Long-Term Clinical Outcomes and Survivorship After Total Knee Arthroplasty Using a Rotating Platform Knee Prosthesis: A Meta-Analysis

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Hopley, Colin D J ^a   Crossett, Lawrence S ^b   Chen, Antonia F ^b  

^a Johnson Johnson Company   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

Low Contact Stress (LCS) knee; Meta analysis; Mobile bearing; Rotating platform; Survivorship; Total knee arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; KNEE PROSTHESIS; KNEE SOCIETY SCORE; LOW CONTACT STRESS ROTATING PLATFORM; OSTEOARTHRITIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS; SCORING SYSTEM; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT;

EID: 84870730427     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: 15328406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.04.026     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Pappas M.J. Engineering design of the LCS knee replacement in LCS mobile bearing knee arthroplasty: 25 years experience 2002, 67. Springer Verlag, Berlin. H. Hamelynck, J.B. Stiehl (Eds.).
2. Callaghan J., Wells C., Liu S., et al. Cemented rotating-platform total knee replacement: a concise follow-up, at a minimum of twenty years, of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010, 92:1635.
3. CDC Public health and aging: projected prevalence of self-reported arthritis or chronic joint symptoms among persons aged 65 years-United States, 2005-2030. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2003, 52:489.
4. Kurtz S., Ong K., Lau E., et al. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005-2030. J Bone Joint Surg 2007, 89-A:780.
5. Carothers J., Raymond K., Dennis D., et al. Mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty a meta-analysis. J Arthroplasty 2011, 26:537.
6. Insall J.N., Dorr L.D., Scott R.D., et al. Rationale of the knee society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989, 248:13.
7. Journal of bone joint surgery instructions for authors. Levels of evidence for primary research question. (accessed January 30, 2008). http://www2.ejbjs.org/misc/instrux.dtl#levels.
8. Sutton A., Abrams K., Jones D., et al. Methods for meta-analysis in medical research 2000, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
9. Egger M., Davey Smith G., Altman D. Systematic review in health care meta-analysis in context 2001, 211. BMJ Books, London.
10. Kalbfliesch J., Prentice R. The statistical analysis of failure time data 1980, John Wiley and Sons, New York.
11. Dept Orthopedics University of Lund Annual The Swedish National Knee Arthroplasty Register Annual Report 2011 (accessed February 24, 2012). http://www.knee.nko.se/.
12. Altman G. Practical statistics for medical research 1991, Chapman and Hall, London.
13. Ali M.S., Mangaleshkar S.R. Uncemented rotating-platform total knee arthroplasty: a 4-year to 12-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty 2006, 21:80.
14. Bhan S., Malhotra R., Kiran E.K., et al. A comparison of fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty at a minimum follow-up of 4.5 years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005, 87:2290.
15. Callaghan J.J., Squire M.W., Goetz D.D., et al. Cemented rotating-platform total knee replacement. A nine to twelve-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2000, 82:705.
16. Callaghan J.J., O'Rourke M.R., Iossi M.F., et al. Cemented rotating-platform total knee replacement: a concise follow-up, at a minimum of fifteen years, of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005, 87:1995.
17. Esftathopoulos N., Mavrogenis A., Lallos S., et al. 10-Year evaluation of the cementless Low contact stress rotating platform total knee arthroplasty. J Long Term Eff Med Implants 2009, 19:255.
18. Huang C.H., Ma H.M., Lee Y.M., et al. Long-term results of Low contact stress mobile-bearing total knee replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003, 416:265.
19. Kim Y.H., Kim J.S. Comparison of anterior-posterior-glide and rotating-platform low contact stress mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004, 86:1239.
20. Kim Y.H., Kim J.S., Choi Y. Osteolysis after unidirectional and multidirectional mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty in young patients. J Arthroplasty 2009, 24:586.
21. Kim Y.H., Yoon S.H., Kim J.S. The long-term results of simultaneous fixed bearing and mobile-bearing total knee replacements performed in the same patient. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007, 89:1317.
22. Kim Y.H., Kim J.-S., Park J.-W., Joo J.-H. Comparison of the Low Contact Stress and Press Fit Condylar rotating-platform mobile-bearing prostheses in total knee arthroplasty a prospective randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011, 93:1001.
23. O'Brien S., Spence D., Ogonda L., et al. LCS mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty without patellar resurfacing. Does the unresurfaced patella affect outcome? Survivorship at a minimum 10-year follow-up. Knee 2011.
24. Papachristou G., Plessas S., Sourlas J., et al. Cementless LCS rotating-platform knee arthroplasty in patients over 60 years without patella replacement: a mid-term clinical-outcome study. Med Sci Monit 2006, 12:CR264.
25. Specchiulli F., Gabrieli R., Borsetti D., et al. Midterm results of mobile-bearing knee replacements. J Orthop Trauma 2007, 8:123.
26. Buechel F.F. Long-term followup after mobile-bearing total knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002, 404:40.
27. Cho W.S., Youm Y.S., Ahn S.C., et al. What have we learned from LCS mobile bearing knee system?. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2010, 18:1345.
28. Sorrells R.B., Voorhorst P.E., Murphy J.A., et al. Uncemented rotating-platform total knee replacement: a five to twelve-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004, 86:2156.
29. Stiehl J.B., Hamelynck K., Voorhorst P. International multi-centre survivorship analysis of mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 2006, 30:190.
30. Stiehl J.B., Voorhorst P.E. Total knee arthroplasty with a mobile-bearing prosthesis comparison of retention and sacrifice of the posterior cruciate ligament in cementless implants. Am J Orthop 1999, 28:223.
31. Tarkin I.S., Bridgeman J.T., Jardon O.M., et al. Successful biologic fixation with mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2005, 20:481.
32. Abu-Rajab R.B., Watson W.S., Walker B., et al. Peri-prosthetic bone mineral density after total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006, 88:606.
33. Chiu K.Y., Ng T.P., Tang W.M., et al. Bilateral total knee arthroplasty: one mobile-bearing and one fixed-bearing. J Orthop Surg 2001, 9:45.
34. Hooper G., Rothwell A., Frampton C. The low contact stress mobile-bearing total knee replacement: a prospective study with a minimum follow up of ten years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009, 91-B:58.
35. Jung Y., Jung H., Kwak J. Comparison of the clinical outcomes after total knee arthroplasty with PFC Sigma RP-F verses LCS. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2010, 92(S1):128.
36. Maini P., Kailey P., Talwar N. Hybrid fixation in rotating platform mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty using low contact stress knee. Indian J Orthop 2006, 40:219.
37. Shah K., Smith J., Jones B., et al. Bilateral total knee replacement under a single anaesthetic, using a cementless implant is not unsafe. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2007, 15:269.
38. Vasdev A., Kumar S., Chadda G., et al. Fixed- versus mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty in Indian patients. J Orthop Surg 2009, 17:179.
39. Woolson S.T., Northrop G.D. Mobile- vs. fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty: a clinical and radiologic study. J Arthroplasty 2004, 19:135.
40. Woolson S., Epstein N., Huddleston J. Long-term comparison of mobile-bearing vs fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2011, 26:1219.
41. Kane R., Saleh K., Wilt T.J., et al. Total knee replacement. Evidence report/technology assessment. Number 86. AHRQ Publication No. 04-E006-2. 2003, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville (Md), [cited 2005 Feb. 2]., (accessed January 30, 2008). http://www.ahrq.gov/downloads/pub/evidence/pdf/knee/knee.pdf.
42. The Medical Advisory Secretariat Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care Canada: Total Knee Replacement Health Technology Literature Review June 2005.
43. Publications of the National Agency for Medicines 2/2008. The 2006 Implant Yearbook on Orthopaedic Endoprostheses Finnish Arthroplasty Register Accessed 12/10/09. http://www.nam.fi/instancedata/prime_product_julkaisu/laakelaitos/embeds/julkaisut_laitteet_ja_tarvikkeet_J082_Endopr_2006.pdf.
44. The Department of Epidemiology Aarhus University Hospital DanskKnæalloplastikregisterÅrsrapport 2011 Accessed 24/02/12. https://www.sundhed.dk/content/cms/99/4699_%C3%A5rsrapport2011-dkr-final.pdf.
45. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Haukeland University Hospital The Norwegian Arthroplasty Register Annual Report 2010 Accessed 24/02/12. http://nrlweb.ihelse.net/eng/default.htm#Publications.
46. Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry Annual Report 2011, AOA, Adelaide, Accessed 24/02/12. http://www.dmac.adelaide.edu.au/aoanjrr/publications.jsp.
47. New Zealand Orthopaedic Association The New Zealand Joint Registry, twelve year report, January 1999 to December 2010 Accessed: 24/02/12. http://www.cdhb.govt.nz/NJR/reports/A2D65CA3.pdf.
48. The NRR Centre Hemel Hempstead National Joint Registry for England and Wales Annual Report 2011 Accessed 24/02/12. http://www.njrcentre.org.uk/njrcentre/AbouttheNJR/Publicationsandreports/Annualreports/tabid/86/Default.aspx.
49. Hopley C., Crosett L. Systematic review of complications in TKA mobile bearing knees. J ASTM Int 2011, 1:8.
50. Robbertsson O., Bizjajeva S., Fenstad A.-M., et al. Knee arthroplasty in Denmark, Norway, and Sweden a pilot study from the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association. Acta Orthop 2010, 81:82.