Approximate incremental dynamic analysis using the modal pushover analysis procedure

Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics

Volumn 35, Issue 15, 2006, Pages 1853-1873

  Han, Sang Whan ^a   Chopra, Anil K ^b  

^a Hanyang University   (South Korea)

^b 109 McLaughlin Hall   (United States)

Author keywords

Incremental dynamic analysis; Modal pushover analysis; Performance based earhquake engineering

Indexed keywords

DIMENSIONAL STABILITY; DYNAMIC RESPONSE; EARTHQUAKE EFFECTS; ELASTICITY; VIBRATIONS (MECHANICAL);

DEGREE OF ACCURACY; INCREMENTAL DYNAMIC ANALYSIS; MODAL PUSHOVER ANALYSIS;

STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS;

DYNAMIC ANALYSIS; EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING; GROUND MOTION; SEISMIC RESPONSE; STRUCTURAL RESPONSE; VIBRATION;

EID: 33751508384     PISSN: 00988847     EISSN: 10969845     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.605     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Vamvatisikos D, Cornell CA. Incremental dynamic analysis. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2002; 31:491-514.
2. Vamvatisikos D, Cornell CA. Direct estimation of seismic demand and capacity of multi-degree of freedom systems through incremental dynamic analysis of single degree of freedom approximation. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 2005; 131(4):589-599.
3. Chopra AK, Goel RK. A modal pushover analysis procedure for estimating seismic demands for buildings. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2002; 31:561-582.
4. Chopra AK, Goel RK. A modal pushover analysis procedure to estimate seismic demands for unsymmetric-plan buildings. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2004; 33(8):903-928.
5. Vamvatisikos D, Cornell CA. Applied incremental dynamic analysis. Earthquake Spectra 2004; 20(2):523-533.
6. Krawinkler H, Miranda E. Performance-based earthquake engineering. In Earthquake Engineering: From Engineering Seismology to Performance-Based Engineering, Bozorgnia Y, Bertero VV (eds). CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, 2004.
7. Chopra AK. Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering (2nd edn). Prentice-Hall: New Jersey, 2001.
8. Goel RK, Chopra AK. Evaluation of modal and FEMA pushover analyses: SAC buildings. Earthquake Spectra 2004; 20(1):225-254.
9. Chopra AK, Chintanapakdee C. Comparative evaluation of FEMA and modal pushover analyses: vertically regular and irregular generic frames. Earthquake Spectra 2004; 20(1):255-271.
10. Chintanapakdee C, Chopra AK. Seismic response of vertically irregular frames: response history and modal pushover analyses. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 2004; 130(8):1177-1185.
11. Gupta A, Krawinkler H. Seismic demands for performance evaluation of steel moment resisting frame structures (SAC Task 5.4.3). Report No. 132, John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 1999.
12. SAC. Experimental investigation of beam-column subassemblies. Report No. SAC/BD 96/01, SAC Joint Venture, Richmond, CA, 1996.
13. Ibarra LF. Global collapse of frame structures under seismic excitations. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 2003.
14. Federal Emergency Management Agency. Recommended Seismic Design Criteria for New Steel Moment Frame Buildings. Washington, DC, 2000.
15. Ibarra L, Medina RA, Krawinkler H. Hysteretic models that incorporate strength and stiffness deterioration. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2005; 34:1489-1515.
16. Dolsek M, Fajfar P. Simplified non-linear seismic analysis of infilled concrete frames. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2005; 34(1):49-66.