PND at 25: Past, Present, and Future Trends in Summarizing Single-Subject Research

Remedial and Special Education

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 9-19

  Scruggs, Thomas E ^a   Mastropieri, Margo A ^a  

^a GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

meta analysis; quantitative; single subject

Indexed keywords

EID: 84870944572     PISSN: 07419325     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0741932512440730     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Algozzine B.,Browder D.,Karvonen M.,Test D. W.,Wood W. M.Effects of interventions to promote self-determination for individuals with disabilities.Review of Educational Research. 2001;71:219-277.
2. Allison D. B.,Faith M. S.,Franklin R.Antecedent exercise in the treatment of disruptive behavior: A review and meta-analysis.Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice. 1995;2:279-303.
3. Allison D. B.,Gorman B. S.Calculating and estimating effect sizes for meta-analysis: The case of the single case.Behaviour Research and Therapy. 1993;31:621-631.
4. Publication manual of the American Psychological Association. 2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.Washington, DC: Author; 2010:.
5. Beeson P. M.,Robey R. R.Evaluating single-subject treatment research: Lessons learned from the aphasia literature.Neuropsychology Review. 2006;16:161-169.
6. Browder D. M.,Wakeman S. Y.,Spooner F.,Ahlgrim-Delzell L.,Algozzine B.Research on reading instruction for individuals with significant cognitive disabilities.Exceptional Children. 2006;72:392-408.
7. Busk P. L.,Serlin R. C.Single-case research design and analysis: New directions for psychology and education. Kratochwill T. R.Levin J. R., ed. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum; 1992:187-212.
8. Casto G.,Mastropieri M. A.The effectiveness of early intervention for students with disabilities: A meta-analysis.Exceptional Children. 1986;52:417-424.
9. Cohen R.Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.New York: Routledge; 1988:.
10. Danov S. E.,Symons F. J.A survey evaluation of the reliability of visual inspection and functional analysis graphs.Behavior Modification. 2008;32:828-839.
11. DeProspero A.,Cohen S.Inconsistent visual analyses of intrasubject data.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 1979;12:573-579.
12. DuPaul G. J.,Eckert T. L.The effects of school-based interventions for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: A meta-analysis.School Psychology Review. 1997;26:5-27.
13. Eysenck H. J.An exercise in mega-silliness.American Psychologist. 1978;33:517.
14. Glass G.Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research.Educational Researcher. 1976;5 (10): 3-8.
15. Glass G.,McGaw B.,Smith M.Meta-analysis in social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage; 1981:.
16. Gorman-Smith D.,Matson J. L.A review of treatment research for self-injurious and stereotyped responding.Journal of Mental Deficiency Research. 1985;29:295-308.
17. Gottman J. M.,Glass G. V.Single subject research: Strategies for evaluating change. Kratochwill T. R., ed. New York: Academic; 1978:197-235.
18. GriceJ. W.BarrettP. T. (2011). A note on Cohen's overlapping proportions of normal distributions. Stillwater, OK: Oklahoma State University, Department of Psychology. Retrieved from http://psychology.okstate.edu/faculty/jgrice/personalitylab/GriceBarrett_2011_CohenOverlap.pdf.
19. Hedges L.,Olkin I.Statistical methods for meta-analysis. New York: Academic; 1985:.
20. Hinton P. R.Statistics explained: A guide for social science students. 2004). Statistics explained: A guide for social science students (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.New York: Routledge; 2004:.
21. Huitema B. E.Autocorrelation in applied behavior analysis: A myth.Behavioral Assessment. 1985;7:107-118.
22. Jackson G. R.Methods for integrative reviews.Review of Educational Research. 1980;50:438-460.
23. Jones R. R.,Weinrott M. R.,Vaught R. W.Effects of serial dependency on the agreement between visual and statistical inference.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 1978;11:272-282.
24. Kahng S.,Chung K. M.,Gutshall K.,Pitts S. C.,Kao J.,Girolami K.Consistent visual analyses of intrasubject data.Journal of Applied Behavioral Analysis. 2010;43:35-45.
25. Kazdin A. E.Methodological and interpretive problems of single-case experimental designs.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1978;46:629-642.
26. Ma H. H.An alternative method for quantitative synthesis of single-subject research: Percentage of data points exceeding the median.Behavior Modification. 2006;30:598-617.
27. Maggin D. M.,Briesch A. M.,Chafouleas S. M. Poster presented at the 2010 Institute of Education Sciences Research Conference; 2010National Harbor, MD; 2010.
28. Maggin D. M.,O'Keeffe B. V.,Johnson A. H.A quantitative synthesis of methodology in the meta-analysis of single-subject research for students with disabilities: 1985-2009.Exceptionality. 2011;19:109-135.
29. Mastropieri M. A.,Scruggs T. E.Early intervention for socially withdrawn children.Journal of Special Education. 1985-1986;19:429-441.
30. Mastropieri M. A.,Scruggs T. E.Constructing more meaningful relationships: Mnemonic instruction for special populations.Educational Psychology Review. 1989;1:83-111.
31. Mathur S. R.,Kavale K. A.,Quinn M. M.,Forness S. R.,Rutherford R. B.Social skills interventions with students with behavioral problems: A quantitative synthesis of single-subject research.Behavioral Disorders. 1998;23:193-201.
32. Moher D.,Tetzlaff J.,Tricco A. C.,Sampson M.,Altman D. G.Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews.PLoS Medicine. 2007;4 (3): e78.
33. Mostert M.Characteristics of meta-analyses reported in mental retardation, learning disabilities, and emotional and behavioral disorders.Exceptionality. 2001;9:199-225.
34. Rogers L.,Graham S.A meta-analysis of single subject design writing intervention research.Journal of Educational Psychology. 2008;100:879-906.
35. Reid R.,Trout A. L.,Schwartz M.Self-regulation interventions for children with ADHD.Exceptional Children. 2005;71:361-377.
36. Skiba R.,Casey A.,Center B.Nonaversive procedures in the treatment of classroom behavior problems.Journal of Special Education. 1985-1986;19:459-481.
37. Schlosser R. W.,Goetze H.Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities. Scruggs T. E.Mastropieri M. A., ed. Bingley, UK: Emerald; 1992:135-175.
38. Schlosser R. W.,Lee D. L.,Wendt O.Application of the percentage of nonoverlapping data (PND) in systematic reviews and meta-analyses: A systematic review of reporting characteristics.Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention. 2008;2:163-187.
39. Schlosser R. W.,Wendt O.,Sigafoos J.Not all systematic reviews are created equal: Considerations for appraisal.Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention. 2007;1:138-150.
40. Salzberg C. L.,Strain P. S.,Baer D. M.Meta-analysis for single-subject research: When does it clarify, when does it obscure?.Remedial and Special Education. 1987;8 (2): 43-48.
41. Scruggs T. E.,Mastropieri M. A.Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities. Scruggs T. E.Mastropieri M. A., ed. Bingley, UK: Emerald; 1994a:259-280.
42. Scruggs T. E.,Mastropieri M. A.The utility of the PND statistic: A reply to Allison and Gorman.Behaviour Research and Therapy. 1994b;32:879-883.
43. Scruggs T. E.,Mastropieri M. A.Synthesizing single subject research: Issues and applications.Behavior Modification. 1998;22:221-242.
44. Scruggs T. E.,Mastropieri M. A.How to summarize single-participant research: Ideas and applications.Exceptionality. 2001;9:227-245.
45. Scruggs T. E.,Mastropieri M. A.,Berkeley S.,Graetz J.Do special education interventions improve the learning of secondary content? A meta-analysis.Remedial and Special Education. 2010;31:437-449.
46. Scruggs T. E.,Mastropieri M. A.,Casto G.The quantitative synthesis of single subject research: Methodology and validation.Remedial and Special Education. 1987a;8 (2): 24-33.
47. Scruggs T. E.,Mastropieri M. A.,Casto G.Reply to Owen White.Remedial and Special Education. 1987b;8 (2): 40-42.
48. Scruggs T. E.,Mastropieri M. A.,Casto G.Response to Salzberg, Strain, and Baer.Remedial and Special Education. 1987c;8 (2): 49-52.
49. Scruggs T. E.,Mastropieri M. A.,Cook S.,Escobar C.Early intervention for children with conduct disorders: A quantitative synthesis of single-subject research.Behavioral Disorders. 1986;11:260-271.
50. Scruggs T. E.,Mastropieri M. A.,Forness S. R.,Kavale K. A.Early language intervention: A quantitative synthesis of single-subject research.Journal of Special Education. 1988;22:259-283.
51. Scruggs T. E.,Mastropieri M. A.,McEwen I.Early intervention for developmental functioning: A quantitative synthesis of single subject research.Journal for the Division of Early Childhood. 1988;12:359-367.
52. Stokes T. F.,Baer D. M.An implicit technology of generalization.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 1977;10:349-367.
53. Strain P. S.,Smith B. J.A counter-interpretation of early intervention effects: A response to Casto and Mastropieri.Exceptional Children. 1986;53:260-265.
54. Swanson H. L.,Sachse-Lee C.A meta-analysis of single-subject-design intervention research for students with LD.Journal of Learning Disabilities. 2000;33:114-136.
55. Tawney J. W.,Gast D. I.Single-subject research in special education. Columbus, OH: Merrill; 1984:.
56. White K. R.The relation between socioeconomic status and academic achievement.Psychological Bulletin. 1982;91:461-481.
57. White K.Efficacy of early intervention.Journal of Special Education. 1985;19:401-416.
58. Wolery M.,Busick M.,Reichow R.,Barton E. E. Paper presented at the Conference on Research Innovations in Early Intervention; 2008San Diego, CA; 2008.
59. Wolery M.,Busick M.,Reichow R.,Barton E. E.Comparison of overlap methods for quantitatively synthesizing single-subject data.Journal of Special Education. 2010;44:18-28.
60. Ximenes V.,Manolov R.,Solanas A.,Quera V.Factors affecting visual inference in single-case designs.Spanish Journal of Psychology. 2009;12:823-832.