Primary stability of turned and acid-etched screw-type implants: A removal torque and histomorphometric study in rabbits

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 22, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 886-892

  De Fernandes, Eduardo Lima ^a,b   Unikowski, Ieda Levenzon ^b   Teixeira, Eduardo Rolim ^c   Costa, Nilza Pereira Da ^c   Shinkai, Rosemary Sadami ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDADE LUTERANA DO BRASIL   (Brazil)

^b Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul ^*  (Brazil)

^c PONTIFICAL CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF RIO GRANDE DO SUL   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Dental implant; Osseointegration; Primary stability; Surface treatment

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BONE REGENERATION; BONE SCREW; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DEVICE REMOVAL; EVALUATION; FEMALE; MATERIALS TESTING; PHYSIOLOGY; RABBIT; SURFACE PROPERTY; TIBIA; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TORQUE;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; BONE SCREWS; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS RETENTION; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DEVICE REMOVAL; FEMALE; MATERIALS TESTING; OSSEOINTEGRATION; RABBITS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TIBIA; TORQUE;

EID: 38149135055     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Meredith N. Assessment of implant stability as a prognostic determinant. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11:491-501.
2. Martinez H, Davarpanah M, Missika P, Celletti R, Lazzara R. Optimal implant stabilization in low density bone. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:423-432.
3. Lioubavina-Hack N, Lang NP, Karring T. Significance of primary stability for osseointegration of dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17:244-250.
4. Jokstad A, Braegger U, Brunski JB, Carr AB, Naert I, Wennerberg A. Quality of dental implants. Int Dent J 2003;53(6suppl 2): 409-443.
5. Fugazzotto PA, Wheeler SL, Lindsay JA. Success and failure rates of cylinder implants in type IV bone. J Periodontol 1993;64:1085-1087.
6. Ivanoff CJ, Sennerby L, Lekholm U. Influence of initial implant mobility on the integration of titanium implants. An experimental study in rabbits. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996;7:120-127.
7. Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Oral implant surfaces: Part 2-review focusing on clinical knowledge of different surfaces. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:544-564.
8. Gotfredsen K, Wennerberg A, Johansson C, Skovgaard LT, Hjorting-Hansen E. Anchorage of TiO2-blasted, HA-coated, and machined implants: An experimental study with rabbits. J Biomed Mater Res 1995;29:1223-1231.
9. Wennerberg A, Ektessabi A, Albrektsson T, Johansson C, Andersson B. A 1-year follow-up of implants of differing surface roughness placed in rabbit bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12:486-494.
10. Lazzara RJ, Testori T, Trisi P, Porter SS, Weinstein RL. A human histologic analysis of osseotite and machined surfaces using implants with 2 opposing surfaces. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1999;19:117-129.
11. Abrahamsson I, Zitzmann NU, Berglundh T, Wennerberg A, Lindhe J. Bone and soft tissue integration to titanium implants with different surface topography: An experimental study in the dog. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:323-332.
12. Cordioli G, Majzoub Z, Piatelli A, Scarano A. Removal torque and histomophometric investigation of 4 different titanium surfaces: An experimental study in the rabbit tibia. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:668-674.
13. Klokkevold PR, Johnson P, Dadgostari S, Caputo A, Davies JE, Nishimura RD. Early endosseous integration enhanced by dual acid etching of titanium: A torque removal study in the rabbit. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:350-357.
14. London RM, Roberts FA, Baker DA, Rohrer MD, O'Neal RB. Histologic comparison of thermal dual-etched implant surface to machined, TPS, and HA surfaces: Bone contact in vivo in rabbits. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002;17:369-376.
15. Cho SA, Park KT. The removal torque of titanium screw inserted in rabbit tibia treated by dual acid etching. Biomaterials 2003;24:3611-3617.
16. Zechner W, Tangl S, Furst G, et al. Osseous healing characteristics of three different implant types. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14:150-157.
17. Smith DC. Dental implants: Materials and design considerations. Int J Prosthodont 1993;6:106-117.
18. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Andersson B. Design and surface characteristics of 13 commercially available oral implant systems. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993;8:622-633.
19. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Andersson B, Kroll JJ. A histomorphometric and removal torque study of screw-shaped titanium implants with three different surface topographies. Clin Oral Implants Res 1995;6:24-30.
20. Matsuzaka K, Walboomers XF, Yoshinari M, Inoue T, Jansen JA. The attachment and growth behavior of osteoblast-like cells on microtextured surfaces. Biomaterials 2003;24:2711-2719.
21. Keller JC, Schneider GB, Stanford CM, Kellogg B. Effects of implant microtopography on osteoblast cell attachment. Implant Dent 2003;12:175-181.
22. Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Oral implant surfaces: Part 1 - review focusing on topographic and chemical properties of different surfaces and in vivo responses to them. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:536-543.
23. Shalabi MM, Gortemaker A, Van't Hof MA, Jansen JA, Creugers NH. Implant surface roughness and bone healing: A systematic review. J Dent Res 2006;85:496-500.
24. Orenstein IH, Tarnow DP, Morris HF, Ochi S. Factors affecting implant mobility at placement and integration of mobile implants at uncovering. J Periodontol 1998;69:1404-1412.
25. Buser D, Schenk RK, Steinemann S, Fiorellini JP, Fox CH, Stich H. Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res 1991;25:889-902.
26. Martin JY, Schwartz Z, Hummert TW, et al. Effect of titanium surface roughness on proliferation, differentiation, and protein synthesis of human osteoblast-like cells (MG63). J Biomed Mater Res 1995;29:389-401.
27. Sennerby L, Thomsen P, Ericson LE. A morphometric and biomechanic comparison of titanium implants inserted in rabbit cortical and cancellous bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;7:62-71.
28. Meredith N, Shagaldi F, Alleyne D, Sennerby L, Cawley P. The application of resonance frequency measurements to study the stability of titanium implants during healing in the rabbit tibia. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:234-243.
29. Johansson CB, Albrektsson T. Integration of screw implants in the rabbit: A 1-yr follow-up of removal torque of titanium implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1987;2:69-75.
30. Proceedings of the Third ITI (International Team for Implantology) Consensus Conference. Gstaad, Switzerland, August 2003. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19 Suppl:7-154.