Structural influence from calcium phosphate coatings and its possible effect on enhanced bone integration

Acta Odontologica Scandinavica

Volumn 67, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 333-340

  Wennerberg, Ann ^a   Albrektsson, Tomas ^b  

^a MALMÖ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Calcium phosphate coating; Implant; Surface topography

Indexed keywords

CALCIUM PHOSPHATE;

CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; FRACTURE HEALING; HUMAN; IMPLANT; MATERIAL COATING; MEDLINE; REVIEW; SURFACE PROPERTY;

CALCIUM PHOSPHATES; COATED MATERIALS, BIOCOMPATIBLE; DENTAL IMPLANTS; HUMANS; NANOPARTICLES; NANOPORES; OSSEOINTEGRATION; PHYSICOCHEMICAL PHENOMENA; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 70350453777     PISSN: 00016357     EISSN: 15023850     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00016350903188325     Document Type: Review

References (41)

1. Albrektsson T, Branemark PI, Hansson HA, Lindström J. Osseointegrated titanium implants. Acta Orthop Scand 1981;/52:/155-70.
2. Cooper LF. A role for surface topography in creating and maintaining bone at titanium endosseous implants. J Prosth Dentistry 2000;/84:/522-34.
3. Shalabi MM, Gortemaker A, Van't Hof MA, Jansen JA, Creugers NH. Implant surface roughness and bone healing: A systematic review. J Dent Res 2006;/85:/496-500.
4. Le Guéhennec L, Soueidan A, Layrolle P, Amouriq Y. Surface treatments of titanium dental implants for rapid osseointegration. Dent Mater 2007;/23:/844-54.
5. Sennerby L, Dasmah A, Larsson B, Iverhed M. Bone tissue responses to surface-modified zirconia implants: A histomorphometric and removal torque study in the rabbit. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2005;/7 Suppl 1:/S13-20.
6. Gahlert M, Gudehus T, Eichhorn S, Steinhauser E, Kniha H, Erhardt W. Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;/18:/662-8.
7. Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Oral implant surfaces: Part 1. Review focusing on topographic and chemical properties of different surfaces and in vivo responses to them. Int J Prosthodont 2004;/17:/536-43.
8. Ellingsen JE, Johansson CB, Wennerberg A, Holmén A. Improved retention and bone to implant contact with fluoride-modified titanium implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;/19:/659-66.
9. Buser D, Broggini N, Wieland M, Schenk RK, Denzer AJ, Cochran DL, et al. Enhanced bone apposition to a chemically modified SLA titanium surface. J Dent Res 2004;/83:/ 529-533
10. Sul YT, Johansson C, Albrektsson T. Which surface properties enhance bone response to implants? Comparison of oxidized magnesium, TiUnite, and Osseotite implant surfaces. Int J Prosthodont 2006;/19:/319-28.
11. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. On implant surfaces. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009; Accepted.
12. Wong M, Eulenberger J, Schenk R, Hunziker E. Effect of surface topology on the osseointegration of implant materials in trabecular bone. J Biomed Mater Res 1995;/29:/1567-75.
13. Gotfredsen K, Wennerberg A, Johansson C, Skovgaard LT, Hjørting-Hansen E. Anchorage of TiO2-blasted, HA-coated, and machined implants: An experimental study with rabbits. J Biomed Mater Res 1995;/29:/1223-31.
14. Gottlander M, Johansson CB,Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Radin S, Ducheyne P. Bone tissue reactions to an electrophoretically applied calcium phosphate coating. Biomaterials 1997;/18:/551-7.
15. Vercaigne S, Wolke JG, Naert I, Jansen JA. Bone healing capacity of titanium plasma-sprayed and hydroxylapatitecoated oral implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998;/9:/ 261-271 (Pubitemid 128657999)
16. Li J. Behaviour of titanium and titania-based ceramics in vitro and in vivo. Biomaterials 1993;/14:/229-32.
17. Yeo IS, Han JS, Yang JH. Biomechanical and histomorphometric study of dental implants with different surface characteristics. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomat 2008;/ 87:/303-11.
18. Hayakawa T, Yoshinari M, Kiba H, Yamamoto H, Nemoto K, Jansen JA. Trabecular bone response to surface roughened and calcium phosphate (Ca-P) coated titanium implants. Biomaterials 2002;/23:/1025-31.
19. Vercaigne S, Wolke JG, Naert I, Jansen JA. A histological evaluation of TiO2-gritblasted and Ca-P magnetron sputter coated implants placed into the trabecular bone of the goat: Part 2. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;/11:/314-24.
20. Hayakawa T, Yoshinari M, Nemoto K, Wolke JG, Jansen JA. Effect of surface roughness and calcium phosphate coating on the implant/bone response. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;/ 11:/296-304.
21. Novaes AB Jr, Souza SL, de Oliveira PT, Souza AM. Histomorphometric analysis of the bone-implant contact obtained with 4 different implant surface treatments placed side by side in the dog mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002;/17:/377-83.
22. Lee IS, Kim DH, Kim HE, Jung YC, Han CH. Biological performance of calcium phosphate films formed on commercially pure Ti by electron-beam evaporation. Biomaterials 2002;/23:/609-15.
23. Borsari V, Fini M, Giavaresi G, Rimondini L, Consolo U, Chiusoli L, et al. Osteointegration of titanium and hydroxyapatite rough surfaces in healthy and compromised cortical and trabecular bone: In vivo comparative study on young, aged, and estrogen-deficient sheep. J Orthop Res 2007;/25:/1250-60.
24. Savarino L, Fini M, Ciapetti G, Cenni E, Granchi D, Baldini N, et al. Biologic effects of surface roughness and fluorhydroxyapatite coating on osteointegration in external fixation systems: An in vivo experimental study. J Biomed Mater Res A 2003;/66:/652-61.
25. Aebli N, Krebs J, Stich H, Schawalder P, Walton M, Schwenke D, et al. In vivo comparison of the osseointegration osseointegration of vacuum plasma sprayed titanium- and hydroxyapatite- coated implants. J Biomed Mater Res A 2003;/66:/ 356-363
26. Le Guehennec L, Goyenvalle E, Lopez-Heredia M-A, Weiss P, Amouriq Y, Layrolle P. Histomorphometric analysis of the osseointegration of four different implant surfaces in the femoral epiphyses of rabbits. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;/ 19:/1103-10.
27. Taba Jú nior M, Novaes AB Jr, Souza SL, Grisi MF, Palioto DB, Pardini LC. Radiographic evaluation of dental implants with different surface treatments: An experimental study in dogs. Implant Dent 2003;/12:/252-8.
28. Svehla M, Morberg P, Bruce W, Zicat B, Walsh WR. The effect of substrate roughness and hydroxyapatite coating thickness on implant shear strength. J Arthroplast 2002;/17:/ 304-311
29. Fini M, Savarino L, Nicoli Aldini N, Martini L, Giavaresi G, Rizzi G, et al. Biomechanical and histomorphometric investigations on two morphologically differing titanium surfaces with and without fluorohydroxyapatite coating: An experimental study in sheep tibiae. Biomaterials 2003;/24:/ 3183-3192
30. Goené R, Testori T, Trisi P. Influence of a nanometer-scale surface enhancement on de novo bone formation on titanium implants: A histomorphometric study in human maxillae. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2007;/27:/ 211-219
31. Jeffcoat MK, McGlumphy EA, Reddy MS, Geurs NC, Proskin HP. A comparison of hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated threaded, HA-coated cylindric, and titanium-threaded endosseous dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;/18:/406-10.
32. Mendes VC, Moineddin R, Davies JE. The effect of discrete calcium phosphate nanocrystals on bone-bonding to titanium surfaces. Biomaterials 2007;/28:/4748-55.
33. Meirelles L, Arvidsson A, Andersson M, Kjellin P, Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Nano hydroxyapatite structures influence early bone formation. J Biomed Mater Res A 2008;/87:/299-307.
34. Meirelles L, Melin L, Peltola T, Kjellin P, Kangasniemi I, Currie F, et al. Effect of hydroxyapatite and titania nanostructures on early in vivo bone response. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2008;/10:/245-54.
35. Meirelles L, Currie F, Jacobsson M, Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. The effect of chemical and nano topographical modifications on early stage of osseointegration. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008;/23:/641-7.
36. Li Y, Lee IS, Cui FZ, Choi SH. The biocompatibility of nanostructured calcium phosphate coated on micro-arc oxidized titanium. Biomaterials 2008;/29:/2025-32.
37. Schliephake H, Aref A, Scharnweber D, Rö ssler S, Sewing A. Effect of modifications of dual acid-etched implant surfaces on periimplant bone formation. Part II: Calcium phosphate coatings. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;/20:/38-44.
38. Sawase T, Jimbo R, Wennerberg A, Suketa N, Tanaka Y, Atsuta M. A novel characteristic of porous titanium oxide implants. Clin Oral Impl Res 2007;/18:/680-5.
39. Jimbo R, Ono D, Hirakawa Y, Odatsu T, Tanaka T, Sawase T. Chemically accelerated photo-induced hydrophilicity promotes osseointegration: An animal study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2009. In press.
40. Albrektsson T, Branemark P-I, Hansson H-A, Kasemo B, Larsson K, Lundstöm I, et al. The interface zone of inorganic implants in vivo: Titanium implants in bone. Biomed Engin 1983;/11:/1-27.
41. Gottlander M, Johansson CB, Albrektsson T. Short and long-term studies with a plasma-sprayed calcium phosphatecoated implant. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;/8:/345-51.