Cognitive and motivational profile shape predicts mathematical skills over and above profile level

Psychology in the Schools

Volumn 50, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 37-56

  Reimann, Giselle ^a   Stoecklin, Markus ^a   Lavallee, Kristen ^a   Gut, Janine ^a   Frischknecht, Marie Claire ^a   Grob, Alexander ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BASEL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84871156895     PISSN: 00333085     EISSN: 15206807     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pits.21659     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Alloway, T. P. (2009). Working memory, but not IQ, predicts subsequent learning in children with learning difficulties. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 25, 92-98. doi:10.1027/1015-5759.25.2.92.
2. Borsuk, E. R., Watkins, M. W., & Canivez, G. L. (2006). Long-term stability of membership in a Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Third Edition (WISC-III) subtest core profile taxonomy. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 24, 52-68. doi:10.1177/0734282905285225
3. Brunstein, J., & Heckhausen, H. (2006). Leistungsmotivation [achievement motivation]. In J. Heckhausen & H. Heckhausen (Eds.), Motivation und handeln [motivation and action]. Heidelberg: Springer.
4. Bull, R., Espy, K. A., & Wiebe, S. A. (2008). Short-term memory, working memory, and executive functioning in preschoolers: Longitudinal predictors of mathematical achievement at age 7 years. Developmental Neuropsychology, 33, 205-228. doi:10.1080/87565640801982312
5. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Daniel, M. H. (2007). "Scatter" and the construct validity of FSIQ: Comment on Fiorello et al. (2007). Applied Neuropsychology, 14, 291-295. doi:10.1080/09084280701719401
7. Davison, M. L., Kim, S. K., & Ding, S. (2001). Profile analysis via multidimensional scaling (PAMS): Exploring the predominant profile patterns in data. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA.
8. Davison, M. L., & Kuang, H. (2000). Profile patterns: Research and professional interpretation. School Psychology Quarterly, 15, 457-464. doi:10.1037/h0088801
9. de Leeuw, J., & Mair, P. (2008). Multidimensional scaling using majorization: SMACOF in R. UCLA Statistics Preprint Series, 537, 1-29. Retrieved March 10, 2011, from http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/smacof/vignettes/smacof.pdf
10. de Leeuw, J., & Stoop, I. (1984). Upper bounds for kruskal's stress. Psychometrika, 49, 391-402. doi:10.1007/BF02306028
11. Ding, C. S. (2001). Profile analysis: Multidimensional scaling approach. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7. Retrieved March 10, 2011, from http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=7&n=16.
12. Ding, C. S. (2003). Exploratory longitudinal profile analysis via multidimensional scaling. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 8. Retrieved February 6, 2011, from http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=8&n=12
13. Ding, C. S. (2005). Determining the significance of scale values from multidimensional scaling profile analysis using a resampling method. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 37-47. doi:10.3758/BF03206396
14. Ding, C. S. (2006). Multidimensional scaling modeling approach to latent profile analysis in psychological research. International Journal of Psychology, 41, 226-238. doi:10.1080/00207590500412219
15. Duckworth, A. L., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2005). Self-discipline outdoes IQ in predicting academic performance of adolescents. Psychological Science, 16, 939-944. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01641.x
16. Elliott, C. D., Hale, J. B., Fiorello, C. A., Dorvil, C., & Moldovan, J. (2010). Differential Ability Scales-II prediction of reading performance: Global scores are not enough. Psychology in the Schools, 47, 698-720. doi:10.1002/pits.20499
17. Fiorello, C. A., Hale, J. B., Holdnack, J. A., Kavanagh, J. A., Terrell, J., & Long, L. (2007). Interpreting intelligence test results for children with disabilities: Is global intelligence relevant? Applied Neuropsychology, 14, 2-12. doi:10.1080/09084280701280338
18. Fiorello, C. A., Hale, J. B., McGrath, M., Ryan, K., & Quinn, S. (2002). IQ interpretation for children with flat and variable test profiles. Learning and Individual Differences, 13, 115-125. doi:10.1016/S1041-6080(02)00075-4
19. Floyd, R. G., Evans, J. J., & McGrew, K. S. (2003). Relations between measures of Cattell-Horn-Carroll (CHC) cognitive abilities and mathematics achievement across the school-age years. Psychology in the Schools, 40, 155-171. doi:10.1002/pits.10083
20. Folmer, A. S., Cole, D. A., Sigal, A. B., Benbow, L. D., Satterwhite, L. F., Swygert, K. E., et al. (2008). Age-related changes in children's understanding effort and ability: Implications for attribution theory and motivation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 99, 114-134. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2007.09.003
21. Freberg, M. E., Vandiver, B. J., Watkins, M. W., & Canivez, G. L. (2008). Significant factor score variability and the validity of the WISC-III Full Scale IQ in predicting later academic achievement. Applied Neuropsychology, 15, 131-139. doi:10.1080/09084280802084010
22. Fredricks, J. A., & Eccles, J. S. (2002). Children's competence and value beliefs from childhood through adolescence: Growth trajectories in two male-sex-typed domains. Developmental Psychology, 38, 519-533. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.38.4.519
23. Frisby, C. L., & Kim, S. K. (2008). Using profile analysis via multidimensional scaling (PAMS) to identify core profiles from the WMS-III. Psychological Assessment, 20, 1-9. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.20.1.1
24. Fulmer, S. M., & Frijters, J. C. (2009). A review of self-report and alternative approaches in the measurement of student motivation. Educational Psychology Review, 21, 219-246. doi:10.1007/s10648-009-9107-x
25. Glutting, J. J., Watkins, M. W., Konold, T. R., & McDermott, P. A. (2006). Distinctions without a difference: The utility of observed versus latent factors from the WISC-IV in estimating reading and math achievement on the WIAT-II. The Journal of Special Education, 40, 103-114. doi:10.1177/00224669060400020101
26. Gottfried, A. E. (1990). Academic intrinsic motivation in young elementary school children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 525-538. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.82.3.525
27. Grob, A., Meyer, C. S., & Hagmann-von Arx, P. (2009). Intelligence and Development Scales (IDS). Bern: Huber.
28. Hagmann-von Arx, P., Meyer, C. S., & Grob, A. (2008). Assessing intellectual giftedness with the WISC-IV and the IDS. Zeitschrift fuer Psychologie [Journal of Psychology], 216, 172-179. doi:10.1027/0044-3409.216.3.172
29. Hale, J. B., Fiorello, C. A., Dumont, R., Willis, J. O., Rackley, C., & Elliott, C. (2008). Differential Ability Scales - Second Edition (neuro)psychological predictors of math performance for typical children and children with math disabilities. Psychology in the Schools, 45, 838-858. doi:10.1002/pits.20330
30. Hale, J. B., Fiorello, C. A., Kavanagh, J. A., Hoeppner, J. A. B., & Gaither, R. A. (2001). WISC-III predictors of academic achievement for children with learning disabilities: Are global and factor scores comparable? School Psychology Quarterly, 16, 31-55. doi:10.1521/scpq.16.1.31.19158
31. Hale, J. B., Fiorello, C. A., Kavanagh, J. A., Holdnack, J. A., & Aloe, A. M. (2007). Is the demise of IQ interpretation justified? A response to special issue authors. Applied Neuropsychology, 14, 37-51. doi:10.1080/09084280701280445
32. Haynes, S. N., & Lench, H. C. (2003). Incremental validity of new clinical assessment measures. Psychological Assessment, 15, 456-466. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.15.4.456
33. Jacobs, J. E., Lanza, S., Osgood, D. W., Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Changes in children's self-competence and values: Gender and domain differences across grade one through twelve. Child Development, 73, 509-527. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00421
34. Kahana, S. Y., Youngstrom, E. A., & Glutting, J. J. (2002). Factor and subtest discrepancies on the Differential Ability Scales - Examining prevalence and validity in predicting academic achievement. Assessment, 9, 82-93. doi:10.1177/1073191102009001010
35. Kim, S. K. (2010). Evaluating the invariance of cognitive profile patterns derived from profile analysis via multidimensional scaling (PAMS): A bootstrapping approach. International Journal of Testing, 10, 33-46. doi:10.1080/15305050903454549
36. Kim, S. K., Davison, M. L., & Frisby, C. L. (2007). Confirmatory factor analysis and profile analysis via multidimensional scaling. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 1-32. doi:10.1080/00273170701328973
37. Kim, S. K., Frisby, C. L., & Davison, M. L. (2004). Estimating cognitive profiles using profile analysis via multidimensional scaling (PAMS). Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 595-624. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr3904_2
38. Kotz, K. M., Watkins, M. W., & McDermott, P. A. (2008). Validity of the general conceptual ability score from the differential ability scales as a function of significant and rare interfactor variability. School Psychology Review, 37, 261-278. Retrieved February 6, 2011, from http://edpsychassociates.com/Papers/GCAvalidity(2008).pdf
39. Linnenbrink, E. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (2002). Motivation as an enabler for academic success. School Psychology Review, 31, 313-327. Retrieved March 10, 2011, from http://psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/2002-18945-003
40. Lobeck, A., & Frei, M. (1987). Schweizer rechentest 1. - 3. Klasse [Swiss test of arithmetics grades 1 to 3]. Basel: Beltz.
41. Logan, S., Medford, E., & Hughes, N. (2011). The importance of intrinsic motivation for high and low ability readers' reading comprehension performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 124-128. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2010.09.011
42. Lohman, D. F., Gambrell, J., & Lakin, J. (2008). The commonality of extreme discrepancies in the ability profiles of academically gifted students. Psychology Science Quarterly, 50, 269-282. Retrieved March 10, 2011, from http://faculty.education.uiowa.edu/dlohman/pdf/Lohman_Gambrell_Lakin.pdf
43. Naglieri, J. A. (2000). Can profile analysis of ability test scores work? An illustration using the PASS theory and CAS with an unselected cohort. School Psychology Quarterly, 15, 419-433. doi:10.1037/h0088798
44. Peres-Neto, P. R., & Jackson, D. A. (2001). How well do multivariate data sets match? The advantages of a Procrustean superimposition approach over the Mantel test. Oecologia, 129, 169-178. doi:10.1007/s004420100720
45. Petermann, F., & Petermann, U. (2007). Hamburg Wechsler Intelligenztest fuer Kinder-IV (HAWIK-IV). Bern: Huber.
46. Pfeiffer, S. I., Reddy, L. A., Kletzel, J. E., Schmelzer, E. R., & Boyer, L. M. (2000). The practitioner's view of IQ testing and profile analysis. School Psychology Quarterly, 15, 376-385. doi:10.1037/h0088795
47. Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
48. Pritchard, D. A., Livingston, R. B., Reynolds, C. R., & Moses, J. A., Jr. (2000). Modal profiles for the WISC-III. School Psychology Quarterly, 15, 400-418. doi:10.1037/h0088797
49. Rizza, M. G., McIntosh, D. E., & McCunn, A. (2001). Profile analysis of the Woodcock-Johnson III Tests of Cognitive Abilities with gifted students. Psychology in the Schools, 38, 447-455. doi:10.1002/pits.1033
50. Robinson, B. R., & Harrison, P. L. (2005). WISC-III core profiles for students referred or found eligible for special education and gifted programs. School Psychology Quarterly, 20, 51-65. doi:10.1521/scpq.20.1.51.64194
51. Rohde, T. E., & Thompson, L. A. (2007). Predicting academic achievement with cognitive ability. Intelligence, 35, 83-92. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2006.05.004
52. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54-67. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
53. Sattler, J. M., & Saklofske, D. H. (2001). Interpreting the WISC-III. In J. M. Sattler (Ed.), Assessment of children - cognitive applications (4th ed.). (pp. 298-334). San Diego: Jerome M. Sattler, Publisher, Inc.
54. Schuler, H., & Prochaska, M. (2001). Leistungsmotivationsinventar (LMI). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
55. Smith, C. B., & Watkins, M. W. (2004). Diagnostic utility of the Bannatyne WISC-III pattern. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 19, 49-56. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2004.00089.x
56. Spinath, B., Spinath, F. M., Harlaar, N., & Plomin, R. (2006). Predicting school achievement from general cognitive ability, self-perceived ability, and intrinsic value. Intelligence, 34, 363-374. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2005.11.004
57. Watkins, M. W. (2000). Cognitive profile analysis: A shared professional myth. School Psychology Quarterly, 15, 465-479. doi:10.1037/h0088802
58. Watkins, M. W., & Glutting, J. J. (2000). Incremental validity of WISC-III profile elevation, scatter, and shape information for predicting reading and math achievement. Psychological Assessment, 12, 402-408. doi: 10.1037//1040-3590.12.4.402
59. Watkins, M. W., Glutting, J. J., & Lei, P. W. (2007). Validity of the full-scale IQ when there is significant variability among WISC-III and WISC-IV factor scores. Applied Neuropsychology, 14, 13-20. doi:10.1080/09084280701280353
60. Watkins, M. W., Glutting, J. J., & Youngstrom, E. A. (2005). Issues in subtest profile analysis. In D. P. Flanagan & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (pp. 251-268). New York: The Guilford Press.
61. Wechsler, D. (1991). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children - Third Edition. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
62. Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., Roeser, R. W., & Schiefele, U. (2008). Development of achievement motivation. In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Child and adolescent development: An advanced course. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.