In Vivo Histological Response to Anodized and Anodized/Hydrothermally Treated Titanium Implants

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials

Volumn 66, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 520-525

  Son, Won Woo ^a   Zhu, Xiaolong ^a   Shin, Hong In ^a   Ong, Joo L ^b   Kim, Kyo Han ^a,b  

^a Kyungpook National University   (South Korea)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

Author keywords

Anodization; Bone implant contact; Hydrothermal treatments; Hydroxyapatite; Removal torque value; Titanium implants

Indexed keywords

BONE; HISTOLOGY; IMPLANTS (SURGICAL); SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE TREATMENT; TITANIUM; TORQUE; X RAY DIFFRACTION ANALYSIS;

ANODIZATION;

BIOMATERIALS;

TITANIUM;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HEAT TREATMENT; HISTOLOGY; IMPLANT; IMPLANTATION; IN VIVO STUDY; NEEDLE; NONHUMAN; POROSITY; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; STRENGTH; TORQUE; X RAY DIFFRACTION;

EID: 0344738845     PISSN: 00219304     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.10042     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Kasemo B. Biocompatibility of titanium implants: Surface science aspects. J Prosthet Dent 1983;49:832-837.
2. Lausma J, Mattsson L, Rolander U, Kasemo B. Chemical composition and morphology of titanium surface oxides. Mater Res Soc Symp Proc 1986;55:351-359
3. Pan J, Thierry D, Leygraf C. Electrochemical impedence spectroscopy study of the passive oxide film on titanium for implant application. Electrochem Acta 1996;41:1143-1153
4. Ong JL, Raikar GN, Lucas LC, Connatsern R, Gregory JC. Spectroscopic characterization of passivated titanium in a physiologic solution. J Mater Sci Mater Med 1995;6:113-119.
5. Kilpadi D, Lemons J. Surface energy characterization of unalloyed titanium implants. J Biomed Mater Res 1994;28:1419-1425
6. Buser D, Schenk RK, Steinemann S, Forellini JP, Fox C, Stich H. Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A hisomorphometric study in miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res 1991;25:889-902.
7. Sitting C, Textor M, Spencer ND, Wieland M, Valloton PH. Surface characterization of implant material CP Ti Ti-6Al-4V with different pretreatments. J Mater Sci Mater Med 1999;10: 35-46.
8. Cigada A, Cabrini M, Pedeferri P. Increasing of the corrosion resistance of the Ti6Al4V alloy by high thickness anodic oxidation. J Mater Sci Mater Med 1992;3:408-412.
9. Ishizawa H, Ogino M. Formation and characterization of titanium anodic oxide film containing Ca and P. J Biomed Mater Res 1995;29:65-72.
10. Zhu X, Kim KH, Ong JL, Jeong YS. Surface analysis of anodic oxide films containing P on titanium. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2001;17:331-336
11. Zhu X, Kim KH, Jeong YS. Anodic oxide films containing Ca and P of titanium biomaterial. Biomaterials 2001;22:2199-2206.
12. Zhu X, Ong JL, Kim SY, Kim KH. Surface characteristics and structure of anodic oxide films containing Ca and P on titanium implant material. J Biomed Mater Res 2002;60:333-338.
13. Suh JY, Jang BC, Zhu X, Ong JL, Kim KH. Effect of hydrothermally treated anodic oxide films on osteoblast attach and proliferation. Biomaterials 2003;24:347-355.
14. Branemark R, Thomsen P. Biomechanical and morphological studies on osseointegration in immunological arthritis in rabbits. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 1997;31:185-195.
15. Branemark R, Ohrnell LO, Nilsson P, Thomsen P. Biomechanical characterization of osseointegration during healing: An experimental in vivo study in the rat. Biomaterials 1997;18:969-978.
16. Johansson, C. Albrektsson, T. Integration of screw implants in the rabbit: A 1-year follow-up of removal torque of titanium implants. Int J Oral Maxillofacial Implants 1987;2:69-75.
17. Hure G, Donath K, Lesounrd M, Chappard D, Basle MF. Does titanium surface treatment influence the bone-implant interface? SEM and histomorphometry in a 6-sheep study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:506-511.
18. Lucchini JP, Aurelle JL, Therin M, Donath K, Becker W, A pilot study comparing screw-shaped implants. Surface analysis and histologic evaluation of bone healing. Clin Oral Impl Res 1996;7:397-404.
19. Cooley DR, Van Dellen AF, Burgess JO, Windeler AS, The advantages of coated titanium implants prepared by radio frequency sputtering from hydroxyapatite. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 67:93-100.
20. Rivero DP, Fox J, Skipor AK, Urban RM, Galante JO. Calcium phosphate coated porous titanium implants for enhanced skeletal fixation. J Biomed Mater Res 1988;22:191-201.
21. Bloebaum RD, Merrel M, Gustke K, Simmons M. Retrieval analysis of a hydroxyapatite-coated hip prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1991;267:97-102.
22. Thomas KA, Cook SD. An evaluation of variable influencing implant fixation by direct bone apposition. J Biomed Mater Res 1985;19:875-903.
23. Ong JL, Bessho K, Cavin C, Carnes DL. Bone response to radio frequency sputtered calcium phosphate implants and titanium implants in vivo. J Biomed Mater Res 2002;59:184-190.