Homoplasy, Pollination, and Emerging Complexity During the Evolution of Floral Development in the Tropical Gingers (Zingiberales)

Botanical Review

Volumn 78, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 440-462

  Specht, Chelsea D ^a,d   Yockteng, Roxana ^a,e   Almeida, Ana Maria ^a   Kirchoff, Bruce K ^b   Kress, W John ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO   (United States)

^c DEPARTMENT OF PALEOBIOLOGY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^e MUSÉUM NATIONAL D'HISTOIRE NATURELLE   (France)

Author keywords

Developmental evolution; Diversification rates; Floral evolution; Key innovation; Model clade; Pollination syndrome; Zingiberales

Indexed keywords

LILIOPSIDA; ZINGIBER OFFICINALE; ZINGIBERALES;

EID: 84871262543     PISSN: 00068101     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12229-012-9111-6     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Armbruster, W. S. & N. Muchhala. 2009. Associations between floral specialization and species diversity: Cause, effect, or correlation? Evolutionary Ecology 23: 159-179.
2. Bartlett, M. & C. D. Specht. 2010. Evidence for the involvement of GLOBOSA-like gene duplications and expression divergence in the evolution of floral morphology in the Zingiberales. New Phytologist 187: 521-541.
3. --- & ---. 2011. Changes in expression pattern of the teosinte branched-1 like genes in the Zingiberales provide a mechanism for evolutionary shifts in symmetry across the order. American Journal of Botany 98: 227-243.
4. Berenbaum, M. R., C. Favret & M. A. Schuler. 1996. On defining "key innovations" in an adaptive radiation: Cytochrome P450s and Papilionidae. American Naturalist 148: S139-S155.
5. Bollback, J. P. 2006. SIMMAP: Stochastic character mapping of discrete traits on phylogenies. Bmc Bioinformatics 7: 88.
6. Box, M. S. & P. J. Rudall. 2006. Floral structure and ontogeny in Globba (Zingiberaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 258: 107-122.
7. Bryant, H. N. 2004. The cladistics of matrix representation with parsimony analysis. pp 353-368. In: O. Bininda-Emonds (ed). Phylogenetic supertrees: Combining information to reveal the tree of Life. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
8. Buchmann, S. L. 1980. Preliminary anthecological observations on Xiphidium caeruleum Aubl. (Monocotyledoneae: Haemodoraceae) in Panama. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 53: 685-699.
9. Burger, W. C. 1981. Why are there so many kinds of flowering plants. Bioscience 31: 572-581.
10. Carroll, S. B. 2006. Endless forms most beautiful: The new science of Evo Devo and the making of the animal kingdom. W. W. Norton, New York.
11. Castellanos, M. C., P. Wilson & J. D. Thomson. 2004. 'Anti-bee' and 'pro-bird' changes during the evolution of hummingbird pollination in Penstemon flowers. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 17: 876-885.
12. Chan, K. M. A. & B. R. Moore. 2002. Whole-tree methods for detecting differential diversification rates. Systematic Biology 51: 855-865.
13. --- & ---. 2005. SymmeTREE: Whole-tree analysis of differential diversification rates. Bioinformatics 21: 1709-1710.
14. Classen-Bockhoff, R. 1991. Untersuchungen zur Konstruktion des Bestäubungsapparates von Thalia geniculata (Marantaceen). Botanica Acta 104: 183-193.
15. Darwin, C. 1859. The origin of species.
16. Eriksson, O. & B. Bremer. 1992. Pollination systems, dispersal modes, life forms, and diversification rates in angiosperm families. Evolution 46: 258-266.
17. Faden, R. B. 1992. Floral attraction and floral hairs in the Commelinaceae. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 79: 46-52.
18. Farris, J. S. 1976. Expected asymmetry of phylogenetic trees. Systematic Zoology 25: 196-198.
19. Fenster, C. B., W. S. Armbruster, P. Wilson, M. R. Dudash & J. D. Thomson. 2004. Pollination syndromes and floral specialization. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics 35: 375-403.
20. Fleming, T. H., C. Geiselman & W. J. Kress. 2009. The evolution of bat pollination: A phylogenetic perspective. Annals of Botany 104: 1017-1043.
21. Funk, V. & C. D. Specht. 2007. Meta-trees: Grafting for a global perspective. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 120: 233-241.
22. Gentry, A. H. 1982. Neotropical floristic diversity: Phytogeographical connections between Central and South America, pleistocene climatic fluctuations, or an accident of the andean orogeny? Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 69: 557-593.
23. Gittleman, J. L., K. E. Jones & S. A. Price. 2004. Supertrees: Using complete phylogenies in comparative biology. pp 439-460. In: O. Bininda-Emonds (ed). Phylogenetic supertrees: Combining information to reveal the tree of life. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
24. Givnish, T. J. 2010. Ecology of plant speciation. Taxon 59: 1326-1366.
25. Gompel, N., B. Prud'homme, P. J. Wittkopp, V. A. Kassner & S. B. Carroll. 2005. Chance caught on a wing: cis-regulatory evolution and the origin of pigment patterns in Drosophila. Nature 433: 481-487.
26. Hardy, C. R., L. L. Sloat & R. B. Faden. 2009. Floral organogenesis and the developmental basis for pollinator deception in the asiatic dayflower, Commelina communis (Commelinaceae). American Journal of Botany 96: 1236-1244.
27. Hodges, S. A. 1997a. Floral nectar spurs and diversification. International Journal of Plant Sciences 158: S81-S88.
28. --- 1997b. A rapid adaptive radiation via a key innovation in Aquilegia. pp 391-405. In: T. J. Givnish & K. J. Sytsma (eds). Molecular evolution and adaptive radiations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
29. Hopper, S. D. & A. H. Burbidge. 1978. Assortative pollination by red wattlebirds in a hybrid population of Anigozanthos Labill (Haemodoraceae). Australian Journal of Botany 26: 335-350.
30. Huelsenbeck, J. P., R. Nielsen & J. P. Bollback. 2003. Stochastic mapping of morphological characters. Systematic Biology 52: 131-158.
31. Husband, B. C. & S. C. H. Barrett. 1992. Pollinator visitation in populations of tristylous Eichhornia-paniculata in Northeastern Brazil. Oecologia 89: 365-371.
32. Johansen, L. B. 2005. Phylogeny of Orchidantha (Lowiaceae) and the Zingiberales based on six DNA regions. Systematic Botany 30: 106-117.
33. Kay, K. M., P. A. Reeves, R. G. Olmstead & D. W. Schemske. 2005. Rapid speciation and the evolution of hummingbird pollination in neotropical Costus subgenus Costus (Costaceae): Evidence from nrDNA ITS and ETS sequences. American Journal of Botany 92: 1899-1910.
34. Kennedy, H. 2000. Diversification in pollination mechanisms in the Marantaceae. In: K. L. Wilson & D. A. Morrison (eds). Monocots: Systematics and evolution. CSIRO, Melbourne.
35. Kirchoff, B. K. 1983. Floral organogenesis in 5 genera of the Marantaceae and in Canna (Cannaceae). American Journal of Botany 70: 508-523.
36. --- 1988. Inflorescence and flower development in Costus scaber (Costaceae). Canadian Journal of Botany 66: 339-345.
37. --- 1991. Homeosis in the flowers of the Zingiberales. Am. J. Bot. 78: 833-837.
38. --- 1998. Infloresence and flower development in the Hedychieae (Zingiberaceae): Scaphochlamys kunstleri (Baker) Holttum. International Journal of Plant Sciences 159: 261-274.
39. --- & H. Kunze. 1995. Inflorescence and floral development in Orchidantha Maxillarioides (Lowiaceae). International Journal of Plant Sciences 156: 159-171.
40. ---, L. P. Lagomarsino, W. H. Newman, M. E. Bartlett & C. D. Specht. 2009. Early floral development of Heliconia latispatha (Heliconiaceae), a key taxon for understanding the evolution of flower development in the Zingiberales. Am. J. Bot. 96: 580-593.
41. Kress, W. J. 1995. Phylogeny of the Zingiberanae: Morphology and molecules. pp 443-460. In: P. Rudall, P. J. Cribb, D. F. Cutler, & C. J. Humphries (eds). Monocotyledons: Systematics and evolution. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK.
42. --- & C. D. Specht. 2005. Between Cancer and Capricorn: Phylogeny, evolution, and ecology of the tropical Zingiberales. In: I. Friis & H. Balslev (eds). Proceedings of a symposium on plant diversity and complexity patterns-local, regional and global dimensions. Biologiske Skrifter, The Royal Danish Academy of Sciences and Letters, Copenhagen.
43. --- & ---. 2006. The evolutionary and biogeographic origin and diversification of the tropical monocot order Zingiberales. pp 619-630. In: J. T. Columbus, E. A. Friar, C. W. Hamilton, J. M. Porter, L. M. Prince, et al. (eds). Monocots: Comparative biology and evolution. Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden, Claremont, CA.
44. ---, L. M. Prince, W. J. Hahn & E. A. Zimmer. 2001. Unraveling the evolutionary radiation of the families of the Zingiberales using morphological and molecular evidence. Systematic Biology 50: 926-944.
45. ---, --- & K. J. Williams. 2002. The phylogeny and a new classification of the gingers (Zingiberaceae): Evidence from molecular data. American Journal of Botany 89: 1682-1696.
46. Ley, A. C. & R. Classen-Bockhoff. 2009. Pollination syndromes in African Marantaceae. Annals of Botany 104: 41-56.
47. Liu, A., W. J. Kress, H. Wang & D. Z. Li. 2002. Insect pollination of Musella (Musaceae), a monotypic genus endemic to Yunnan, China. Plant Systematics and Evolution 235: 135-146.
48. Losos, J. B. & D. B. Miles. 2002. Testing the hypothesis that a clade has adaptively radiated: Iguanid lizard clades as a case study. American Naturalist 160: 147-157.
49. Magallon, S. & M. J. Sanderson. 2001. Absolute diversification rates in angiosperm clades. Evolution 55: 1762-1780.
50. Martin, C. & B. J. Glover. 2007. Functional aspects of cell patterning in aerial epidermis. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 10: 70-82.
51. McKenna, D. D. & B. D. Farrell. 2006. Tropical forests are both evolutionary cradles and museums of leaf beetle diversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103: 10947-10951.
52. Mitter, C., B. Farrell & B. Wiegmann. 1988. The phylogenetic study of adaptive zones-Has phytophagy promoted insect diversification. American Naturalist 132: 107-128.
53. Moore, B. R., K. M. A. Chan & M. J. Donoghue. 2004. Detecting diversification rate variation in supertrees. pp 487-533. In: O. Bininda-Emonds (ed). Phylogenetic supertrees: Combining information to reveal the tree of life. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
54. Orth, A. I. & K. D. Waddington. 1997. The movement patterns of carpenter bees Xylocopa micans and bumblebees Bombus pennsylvanicus on Pontederia cordata inflorescences. Journal of Insect Behavior 10: 79-86.
55. Patel, N. 2004. Evolutionary biology: Time, space and genomes. Nature 431: 28-29.
56. Pellmyr, O. 2002. Pollination by animals. pp 157-184. In: C. M. Herrera & O. Pellmyr (eds). Plant-animal Interactions: An evolutionary approach. Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK.
57. Pischtschan, E. & R. Classen-Bockhoff. 2008. Setting-up tension in the style of Marantaceae. Plant Biology 10: 441-450.
58. Prince, L. M. 2010. Phylogenetic relationships and species delimitation in Canna (Cannaceae). pp 307-331. In: O. Seberg, G. Petersen, A. S. Barfod, & J. I. Davis (eds). Diversity, phylogeny, and evolution in the monocotyledons. Aarhus University Press, Denmark.
59. --- & W. J. Kress. 2006. Phylogenetic relationships and classification in Marantaceae: Insights from plastid DNA sequence data. Taxon 55: 281-296.
60. Raff, R. A. 1996. The shape of life: Genes, development and the evolution of animal form. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
61. Ricklefs, R. E., J. B. Losos & T. M. Townsend. 2007. Evolutionary diversification of clades of squamate reptiles. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 20: 1751-1762.
62. Rudwick, M. J. S. 1997. Georges Cuvier, fossil bones, and geological catastrophes. Chicago University Press, Chicago.
63. Sanderson, M. J. & M. F. Wojciechowski. 1996. Diversification rates in a temperate legume clade: Are there "so many species" of Astragalus (Fabaceae)? American Journal of Botany 83: 1488-1502.
64. Schena, M., D. Shalon, R. W. Davis & P. O. Brown. 1995. Quantitative monitoring of gene-expression patterns with a complementary-DNA microarray. Science 270: 467-470.
65. Schierwater, B. & K. Kuhn. 1998. Homology of hox genes and the zootype concept in early metazoan evolution. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 9: 375-381.
66. Slowinski, J. B. & C. Guyer. 1993. Testing whether certain traits have caused amplified diversification-An improved method based on a model of random speciation and extinction. American Naturalist 142: 1019-1024.
67. Specht, C. D. 2005. Phylogenetics, floral evolution and rapid radiation in the tropical monocot family Costaceae (Zingiberales). In: A. K. Sharma & A. Sharma (eds). Plant genome: Biodiversity and evolution. Scientific Publications, Inc., Calcutta.
68. --- 2006a. Gondwanan vicariance or dispersal in the tropics? The biogeographic history of the tropical monocot family Costaceae (Zingiberales). pp 633-644. In: J. T. Columbus, E. A. Friar, C. W. Hamilton, J. M. Porter, L. M. Prince, et al. (eds). Monocots: Comparative biology and evolution. Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden, Claremont, CA.
69. --- 2006b. Systematics and evolution of the tropical monocot family Costaceae (Zingiberales): A multiple dataset approach. Systematic Botany 31: 89-106.
70. --- & W. J. Kress. 2006. The evolutionary and biogeographic origin and diversification of the tropical monocot order (Zingiberales). Pp 621-632. In: J. T. Columbus, E. A. Friar, C. W. Hamilton, J. M. Porter, L. M. Prince, et al. (eds). Monocots: comparative biology and evolution. Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden, Claremont, CA.
71. --- & D. W. Stevenson. 2006. A new phylogeny-based generic classification of Costaceae (Zingiberales). Taxon 55: 153-163.
72. ---, W. J. Kress, D. W. Stevenson & R. DeSalle. 2001. A molecular phylogeny of Costaceae (Zingiberales). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 21: 333-345.
73. ---, ---, H. Driscoll, L. Lagomarsino & H. Cooper. 2006. A preliminary molecular phylogeny for Heliconia (Heliconiaceae), Abstract #499, Botany 2006, Chico, CA.
74. Stevenson, D. W., J. I. Davis, J. V. Freudenstein, C. R. Hardy, M. P. Simmons, et al. 2000. A phylogenetic analysis of the monocotyledons based on morphological and molecular character sets with comments on the placement of Acorus and Hydatellaceae. In: K. L. Wilson & D. A. Morrison (eds). Monocots: Systematics and evolution. CSIRO, Melbourne.
75. Vamosi, J. C. & S. M. Vamosi. 2010. Key innovations within a geographical context in flowering plants: Towards resolving Darwin's abominable mystery. Ecology Letters 13: 1270-1279.
76. White, P. R. 1928. Studies on the banana. An investigation of the floral morphology and cytology of certain types of the genus Musa L. Zeitschr Zell Forsch U Mikrosk Anat 7: 673-733.
77. Williams, K. J., W. J. Kress & P. S. Manos. 2004. The phylogeny, evolution, and classification of the genus Globba and tribe Globbeae (Zingiberaceae): Appendages do matter. American Journal of Botany 91: 100-114.
78. Wimsatt, W. C. & J. C. Schank. 1988. Two constraints on the evolution of complex adaptations and the means for their avoidance. pp 231-273. In: M. H. Nitecki (ed). Evolutionary progress. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
79. Wittkopp, P. J., A. Kopp & S. B. Carroll. 2003. Evolution in black and white: Genetic control of pigment patterns in Drosophila. Trends in Genetics 19: 495-504.
80. Zeh, D. W., J. A. Zeh & R. L. Smith. 1989. Ovipositors, amnions and eggshell architecture in the diversification of terrestrial arthropods. Quarterly Review of Biology 64: 147-168.