Probabilistic fragility analysis parameterized by fundamental response quantities

Engineering Structures

Volumn 29, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 1238-1251

  Jeong, Seong Hoon ^a   Elnashai, Amr S ^b  

^a Inha University   (South Korea)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

Damage assessment; Fragility analysis; Inelastic earthquake response

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DEGREES OF FREEDOM (MECHANICS); DUCTILITY; RELIABILITY THEORY; STIFFNESS; STRENGTH OF MATERIALS; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

FRAGILITY ANALYSIS; INELASTIC EARTHQUALKE RESPONSE; LOG-NORMAL FRAGILITY RELATIONSHIP; MULTI-DEGREE OF FREEDOM (MDOF);

DYNAMIC RESPONSE;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DEGREES OF FREEDOM (MECHANICS); DUCTILITY; DYNAMIC RESPONSE; RELIABILITY THEORY; STIFFNESS; STRENGTH OF MATERIALS; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATABASE; DUCTILITY; PROBABILITY; RELIABILITY ANALYSIS; RESPONSE ANALYSIS; SEISMIC RESPONSE; STIFFNESS; STRENGTH; STRUCTURAL RESPONSE;

EID: 34247475833     PISSN: 01410296     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.06.026     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Rossetto T., and Elnashai A.S. Derivation of vulnerability functions for European-type RC structures based on observational data. Engineering Structures 25 10 (2003) 1241-1263
2. Applied Technology Council. ATC-13: Earthquake damage evaluation data for California (1985), ATC, Redwood City (California)
3. National Institute of Building Sciences. Development of a standardized earthquake loss estimation methodology (1995), FEMA, Washington(DC)
4. Chryssanthopoulos M.K., Dymiotis C., and Kappos A.J. Probabilistic evaluation of behaviour factors in EC8-designed R/C frames. Engineering Structures 22 8 (2000) 1028-1041
5. Singhal A., and Kiremidjian A.S. Method for probabilistic evaluation of seismic structural damage. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE 122 12 (1996) 1459-1467
6. Erberik M.A., and Elnashai A.S. Fragility analysis of flat-slab structures. Engineering Structures 26 7 (2004) 937-948
7. Applied Technology Council. ATC-40: Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings (1996), ATC, Redwood City (California)
8. Barbat A.H., Moya F.Y., and Canas J.A. Damage scenarios simulation for seismic risk assessment in urban zones. Earthquake Spectra 12 3 (1996) 371-394
9. Singhal A., and Kiremidjian A.S. Bayesian updating of fragilities with application to RC frames. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE 124 8 (1998) 922-929
10. Kappos A.J., Stylianidis K.C., and Pitilakis K. Development of seismic risk scenarios based on a hybrid method of vulnerability assessment. Natural Hazards 17 2 (1998) 177-192
11. Federal Emergency Management Agency. FEMA-273: NEHRP guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings (1997), FEMA, Washington(DC)
12. Saiidi M., and Sozen M.A. Simple nonlinear seismic analysis of RC structures. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE 107 5 (1981) 937-953
13. Fajfar P, Fischinger M. N2 - A method for non-linear seismic analysis of regular structures. In: Proceedings of the 9th world conference on earthquake engineering. 1988
14. Qi X., and Moehle J.P. Displacement design approach for reinforced concrete structures subjected to earthquakes (1991), Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley (California)
15. Aschheim M., and Black EF. Yield point spectra for seismic design and rehabilitation. Earthquake Spectra 16 2 (2000) 317-335
16. Shinozuka M., Feng M.Q., Kim H.K., and Kim S.H. Nonlinear static procedure for fragility curve development. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE 126 12 (2000) 1287-1295
17. Chopra A.K., and Goel R.K. Capacity-demand-diagram methods for estimating seismic deformation of inelastic structures: SDF systems (1999), Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley (California)
18. Elnashai AS, Spencer BF, Kuchma D, Kim S, Burdette N, Holub C et al. Analysis and distributed hybrid simulation of shear-sensitive rc bridges subjected to horizontal and vertical earthquake ground motion. In: 37th Annual meeting of the US-Japan panel on wind and seismic effects. 2005
19. Neilson BG. Analytical fragility curves for highway bridges in moderate seismic zones. Ph.D. thesis. Atlanta (GA): Georgia Institute of Technology; 2005
20. Lee D., Choi E., and Zi G. Evaluation of earthquake deformation and performance for rc bridge piers. Engineering Structures 27 10 (2005) 1451-1464
21. Eurocode 8. Design provisions for earthquake resistance of structures. European Pre-standard ENV 1998-1, 1-2 and 1-3, European Committee for Standardization. Bruxelles. 1994
22. Mwafy A.M., and Elnashai A.S. Static pushover versus dynamic collapse analysis of RC buildings. Engineering Structures 23 5 (2001) 407-424
23. Elnashai AS, Papanikolau V, Lee D. ZeusNL - a system for inelastic analysis of structures. Mid-America Earthquake Center, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Program release Sep. 2002; 2002
24. Elnashai A.S., and Elghazouli A.Y. Performance of composite steel/concrete members under earthquake loading. Part I: Analytical model. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 22 4 (1993) 315-345
25. Jeong S.H., and Elnashai A.S. Analytical assessment of an irregular RC frame for full-scale 3D pseudo-dynamic testing. Part I: Analytical model verification. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 9 1 (2005) 95-128
26. Martinez-Rueda J.E., and Elnashai A.S. Confined concrete model under cyclic load. Materials and Structures 30 197 (1997) 139-147
27. Elnashai A.S., and Izzuddin B.A. Modelling of material nonlinearities in steel structures subjected to transient dynamic loading. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 22 6 (1993) 509-532
28. Romero S., and Rix G.J. Regional variations in near surface shear wave velocity in the greater Memphis area. Engineering Geology 62 1-3 (2001) 137-158
29. Drosos VA. Synthesis of earthquake ground motions for the new Madrid seismic zone. M.S. thesis. Atlanta (GA): Georgia Institute of Technology; 2003
30. Zhong Q. Assessing the effectiveness of reducing seismic vulnerability by a program of bridge pier wrapping. Ph.D. thesis. Urbana (IL): University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; 2001
31. Hwang H., Jernigan J.B., and Lin Y.W. Evaluation of seismic damage to Memphis bridges and highway systems. Journal of Bridge Engineering 5 4 (2000) 322-330
32. Priestley M.J.N., and Park R. Strength and ductility of concrete bridge columns under seismic loading. ACI Structural Journal 84 8 (1987) 61-76
33. Kawashima K, Unjoh S. The damage of highway bridges in the 1995 Hyogo-ken Nanbu earthquake and its impact on Japanese seismic design. 1997;1(3):505-41
34. Federal Emergency Management Agency. FEMA-356: Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings (1999), FEMA, Washington(DC)
35. Bartlett F.M., and MacGregor J.G. Statistical analysis of the compressive strength of concrete in structures. ACI Material Journal 93 2 (1996) 158-168
36. Mirza S.A., and MacGregor J.G. Variability of mechanical properties of reinforcing bars. ASCE Journal of Structural Division 105 (1979) (ST5)
37. Wen YK, Ellingwood BR, Bracci J. Vulnerability function framework for consequence-based engineering. MAE report 04-04. Mid-America Earthquake Center, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; 2004
38. Pinto P.E., Giannini R., and Franchin P. Seismic Reliability Analysis of Structures (2004), IUSS Press
39. Kwon O.S., and Elnashai A.S. The effect of material and ground motion uncertainty on the seismic vulnerability curves of RC structures. Engineering Structures 28 2 (2006) 289-303
40. Kim YS, Elnashai AS, Spencer BF, Ukkusuri S, Waller ST. Seismic performance assessment of highway networks. In: 8th National conference on earthquake engineering. 2006