Environmental enrichment for laboratory rodents and rabbits: Requirements of rodents, rabbits, and research

ILAR Journal

Volumn 46, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 162-170

  Baumans, Vera ^a,b  

^a KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^b UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Animal needs; Environmental enrichment; Housing; Rabbits; Rodents; Variation

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL CARE; ANIMAL FOOD; ANIMAL HOUSING; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; ARTICLE; ENVIRONMENTAL ENRICHMENT; EXPERIMENTAL ANIMAL; MOTIVATION; NONHUMAN; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; RABBIT; RESEARCH; RODENT; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; STAFF TRAINING; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; VETERINARY MEDICINE; ANIMAL; ANIMAL WELFARE; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; REVIEW; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; STANDARD;

ANIMALIA; ORYCTOLAGUS CUNICULUS; RODENTIA;

ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; ANIMAL WELFARE; ANIMALS; ANIMALS, LABORATORY; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; HOUSING, ANIMAL; RABBITS; RODENTIA; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT;

EID: 17144373320     PISSN: 10842020     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ilar.46.2.162     Document Type: Article

References (94)

1. Augustsson H, Van de Weerd HA, Kruitwagen CLJJ, Baumans V. 2003. Effect of enrichment on variation and results in the ligh/dark test. Lab Anim 37:328-340.
2. Baumans V. 1997. Environmental enrichment: Practical applications. In: Van Zutphen LFM, Balls M, eds. Animal Alternatives, Welfare and Ethics. Amsterdam: Elsevier BV. p 187-191.
3. Baumans V. 1999. The laboratory mouse. In: Poole T, ed. UFAW Handbook on the Care and Management of Laboratory Animals. Vol. 1. Oxford: Blackwell Science Ltd. p 282-312.
4. Baumans V. 2000. Environmental Enrichment: A right of rodents! In: Balls M, Van Zeller A-M, Halder M, eds. Progress in the Reduction, Refinement and Replacement of Animal Experimentation. Amsterdam: Elsevier BV. p 1251-1255.
5. Baumans V. 2004. The welfare of laboratory mice. In: Kaliste E, ed. The Welfare of Laboratory Animals. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. p 119-152.
6. Bayne K. 1996. Normal and abnormal behaviors of laboratory animals: What do they mean? Lab Anim 25:21-24.
7. Benn DM. 1995. Innovations in research animal care. J Am Vet Med Assoc 206:465-468.
8. Berdoy M. 2002. Ratlife. Available online (www.ratlife.org).
9. Blanchard RJ, Blanchard DC. 2003. Bringing natural behaviors into the laboratory: A tribute to Paul MacLean. Physiol Behav 79:515-524.
10. Blom HJM. 1993. Evaluation of housing conditions for laboratory mice and rats. Thesis, Utrecht University, the Netherlands.
11. Blom HJM, Van Tintelen G, Baumans V, Van den Broek J, Beynen AC. 1995. Development and application of a preference test system to evaluate housing conditions for laboratory rats. Appl Anim Behav Sci 43:279-290.
12. Brain PF. 1999. The laboratory gerbil. In: Poole T, ed. UFAW Handbook on the Care and Management of Laboratory Animals. Vol. 1. Oxford: Blackwell Science Ltd. p 345-355.
13. Broom DM. 1986. Indicators of poor welfare. Br Vet J 142:524-526.
14. Council of Europe. 1997. Resolution on the Accommodation and Care of Laboratory Animals, adopted by the multilateral consultation on 30 May 1997, Strasbourg, France.
15. Council of Europe, Revision of Appendix A in preparation, European Convention for the Protection of Vertebrate Animals Used for Experimental and Other Scientific Purposes [ETS 123], Strasbourg, France. Available online (www.coe.int/animalwelfare).
16. Crabbe JC, Wahlsten D, Dudek BC. 1999. Genetics of mouse behavior: Interactions with laboratory environment. Science 284:1670-1672.
17. Dawkins MS. 1983. Battery hens name their price: Consumer demand theory and the measurements of ethological "needs." Anim Behav 31: 1195-2005.
18. Dean SW. 1999. Environmental enrichment of laboratory animals used in regulatory toxicology studies. Lab Anim 33:309-327.
19. Eskola S, Kaliste-Korhonen E. 1999a. Aspen wood-wool is preferred as a resting place, but does not affect intracage fighting of male BALB/c and C57BL/6J mice. Lab Anim 33:108-121.
20. Eskola S, Kaliste-Korhonen E. 1999b. Nesting material and number of females per cage: Effects on mice productivity in BALB/c, C57BL/6J, DBA/2 and NIH/S mice. Lab Anim 33:122-128.
21. Eskola S, Lauhikari M, Voipio HM, Nevalainen T. 1999a. The use of aspen blocks and tubes to enrich the cage environment of laboratory rats. Scand J Lab Anim Sci 26: 1-10.
22. Eskola S, Lauhikari M, Voipio HM, Laitinen M, Nevalainen T. 1999b. Environmental enrichment may alter the number of rats needed to achieve statistical significance. Scand J Lab Anim Sci 26:134-144.
23. Fortmeyer HP. 1982. The influence of exogenous factors such as maintenance and nutrition on the course and results of animal experiments. Anim Tox Res 13-32.
24. Hebb DO. 1947. The effects of early experience on problem-solving at maturity. Am Psychol 2:306-307.
25. Henderson N. 1970. Genetic influences on the behaviour of mice can be obscured by laboratory rearing. J Comp Physiol Psychol 72:505-511.
26. Jahkel M, Rilke O, Koch R, Oehler J. 2000. Open field locomotion and neurotransmission in mice evaluated by principal component factor analysis-effects of housing condition, individual activity disposition and psychotropic drugs. Prog Neuro-Psychopath 24:61-84.
27. Kaliste E, Mering S. 2004. The welfare of laboratory rats. In: Kaliste E, ed. The Welfare of Laboratory Animals. Dordrecht: KluwerAcademic Publishers. p 153-180.
28. Kaliste-Korhonen E, Eskola S, Rekilä T, Nevalainen T. 1995. Effects of gnawing material, group size and cage level in rack on Wistar rats. Scand J Lab Anim Sci 22:291-299.
29. Krohn TC, Ritskes-Hoitinga J, Svendsen P. 1999. The effects of feeding and housing on the behaviour of the laboratory rabbit. Lab Anim 33: 101-107.
30. Kuhnen G. 1997. The effect of cage size and environmental enrichment on the generation of fever in golden hamster. Ann N Y Acad Sci 813:398-400.
31. Kuhnen G. 1999. The effect of cage size and enrichment on core temperature and febrile response of the golden hamster. Lab Anim 33:221-227.
32. Love JA. 1994. Group housing: Meeting the physical and social needs of the laboratory rabbit. Lab Anim Sci 44:5-11.
33. Manser CE, Broom DM, Overend P, Morris TM. 1998. Investigations into the preferences of laboratory rats for nestboxes and nesting materials. Lab Anim 32:23-35.
34. Mason GJ, Cooper J, Clarebrough C. 2001. Frustrations of fur-farmed mink-Mink may thrive in captivity but they miss having water to romp about in. Nature 410:35-36.
35. Mench JA. 1998. Environmental enrichment and the importance of exploratory behaviour. In: Shepherdson DJ, Mellen JD, Hutchins M, eds. Second Nature: Environmental Enrichment for Captive Animals. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press. p 30-46.
36. Mering S, Kaliste-Korhonen E, Nevalainen T. 2001. Estimates of appropriate number of rats: Interaction with housing environment. Lab Anim 35:80-90.
37. Mohammed AH, Zhu SW, Darmopil S, Hjerling-Leffler J, Ernfors P, Winblad B, Diamond MC, Eriksson PS, Bogdanovich N. 2002. Environmental enrichment and the brain. In: Hofman MA, Boer GJ, Holtmaat AJGD, Van Someren EJW, Verhaagen J, Swaab DF, eds. Progress in Brain Research. Vol 138. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science BV.
38. Morton DB, Jennings M, Batchelor GR, Bell D, Birke L, Davies K, Eveleigh JR, Gunn D, Heath M, Howard B, Koder P, Phillips J, Poole T, Sainsbury AW, Sales GD, Smith DJA, Stauffacher M, Turner RJ. 1993. Refinements in rabbit husbandry. Second report of the BVAAWF/FRAME/RSPCA/UFAW Joint Working Group on Refinement. Lab Anim 27:301-329.
39. Nevison CM, Hurst JL, Barnard CJ. 1999. Strain-specific effects of cage enrichment in laboratory mice (Mus musculus). Anim Welf 8:361-379.
40. Newberry RC. 1995. Environmental enrichment: Increasing the biological relevance of captive environment. Appl Anim Behav Sci 44:229-243.
41. Niethammer J. 1988. Wühler. In: Säugetiere, Bd. 3. Grzimek Enzyklopädie. München: Kindler Veriag. p 206-265.
42. Nolen GA, Alexander JC. 1966. Effects of diet and type of nesting material on the reproduction and lactation of the rat. Lab Anim Care 16:327-336.
43. Norris ML, Adams CE. 1976. Incidence of pup mortality in the rat with particular reference to nesting material, maternal age and parity. Lab Anim 10:165-169.
44. NRC [National Research Council]. 1996. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. 7th ed. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
45. Olsson A, Dahlborn K. 2002. Improving housing conditions for laboratory mice: A review of "environmental enrichment." Lab Anim 36:243-270.
46. Olsson AS, Nevison CM, Patterson-Kane EG, Sherwin CM, Van de Weerd HA, Würbel H. 2003. Understanding behaviour: The relevance of ethological approaches in laboratory animal science. J Appl Anim Behav Sci 81:245-264.
47. Poole TB. 1998. Meeting a mammal's psychological needs: Basic principles. In: Shepherdson DJ, Mellen JD, Hutchins M, eds. Second Nature: Environmental Enrichment for Captive Animals. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press. p 94.
48. Porter G, Lane-Petter W. 1965. The provision of sterile bedding and nesting materials with their effects on breeding mice. J Anim Tech Assoc 16:5-8.
49. Prior H, Sachser N. 1995. Effects of enriched housing environment on the behaviour of young male and female mice in four exploratory tasks. J Exp Anim Sci 37:57-68.
50. Reinhardt V. 2004. Common husbandry-related variables in biomedical research with animals. Lab Anim 38:213-235.
51. Renner MJ, Hackett Renner C. 1993. Expert and novice intuitive judgments about animal behaviour. Bull Psych Soc 31:551-552.
52. Rilke O, Jahkel M, Oehler J. 1998. Dopaminergic parameters during social isolation in low- and high-active mice. Pharmacol Biochem 60:499-505.
53. Rose MA. 1994. Environmental factors likely to impact on an animal's well-being - An overview. In: Baker, RM, Jenkin, G. and Mellor, DJ, eds. Improving the Well-being of Animals in the Research Environment. Adelaide: ANZCCART. p 99-116.
54. Russell WMS, Burch RL. 1959. The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique. London: Methuen.
55. Sharp JL, Zammit TG, Azar TA, Lawson DM. 2002. Stress-like responses to common procedures in male rats housed alone or with other rats. Contemp Top Lab Anim Sci 41:8-14.
56. Sharp JL, Zammit TG, Azar TA, Lawson DM. 2003. Stress-like responses to common procedures in individually and group-housed female rats. Contemp Top Lab Anim Sci 42:9-18.
57. Shepherdson DJ. 1998. Tracing the path of environmental enrichment in zoos. In: Shepherdson DJ, Mellen JD, Hutchins M, eds. Second Nature: Environmental Enrichment for Captive Animals. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press. p 1-12.
58. Sherwin CM, Nicol CJ. 1997. Behavioural demand functions of caged laboratory mice for additional space. Anim Behav 53:67-74.
59. Sherwin CM. 1997. Observations on the prevalence of nestbuilding in non-breeding TO strain mice and their use of two nesting materials. Lab Anim 31:125-132.
60. Sherwin CM. 2002. Comfortable quarters for mice in research institutions. In: Reinhardt V, Reinhardt A, eds. Comfortable Quarters for Laboratory Animals. 9th ed. Washington: Animal Welfare Institute. p 6-17.
61. Sherwin CM. 2004. Mirrors as potential environmental enrichment for individually housed laboratory mice. Appl Anim Behav Sci 87:95-103.
62. Sörensen DB. 2004. Animal welfare - An introduction. In: Kaliste E, ed. The Welfare of Laboratory Animals. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. p 3-14.
63. Sörensen DB, JL Ottesen, AK Hansen. 2004. Consequences of enhancing environmental complexity for laboratory rodents - A review with emphasis on the rat. Anim Welf 13:193-204.
64. Spinelli JS, Markowitz H. 1985. Prevention of cage associated distress. Lab Anim 14:19-24.
65. Stauffacher M. 1995. Environmental enrichment, fact and fiction. Scand J Lab Anim Sci 22:39-42.
66. Stauffacher M. 1997a. Housing requirements: What ethology can tell us. In: Van Zutphen LFM, Balls M, eds. Animal Alternatives, Welfare and Ethics. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science BV. p 179-186.
67. Stauffacher M. 1997b. Comparative studies on housing conditions. In: O'Donoghue PN, ed. Harmonization of Laboratory Animal Husbandry. London: Royal Society of Medicine Press. p 5-9.
68. Stauffacher M. 2000. Refinement in rabbit housing and husbandry. In: Balls M, van Zeller AM, Halder M, eds. Progress in the Reduction, Refinement and Replacement of Animal Experimentation, Developments in Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Amsterdam: Elsevier Science BV. p 1269-1277.
69. Stewart K. 2004. Development of an environmental enrichment program utilizing simple strategies. AWIC Bull 12:1-2.
70. Stewart KL, Bayne K. 2004. Environmental enrichment for laboratory animals. In: Reuter JD, Suckow MA, eds. Laboratory Animal Medicine and Management, International Veterinary Information Service, B2520.0404.
71. Townsend P. 1997. Use of in-cage shelters by laboratory rats. Anim Welf 6:95-103.
72. Tsai PP, Stelzer HD, Hedrich HJ, Hackbarth H. 2003. Are the effects of different designs on the physiology and behaviour of DBA/2 mice consistent? Lab Anim 37:314-327.
73. Turner RJ, Held SD, Hirst JE, Billinghurst G, Wootton RJ. 1997. An immunological assessment of group housed rabbits. Lab Anim 31:362-372.
74. Van de Weerd HA, Baumans V, Koolhaas JM, van Zutphen LFM. 1994. Strain specific behavioural response to environmental enrichment in the mouse. J Exp Anim Sci 36:117-127.
75. Van de Weerd HA, Baumans V. 1995. Environmental enrichment in rodents. In: Environmental Enrichment Information Resources for Laboratory Animals. AWIC Resource Series 2:145-149.
76. Van de Weerd HA. 1996. Environmental Enrichment for Laboratory Mice: Preferences and Consequences. PhD Thesis, Utrecht University, the Netherlands.
77. Van de Weerd HA, van Loo PLP, van Zutphen LFM, Koolhaas JM, Banmans V. 1997a. Preferences for nesting material as environmental enrichment for laboratory mice. Lab Anim 31:133-143.
78. Van de Weerd HA, van Loo PLP, van Zutphen LFM, Koolhaas JM, Baumans V. 1997b. Nesting material as environmental enrichment has no adverse effects on behavior and physiology of laboratory mice. Physiol Behav 62:1019-1028.
79. Van de Weerd HA, Van Loo PLP, Van Zutphen LFM, Koolhaas JM, Baumans V. 1998. Strength of preference for nesting material as environmental enrichment in laboratory mice. Appl Anim Behav Sci 55: 369-382.
80. Van de Weerd HA, Aarsen EL, Mulder A, Kruitwagen CLJJ, Hendriksen CFM, Baumans V. 2002. Effects of environmental enrichment for mice: Variation in experimental results. J Appl Anim Welf Sci 5:87-109.
81. Van Loo PLP, Croes IAA, Baumans V. 2004. Music for mice: Does it affect behaviour and physiology? Abstract, Telemetry Workshop. FELASA meeting, Nantes, France.
82. Van Loo PLP, de Groot AC, Van Zutphen LFM and Baumans V. 2001. Do male mice prefer or avoid each other's company? Influence of hierarchy, kinship and familiarity. J Appl Anim Welf Sci 4:91-103.
83. Van Loo PLP, Kruitwagen CLJJ, Koolhaas JM, Van de Weerd HA, Van Zutphen LFM, Baumans V. 2002. Influence of cage enrichment on aggressive behaviour and physiological parameters in male mice. J Appl Anim Behav Sci 76:65-81.
84. Van Loo PLP, Kruitwagen CLJJ, Van Zutphen LFM, Koolhaas JM and Baumans V. 2000. Modulation of aggression in male mice: Influence of cage cleaning regime and scent marks. Anim Welf 9:281.
85. Van Zutphen LFM, Baumans V, Beynen AC. 1993. Principles of Laboratory Animal Science. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
86. Vesell ES. 1967. Induction of drug-metabolizing enzymes in liver microsomes of mice and rats by softwood bedding. Science 157:1057-1058.
87. Wahlsten D, Metten P, Phillips TJ, Boehm II SL, Burkhart-Kasch S, Dorow J, Doerksen S, Downing C, Fogarty J, Rodd-Henricks K, Hen R, McKinnon CS, Merrill CM, Nolte C, Schalomon M, Schlumbohm J, Sibert JR, Wenger CD, Dudek BC, Crabbe JC. 2003. Different data from different labs: Lessons from studies in gene-environment interaction. J Neurobiol 54:283-311.
88. Waiblinger E, Köning B. 2004. Refinement of gerbil housing and husbandry in the laboratory. Anim Welf 13:229-235.
89. Wainwright PE, Huang YS, BulmanFleming B, Levesque S, McCutcheon D. 1994. The effects of dietary fatty-acid composition combined with environmental enrichment on brain and behavior in mice. Behav Brain Res 60:125-136.
90. Widman DR, Abrahamson GC, Rosellini RA. 1992. Environmental enrichment: The influence of restricted daily exposure and subsequent exposure to uncontrollable stress. Physiol Behav 51:309-318.
91. Wiedenmayer C. 1997. Causation of the ontogenetic development of stereotypic digging in gerbils. Anim Behav 53:461-470.
92. Würbel H. 2001. Ideal homes? Housing effects on rodent brain and behaviour. Trends Neurosci 24:207-210.
93. Würbel H, Stauffacher M, von Holst D. 1996. Stereotypies in laboratory mice - Quantitative and qualitative description of the ontogeny of wiregnawing and jumping in ICR and ICR nu-mice. Ethology 102:371-385.
94. Young RJ. 2003. Environmental enrichment for captive animals. UFAW Animal Welfare Series. London: Blackwell Science Ltd.