Identification of proteins related to the stress response in Enterococcus faecalis V583 caused by bovine bile

Proteome Science

Volumn 8, Issue , 2010, Pages

  Bøhle, Liv A ^a   Færgestad, Ellen M ^b   Veiseth Kent, Eva ^b   Steinmoen, Hilde ^a   Nes, Ingolf F ^a   Eijsink, Vincent G H ^a   Mathiesen, Geir ^a  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES   (Norway)

^b NOFIMA   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BACTERIAL PROTEIN; BILE ACID; PROTEOME; RIBOSEPHOSPHATE PYROPHOSPHOKINASE;

ARTICLE; BACTERIAL STRAIN; BACTERIAL SURVIVAL; CELLULAR STRESS RESPONSE; CONTROLLED STUDY; COW; ENERGY METABOLISM; ENTEROCOCCUS FAECALIS; FATTY ACID SYNTHESIS; MASS SPECTROMETRY; NONHUMAN; PHOSPHOLIPID SYNTHESIS; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN SYNTHESIS REGULATION; PROTEIN TRANSPORT; TWO DIMENSIONAL GEL ELECTROPHORESIS;

BOVINAE; ENTEROCOCCUS FAECALIS;

EID: 77955134701     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14775956     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1477-5956-8-37     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Paulsen IT, Banerjei L, Myers GS, Nelson KE, Seshadri R, Read TD, Fouts DE, Eisen JA, Gill SR, Heidelberg JF, et al. Role of mobile DNA in the evolution of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis. Science 2003, 299:2071-2074. 10.1126/science.1080613, 12663927.
2. Tacconelli E, Cataldo MA. Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE): transmission and control. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2008, 31:99-106. 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2007.08.026, 18164908.
3. Cetinkaya Y, Falk P, Mayhall CG. Vancomycin-resistant enterococci. Clin Microbiol Rev 2000, 13:686-707. 10.1128/CMR.13.4.686-707.2000, 88957, 11023964.
4. Fisher K, Phillips C. The ecology epidemiology and virulence of Enterococcus. Microbiology 2009, 155:1749-1757. 10.1099/mic.0.026385-0, 19383684.
5. Rince A, Le Breton Y, Verneuil N, Giard JC, Hartke A, Auffray Y. Physiological and molecular aspects of bile salt response in Enterococcus faecalis. Int J Food Microbiol 2003, 88:207-213. 10.1016/S0168-1605(03)00182-X, 14596992.
6. Begley M, Gahan CG, Hill C. The interaction between bacteria and bile. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2005, 29:625-651. 10.1016/j.femsre.2004.09.003, 16102595.
7. Taranto MP, Fernandez Murga ML, Lorca G, de Valdez GF. Bile salts and cholesterol induce changes in the lipid cell membrane of Lactobacillus reuteri. J Appl Microbiol 2003, 95:86-91. 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2003.01962.x, 12807457.
8. Ruiz L, Sanchez B, Ruas-Madiedo P, de Los Reyes-Gavilan CG, Margolles A. Cell envelope changes in Bifidobacterium animalis ssp. lactis as a response to bile. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2007, 274:316-322. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2007.00854.x, 17651391.
9. Bron PA, Marco M, Hoffer SM, Van Mullekom E, de Vos WM, Kleerebezem M. Genetic characterization of the bile salt response in Lactobacillus plantarum and analysis of responsive promoters in vitro and in situ in the gastrointestinal tract. J Bacteriol 2004, 186:7829-7835. 10.1128/JB.186.23.7829-7835.2004, 529069, 15547253.
10. Kristoffersen SM, Ravnum S, Tourasse NJ, Okstad OA, Kolsto AB, Davies W. Low concentrations of bile salts induce stress responses and reduce motility in Bacillus cereus ATCC 14579. J Bacteriol 2007, 189:5302-5313. 10.1128/JB.00239-07, 1951874, 17496091.
11. Gueimonde M, Garrigues C, van Sinderen D, de los Reyes-Gavilan CG, Margolles A. Bile-inducible efflux transporter from Bifidobacterium longum NCC2705, conferring bile resistance. Appl Environ Microbiol 2009, 75:3153-3160. 10.1128/AEM.00172-09, 2681658, 19304838.
12. Whitehead K, Versalovic J, Roos S, Britton RA. Genomic and genetic characterization of the bile stress response of probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri ATCC 55730. Appl Environ Microbiol 2008, 74:1812-1819. 10.1128/AEM.02259-07, 2268311, 18245259.
13. Pfeiler EA, Azcarate-Peril MA, Klaenhammer TR. Characterization of a novel bile-inducible operon encoding a two-component regulatory system in Lactobacillus acidophilus. J Bacteriol 2007, 189:4624-4634. 10.1128/JB.00337-07, 1913432, 17449631.
14. Bron PA, Molenaar D, de Vos WM, Kleerebezem M. DNA micro-array-based identification of bile-responsive genes in Lactobacillus plantarum. J Appl Microbiol 2006, 100:728-738. 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.02891.x, 16553727.
15. Solheim M, Aakra A, Vebo H, Snipen L, Nes IF. Transcriptional responses of Enterococcus faecalis V583 to bovine bile and sodium dodecyl sulfate. Appl Environ Microbiol 2007, 73:5767-5774. 10.1128/AEM.00651-07, 2074917, 17660310.
16. Flahaut S, Frere J, Boutibonnes P, Auffray Y. Comparison of the bile salts and sodium dodecyl sulfate stress responses in Enterococcus faecalis. Appl Environ Microbiol 1996, 62:2416-2420. 168024, 8779581.
17. Flahaut S, Hartke A, Giard JC, Benachour A, Boutibonnes P, Auffray Y. Relationship between stress response towards bile salts acid and heat treatment in Enterococcus faecalis. FEMS Microbiol Lett 1996, 138:49-54. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1996.tb08133.x, 8674969.
18. Giard JC, Laplace JM, Rince A, Pichereau V, Benachour A, Leboeuf C, Flahaut S, Auffray Y, Hartke A. The stress proteome of Enterococcus faecalis. Electrophoresis 2001, 22:2947-2954. 10.1002/1522-2683(200108)22:14<2947::AID-ELPS2947>3.0.CO;2-K, 11565789.
19. Sahm DF, Kissinger J, Gilmore MS, Murray PR, Mulder R, Solliday J, Clarke B. In vitro susceptibility studies of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1989, 33:1588-1591. 172707, 2554802.
20. Shevchenko A, Wilm M, Vorm O, Mann M. Mass spectrometric sequencing of proteins silver-stained polyacrylamide gels. Anal Chem 1996, 68:850-858. 10.1021/ac950914h, 8779443.
21. Berth M, Moser FM, Kolbe M, Bernhardt J. The state of the art in the analysis of two-dimensional gel electrophoresis images. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2007, 76:1223-1243. 10.1007/s00253-007-1128-0, 2279157, 17713763.
22. Leverrier P, Dimova D, Pichereau V, Auffray Y, Boyaval P, Jan G. Susceptibility and Adaptive Response to Bile Salts in Propionibacterium freudenreichii: Physiological and Proteomic Analysis. Appl Environ Microbiol 2003, 69:3809-3818. 10.1128/AEM.69.7.3809-3818.2003, 165135, 12839748.
23. Sanchez B, Champomier-Verges MC, Anglade P, Baraige F, de Los Reyes-Gavilan CG, Margolles A, Zagorec M. Proteomic analysis of global changes in protein expression during bile salt exposure of Bifidobacterium longum NCIMB 8809. J Bacteriol 2005, 187:5799-5808. 10.1128/JB.187.16.5799-5808.2005, 1196055, 16077128.
24. Moen B, Oust A, Langsrud O, Dorrell N, Marsden GL, Hinds J, Kohler A, Wren BW, Rudi K. Explorative multifactor approach for investigating global survival mechanisms of Campylobacter jejuni under environmental conditions. Appl Environ Microbiol 2005, 71:2086-2094. 10.1128/AEM.71.4.2086-2094.2005, 1082531, 15812042.
25. Langsrud T. Rotation tests. Statistics and computing 2005, 15:53-60.
26. Rappsilber J, Ishihama Y, Mann M. Stop and go extraction tips for matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization, nanoelectrospray, and LC/MS sample pretreatment in proteomics. Analyt Chem 2003, 75:663-670.
27. Lee K, Lee HG, Choi YJ. Proteomic analysis of the effect of bile salts on the intestinal and probiotic bacterium Lactobacillus reuteri. J Biotechnol 2008, 137:14-19. 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2008.07.1788, 18680767.
28. Sanchez B, Champomier-Verges MC, Stuer-Lauridsen B, Ruas-Madiedo P, Anglade P, Baraige F, de los Reyes-Gavilan CG, Johansen E, Zagorec M, Margolles A. Adaptation and response of Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis to bile: a proteomic and physiological approach. Appl Environ Microbiol 2007, 73:6757-6767. 10.1128/AEM.00637-07, 2074956, 17827318.
29. Leverrier P, Vissers JP, Rouault A, Boyaval P, Jan G. Mass spectrometry proteomic analysis of stress adaptation reveals both common and distinct response pathways in Propionibacterium freudenreichii. Arch Microbiol 2004, 181:215-230. 10.1007/s00203-003-0646-0, 14730419.
30. Schmidt G, Zink R. Basic features of the stress response in three species of bifidobacteria: B. longum, B. adolescentis, and B. breve. Int J Food Microbiol 2000, 55:41-45. 10.1016/S0168-1605(00)00211-7, 10791715.
31. Ramirez-Arcos S, Liao M, Marthaler S, Rigden M, Dillon JA. Enterococcus faecalis divIVA: an essential gene involved in cell division, cell growth and chromosome segregation. Microbiology 2005, 151:1381-1393. 10.1099/mic.0.27718-0, 15870448.
32. Mukherjee P, Sureka K, Datta P, Hossain T, Barik S, Das KP, Kundu M, Basu J. Novel role of Wag31 in protection of mycobacteria under oxidative stress. Mol Microbiol 2009, 73:103-119. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06750.x, 19496931.
33. Ruiz L, Coute Y, Sanchez B, de los Reyes-Gavilan CG, Sanchez JC, Margolles A. The cell-envelope proteome of Bifidobacterium longum in an in vitro bile environment. Microbiology 2009, 155:957-967. 10.1099/mic.0.024273-0, 19246766.
34. Vebø HC, Snipen L, Nes IF, Brede DA. The transcriptome of the nosocomial pathogen Enterococcus faecalis V583 reveals adaptive responses to growth in blood. PLoS One 2009, 4:e7660. 10.1371/journal.pone.0007660, 2766626, 19888459.
35. Zuniga M, Comas I, Linaje R, Monedero V, Yebra MJ, Esteban CD, Deutscher J, Perez-Martinez G, Gonzalez-Candelas F. Horizontal gene transfer in the molecular evolution of mannose PTS transporters. Mol Biol Evol 2005, 22:1673-1685. 10.1093/molbev/msi163, 16006479.
36. Begley M, Hill C, Gahan CG. Bile salt hydrolase activity in probiotics. Appl Environ Microbiol 2006, 72:1729-1738. 10.1128/AEM.72.3.1729-1738.2006, 1393245, 16517616.
37. Jones BV, Begley M, Hill C, Gahan CG, Marchesi JR. Functional and comparative metagenomic analysis of bile salt hydrolase activity in the human gut microbiome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008, 105:13580-13585. 10.1073/pnas.0804437105, 2533232, 18757757.
38. Elkins CA, Moser SA, Savage DC. Genes encoding bile salt hydrolases and conjugated bile salt transporters in Lactobacillus johnsonii 100-100 and other Lactobacillus species. Microbiology 2001, 147:3403-3412.
39. Tanaka H, Doesburg K, Iwasaki T, Mierau I. Screening of lactic acid bacteria for bile salt hydrolase activity. J Dairy Sci 1999, 82:2530-2535. 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(99)75506-2, 10629797.
40. Lambert JM, Bongers RS, de Vos WM, Kleerebezem M. Functional analysis of four bile salt hydrolase and penicillin acylase family members in Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1. Appl Environ Microbiol 2008, 74:4719-4726. 10.1128/AEM.00137-08, 2519332, 18539794.
41. McAuliffe O, Cano RJ, Klaenhammer TR. Genetic analysis of two bile salt hydrolase activities in Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM. Appl Environ Microbiol 2005, 71:4925-4929. 10.1128/AEM.71.8.4925-4929.2005, 1183333, 16085898.
42. Fang F, Li Y, Bumann M, Raftis EJ, Casey PG, Cooney JC, Walsh MA, O'Toole PW. Allelic variation of bile salt hydrolase genes in Lactobacillus salivarius does not determine bile resistance levels. J Bacteriol 2009, 191:5743-5757. 10.1128/JB.00506-09, 2737978, 19592587.