Influence of implant surface topography on early osseointegration: A histological study in human jaws

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials

Volumn 80, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 377-385

  Shibli, Jamil Awad ^a   Grassi, Sauro ^a   De Figueiredo, Luciene Cristina ^a   Feres, Magda ^a   Marcantonio Jr , Elcio ^b   Iezzi, Giovanna ^c   Piattelli, Adriano ^c  

^a GUARULHOS UNIVERSITY   (Brazil)

^b SÃO PAULO STATE UNIVERSITY UNESP   (Brazil)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CHIETI   (Italy)

Author keywords

Dental implants; Human histology; Implant surface topography; Osseointegration; Wound healing

Indexed keywords

HISTOLOGY; OXIDATION; SURFACE TOPOGRAPHY; SURGERY; TISSUE; TITANIUM;

HUMAN HISTOLOGY; IMPLANT SURFACE TOPOGRAPHY; OSSEOINTEGRATION; WOUND HEALING;

DENTAL PROSTHESES;

TITANIUM;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BONE DENSITY; BONE REGENERATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVALUATION; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMPLANT; JAW; MANDIBLE; MAXILLA; MORPHOMETRICS; OXIDATION; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOPOGRAPHY; WOUND HEALING;

ADULT; BONE DENSITY; COATED MATERIALS, BIOCOMPATIBLE; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL MATERIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MANDIBLE; MATERIALS TESTING; MAXILLA; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; MIDDLE AGED; OSSEOINTEGRATION; OXIDATION-REDUCTION; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TIME FACTORS; TITANIUM;

EID: 33846960749     PISSN: 15524973     EISSN: 15524981     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.30608     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Thomas K, Cook SD. Relationship between surface characteristics and the degree of bone-implant integration. J Biomed Mater Res 1992;26:831-833.
2. Albrektsson T, Bränemark PI, Hansson HA, Lindstrom J. Osseointegrated titanium implants. Acta Orthop Scand 1981;52:155-170.
3. 2-blasted titanium implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1992;3:77-84.
4. 2-blasted, HA-coated, and machined implants: An experimental study in rabbits. J Biomed Mater Res 1995;29:1223-1231.
5. Buser D, Schenk RK, Steinemann S, Fiorellini JP, Fox CH, Stich H. Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res 1991;25:889-902.
6. Buser D, Nydegger T, Hirt HP, Cochran DL, Nolte LP. Removal torques values of titanium implants in the maxilla of miniature pigs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13:611-619.
7. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Andersson B, Kroll JJ. A histomorphometrical and removal torque study of screw-shaped titanium implants with three different surface topographies. Clin Oral Implants Res 1995;6:24-30.
8. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Johanson CB, Andersson B. Experimental study of turned and grit blasted screw-shaped implants with special emphasis on effects of blasting material and surface topography. Biomaterials 1996;17:15-22.
9. Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T, Linder E, Lang NP, Lindhe J. Early bone formation adjacent to rough and turned endosseous implant surfaces. An experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15:381-392.
10. Albrektsson T. Is surgical skill more important for clinical success than changes in implant hardware? Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2001;3:174,175.
11. Buser D. Effects of various titanium surface configurations on osseointegration and clinical implant stability. In: Lang NP, Karring T, Lindhe J, editors. Proceedings of the 3rd European Workshop on Periodontology. Berlin: Quintessenz Verlag; 1999. pp 88-101.
12. Shalabi MM, Wolke JG, Jansen JA. The effects of implant surface roughness and surgical technique on implant fixation in an in vitro model. Clin Oral Implant Res 2006;17:172-178.
13. Morris HF, Ochi S, Crum P, Orenstein IH, Winkler S. AICRG, Part I. A 6-year multicentered, multidisciplinary clinical study of a new and innovative implant design. J Oral Implantol 2004;30:125-133.
14. Zechner W, Trinkl N, Watzak G, Busenlechner D, Tepper G, Haas R, Watzek G. Radiologic follow-up of peri-implant bone loss around machined-surface and rough-surface interforaminal implant in the mandible functionally loaded for 3 to 7 years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:216-219.
15. Esposito M, Coulthard P, Thomsen P, Worthington HV. The role of implant surface modifications, shape and material on the success of osseointegrated dental implants. A cochrane systematic review. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2005;13:15-31.
16. Hallgren C, Sawase T, Ortengren U, Wennerberg A. Histomorphometric and mechanical evaluation of the bone-tissue response to implants prepared with different orientation of surface topography. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2001;3:194-203.
17. Trisi P, Lazarra R, Rebaudi A, Rao W, Testori T, Porter SS. Bone-implant contact on machined and dual acid-etched surfaces after 2 months of healing in the human maxilla. J Periodontol 2003;74:945,956.
18. Hall J, Lausmaa J. Properties of a new porous oxide surface on titanium implants. Appl Osseointegr Res 2000;1:5-8.
19. Sul YT. The significance of the surface properties of oxidized titanium to the bone response: Special emphasis on potential biochemical bonding of titanium implants. Biomaterials 2003;24:3893-3907.
20. Ivanoff CJ, Widmark G, Johansson C, Wennerberg A. Histological evaluation of bone response to oxidized and turned titanium micro-implants in human jawbone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:341-348.
21. Huang YH, Xiropaidis AV, Sorensen RG, Albandar JM, Hall J, Wikesjö UME. Bone formation at titanium porous oxide (TiUnite®) oral implants in type IV bone. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16:105-111.
22. Jungner M, Lundqvist P, Lundgren S. Oxidized titanium implants (Nobel Biocare® TiUnite™) compared with turned titanium implants (Nobel Biocare® markIII™) with the respect to implant failure in a group of consecutive patients treated with early functional loading and two-stage protocol. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16:308-312.
23. Zhu X, Kim KH, Jeong Y. Anodic oxide films containing Ca and P of titanium biomaterial. Biomaterials 2001;22:2199-2206.
24. Piattelli A, Scarano A, Quaranta M. High-precisio, cost-effective system for producing thin sections of oral tissues containing dental implants. Biomaterials 1997;18:577-579.
25. Davies JE. Mechanisms of endosseous integration. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11:391-401.
26. 2 blasted and turned titanium microimplants in human. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:128-134.
27. Buser D, Mericske-Stern R, Bernard JP, Behneke A, Behneke N, Hirt HP, Belser UC, Lang NP. Long-term evaluation of non-submerged ITI implants. Part I. 8-year life table analysis of a prospective multi-center study with 2359 implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:161-172.
28. Den Braber ET, De Ruijter JE, Smits HTJ, Ginsel LA, Von Recum AF, Jansen JA. Effect of parallel surface microgrooves and surface energy on cell growth. J Biomed Mater Res 1995;29:511-518.
29. Lumbikanonda N, Sammons R. Bone cell attachment to dental implants of different surface characteristics. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:627-636.
30. D'Hoedt B. The influence of implant materials and material surfaces on blood clotting: A scanning electron microscopy study. In: van Sttenberghe D, Albrektsson T, Bränemark PI, Henry PJ, Holt R, Linden C, editors. Tissue integration in oral and maxillofacial reconstruction. Proceedings of an International Congress. Current Clinical Practice Series 1985;29:46-50.
31. Meyer A, Baier R, Natiella J, Meenagha M. Investigation of tissue/implant interactions during the first two hours of implantation. J Oral Implantol 1988;14:363-379.
32. Zechner W, Tangl S, Fürst G, Tepper G, Thams U, Mailath G, Watzek G. Osseous healing characteristics of three different implant types. A histological and histomorphometric study in mini-pigs. Clin Oral Implant Res 2003;14:150-157.
33. Wen X, Wang X, Zhang N. Microrough surface of metallic biomaterials: A review. Biomed Mater Eng 1996;6:173-189.
34. Yan WQ, Nakamura T, Kobayashi M, Kim HM, Miyaji F, Kokubo T. Bonding of chemically treated titanium implants to bone. J Biomed Mater Res 1997;37:267-275.
35. Schneirder GB, Zaharias R, Seabold D, Keller J, Stanford C. Differentiation of preosteoblasts is affected by implant surface microtopographies. J Biomed Mater Res A 2004;64:462-468.
36. Schneider GB, Perinpanayagam H, Clegg M, Zaharias R, Seabold D, Keller J, Stanford C. Implant surface roughness affect osteoblast gene expression. J Dent Res 2003;82:372-376.
37. Jaffin RA, Berman CL. The excessive loss of Branemark fixtures in type IV bone. A 5-year analysis. J Periodontol 1991;62:2-4.
38. Friberg B, Jemt T, Lekholm U. Early failures in 4641 consecutively placed Bränemark dental implants. A study from stage I surgery to the connection of completed prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991;6:142-146.
39. Quirynen M, Naert I, van Steenberghe D, Teerlinck J, Dekeyser C, Theuniers G. Periodontal aspects of osseointegrated fixtures supporting an overdenture. A 4-year retrospective study. J Clin Periodontol 1991;18:719-728.
40. Jemt T. Implant treatment in resorbed edentulous upper jaws: A three-year follow-up study on 70 patients. Clin Oral Implants Res 1993;4:187-194.
41. Jemt T, Chai J, Harnett J, Heath MR, Hutton JE, Johns RB, McKenna S, McNamara DC, van Steenberghe D, Taylor R, Watson RM, Hermann I. A 5-year prospective multicenter follow-up report on overdentures supported by osseointegrated implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:291-298.
42. Ivanoff CJ, Grondahl K, Sennerby L, Bergtrom C, Lekholm U. Influence of variations in implant diameters: A 3- to 5-year retrospective clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:175-182.
43. Ivanoff CJ. On surgical and implant related factors influencing integration and function of titanium implants. Experimental and clinical aspects, Thesis, Göteborg University, Göteborg, 1999.
44. Leib AM, Kowalsky CJ. Human histological research: Is it necessary? Humane? Ethical? J Periodontol 2005;76:1207-1210.