Key innovations within a geographical context in flowering plants: Towards resolving Darwin's abominable mystery

Ecology Letters

Volumn 13, Issue 10, 2010, Pages 1270-1279

  Vamosi, Jana C ^a   Vamosi, Steven M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Angiosperms; Biogeography; Diversification; Ecological limits; Extinction; Key innovations; Latitudinal biodiversity gradient; Lineage age; Pollination; Speciation

Indexed keywords

AVES; MAGNOLIOPHYTA; MAMMALIA;

EID: 78149323106     PISSN: 1461023X     EISSN: 14610248     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01521.x     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Barraclough, T.G. & Savolainen, V. (2001). Evolutionary rates and species diversity in flowering plants. Evolution, 55, 677-683.
2. Burlando, B. (1993). The fractal geometry of evolution. J. Theor. Biol., 163, 161-172.
3. Burnham, K.P. & Anderson, D.L. (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical-theoretic approach. In. Springer-Verlag, New York.
4. Cardillo, M., Huxtable, J.S. & Bromham, L. (2003). Geographic range size, life history, and rates of diversification in Australian mammals. J. Evol. Biol., 16, 282-288.
5. Crepet, W.L. & Niklas, K.J. (2009). Darwin's second 'abominable mystery': why are there so many angiosperm species? Am. J. Bot., 96, 366-381.
6. Davies, T.J., Barraclough, T.G., Chase, M.W., Soltis, P.S., Soltis, D.E. & Savolainen, V. (2004a). Darwin's abominable mystery: insights from a supertree of the angiosperms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 101, 1904-1909.
7. Davies, T.J., Barraclough, T.G. & Savolainen, V. (2004b). Environmental causes for plant biodiversity gradients. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B, 359, 1645-1656.
8. De Queiroz, A. (2002). Contingent predictability in evolution: key traits and diversification. Syst. Biol., 51, 917-929.
9. Drummond, A.J., Ho, S.Y.W., Phillips, M.J. & Rambaut, A. (2006). Relaxed phylogenetics and dating with confidence. PLoS Biol., 4, e88.
10. Eriksson, O. & Bremer, B. (1992). Pollination systems, dispersal modes, life forms, and diversification rates in angiosperm families. Evolution, 46, 258-266.
11. Fitzjohn, R.G., Maddison, W.P. & Otto, S.P. (2009). Estimating trait-dependent speciation and extinction rates from incompletely resolved phylogenies. Syst. Biol., 58, 595-611.
12. Freckleton, R.P., Harvey, P.H. & Pagel, M. (2002). Phylogenetic analysis and comparative data: a test and review of evidence. Am. Nat., 160, 712-726.
13. Von Hagen, K.B. & Kadereit, J.W. (2003). The diversification of Halenia (Gentianaceae): ecological opportunity versus key innovation. Evolution, 57, 2507-2518.
14. Hedges, S.B., Dudley, J. & Kumar, S. (2006). TimeTree: a public knowledge-base of divergence times among organisms. Bioinformatics, 22, 2971-2972.
15. Heilbuth, J.C. (2000). Lower species richness in dioecious clades. Am. Nat., 156, 221-241.
16. Igic, B., Lande, R. & Kohn, J.R. (2008). Loss of self-incompatibility and its evolutionary consequences. Int. J. Plant Sci., 169, 93-104.
17. Jansson, R. & Davies, T.J. (2008). Global variation in diversification rates of flowering plants: energy vs. climate change. Ecol. Lett., 11, 173-183.
18. Magallon, S. & Sanderson, M.J. (2001). Absolute diversification rates in angiosperm clades. Evolution, 55, 1762-1780.
19. Mittelbach, G.G., Schemske, D.W., Cornell, H.V., Allen, A.P., Brown, J.M., Bush, M.B. et al. (2007). Evolution and the latitudinal diversity gradient: speciation, extinction and biogeography. Ecol. Lett., 10, 315-331.
20. Morin, X. & Chuine, I. (2006). Niche breadth, competitive strength and range size of tree species: a trade-off based framework to understand species distribution. Ecol. Lett., 9, 185-195.
21. Olesen, J.M. & Jordano, P. (2002). Geographic patterns in plant-pollinator mutualistic networks. Ecology, 83, 2416-2424.
22. Pagel, M. (1999). The maximum likelihood approach to reconstruction ancestral character states of discrete characters on phylogenies. Syst. Biol., 48, 612-622.
23. Paradis, E., Claude, J. & Strimmer, K. (2004). APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics, 20, 289-290.
24. Payne, J.L. & Finnegan, S. (2007). The effect of geographic range on extinction risk during background and mass extinction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 104, 10506-10511.
25. Phillimore, A.B. & Price, T.D. (2008). Density-dependent cladogenesis in birds. PLoS Biology, 6(3), e71.
26. Pianka, E.R. (1966). Latitudinal gradients in species diversity: a review of concepts. Am. Nat., 100, 33-46.
27. R Development Core Team (2008). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.
28. Rabosky, D.L. (2009a). Ecological limits and diversification rate: alternative paradigms to explain the variation in species richness among clades and regions. Ecol. Lett., 12, 735-743.
29. Rabosky, D.L. (2009b). Ecological limits on clade diversification in higher taxa. Am. Nat., 173, 662-674.
30. Ree, R.H. (2005). Detecting the historical signature of key innovations using stochastic models of character evolution and cladogenesis. Evolution, 59, 257-265.
31. Ricklefs, R.E. (2003). Global diversification rates of passerine birds. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 270, 2285-2291.
32. Ricklefs, R.E. (2006). Global variation in the diversification rate of passerine birds. Ecology, 87, 2468-2478.
33. Ricklefs, R.E. (2007). History and diversity: explorations at the intersection of ecology and evolution. Am. Nat., 170, S56-S70.
34. Ricklefs, R.E. & Renner, S.S. (1994). Species richness within families of flowering plants. Evolution, 48, 1619-1636.
35. Roy, K., Hunt, G., Jablonski, D., Krug, A.Z. & Valentine, J.W. (2009). A macroevolutionary perspective on species range limits. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 276, 1485-1493.
36. Sargent, R.D. (2004). Floral symmetry affects speciation rates in angiosperms. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 271, 603-608.
37. Savolainen, V., Heard, S.B., Powell, M.P., Davies, T.J. & Mooers, A.O. (2002). Is cladogenesis heritable? Syst. Biol., 51, 835-843.
38. Schaefer, C.W. (2009). The reality of the higher taxonomic categories. J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res., 14, 1-10.
39. Smith, F.A. (2004). Similarity of mammalian body size across the taxonomic hierarchy and across space and time. Am. Nat., 163, 672-691.
40. Smith, S.A. & Donoghue, M.J. (2008). Rates of molecular evolution are linked to life history in flowering plants. Science, 322, 86-89.
41. Smith, S.A., Beaulieu, J.M. & Donoghue, M.J. (2009). An uncorrelated relaxed-clock analysis suggests an earlier origin for flowering plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 5897-5902.
42. Stevens, P.F. (2001 onwards) Angiosperm Phylogeny Website. Version 9, June 2008. Available at:
43. Tiffney, B.H. & Mazer, S.J. (1995). Angiosperm growth habit, dispersal and diversification reconsidered. Evol. Ecol., 9, 93-117.
44. Udvardy, M.D.F. (1975) A classification of the biogeographical provinces of the world. In: IUCN Occasional Paper no. 18. Morgues, Switzerland: IUCN.
45. Vamosi, J.C. & Vamosi, S.M. (2004). The role of diversification in causing the correlates of dioecy. Evolution, 58, 723-731.
46. Vamosi, J.C. & Vamosi, S.M. (2005). Present day risk of extinction may exacerbate the lower species richness of dioecious clades. Divers. Distrib., 11, 25-32.
47. Webb, C.O. & Donoghue, M.J. (2005). Phylomatic: tree assembly for applied phylogenetics. Mol. Ecol. Notes, 5, 181. Available at:
48. Webb, C.O., Ackerly, D. & Kembel, S. (2008). Software for the analysis of community phylogenetic structure and character evolution, Version 4.0.1. Available at:
49. Wiens, J.J. & Donoghue, M.J. (2004). Historical biogeography, ecology, and species richness. Trends Ecol. Evol., 19, 639-644.