Refinement: Promoting the three Rs in practice

Laboratory Animals

Volumn 42, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 284-293

  Lloyd, M H ^a   Foden, B W ^b   Wolfensohn, S E ^c  

^a Home Office Central Research Establishment   (United Kingdom)

^b ASTRAZENECA   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Obstacles; Refinement; Refinement loop; Welfare

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL WELFARE; ARTICLE; CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; EVALUATION; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE FACILITY; MEDICAL ETHICS; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; QUALITY CONTROL; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; TECHNOLOGY; UNITED KINGDOM;

ANIMAL WELFARE; ANIMALS; HUMANS; MODELS, ANIMAL; RESEARCH;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 47749121769     PISSN: 00236772     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1258/la.2007.007045     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Chapman A (2007) Conscious Competence Learning Model. See http:// www.businessballs.com/ consciouscompetencelearningmodel.htm
2. Hartley P, Lloyd M, Burton N (2004) Obstacles to the refinement of scientific procedures using living animals. Poster presentation. In: Proceedings of the UFAW International Symposium 'Science in the Service of Animal Welfare' (Kirkwood JK, Roberts EA, Vickery S, eds). Edinburgh, 2-4 April 2003. Animal Welfare 13(suppl.), S242
3. Karas A (2006) Barriers to assessment and treatment of pain in laboratory animals. Laboratory Animals Europe 6, 30-9
4. FAWC (1979) The Five Freedoms. London: Farm Animal Welfare Council
5. Hawkins P, Felton LM, van Loo P, et al. (2006) Report of the 2005 RSPCA/UFAW Rodent Welfare Group meeting. Lab Animal 35, 1006-29
6. Ritskes-Hoitinga M, Gravesen L, Jegstrup I (2006) Refinement Benefits Animal Welfare and Quality of Science. NC3Rs website. See http:// www.nc3rs. org.uk/news.asp?id=212
7. Smith K (2006) Caught in the middle. Nature 444, 811
8. Wolfensohn S, Honess P (2007) Laboratory animal, pet animal, farm animal, wild animal: which gets the best deal? Animal Welfare 16(Suppl.), 117-23