' assessment and special needs intervention and resourcing in the London Borough of Castleton (pseudonym). Unpublished report (University of Sunderland, School of Education).
17. EMBRETSON, S. E. (1987) Towards development of a psychometric approach, in: C. S. LIDZ (Ed.) Dynamic Assessment: An Interactional Approach to evaluating learning potential (New York, Guilford Press).
18. FERNANDEZ-BALLESTEROS, R. & CALERO, M.D. (1993) Measuring learning potential, International Journal of Cognitive Education & Mediated Learning, 3, pp. 9-21.
19. FERNANDEZ-BALLESTEROS, R. & CALERO, M.D. (2000) The Assessment of Learning Potential: The EPA Instrument, in: C. S. LIDZ & J. G. ELLIOTT (Eds) Dynamic Assessment: Prevailing models and applications (New York, Elsevier).
20. FEUERSTEIN, R., RAND, Y. & HOFFMAN, M. B. (1979) The Dynamic Assessment of Retarded Performers: The Learning Potential Assessment Device, Theory, Instruments and Techniques (Baltimore, University Park Press).
21. FEUERSTEIN, R., RAND, Y., HOFFMAN, M.B. & MILLER, R. (1980) Instrumental Enrichment: An Intervention Program for Cognitive Modifiability (Baltimore, University Park Press).
22. FEUERSTEIN, R. FEUERSTEIN, R. & GROSS, S. (1997) The Learning Potential Assessment Device, in: D. P. FLANAGAN, J. L. GENSHAFT & P. L. HARRISON (Eds) Contemporary Intellectual Assessment: Theories, Tests and Issues (New York, Guilford Press).
23. FIGG, J. Y. (2002) Dynamic assessment and educational intervention, Paper presented at the Tenth International Conference on Thinking (June), Harrogate.
24. FLANAGAN, D. P. & McGREW, K. S. (1997) A cross-battery approach to assessing and interpreting cognitive abilities: narrowing the gap between practice and cognitive science, in: D. P. FLANAGAN, J. L. GENSHAFT & P. L. HARRISON (Eds) Contemporary Intellectual Assessment: Theories, Tests and Issues (New York, Guilford Press).
25. FREEMAN, L. & MILLER, A. (2001) Norm-referenced, criterion-referenced, and dynamic asssessment: what exactly is the point?, Educational Psychology in Practice, 17, pp. 3-16.
26. FUCHS, D., FUCHS, L. S., BENOWITZ, S. & BARRINGER, K. (1987) Norm-referenced tests: Are they valid for use with handicapped students?, Exceptional Children, 54, pp. 263-271.
27. GERBER, M. M. (2000). Dynamic assessment for students with learning disabilities: Lessons in theory and design, in: C. S. LIDZ & J. G. ELLIOTT (Eds) Dynamic Assessment: Prevailing models and applications (New York, Elsevier).
28. GIPPS, C. (1999). Socio-cultural aspects of assessment, in: A. IRAN-NEJAD & P. D. PEARSON (Eds) Review of Research in Education, Volume 24 (Washington, American Educational Research Association).
29. GREENBERG, K. H. (2000) Inside professional practice: A collaborative systems orientation to linking dynamic assessment and intervention, in: C. S. LIDZ & J. G. ELLIOTT (Eds) Dynamic Assessment: Prevailing models and applications (New York, Elsevier).
30. GRIGORENKO, E. L. & STERNBERG, R. J. (1998) Dynamic Testing, Psychological Bulletin, 124, pp. 75-111.
31. GUTHKE, J. & BECKMANN, J. F. (2000a) The Learning Concept: Application and Practice, in: C. S. LIDZ & J. G. ELLIOTT (Eds) Dynamic Assessment: Prevailing models and applications (New York, Elsevier).
32. GUTHKE, J. & BECKMANN, J.F. (2000b) The learning test concept and dynamic assessment, in: A. KOZULIN & Y. RAND (Eds) Experience of mediated learning: An impact of Feuerstein's theory in education and psychology (Oxford, Elsevier).
33. GUTHKE, J. & BECKMANN, J. F. (2003) Dynamic assessment with diagnostic programs, in: R. J. STERNBERG, J. LAUTREY & T. I. LUBART (Eds) Models of Intelligence for the new millenium (Washington DC, American Psychological Society) (to appear in 2003).
34. GUTHKE, J., BECKMANN, J. F. & DOBAT, H. (1997) Dynamic testing-problems, uses, trends and evidence of validity, Educational and Child Psychology, 14, pp. 17-32.
35. GUTHKE, J., BECKMANN, J. F., STEIN, H., VAHLE, H. & RITTNER, S. (1995) Adaptive Computergestutzte Intelligenz-Lerntestbatterie (ACIL) [The Adaptive, Computer-Assisted Intelligence Learning Test Battery] (Modlingen, Schuhfried GmbH).
36. GUTHKE, J. & GITTER, K. (1991) Prognose der Schulleistungsentwicklung mittels Status- und Lerntests in der Vorschulzeit [Predicting school achievement by means of static and learning tests applied to preschoolers], in: H. TEICHMANN, B. MEYER-PROBST & D. ROETHER (Eds) Risikobewaeltigung in der lebenlangen psychischen Entwicklung (Berlin, Verlag Gesundheit).
37. GUTHKE, J., HARNISCH, A. & CARUSO, D. (1986) The diagnostic program of 'syntactical rule and vocabulary acquisition'-a contribution to the psychodiagnostics of foreign language learning ability, in: F. KLIX & H. HAGENDORF (Eds) Human Memory and Cognitive Capabilities (Amsterdam, North Holland).
38. GUTHKE, J. & STEIN, H. (1996) Are learning tests the better version of intelligence tests?, European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 12, pp. 1-13.
39. GUTHKE, J. & WIEDL, K. H. (1996) Dynamisches Testen. Zur Psychdiagnostik der Intraindivduellen Variabilitat [Dynamic Assessment. On psychodiagnosis of intraindividual variability] (Gottingen, Hogrefe).
40. GUTHKE, J. & WINGENFIELD, S. (1992) The learning test concept: Origins, state of the art, and trends, in: H. C. HAYWOOD & D. TZURIEL (Eds) Interactive Assessment (New York, Springer).
41. HAMERS, J. H. M., HESSELS, M. G. & VAN LUIT, J. E. H. (1991) The Learning Potential Test for Ethnic Minorities. Test and Manual (Lisse, Swets & Zeitlinger).
42. HAMERS, J. H. M., DE KONING, E. & RUIJSSENAARS, A. J. J. M. (1997) A diagnostic programme as learning potential assessment procedure, Educational and Child Psychology, 14, pp. 46-55.
43. HAMERS, J. H. M., PENNINGS, A. H. & GUTHKE, J. (1994) Training-based assessment of school achievement, Learning and Instruction, 4, pp. 347-360.
44. HAYWOOD, H. C. (1993) Interactive assessment: Assessment of learning potential, school learning, and adaptive behavior. Ninth Annual Learning Disorders Conference, Harvard University, Graduate School of Education, Cambridge, MA.
45. HAYWOOD, H. C. (2001) What is Dynamic 'Testing': A response to Sternberg and Grigorenko, Issues in Education, 7, pp. 201-210.
46. HAYWOOD, H. C., BROWN, A. L. & WINGENFELD, S. (1990) Dynamic approaches to psychoeducational assessment, School Psychology Review, 19, pp. 411-422.
47. HESSELS, M. G. (1997) Low IQ but high learning potential: Why Zeyneb and Moussa do not belong in special education, Educational and Child Psychology, 14, pp. 121-136.
48. HESSELS, M. G. (2000) The Learning Potential Test for Ethnic Minorities (LEM): A Tool for Standardized Assessment of Children in Kindergarten and the First Years of Primary School, in: C. S. LIDZ & J. G. ELLIOTT (Eds) Dynamic Assessment: Prevailing models and applications (New York, Elsevier).
49. HESSELS, M. G. & HESSELS-SCHLATTER, C. (2002) Learning potential in immigrant children in two countries: the Dutch and Swiss-French version of the Learning potential test for Ethnic Minorities, in: D. G. M. VAN DER AALSVOORT, W. C. M. RESING & A. J. J. M. RUIJSSENAARS, Learning potential assessment and cognitive training. Actual research and perspectives in theory building and methodology (Greenwich, CT, JAI Press).
50. HESSELS-SCHLATTER, C. (submitted) Enhancement of inductive reasoning in persons with severe impairments.
51. HESSELS-SCHLATTER, C. (2002) A dynamic test to assess learning capacity in people with severe impairments, American Journal of Mental Retardation, 107, pp. 340-351.
52. JENSEN, M. R. (2003) Mediating knowledge construction: Towards a dynamic model of assessment and learning, Educational and Child Psychology.
53. th edn (Pacific Grove, CA, Brooks/Cole).
54. KLAUER, K. J. & PHYE, G. D. (1995) Cognitive Training for Children (Seattle, Hogrefe and Huber Publishers).
55. LAUCHLAN, F. & ELLIOTT, J. G. (2001) The psychological assessment of learning potential, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, pp. 647-665.
56. LIDZ, C. S. (1991) Practitioner's Guide to Dynamic Assessment (New York, Guilford Press).
57. LIDZ, C. S. (1992) Dynamic assessment: some thoughts on the model, the medium and the message, in: J. S. CARLSON (Ed.) Advances in Cognition and Educational Practice, Vol. 1: Theoretical Issues: Intelligence, cognition and Assessment (Greenwich, CT, JAI Press).
58. LIDZ, C. S. (1997a) Dynamic assessment approaches, in: D. P. FLANAGAN, J. L. GENSHAFT and P. L. HARRISON (Eds) Contemporary Intellectual Assessment: Theories, Tests and Issues (New York, Guilford Press).
59. LIDZ, C. S. (1997b) Dynamic assessment: psychoeducational assessment with cultural sensitivity, Journal of Social Distress and the Homeless, 6, pp. 95-111.
60. LIDZ, C. S. (2000) The Application of Cognitive Functions Scale (ACFS): An Example of Curriculum-Based Dynamic Assessment, in: C. S. LIDZ & J. G. ELLIOTT (Eds) Dynamic Assessment: Prevailing models and applications (New York, Elsevier).
61. LIDZ, C. S. & ELLIOTT, J. G. (Eds) (2000) Dynamic Assessment: Prevailing models and applications (New York, Elsevier).
62. LIDZ, C. S. & JEPSEN, R. H. (1997) Application of Cognitive Functions Scale Administration Manual, Unpublished document.
63. LOPEZ, E. C. (1997) The cognitive assessment of limited English proficient and bilingual children, in: D. P. FLANAGAN, J. L. GENSHAFT & P. L. HARRISON (Eds) Contemporary Intellectual Assessment: Theories, Tests and Issues (New York, Guilford Press).
64. McGREW, K. S. (1994) Clinical interpretation of the Woodcock-Johnson-Revised Tests of Cognitive Ability-Revised (Boston, MA, Allyn & Bacon).
65. McGUINNESS, C. (1999) From thinking skills to thinking classrooms: a review and evaluation of approaches for developing pupils' thinking. DfEE Research Report RR115 (Norwich, HMSO).
66. MILLER, L., GILLAM, R. B. & PENA, E. D. (2002) Dynamic Assessment & Intervention: Improving Children's Narrative Abilities (Austin, TX, Pro-Ed Publishing).
67. RESCHLY, D. J. (1997) Diagnostic and treatment utility of intelligence tests, in: D. P. FLANAGAN, J. L. GENSHAFT & P. L. HARRISON (Eds) Contemporary Intellectual Assessment: Theories, Tests and Issues (New York, Guilford Press).
68. RESCHLY, D. J. (1988) Special education reform: school psychology revolution, School Psychology Review, 17, pp. 459-475.
69. RESING, W. (1997) Learning potential assessment: The alternative for measuring intelligence?, Educational and Child Psychology, 14, pp. 68-82.
70. RESING, W. (2000) Assessing the Learning Potential for Inductive Reasoning in Young Children, in: C. S. LIDZ & J. G. ELLIOTT (Eds) Dynamic Assessment: Prevailing models and applications (New York, Elsevier).
71. ROBINSON-ZANARTU, C. A. & AGANZA, J. S. (2000) Dynamic Assessment and Sociocultural Context: Assessing the Whole Child, in: C. S. LIDZ & J. G. ELLIOTT (Eds) Dynamic Assessment: Prevailing models and applications (New York, Elsevier).
72. ROSENTHAL, R. & JACOBSON, L. (1968) Pygmalion in the Classroom (New York, Holt, Rinehart & Winston).
73. SAMUELS, M, TZURIEL, D. & MALLOY-MILLER, T. (1989). Dynamic assessment of children with learning difficulties, in: R. T. BROWN & M. CHAZAN (Eds) Learning difficulties and emotional problems (Calgary, AB, Detselig Enterprises).
74. SCHLATTER, C. & BUCHEL, F. (2000) Detecting reasoning abilities of persons with moderate mental retardation: The Analogical Reasoning Learning Test (ARLT), in: C. S. LIDZ & J. G. ELLIOTT (Eds) Dynamic Assessment: Prevailing models and applications (New York, Elsevier).
75. SNOW, R. E. (1990) Progress and propaganda in learning assessment, Contemporary Psychology, 35, pp. 1134-1136.
76. STERNBERG, R. J. & GRIGORENKO, E. L. (2001a) All Testing is Dynamic Testing, Issues in Education, 7, pp. 137-170.
77. STERNBERG, R. J. GRIGORENKO, E. L. (2001b) The truth can now be told: This whole exchange is one big dynamic test!, Issues in Education, 7, pp. 251-260.
78. STERNBERG, R. J. GRIGORENKO, E. L. (2002) Dynamic Testing (New York, Cambridge University Press).
79. STERNBERG, R. J. GRIGORENKO, E. C., NGROSHO, D., TANTUFUYE, E., MBISE, A., NOKES, C., JUKES, M. & BUNDY, D. A. (2003). Assessing intellectual potential in rural Tanzanian school children, Intelligence (in press).
80. SWANSON, H. L. (1995) Using the cognitive processing test to assess ability: development of a dynamic assessment measure, School Psychology Review, 24, pp. 672-693.
81. SWANSON, H. L. (2000). Swanson-Cognitive Processing Test: Review and Applications, in: C. S. LIDZ & J. G. ELLIOTT (Eds) Dynamic Assessment: Prevailing models and applications (New York, Elsevier).
82. SWANSON, H. L. & LUSSIER, C. M. (2001) A selective synthesis of the experimental literature on dynamic assessment, Review of Educational Research, 71, pp. 321-349.
83. THORNDIKE, R. M. (1997) The early history of intelligence testing, in: D. P. FLANAGAN, J. L. GENSHAFT & P. L. HARRISON (Eds) Contemporary Intellectual Assessment: Theories, Tests and Issues (New York, Guilford Press).
84. TZURIEL, D. (1992) The dynamic testing approach: A reply to Frisby and Braden, The Journal of Special Education, 26, pp. 302-324.
85. TZURIEL, D. (1995) The Cognitive Modifiability Battery, (CMB): Assessment and Intervention Instruction Manual (School of Education, Bar Ilan University).
86. TZURIEL, D. (2000) The Cognitive Modifiability Battery (CMB): Assessment and Intervention, in: C. S. LIDZ & J. G. ELLIOTT (Eds) Dynamic Assessment: Prevailing models and applications (New York, Elsevier).
87. TZURIEL, D. (2001) Dynamic assessment of young children (New York, Kluwer).
88. TZURIEL, D. & SHAMIR, A. (2001) Computer-assisted dynamic assessment of seriational thinking, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18, pp. 21-32.
89. VYGOTSKY, L. (1978) Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes (Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press).
90. VAUGHT, S. R. & HAYWOOD, H. C. (1990) Interjudge agreement in dynamic assessment: Two instruments from the Learning Potential Assessment Device, The Thinking Teacher, 5, pp. 1-6, 11-13.
91. WAGNER, R. & STERNBERG, R. J. (1984) Alternative conceptions of intelligence and their implications for education, Review of Educational Research, 54, pp. 179-223.
92. rd edn (San Antonio, TX, Psychological Corporation).