In vitro comparison of commensal, probiotic and pathogenic strains of Enterococcus faecalis

British Journal of Nutrition

Volumn 108, Issue 11, 2012, Pages 2043-2053

  Christoffersen, Trine E ^a,b   Jensen, Hanne ^c   Kleiveland, Charlotte R ^b   Dørum, Guro ^b   Jacobsen, Morten ^b,d   Lea, Tor ^b  

^a ØSTFOLD UNIVERSITY COLLEGE   (Norway)

^b NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES   (Norway)

^c NOFIMA   (Norway)

^d Østfold Hospital Trust Fredrikstad   (Norway)

Author keywords

Enterococcus faecalis; Probiotics; Symbioflor 1

Indexed keywords

CD83 ANTIGEN; CD86 ANTIGEN; GLYCOSAMINOGLYCAN; HEPARIN;

ARTICLE; BACTERIAL STRAIN; CELL MATURATION; COMMENSAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENDRITIC CELL; DUODENUM FLUID; ENTEROCOCCUS FAECALIS; IMMUNOMODULATION; IN VITRO STUDY; IN VIVO STUDY; INTESTINE EPITHELIUM CELL; METHODOLOGY; MUCUS; NONHUMAN; PATHOGENIC STRAIN; PH; PROBIOTIC STRAIN; STOMACH JUICE; STRAIN DIFFERENCE;

BACTERIAL ADHESION; BLOOD; CACO-2 CELLS; CELLS, CULTURED; CHEESE; DENDRITIC CELLS; DUODENUM; ENTEROCOCCUS FAECALIS; ENTEROCYTES; FECES; GASTRIC JUICE; GASTRIC MUCINS; GASTROINTESTINAL CONTENTS; GRAM-POSITIVE BACTERIAL INFECTIONS; HUMANS; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; INTESTINAL MUCOSA; MICROBIAL VIABILITY; MONOCYTES; PROBIOTICS; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

ENTEROCOCCUS FAECALIS;

EID: 84871303586     PISSN: 00071145     EISSN: 14752662     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0007114512000220     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations & World Health Organization (2001) Health and nutritional properties of probiotics in food including powder milk with live lactic acid bacteria, a joint FAO/WHO expert consultation. Cordoba, Argentina, 1-4 October 2001. http://www.who.int/ foodsafety/publications/fs-management/en/probiotics.pdf (accessed January 2012).
2. Resta-Lenert S & Barrett KE (2003) Live probiotics protect intestinal epithelial cells from the effects of infection with enteroinvasive Escherichia coli (EIEC). Gut 52, 988-997.
3. He T, Priebe MG, Zhong Y, et al. (2008) Effects of yogurt and bifidobacteria supplementation on the colonic microbiota in lactose-intolerant subjects. J Appl Microbiol 104, 595-604.
4. Baken KA, Ezendam J, Gremmer ER, et al. (2006) Evaluation of immunomodulation by Lactobacillus casei Shirota: immune function, autoimmunity and gene expression. Int J Food Microbiol 112, 8-18.
5. Lebeer S, Vanderleyden J & De Keersmaecker SC (2010) Host interactions of probiotic bacterial surface molecules: comparison with commensals and pathogens. Nat Rev Microbiol 8, 171-184.
6. Smits HH, Engering A, van der Kleij D, et al. (2005) Selective probiotic bacteria induce IL-10-producing regulatory T cells in vitro by modulating dendritic cell function through dendritic cell-specific intercellular adhesion molecule 3-grabbing nonintegrin. J Allergy Clin Immunol 115, 1260-1267.
7. Evrard B, Coudeyras S, Dosgilbert A, et al. (2011) Dose-dependent immunomodulation of human dendritic cells by the probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus Lcr35. PLoS One 6, e18735.
8. Food and Agriculture Organization ofthe United Nations, World Health Organization (2002) Guidelines for the Evaluation of Probiotics in Food. London, Ontario, Canada, April 30 and May 1, 2002. http://www.who.int/foodsafety/ publications/fs- management/en/probiotic-guidelines.pdf (accessed January 2012).
9. Franz CM, Stiles ME, Schleifer KH, et al. (2003) Enterococci in foods-a conundrum for food safety. Int J Food Microbiol 88, 105-122.
10. Foulquie Moreno MR, Sarantinopoulos P, Tsakalidou E, et al. (2006) The role and application of enterococci in food and health. Int J Food Microbiol 106, 1-24.
11. Linden PK & Miller CB (1999) Vancomycin-resistant entero-cocci: the clinical effect of a common nosocomial pathogen. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 33, 113-120.
12. Fisher K & Phillips C (2009) The ecology, epidemiology and virulence of Enterococcus. Microbiology 155, 1749-1757.
13. Sahm DF, Kissinger J, Gilmore MS, et al. (1989) In vitro susceptibility studies of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 33, 1588-1591.
14. Paulsen IT, Banerjei L, Myers GS, et al. (2003) Role of mobile DNA in the evolution of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis. Science 299, 2071-2074.
15. Habermann W, Zimmermann K, Skarabis H, et al. (2002) Reduction of acute recurrence in patients with chronic recurrent hypertrophic sinusitis by treatment with a bacterial immunostimulant (Enterococcus faecalis bacteria of human origin-a medical probiotic) (article in German). Arzneimittelforschung 52, 622-627.
16. Habermann W, Zimmermann K, Skarabis H, et al. (2001) The effect of a bacterial immunostimulant (human Enterococcus faecalis bacteria) on the occurrence of relapse in patients with chronic bronchitis (article in German). Arzneimittelforschung 51, 931-937.
17. Guillemard E, Tondu F, Lacoin F, et al. (2010) Consumption of a fermented dairy product containing the probiotic Lactobacillus casei DN-114001 reduces the duration of respiratory infections in the elderly in a randomised controlled trial. Br J Nutr 103, 58-68.
18. Vouloumanou EK, Makris GC, Karageorgopoulos DE, et al. (2009) Probiotics for the prevention of respiratory tract infections: a systematic review. Int J Antimicrob Agents 34, 197e1-197e10.
19. European Food Safety Authority (2010) Scientific Opinion on the maintenance of the list of QPS biological agents intentionally added to food and feed (2010 update): FSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ). http://www.efsa.europa. eu/fr/scdocs/doc/1944.pdf (accessed January 2012).
20. Domann E, Hain T, Ghai R, et al. (2007) Comparative geno-mic analysis for the presence of potential enterococcal virulence factors in the probiotic Enterococcus faecalis strain Symbioflor 1. Int J Med Microbiol 297, 533-539.
21. Brede DA, Snipen LG, Ussery DW, et al. (2011) Complete genome sequence of the commensal Enterococcus faecalis 62, isolated from a healthy Norwegian infant. J Bacteriol 193, 2377-2378.
22. Solheim M, Brekke MC, Snipen LG, et al. (2011) Comparative genomic analysis reveals significant enrichment of mobile genetic elements and genes encoding surface structure-proteins in hospital-associated clonal complex 2 Enterococcus faecalis. BMC Microbiol 11, 3.
23. Solheim M, Aakra A, Snipen LG, et al. (2009) Comparative genomics of Enterococcus faecalis from healthy Norwegian infants. BMC Genomics 10, 194.
24. Kandler O, Stetter KO & Kohl R (1980) Lactobacillus reuteri sp. nov., a new species of heterofermentative lactobacilli. Zbl Bakt Hyg I Abt Orig C 1, 264-269.
25. Shrago AW, Chassy BM & Dobrogosz WJ (1986) Conjugal plasmid transfer (pAMb1) in Lactobacillus plantarum. Appl Environ Microbiol 52, 574-576.
26. Tallon R, Arias S, Bressollier P, et al. (2007) Strain-and matrix-dependent adhesion of Lactobacillus plantarum is mediated by proteinaceous bacterial compounds. J Appl Microbiol 102, 442-451.
27. 2-con-taining cocktail can produce high levels of IL-12p70 and are more mature and Th1-biased than dendritic cells treated with TNF-a or LPS. Immunobiology 216, 649-662.
28. Jensen H, Grimmer S, Naterstad K, et al. (2012) In vitro testing of commercial and potential probiotic lactic acid bacteria. Int J Food Microbiol 153, 216-222.
29. Sava IG, Zhang F, Toma I, et al. (2009) Novel interactions of glycosaminoglycans and bacterial glycolipids mediate binding of enterococci to human cells. J Biol Chem 284, 18194-18201.
30. Zhou LJ & Tedder TF (1996) CD14 blood monocytes can differentiate into functionally mature CD83 dendritic cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93, 2588-2592.
31. Prazma CM & Tedder TF (2008) Dendritic cell CD83: a therapeutic target or innocent bystander? Immunol Lett 115, 1-8.
32. Zhou LJ, Schwarting R, Smith HM, et al. (1992) A novel cell-surface molecule expressed by human interdigitating reticulum cells, Langerhans cells, and activated lymphocytes is a new member of the Ig superfamily. J Immunol 149, 735-742.
33. Tuomola E, Crittenden R, Playne M, et al. (2001) Quality assurance criteria for probiotic bacteria. Am J Clin Nutr 73, Suppl. 2, 393S-398S.
34. Charteris WP, Kelly PM, Morelli L, et al. (1998) Development and application of an in vitro methodology to determine the transit tolerance of potentially probiotic Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium species in the upper human gastrointestinal tract. J Appl Microbiol 84, 759-768.
35. Nueno-Palop C & Narbad A (2011) Probiotic assessment of Enterococcus faecalis CP58 isolated from human gut. Int J Food Microbiol 145, 390-394.
36. Immerstrand T, Paul CJ, Rosenquist A, et al. (2010) Characterization of the properties of Pediococcus parvulus for probiotic or protective culture use. J Food Prot 73, 960-966.
37. Del Piano M, Strozzi P, Barba M, et al. (2008) In vitro sensitivity of probiotics to human pancreatic juice. J Clin Gastroenterol 42, Suppl. 3, S170-S173.
38. de los Reyes-Gavilán CG, Suárez A, Fernández- García M, et al. (2011) Adhesion of bile-adapted Bifidobacterium strains to the HT29-MTX cell line is modified after sequential gastrointestinal challenge simulated in vitro using human gastric and duodenal juices. Res Microbiol 162, 514-519.
39. Jaeger H, Schulz A, Karapetkov N, et al. (2009) Protective effect of milk constituents and sublethal injuries limiting process effectiveness during PEF inactivation of Lb. rhamnosus. Int J Food Microbiol 134, 154-161.
40. TM bacterial viability and counting kit (L34856). http://probes.invitrogen. com/media/pis/mp34856.pdf (accessed August 2011).
41. Joux F & Lebaron P (2000) Use of fluorescent probes to assess physiological functions of bacteria at single-cell level. Microbes Infect 2, 1523-1535.
42. Del Piano M, Ballare M, Anderloni A, et al. (2006) In vitro sensitivity of probiotics to human bile. Dig Liver Dis 38, Suppl. 1, S130.
43. Sidira M, Galanis A, Ypsilantis P, et al. (2010) Effect of probiotic-fermented milk administration on gastrointestinal survival of Lactobacillus casei ATCC 393 and modulation of intestinal microbial flora. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol 19, 224-230.
44. Ritter P, Kohler C & von Ah U (2009) Evaluation of the passage of Lactobacillus gasseri K7 and bifidobacteria from the stomach to intestines using a single reactor model. BMC Microbiol 9, 87.
45. Bohle LA, Faergestad EM, Veiseth-Kent E, et al. (2010) Identification of proteins related to the stress response in Enterococcus faecalis V583 caused by bovine bile. Proteome Sci 8, 37.
46. Flahaut S, Frere J, Boutibonnes P, et al. (1996) Comparison of the bile salts and sodium dodecyl sulfate stress responses in Enterococcus faecalis. Appl Environ Microbiol 62, 2416-2420.
47. Solheim M, Aakra A, Vebo H, et al. (2007) Transcriptional responses of Enterococcus faecalis V583 to bovine bile and sodium dodecyl sulfate. Appl Environ Microbiol 73, 5767-5774.
48. Jacobsen CN, Rosenfeldt Nielsen V, Hayford AE, et al. (1999) Screening of probiotic activities of forty-seven strains of Lactobacillus spp. by in vitro techniques and evaluation of the colonization ability of five selected strains in humans. Appl Environ Microbiol 65, 4949-4956.
49. Li XJ, Yue LY, Guan XF, et al. (2008) The adhesion of putative probiotic lactobacilli to cultured epithelial cells and porcine intestinal mucus. J Appl Microbiol 104, 1082-1091.
50. Sambuy Y, De Angelis I, Ranaldi G, et al. (2005) The Caco-2 cell line as a model of the intestinal barrier: influence of cell and culture-related factors on Caco-2 cell functional characteristics. Cell Biol Toxicol 21, 1-26.
51. Zweibaum A, Triadou N, Kedinger M, et al. (1983) Sucrase-isomaltase: a marker of foetal and malignant epithelial cells of the human colon. Int J Cancer 32, 407-412.
52. Matsumoto H, Erickson RH, Gum JR, et al. (1990) Biosynthesis of alkaline phosphatase during differentiation of the human colon cancer cell line Caco-2. Gastroenterology 98, 1199-1207.
53. Natoli M, Leoni BD, D'Agnano I, et al. (2011) Cell growing density affects the structural and functional properties of Caco-2 differentiated monolayer. J Cell Physiol 226, 1531-1543.
54. Gaudana SB, Dhanani AS & Bagchi T (2010) Probiotic attributes of Lactobacillus strains isolated from food and of human origin. Br J Nutr 103, 1620-1628.
55. Laparra JM & Sanz Y (2009) Comparison of in vitro models to study bacterial adhesion to the intestinal epithelium. Lett Appl Microbiol 49, 695-701.
56. Matsumoto M, Tani H, Ono H, et al. (2002) Adhesive property of Bifidobacterium lactis LKM512 and predominant bacteria of intestinal microflora to human intestinal mucin. Curr Microbiol 44, 212-215.
57. Tuomola EM, Ouwehand AC & Salminen SJ (2000) Chemical, physical and enzymatic pre-treatments of probiotic lacto-bacilli alter their adhesion to human intestinal mucus glycoproteins. Int J Food Microbiol 60, 75-81.
58. Hafez MM, Aboulwafa MM, Yassien MA, et al. (2008) Role of different classes of mammalian cell surface molecules in adherence of coagulase positive and coagulase negative staphylococci. J Basic Microbiol 48, 353-362.
59. Styriak I, Nemcova R, Chang YH, et al. (2003) Binding of extracellular matrix molecules by probiotic bacteria. Lett Appl Microbiol 37, 329-333.
60. Rostand KS & Esko JD (1997) Microbial adherence to and invasion through proteoglycans. Infect Immun 65, 1-8.
61. Fleckenstein JM, Holland JT & Hasty DL (2002) Interaction of an outer membrane protein of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli with cell surface heparan sulfate proteoglycans. Infect Immun 70, 1530-1537.
62. Baldassarri L, Bertuccini L, Creti R, et al. (2005) Glycosami-noglycans mediate invasion and survival of Enterococcus faecalis into macrophages. J Infect Dis 191, 1253-1262.
63. Gu L, Wang H, Guo YL, et al. (2008) Heparin blocks the adhesion of E. coli O157:H7 to human colonic epithelial cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 369, 1061-1064.
64. Coombes JL & Powrie F (2008) Dendritic cells in intestinal immune regulation. Nat Rev Immunol 8, 435-446.
65. Rakoff-Nahoum S, Paglino J, Eslami-Varzaneh F, et al. (2004) Recognition of commensal microflora by Toll-like receptors is required for intestinal homeostasis. Cell 118, 229-241.
66. Christensen HR, Frokiaer H & Pestka JJ (2002) Lactobacilli differentially modulate expression of cytokines and maturation surface markers in murine dendritic cells. J Immunol 168, 171-178.
67. Zoumpopoulou G, Tsakalidou E, Dewulf J, et al. (2009) Differential crosstalk between epithelial cells, dendritic cells and bacteria in a co-culture model. Int J Food Microbiol 131, 40-51.
68. Hart AL, Lammers K, Brigidi P, et al. (2004) Modulation of human dendritic cell phenotype and function by probiotic bacteria. Gut 53, 1602-1609.
69. Zeuthen LH, Fink LN & Frokiaer H (2008) Toll-like receptor 2 and nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-2 play divergent roles in the recognition of gut-derived lactobacilli and bifidobacteria in dendritic cells. Immunology 124, 489-502.
70. Rimoldi M, Chieppa M, Salucci V, et al. (2005) Intestinal immune homeostasis is regulated by the crosstalk between epithelial cells and dendritic cells. Nat Immunol 6, 507-514.
71. Rimoldi M, Chieppa M, Larghi P, et al. (2005) Monocyte-derived dendritic cells activated by bacteria or by bacteria-stimulated epithelial cells are functionally different. Blood 106, 2818-2826.
72. Butler M, Ng CY, van Heel DA, et al. (2006) Modulation of dendritic cell phenotype and function in an in vitro model of the intestinal epithelium. Eur J Immunol 36, 864-874.
73. Nobaek S, Johansson ML, Molin G, et al. (2000) Alteration of intestinal microflora is associated with reduction in abdominal bloating and pain in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Am J Gastroenterol 95, 1231-1238.
74. Hojsak I, Abdovic S, Szajewska H, et al. (2010) Lactobacillus GG in the prevention of nosocomial gastrointestinal and respiratory tract infections. Pediatrics 125, e1171-e1177.
75. Klingberg TD, Pedersen MH, Cencic A, et al. (2005) Application of measurements of transepithelial electrical resistance of intestinal epithelial cell monolayers to evaluate probiotic activity. Appl Environ Microbiol 71, 7528-7530.
76. Klingberg TD, Axelsson L, Naterstad K, et al. (2005) Identification of potential probiotic starter cultures for Scandinavian-type fermented sausages. Int J Food Microbiol 105, 419-431.
77. Ligaarden SC, Axelsson L, Naterstad K, et al. (2010) A candidate probiotic with unfavourable effects in subjects with irritable bowel syndrome: a randomised controlled trial. BMC Gastroenterol 10, 16.
78. Rijkers GT, de Vos WM, Brummer RJ, et al. (2011) Health benefits and health claims of probiotics: bridging science and marketing. Br J Nutr 106, 1291-1296.