WISC-III core profiles for students referred or found eligible for special education and gifted programs

School Psychology Quarterly

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 51-65

  Robinson, Bettina Rae ^a   Harrison, Patti L ^b,c  

^a Tuscaloosa City School   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 17044424556     PISSN: 10453830     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1521/scpq.20.1.51.64194     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Davison, M. L., & Kuang, J. (2000). Profile patterns: Research and professional interpretation. School Psychology Quarterly, 4, 457-464.
2. Glutting, J. J., & McDermott, P. A. (1990a). Pattern and prevalence of core profile types in the WPPSI standardization sample. School Psychology Review, 19, 471-491.
3. Glutting, J. J., & McDermott, P. A. (1990b). Score structures and applications of core profile types in the McCarthy scales standardization sample. The Journal of Special Education, 24, 212-232.
4. Glutting, J. J., McDermott, P. A., & Konold, T. R. (1997). Ontology, structure, and diagnostic benefits of a normative subtest taxonomy from the WISC-III standardization sample. In D. P. Flanagan, J. L. Genshaft, & P. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment. New York: The Guilford Press.
5. Glutting, J. J., McGrath, E. A., Kamphaus, R. W., & McDermott, P. A. (1992). Taxonomy and validity of subtest profiles on the Kaufman assessment battery for children. The Journal of Special Education, 26, 85-115.
6. Haberman, S. J. (1984). The analysis of residuals in cross-classified tables. Biometrics, 29, 205-220.
7. Kamphaus, R. W. (1993). Clinical assessment of children's intelligence. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
8. Kaufman, A. S. (1994). Intelligent testing with the WISC-III. New York: John Wiley.
9. Konold, T. R., Glutting, J. J., McDermott, P. A., Kush, J. C., & Watkins, M. M. (1999). Structure and diagnostic benefits of a normative subtest taxonomy developed from the WISC-III standardization sample. Journal of School Psychology, 37, 29-48.
10. Maller, S. J., & McDermott, P. A. (1997). WAIS-R profile analysis for college students with learning disabilities. School Psychology Review, 26, 575-585.
11. McDermott, P. A., Fantuzzo, J. W., & Glutting, J. J. (1990). Just say no to subtest analysis: A critique on Wechsler theory and practice. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 8, 290-302.
12. McDermott, P. A., Fantuzzo, J. W., Glutting, J. J., Watkins, M. W., & Baggaley, A. R. (1992). Illusions of meaning in the ipsative assessment of children's abilities. Journal of Special Education, 25, 504-526.
13. McDermott, P. A., Glutting, J. J., Jones, J. N., Watkins, M. W., & Kush, J. (1989). Identification and membership of core profile types in the WISC-R national standardization sample. Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1, 292-299.
14. Pfeiffer, S. I., Reddy, L. A., Kletzel, J. E., Schmelzer, E. R., & Boyer, L. M., (2000). The practitioners' view of IQ testing and profile analysis. School Psychology Quarterly, 4, 376-385.
15. Reschly, D. J., & Grimes, J. P., (2002). Best practices in intellectual assessment. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology - IV (pp. 1337-1350). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
16. Watkins, M. W., (2000). Cognitive profile analysis: A shared professional myth. School Psychology Quarterly, 4, 465-479.
17. Watkins, M. W., & Kush, J. C. (1994). Wechsler subtest analysis: The right way, the wrong way, or no way? School Psychology Review, 23, 640-651.
18. Wechsler, D. (1991). Manual for the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-third edition (WISC-III). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
19. Wilson, M. S., & Reschly, D. J. (1996). Assessment in school psychology training and practice. School Psychology Review, 25, 9-23.