Expertiza: Managing feedback in collaborative learning

Monitoring and Assessment in Online Collaborative Environments: Emergent Computational Technologies for E-Learning Support

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 75-96

  Gehringer, Edward F ^a  

^a North Carolina State University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84871064401     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-60566-786-7.ch005     Document Type: Chapter

References (50)

1. Adams, A., & Williams, S. (2006). Customer-driven development for rapid production of assessment learning objects. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 4(1), 1-6. Retrieved from http://www.ejel.org
2. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7-74. doi:10.1080/0969595980050102
3. Blackboard Academic Suite Release 8.0. (2008). Critical thinking tools. Retrieved September 2008, from http://www.blackboard.com/release8/
4. rd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. Retrieved from http://fie.engrng.pitt.edu/fie2003/papers/1066.pdf
5. Chapman, O. L., & Fiore, M. A. (2000). Calibrated peer review. Journal of Interactive Instruction Development.
6. Cho, K., & Schunn, C. (2007). Scaffolded writing and rewriting in the discipline: A Web-based reciprocal peer-review system. Computers & Education, 48, 409-426. doi:10.1016/j.com-pedu.2005.02.004
7. Cho, K., Schunn, C. D., & Wilson, R. W. (2006). Validity and reliability of scaffolded peer assessment of writing from instructor and student perspectives. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(4), 891-901. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.98.4.891
8. Collis, B. (2005). The contributing student: A blend of pedagogy and technology. Australasia, Auckland, New Zealand: EDUCAUSE.
9. Daedalus integrated writing environment: Details. (2008). Retrieved September 2008, from http://www.daedalus.com/products_diwe_details.asp
10. de Pedro Puente, X. (2007). New method using Wikis and forums to evaluate individual contributions in cooperative work while promoting experiential learning: Results from preliminary experience. In Proceedings of the 2007 international Symposium on Wikis, WikiSym '07, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (pp. 87-92). New York: ACM Press.
11. Denning, T., Kelly, M., Lindquist, D., Malani, R., Griswold, W. G., & Simon, B. (2007). Lightweight preliminary peer review: Does in-class peer review make sense? SIGCSE Bulletin, 39(1), 266-270. doi:10.1145/1227504.1227406
12. th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, SIGIR '92, Copenhagen, Denmark (pp. 233-244). New York: ACM Press.
13. Edwards, S. H., & Pérez-Quiñones, M. A. (2007). Experiences using test-driven development with an automated grader. J. Comput. Small Coll., 22(3), 44-50.
14. Egea, K. (2003). Managing the managers: Collaborative virtual teams with large staff and student numbers. In T. Greeing & R. Lister (Eds.), Proc. Australasian Computing Education Conference: Conferences in Research and Practice in Information Technology (ACE2003), Adelaide.
15. Gehringer, E. F. (2001). Building an ethics in computing Web site using peer review. In Proc. of the 2001 Am. Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference.
16. Gehringer, E. F. (2008a). Understanding and relating to your international students. In Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Pittsburgh, PA.
17. Gehringer, E. F. (2008b). Assessing students' Wiki contributions. In Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Pittsburgh, PA.
18. th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, Portland, OR, USA. Retrieved from http://research.csc.ncsu.edu/efg/expertiza/presentations/Code-and-wikis-poster.ppt
19. Gehringer, E. F., & Cui, Y. (2002). An effective strategy for dynamic mapping of peer reviewers. In Proc. of the 2002 Am. Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference.
20. Gehringer, E. F., Ehresman, L. M., Conger, S. G., & Wagle, P. (2007). Reusable learning objects through peer review: The Expertiza approach. Innovate: Journal of Online Education, 3(5).
21. st ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Object-Oriented Programming Systems, Languages, and Applications, OOPSLA '06, Portland, Oregon, USA (pp. 901-906). New York: ACM Press.
22. th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE '09, Chattanooga, TN, USA. New York: ACM Press. Retrieved from http://research.csc.ncsu.edu/efg/expertiza/papers/sigcse09.pdf
23. th Annual SIGCSE Conference on innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, ITICSE '06, Bologna, Italy (pp. 358-358). New York: ACM Press.
24. th Annual SIGCSE Conference on innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, ITICSE '06, Bologna, Italy (pp. 68-72). New York: ACM Press.
25. th Australasian Conference on Computing Education - Vol. 42, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia (pp. 67-72). Darlinghurst, Australia: Australian Computer Society.
26. th international Conference on Software Engineering, Portland, Oregon (pp. 622-627). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.
27. Keeney-Kennicut, W., Guernsel, A. B., & Simpson, N. (2008). Overcoming student resistance to a teaching innovation. [Retrieved from http://www.georgiasouthern.edu/iostl]. J. for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 2008(January), 1-26.
28. Kennedy, J., Shollenberger, K., & Widmann, J. (2007). Student use of author's textbook solution manuals: Effect on student learning of mechanics fundamentals. In Proc. of the 2007 Am. Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference.
29. Kerr, P. M., Park, K. H., & Domazlicky, B. R. (1995). Peer grading of essays in a principles of microeconomics course. Journal of Education for Business, 70(6), 15-25.
30. Lauw, H. W., Lim, E.-P., & Wang, K. (2007). Summarizing review scores of "unequal" reviewers. In Proceedings of the 2007 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining, Minneapolis, MN (pp. 539-544).
31. LeJeune, N. (2006). Assessment of individuals on CS group projects. J. Comput. Small Coll., 22(1), 231-237.
32. McConnell, J. J. (2005). Active and cooperative learning: Tips and tricks (part I). SIGCSE Bulletin, 37(2), 27-30. doi:10.1145/1083431.1083457
33. Mentor, K. (2005). Online encyclopedia of criminal justice. Retrieved December 2008, from http://cjencyclopedia.com
34. Merelo-Guervós, J., & Castillo-Valdivieso, P. (2004). Conference paper assignment using a combined greedy/evolutionary algorithm. In Parallel problem solving from nature - PPSN VIII (LNCS 3242, pp. 602-611). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
35. Moodle. (2008). Workshop module - MoodleDocs. Retrieved September 2008, from http://docs.moodle.org/en/Workshop
36. Ohio State University. (2007). PlantFacts glossary. Retrieved December 2008, from http://140.254.84.203/wiki/index.php/Plant-Facts_Glossary
37. Pesenhofer, A., Mayer, R., & Rauber, A. (2008). Automating the management of scientific conferences using information mining techniques. J. Digital Information Management, 6(1).
38. Pimentel, M., Gerosa, M. A., Fuks, H., &de Lucena, C. J. (2005). Assessment of collaboration in online courses. In Proceedings of the 2005 Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Learning 2005: The Next 10 Years! Taipei, Taiwan (pp. 494-498). International Society of the Learning Sciences.
39. th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, Napa Valley, CA.]. Proceedings of the CIKM, 08, 17.
40. Sakai Services. Information services. (2008). Retrieved September 2008, from http://www.nitle.org/index.php/nitle/content/view/full/1388
41. Schümmer, T., Strijbos, J., & Berkel, T. (2005). A new direction for log file analysis in CSCL: Experiences with a spatio-temporal metric. In Proceedings of the 2005 Conference on Computer Support For Collaborative Learning: Learning 2005: the Next 10 Years! Taipei, Taiwan (pp. 567-576). International Society of the Learning Sciences.
42. Sener, J. (2007). In search of student-generated content in online education. e-Mentor, 4(21). Retrieved from http://www.e-mentor.edu.pl/eng
43. Silva, E., & Moreira, D. (2003). WebCoM: A tool to use peer review to improve student interaction. Journal of Educational Resources in Computing, 3(1), 3. doi:10.1145/958795.958798
44. Skrien, D. (2008). Object-oriented design using Java. New York: McGraw-Hill.
45. Soh, L., Khandaker, N., Liu, X., & Jiang, H. (2006). A computer-supported cooperative learning system with multiagent intelligence. In Proceedings of the Fifth international Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, AAMAS '06, Hakodate, Japan (pp. 1556-1563). New York: ACM Press.
46. Spada, H., Meier, A., Rummel, N., & Hauser, S. (2005). A new method to assess the quality of collaborative process in CSCL. In Proceedings of the 2005 Conference on Computer Support For Collaborative Learning: Learning 2005: the Next 10 Years! Taipei, Taiwan (pp 622-631). International Society of the Learning Sciences.
47. st International Conference on Industrial, Engineering and Other Applications of Applied Intelligent Systems, IEA/AIE 2008, Wroclaw, Poland.
48. Wang, Y. (2002). Dynamic assignment of peer reviewers for teams. Unpublished master's thesis, North Carolina State University, USA. Retrieved from http://www.lib.ncsu.edu/theses/available/etd-11012002-125644/unrestricted/etd.pdf
49. th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE '08, Portland, OR, USA (pp. 107-111). New York: ACM Press.
50. Zeller, A. (2000). Making students read and review code. SIGCSE Bulletin, 32(3), 89-92. doi:10.1145/353519.343090