Commentary on PND at 25

Remedial and Special Education

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 20-25

  Campbell, Jonathan M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

Author keywords

meta analysis; single case research design

Indexed keywords

EID: 84870933515     PISSN: 07419325     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0741932512454725     Document Type: Note

References (28)

1. Campbell J. M.Efficacy of behavioral intervention for reducing problematic behaviors in persons with autism: A quantitative synthesis of single-subject research.Research in Developmental Disabilities. 2003;24:120-138.
2. Campbell J. M.Statistical comparison of four effect sizes for single-subject designs.Behavior Modification. 2004;28:234-246.
3. Campbell J. M.,Herzinger C. V.Single subject research methodology in behavioral sciences. Gast D. L., ed. New York, NY: Routledge; 2010:417-453.
4. Cigna Companies. (2011). Intensive behavioral interventions (Coverage Policy Number 0499). Retrieved from http://www.cigna.com/customer_care/healthcare_professional/coverage_positions/medical/mm_0499_coveragepositioncriteria_intensive_Behavioral_interventions.pdf.
5. Cooper H.The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis. 2009). Hypotheses and problems in research synthesis. In CooperH.HedgesL. V.ValentineJ. C. (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (2nd ed., pp. 19-35). New York, NY: Russell Sage.Cooper H.Hedges L. V.Valentine J. C., ed. New York, NY: Russell Sage; 2009:19-35.
6. Cooper H.,Hedges L. V.The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis. 2009). Research synthesis as a scientific process. In CooperH.HedgesL. V.ValentineJ. C. (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (2nd ed., pp. 3-16). New York, NY: Russell Sage.Cooper H.Hedges L. V.Valentine J. C., ed. New York, NY: Russell Sage; 2009:3-16.
7. Didden R.,Duker P. C.,Korzilius H.Meta-analytic study on treatment effectiveness for problem behaviors with individuals who have mental retardation.American Journal on Mental Retardation. 1997;101:387-399.
8. Faith M. S.,Allison D. B.,Gorman B. S.Design and analysis of single-case research. Franklin R. D.Allison D. B.Gorman B. S., ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1996:245-277.
9. Gast D. L.,Spriggs A. D.Single subject research methodology in behavioral sciences. Gast D. L., ed. New York, NY: Routledge; 2010:199-233.
10. KratochwillT.R.HitchcockJ.HornerR. H.LevinJ. R.OdomS. L.RindskopfD. M.ShadishW. R. (2010). Single-case designs technical documentation. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/pdf/wwc_scd.pdf.
11. Ma H.An alternative method for quantitative synthesis of single subject researches: Percentage of data points exceeding the median.Behavior Modification. 2006;30:598-617.
12. Maggin D. M.,O'Keeffe B. V.,Johnson A. H.A quantitative synthesis of methodology in the meta-analysis of single-subject research for students with disabilities: 1986-2009.Exceptionality. 2011;19:109-135.
13. Moher D.,Liberati A.,Tetzlaff J.,Altman D. G.Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement.PLoS Med. 2009;6:e1000097.
14. Parker R. I.,Hagan-Burke S.,Vannest K.Percentage of all non-overlapping data (PAND): An alternative to PND.Journal of Special Education. 2007;40:194-204.
15. Parker R. I.,Vannest K. J.,Brown L.The improvement rate difference for single case research.Exceptional Children. 2009;75:135-150.
16. Parker R. I.,Vannest K. J.,Davis J. L.Effect size in single-case research: A review of nine nonoverlap techniques.Behavior Modification. 2011;35:303-322.
17. Rindskopf D. M.,Horner R. H.,Spaulding S. Presented at the IES Research Training Institute on single-case design; 2008Washington, DC; 2008.
18. Salzberg C. L.,Strain P. S.,Baer D. M.Meta-analysis for single-subject research: When does it clarify, when does it obscure?.Remedial and Special Education. 1987;8:43-48.
19. Schlosser R. W.,Lee D. L.,Wendt O.Application of the percentage of non-overlapping data (PND) in systematic reviews and meta-analyses: A systematic review of reporting characteristics.Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention. 2008;2:163-187.
20. Scotti J. R.,Evans I. M.,Meyer L. H.,Walker P.A meta-analysis of intervention research with problem behavior: Treatment validity and standards of practice.American Journal on Mental Retardation. 1991;96:233-256.
21. Scruggs T. E.,Mastropieri M. A.PND at 25: Past, present, and future trends in summarizing single-subject research.Remedial and Special Education. 2013;34:9-19.
22. Scruggs T. E.,Mastropieri M. A.,Casto G.The quantitative synthesis of single-subject research: Methodology and validation.Remedial and Special Education. 1987;8:24-33.
23. Shadish W. R.,Rindskopf D. M.Methods of evidence-based practice: Quantitative synthesis of single-subject designs.New Directions for Evaluation. 2007;113:95-109.
24. Shadish W. R.,Rindskopf D. M.,Hedges L. V.The state of the science in the meta-analysis of single-case experimental designs.Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention. 2008;3:188-196.
25. United HealthCare Services Inc. (2011). Intensive behavioral therapy for the treatment of autism spectrum disorders: Medical policy. Retrieved from https://www.unitedhealthcareonline.com/ccmcontent/ProviderII/UHC/en-US/Assets/ProviderStaticFiles/ProviderStaticFilesPdf/Tools%20and%20Resources/Policies%20and%20Protocols/Medical%20Policies/ Medical%20Policies/Intens_Behav_Thpy_Tx_Autism _Spec_Dis.pdf.
26. van den Noortgate W.,Onghena P.Combining single-case experimental data using hierarchical linear models.School Psychology Quarterly. 2003;18:325-346.
27. VannestK. J.ParkerR. I.GonenO. (2011). Single case research: Web based calculators for SCR analysis (Version 1.0) [Web-based application]. College Station: Texas A&M University. Available from www.singlecaseresearch.org.
28. Wolery M.,Busick M.,Reichow B.,Barton E. E.Comparison of overlap methods for quantitatively synthesizing single-subject data.Journal of Special Education. 2010;44:18-28.