A web-based methodology for the prediction of approximate IDA curves

Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics

Volumn 42, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 43-60

  Peruš, Iztok ^a   Klinc, Robert ^a   Dolenc, Matevž ^a   Dolšek, Matjaž ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LJUBLJANA   (Slovenia)

Author keywords

Incremental dynamic analysis; Performance based earthquake engineering; RC frame; Simplified nonlinear method; Static pushover

Indexed keywords

DATABASE SYSTEMS; WEBSITES;

INCREMENTAL DYNAMIC ANALYSIS; NON-LINEAR METHODS; PERFORMANCE-BASED EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING; RC FRAMES; STATIC PUSHOVER;

FORECASTING;

DYNAMIC ANALYSIS; EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING; GROUND MOTION; PREDICTION; REINFORCED CONCRETE; SEISMIC RESPONSE; STRUCTURAL COMPONENT;

EID: 84870865031     PISSN: 00988847     EISSN: 10969845     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.2192     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Vamvatsikos D, Cornell CA. Incremental dynamic analysis. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2002; 31(3): 491-514.
2. Vamvatsikos D, Cornell CA. Direct estimation of the seismic demand and capacity of oscillators with multi-linear static pushovers through IDA. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2006; 35(9): 1097-1117.
3. Han SW, Chopra AK. Approximate incremental dynamic analysis using the modal pushover analysis procedure. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2006; 35(15): 1853-1873.
4. Chopra AK, Goel RK. A modal pushover analysis procedure for estimating seismic demands for buildings. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2002; 31(3): 561-582.
5. Dolšek M, Fajfar P. Simplified non-linear seismic analysis of infilled concrete frames. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2005; 34(1): 49-66.
6. Fajfar P. A nonlinear analysis method for performance-based seismic design. Earthquake Spectra 2000; 16(3): 573-592.
7. Jeong S-H, Elnashai AS. Probabilistic fragility analysis parameterized by fundamental response quantities. Engineering Structures 2007; 29(6): 1238-1251.
8. CEN. Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance. Part 1: General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings, EN 1998-1. European Committee for Standardisation: Brussels, 2004.
9. FEMA. Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings (FEMA Publication 356). American Society of Civil Engineers, Federal Emergency Management Agency: Washington, D.C., 2000.
10. Erduran E, Kunnath SK. Enhanced displacement coefficient method for degrading multi-degree-of-freedom systems. Earthquake Spectra 2010; 26(2): 311-326.
11. Miranda E. Inelastic displacement ratios for structures on firm sites. Journal of Structural Engineering 2000; 126(10): 1150-1159.
12. Turk Ž. Construction informatics in European research: topics and agendas. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering 2007; 21(3): 211-219.
13. OpenSees. Open System for Earthquake Engineering Simulation. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center: Berkeley, California, 2011 http://opensees.berkeley.edu/ (last accessed August 2011).
14. Mathpages. Boolean Expansion as Linear Interpolation, 2008. (Available from: http://www.mathpages.com/home/kmath089.htm)
15. Takeda T, Sozen MA, Nielsen NN. Reinforced concrete response to simulated earthquakes. Journal of the Structural Division 1970; 96(12): 2557-2573.
16. Dolšek M, Klinc R, Dolenc M, Brozovič M, Peruš I. A toolbox and web application for the seismic performance assessment of Buildings. Protection of Built Environment Against Earthquakes, Dolšek (ed.). Springer: New York, 2011; 233-257. (Available from: http://www.springer.com/earth+sciences+and+geography/environmental+science+%26+engineering/book/978-94-007-1447-2)
17. Fardis MN (ed.). Experimental and numerical investigations on the seismic response of RC infilled frames and recommendations for code provisions. ECOEST/PREC 8 Rep. No. 6, LNEC, Lisbon, 1996.
18. Negro P, Pinto AV, Verzeletti G, Magonette GE. PsD test on four-story R/C building designed according to Eurocodes. Journal of Structural Engineering 1996; 122(12): 1409-1417.
19. Dolsek M. Development of computing environment for the seismic performance assessment of reinforced concrete frames by using simplified nonlinear models. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 2010; 8(6): 1309-1329.
20. Peruš I, Poljanšek K, Fajfar P. Flexural deformation capacity of rectangular RC columns determined by the CAE method. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2006; 35(9): 1453-1470.
21. CEN. Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance. Part 3: Strengthening and Repair of Buildings, EN 1998-3. European Committee for Standardisation: Brussels, 2005.
22. Krawinkler H, Seneviratna GDPK. Pros and cons of a pushover analysis of seismic performance evaluation. Engineering Structures 1998; 20(4-6): 452-464.
23. Reyes CJ, Chopra AK. Three-dimensional modal pushover analysis of buildings subjected to two components of ground motion, including its evaluation for tall buildings. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2011; 40: 789-806.
24. Kreslin M, Fajfar P. The extended N2 method taking into account higher mode effects in elevation. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2011; 40: 1571-1589.
25. Koren D, Kilar V. The applicability of the N2 method to the estimation of torsional effects in asymmetric base-isolated buildings. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2011; 40: 867-886.