How to improve housing conditions of laboratory animals: The possibilities of environmental refinement

Veterinary Journal

Volumn 195, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 24-32

  Baumans, V ^a   Van Loo, P L P ^b  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b TNO   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Animal welfare; Environmental refinement; Housing conditions; Laboratory animals; Standardisation

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL HOUSING; ANIMAL TESTING REFINEMENT; ANIMAL WELFARE; ANIMAL WELLBEING; CAT; DOG; ENVIRONMENTAL ENRICHMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; ETHICS; EXPERIMENTAL ANIMAL; GERBIL; GUINEA PIG; HAMSTER; INTEGRATION; NONHUMAN; PHYSIOLOGY; PRIMATE; RABBIT; REVIEW; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION; VETERINARY MEDICINE; ANIMAL; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; STANDARDS;

ANIMALIA;

ANIMAL WELFARE; ANIMALS; ANIMALS, LABORATORY; HOUSING, ANIMAL; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84871413039     PISSN: 10900233     EISSN: 15322971     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2012.09.023     Document Type: Review

References (82)

1. Augustsson H., Van de Weerd H.A., Kruitwagen C.L.J.J., Baumans V. Effect of enrichment on variation and results in the light/dark test. Laboratory Animals 2003, 37:328-340.
2. Baumans V., Schlingmann F., Vonck M., Van Lith H.A. Individually ventilated cages: Beneficial for mice and man?. Contemporary Topics 2002, 41:13-19.
3. Baumans V. Environmental enrichment for laboratory rodents and rabbits: Requirements of rodents, rabbits and research. ILAR Journal 2005, 46:162-170.
4. Baumans, V., 2010a. The impact of the environment on laboratory animals. In: Animal models as tools in ethical biomedical research, Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo, Brazil, pp. 15-23.
5. Baumans V., Augustsson H., Perretta G. Animal needs and environmental refinement. Refinement, Reduction and Research 2010, 75-100. CRC Press, London. B. Howard, T. Nevalainen, G. Perretta (Eds.).
6. Baumans V., Van Loo P.L.P., Pham T.M. Standardisation of environmental enrichment for laboratory mice and rats: Utilisation, practicality and variation in experimental results. Scandinavian Journal of Laboratory Animal Science 2010, 37:1-14.
7. Baumans V. The laboratory mouse. UFAW Handbook on the Care and Management of Laboratory Animals 2010, 276-310. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, UK. Eighth Ed.
8. Bechard A., Meagher R., Mason G. Environmental enrichment reduces the likelihood of alopecia in adult C57BL/6J mice. Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science 2011, 50:171-174.
9. Benefiel A.C., Greenough W.T. Effects of experience and environment on the developing and mature brain: Implications for laboratory animal housing. ILAR Journal 1998, 39:5-11.
10. Berdoy, M., 2002. The Laboratory Rat: A Natural History. Oxford University. (accessed 25 September 2012). http://ratlife.org.
11. Buchanan-Smith H.M. Marmosets and tamarins. UFAW Handbook on the Care and Management of Laboratory Animals 2010, 543-563. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, UK. Eighth Ed.
12. Council of Europe, 2009. European Convention ETS 123 for the Protection of Animals Used for Experimental and other Scientific Purposes (revised 2007) Appendix A.
13. Crabbe J.C., Wahlsten D., Dudek B.C. Genetics of mouse behavior: Interacitons with laboratory environment. Science 1999, 284:1670-1672.
14. Eskola S., Lauhikari M., Voipio H.M., Laitinen M., Nevalainen T. Environmental enrichment may alter the number of rats needed to achieve statistical significance. Scandinavian Journal of Laboratory Animal Science 1999, 26:134-144.
15. European Directive 2010/63/EU (86/609/EEC) for the Protection of Animals used for Experimental and other Scientific Purposes (revised 2010) Annex III.
16. FELASA (Federation of European Laboratory Animal Science Associations), 2006. Working Group Standardization of Enrichment, Working Group Report. (accessed 22 February 2012). http://www.lal.org.uk/pdffiles/FELASA_Enrichment_2006.pdf.
17. Gross A.N., Engel A.K., Richter S.H., Garner J.P., Wuerbel H. Cage-induced stereotypies in female ICR CD-1 mice do not correlate with recurrent perseveration. Behavioral Brain Research 2011, 216:613-620.
18. Hawkins P., Morton D.B., Burman O., Dennison N., Honess P., Jennings M., Lane S., Middleton V., Roughan J.V., Wells S., Westwood K. A guide to defining and implementing protocols for the welfare assessment of laboratory animals: 11th report of the BVAAWF/FRAME/RSPCA/UFAW Joint Working Group on Refinement. Laboratory Animals 2011, 45:1-13.
19. Hoglund A.U., Renstroem A. Evaluation of individually ventilated cage systems for laboratory rodents: Cage environment and animal health aspects. Laboratory Animals 2001, 35:51-70.
20. Holtz W. Pigs and mini pigs. UFAW Handbook on the Care and Management of Laboratory Animals 2010, 473-494. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, UK. Eighth Ed.
21. Hubrecht R.C. Comfortable quarters for dogs in research institutions. Comfortable Quarters for Laboratory Animals 2002, 56-64. Animal Welfare Institute, Washington. Ninth Ed. V. Reinhardt, A. Reinhardt (Eds.).
22. Hubrecht R.C. Enrichment: Animal welfare and experimental outcomes. UFAW Handbook on the Care and Management of Laboratory Animals 2010, 136-146. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, UK. Eighth Ed.
23. Hurst J.L. Introduction to rodents. UFAW Handbook on the Care and Management of Laboratory Animals 1999, 262-273. Blackwell Science Ltd., Oxford, UK. Seventh Ed.
24. Hutchinson E., Avery A., VandeWoude S. Environmental enrichment for laboratory rodents. ILAR Journal 2005, 46:148-161.
25. Jeong Y.H., Kim J.M., Lee S.H., Kim H.S., Suh Y.H. Environmental enrichment compensates for the effects of stress on disease progression in Tg2576 mice, an Alzheimer's disease model. Journal of Neurochemistry 2011, 119:1282-1293.
26. JWGR (Joint Working Group on Refinement) Refinements in husbandry, care and common procedures for non-human primates. 9th report of the BVAAWF/FRAME/RSPCA/UFAW Joint Working Group on Refinement. Laboratory Animals 2009, 43:1-47.
27. Kaiser S., Krueger C., Sachser N. The guinea pig. UFAW Handbook on the Care and Management of Laboratory Animals 2010, 380-398. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, UK. Eighth Ed.
28. Krohn, T.C., 2002. Method developments and assessments of animal welfare in IVC systems. Thesis the Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
29. Krohn T.C., Hansen A.K., Dragsted N. The impact of cage ventilation on rats housed in IVC systems. Laboratory Animals 2003, 37:85-93.
30. Krohn T.C., Salling B., Kornerup Hansen A. How do rats respond to playing radio in the animal facility?. Laboratory Animals 2011, 45:141-144.
31. Kulesskaya N., Rauvala H., Voikar V. Evaluation of social and physical enrichment in modulation of behavioural phenotype in C57BL/6J female mice. PLoS ONE 2011, 6:e24755.
32. Ladewig J. Chronic intermittent stress: a model for the study of long-term stressors. The Biology of Animal Stress 2000, 159-169. CAB International, Oxon, UK.
33. Latham N., Mason G. From house mouse to mouse house: The behavioural biology of free-living Mus musculus and its implications in the laboratory. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 2004, 86:251-289.
34. Lidfors L., Edstroem T. The laboratory rabbit. UFAW Handbook on the Care and Management of Laboratory Animals 2010, 399-417. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, UK. Eighth Ed.
35. Lipman N.S. Isolator rodent caging systems (state of the art): A critical view. Contemporary Topics in Laboratory Animal Science 1999, 38:9-17.
36. Lloyd M.H., Foden B.W., Wolfensohn S.E. Refinement: Promoting the three Rs in practice. Laboratory Animals 2008, 42:284-293.
37. Lutz C.K., Novak M.A. Environmental enrichment for nonhuman primates: Theory and application. ILAR Journal 2005, 46:178-191.
38. Manser C.E., Broom D.M., Overend P., Morris T.H. Operant studies to determine the strength of preference in laboratory rats for nest-boxes and nesting materials. Laboratory Animals 1998, 32:36-41.
39. Mattson M.P., Duan W., Lee J., Guo Z. Suppression of brain aging and neurodegenerative disorders by dietary restriction and environmental enrichment: Molecular mechanisms. Mechanisms of Ageing and Development 2001, 122:757.
40. McCune S. The domestic cat. UFAW Handbook on the Care and Management of Laboratory Animals 2010, 454-472. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, UK. Eighth Ed.
41. Mering S., Kaliste-Korhonen E., Nevalainen T. Estimates of appropriate number of rats: Interaction with housing environment. Laboratory Animals 2001, 35:80-90.
42. Mikkelsen L.F., Sorensen D.B., Krohn T., Lauritzen B., Dragstedt N., Hansen A.K., Ottesen J.L. Clinical pathology and cardiovascular paprmeters are not influenced by housing rats under increased environmental complexity. AnimalWelfare 2010, 19:449-460.
43. Mohammed A.H., Zhu S.W., Darmopil S., Hjerling-Leffler J., Ernfors P., Winblad B., Diamond M.C., Eriksson P.S., Bogdanovich N. Environmental enrichment and the brain. Progress in Brain Research 2002, 138. Elsevier Science BV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
44. Morton D.B. Refinements in rabbit husbandry-Second report of the BVAAWF/FRAME/RSPCA/UFAW Joint Working Group on Refinement (JWGR). Laboratory Animals 1993, 27:301-329.
45. NRC (National Research Council) Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals 2011, The National Academies Press, Washington, DC. Eighth Ed.
46. Newberry R.C. Environmental enrichment: Increasing the biological relevance of captive environments. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 1995, 44:229-243.
47. Olsson I.A.S., Dahlborn K. Improving housing conditions for laboratory mice: A review of 'environmental enrichment'. Laboratory Animals 2002, 3:243-270.
48. Olsson I.A.S., Nevison C.M., Patterson-Kane E.G., Sherwin C.M., Van de Weerd H.A., Würbel H. Understanding behaviour: The relevance of ethological approaches in laboratory animal science. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 2003, 81:245-264.
49. Olsson I.A.S., Westlund K. More than numbers matter: The effect of social factors on behaviour and welfare of laboratory rodents and non-human primates. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 2007, 103:229-254.
50. Ottesen J.L., Weber A., Gürtler H., Mikkelsen L.F. New housing conditions: Improving the welfare of experimental animals. ATLA Alternatives to Laboratory Animals 2004, 32:397-404.
51. Pasalic I., Bosnjak B., Ivetic Tkalcevic V., Seveljevic Jaran D., Javorscak Z., Markovic D., Hrvacic B. Cage enrichment with paper tissue, but not plastic tunnels, increases variability in mouse model of asthma. Laboratory Animals 2011, 45:121-123.
52. Poole T.B. Happy animals make good science. Laboratory Animals 1997, 31:116-124.
53. Poole T.B. Meeting a mammal's psychological needs: Basic principles. Second Nature: Environmental Enrichment for Captive Animals 1998, 94. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, USA.
54. Ras T., Van de Ven M., Patterson-Kane E.G., Nelson K. Rats' preferences for corn versus wood-based bedding and nesting materials. Laboratory Animals 2002, 36:420-425.
55. Reinhardt V. Comfortable Quarters for Laboratory Animals 2002, 65-77. Animal Welfare Institute, Washington, DC, USA. Ninth Ed.
56. Reinhardt V. Caring hands. Discussions by the Laboratory Animal Refinement and Enrichment Forum 2010, vol. 2. Animal Welfare Institute, Washington, DC.
57. Renner M.J., Rosenzweig M.R. Enriched and Impoverished Environments 1987, Springer-Verlag, New York.
58. Renstroem A., Bjoering G., Hoglund A.U. Evaluation of individually ventilated cage systems for laboratory rodents: Occupational health aspects. Laboratory Animals 2001, 35:42-50.
59. Richter H., Garner J.P., Auer C., Kunert J., Würbel H. Systematic variation improves reproducibility of animal experiments. Nature Methods 2010, 7:167-168.
60. Russell, W.M.S., Burch, R.L., 1959. The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique. Methuen, London. Reprinted by UFAW, South Mimms, Potters Bar, Herts UK.
61. Shair H.N., Nunez Y., Osman M.M. Enrichment materials do not negatively affect reproductive success and offspring survival and weight in mice. Lab Animal (NY) 2011, 41:14-19.
62. Sherwin C.M., Nicol C.J. Behavioural demand functions of caged laboratory mice for additional space. Animal Behaviour 1997, 53:67-74.
63. Simpson J., Kelly J.P. The impact of environmental enrichment in laboratory rats-behavioural and neurochemical aspects. Behavioral Brain Research 2011, 222:246-264.
64. Stauffacher M. Environmental enrichment, fact and fiction. Scandinavian Journal of Laboratory Animal Science 1995, 22:39-42.
65. Stewart, K.L., Bayne, K., 2004. Environmental enrichment for laboratory animals. In: Reuter, J.D., Suckow, M.A. (Eds.), Laboratory Animal Medicine and Management, International Veterinary Information Service, B2520.0404.
66. Sztainberg Y., Chen A. An environmental enrichment model for mice. Nature Protocols 2010, 5:1535-1539.
67. Tsai P.P., Stelzer H.D., Hedrich H.J., Hackbarth H. Are the effects of different designs on the physiology and behaviour of DBA/2 mice consistent?. Laboratory Animals 2003, 37:314-327.
68. Van de Weerd H.A., Van Loo P.L.P., van Zutphen L.F.M., Koolhaas J.M., Baumans V. Preferences for nesting material as environmental enrichment for laboratory mice. Laboratory Animals 1997, 31:133-143.
69. Van de Weerd H.A., Aarsen E.L., Mulder A., Kruitwagen C.L.J.J., Hendriksen C.F.M., Baumans V. Effects of environmental enrichment for mice: Variation in experimental results. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 2002, 5:87-109.
70. Van Loo P.L.P., Van Zutphen L.F.M., Baumans V. Male management: Coping with aggression problems in male laboratory mice. Laboratory Animals 2003, 37:300-313.
71. Van Loo P.L.P., Baumans V. The importance of learning young: The use of nesting material in laboratory rats. Laboratory Animals 2004, 38:17-24.
72. Van Loo P.L.P., Blom H.J.M., Meijer M.K., Baumans V. Assessment of the use of two commercially available environmental enrichments by laboratory mice by preference testing. Laboratory Animals 2005, 39:58-67.
73. Van Loo P.L.P., Kuin N., Sommer R., Avsaroglu H., Pham T., Baumans V. Impact of 'living apart together' on postoperative recovery of mice compared with social and individual housing. Laboratory Animals 2007, 41:441-455.
74. Waiblinger E. The laboratory gerbil. UFAW Handbook on the Care and Management of Laboratory Animals 2010, 327-347. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, UK. Eighth Ed.
75. Wahlsten D., Metten P., Phillips T.J., Boehm S.L., Burkhart-Kasch S., Dorow J., Doerksen S., Downing C., Fogarty J., Rodd-Henricks K., Hen R., McKinnon C.S., Merrill C.M., Nolte C., Schalomon M., Schlumbohm J., Sibert J.R., Wenger C.D., Dudek B.C., Crabbe J.C. Different data from different labs: Lessons from studies in gene-environment interaction. Journal of Neurobiology 2003, 54:283-311.
76. Weed J.L., Raber J.M. Balancing animal research with animal well-being: Establishment of goals and harmonization of approaches. ILAR Journal 2005, 46:118-128.
77. Wersinger S.R., Martin L.B. Optimization of laboratory conditions for the study of social behavior. ILAR Journal/National Research Council, Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources 2009, 50:64-80.
78. Whittaker D. The Syrian hamster. UFAW Handbook on the Care and Management of Laboratory Animals 2010, 136-146. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, UK. Eighth Ed.
79. Wolfensohn S. Old World primates. UFAW Handbook on the Care and Management of Laboratory Animals 2010, 593-617. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, UK. Eighth Ed.
80. Würbel H. Ideal homes? Housing effects on rodent brain and behaviour. Trends in Neurosciences 2001, 24:207-211.
81. Würbel, H., 2007. Environmental enrichment does not disrupt standardisation of animal experiments. ALTEX Special Issue, pp. 70-73.
82. Würbel, H., Garner, J.P., 2007. Refinement of rodent research through environmental enrichment and systematic randomization. National centre for the replacement, refinement and reduction of animals in research: London, UK. http://www.Nc3rs.org.uk.