Combining Single-Case Experimental Data Using Hierarchical Linear Models

School Psychology Quarterly

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 325-346

  Van den Noortgate, Wim ^a   Onghena, Patrick ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0242329313     PISSN: 10453830     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1521/scpq.18.3.325.22577     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Barlow, D. H., & Hersen, M. (1984). Single-case experimental designs. Strategies for studying behavior change (2nd ed.). New York: Pergamon.
2. Box, G. E. P., & Jenkins, G. M. (1976). Time series analysis, forecasting and control. San Francisco: Holden-Day.
3. Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
4. Bryk, A. S., Raudenbush, S. W., Congdon, R. T., & Seltzer, M. (1988). An introduction to HIM: User's guide, version 2.0 (computer program). Chicago: University of Chicago.
5. Busk, P. L., & Serlin, R. C. (1992). Meta-analysis for single-case research. In T. R. Kratochwill, & J. R. Levin (Eds.), Single-case research design and analysis. New directions for Psychology and Education (pp. 187-212). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Busse, R. T., Kratochwill, T. R., & Elliott, S. N. (1995). Meta-analysis for single-case consultation outcomes: Applications to research and practice. Journal of School Psychology, 33, 269-285.
7. Cooper, H., & Hedges, L.V. (Eds.) (1994). The handbook of research synthesis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
8. Edgington, E. S. (1995). Randomization tests (3rd ed.). New York: Dekker.
9. Franklin, R. D., Allison, D. B., & German, B. S. (1997). Introduction. In R. D. Franklin, D. B. Allison, & B. S. Gorman (Eds.), Design and analysis of single-case research (pp. 1-12). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. Gilks, W. R., Richardson, S., & Spiegelhalter, D. J. (1996). Markov Chain Monte Carlo in practice. London: Chapman & Hall.
11. Gingerich, W. J. (1984). Meta-analysis of applied time-series data. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 20, 71-79.
12. Glass, G. V. (1976). Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher, 5, 3-8.
13. Goldstein, H. (1995). Multilevel statistical models. London: Arnold.
14. Goldstein, H., Rasbash, J., Plewis, I., Draper, D., Browne, W., Yang, M., Woodhouse, G., & Healy, M. (1998). A user's guide to MLwiN. London: Multilevel Models Project, University of London.
15. Gorman, B. S., & Allison, D. B. (1997). Statistical alternatives for single-case designs. In R. D. Franklin, D. B. Allison, & B. S. Gorman (Eds.), Design and analysis of single-case research (pp. 159-214). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. Gosset, W. S. (1908). The probable error of a mean. Biometrika, 6, 1-25.
17. Gottman, J. M. (1981). Time-series analysis: A comprehensive introduction for social scientists. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
18. Hall, J., Tickle-Degnen, L., Rosenthal, R., & Mosteller, F. (1994). Hypotheses and problems in research synthesis. In H. Cooper, & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 17-28). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
19. Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
20. Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (1990). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
21. Hunter, J. E., Schmidt, F. L., & Jackson, G. B. (1982). Meta-analysis: Cumulating findings across research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
22. Ittenbach, R. F., & Lawhead, W. F. (1997). Historical and philosophical foundations of single-case research. In R. D. Franklin, D. B. Allison, & B. S. Gorman (Eds.), Design and analysis of single-case research (pp. 13-39). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
23. Jayaratne, S., Tripodi, T., & Talsma, E. (1988). The comparative analysis and aggregation of single-case data. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 24, 119-128.
24. Kratochwill, T. R. (1985). Case study research in school psychology. School Psychology Review, 14, 204-215.
25. Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (1993). The efficacy of psychological, educational, and behavioral treatment. Confirmation from meta-analysis. American Psychologist, 48, 1181-1209.
26. Littell, R. C., Milliken, G. A., Stroup, W. W., & Wolfinger, R. D. (1996). SAS system for mixed models. Cary, NC: Author.
27. Marascuilo, L. A., & Serlin, R. C. (1988). Statistics methods for the social and behavioral sciences. New York: Freeman.
28. Meijer, E., van der Leeden, R., & Busing, F. M. T. A. (1995). Implementing the bootstrap for multilevel models. Multilevel Modelling Newsletter, 7, 7-11.
29. Morris, C. (1983). Parametric empirical Bayes inference, theory and applications. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 78, 47-65.
30. Narayan, J. S., Heward, W. L., Gardner, R., Courson, F. H., & Omness, C. K. (1990). Using response cards to increase student participation in an elementary classroom. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 23, 483-490.
31. National Research Council (1992). Combining information. Statistical issues and opportunities for research. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
32. Nugent, W. R. (1996). Integrating single-case and group-comparison designs for evaluation research. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 32, 209-226.
33. Onghena, P. (1992). Randomization tests for extensions and variation of ABAB single-case experimental designs: A rejoinder. Behavioral Assessment, 14, 153-171.
34. Onghena, P., & Edgington, E. S. (1994). Randomization tests for restricted alternating treatment designs. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 32, 783-786.
35. Pearson, K. (1904, November). Report on certain enteric fever inoculation statistics. British Medical Journal, 1243-1246.
36. Raudenbush, S. W. (1988). Educational applications of hierarchical linear models: A review. Journal of Educational Statistics, 13, 85-116.
37. Rosenthal, R. (1998). Meta-analysis: Concepts, corollaries and controversies. In J. G. Adair, D. Belanger, & K. L. Dion (Eds.), Advances in psychological science, Vol. 1: Social, personal, and cultural aspects. Hove, United Kingdom: Psychology Press.
38. SAS Institute (1999). SAS/STAT user's guide, version 8. Cary, NC: Author.
39. Singer, J. (1998). Using SAS PROC MIXED to fit multilevel models, hierarchical models, and individual growth models. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 23, 323-355.
40. Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. (1999). Multilevel analysis. An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. London: Sage.
41. Stage, S. A. (2001). Program evaluation using hierarchical linear modeling with curriculum-based measurement reading probes. School Psychology Quarterly, 16, 91-112.
42. Van den Noortgate, W., & Onghena, P. (2003). Hierarchical linear models for the quantitative integration of effect sizes in single-case research. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35, 1-10.
43. Verbeke, G., & Lesaffre, E. (1997). The effect of misspecifying the random-effects distribution in linear mixed models for longitudinal data. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 23, 541-556.
44. Verbeke, G., & Molenberghs, G. (1997). Linear mixed models in practice: A SAS-oriented approach. New York: Springer-Verlag.
45. Wacker, D. P., Steege, M., & Berg, W. K. (1988). Use of single-case designs to evaluate manipulable influences on school performance. School Psychology Review, 17, 651-657.
46. White, D. M., Rush, F. R., Kazdin, A. E., & Hartmann, D. P. (1989). Applications of meta analysis in individual-subject research. Behavioral Assessment, 11, 281-296.