Comparison of the Low Contact Stress and Press Fit Condylar rotating-platform mobile-bearing prostheses in total knee arthroplasty a prospective randomized study

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery

Volumn 93, Issue 11, 2011, Pages 1001-1007

  Kim, Young Hoo ^a   Kim, Jun Shik ^a   Park, Jang Won ^a   Joo, Jong Hwan ^a  

^a Ewha Womans University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEASUREMENT; POSTERIOR CRUCIATE SACRIFICING MOBILE BEARING PROSTHESIS; POSTERIOR CRUCIATE SACRIFICING MOBILE BEARING TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; POSTERIOR STABILIZED MOBILE BEARING PROSTHESIS; POSTERIOR STABILIZED MOBILE BEARING TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RANGE OF MOTION; SURVIVAL RATE; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT;

EID: 79961058514     PISSN: 00219355     EISSN: 15351386     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.J.00445     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Bartel DL, Bicknell VL, Wright TM. The effect of conformity, thickness, and material on stresses in ultra-high molecular weight components for total joint replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986;68:1041-51. (Pubitemid 17180053)
2. Buechel FF, Pappas MJ. Long-term survivorship analysis of cruciate-sparing versus cruciate-sacrificing knee prostheses using meniscal bearings. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;260:162-9. (Pubitemid 20381533)
3. O'Connor JJ, Goodfellow JW. Theory and practice of meniscal knee replacement: designing against wear. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 1996;210:217-22. (Pubitemid 126759516)
4. Insall JN, Lachiewicz PF, Burstein AH. The posterior stabilized condylar prosthesis: a modification of the total condylar design. Two to four-year clinical experience. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982;64:1317-23. (Pubitemid 13169600)
5. Callaghan JJ, Squire MW, Goetz DD, Sullivan PM, Johnston RC. Cemented rotating-platform total knee replacement. A nine to twelve-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82:705-11. (Pubitemid 30307872)
6. Callaghan JJ, O'Rourke MR, Iossi MF, Liu SS, Goetz DD, Vittetoe DA, Sullivan PM, Johnston RC. Cemented rotating-platform total knee replacement. A concise followup, at a minimum of fifteen years, of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:1995-8. (Pubitemid 41279130)
7. Kim YH, Yoon SH, Kim JS. The long-term results of simultaneous fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing total knee replacements performed in the same patient. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89:1317-23.
8. Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Hoff WA, Gabriel SM. In vivo knee kinematics derived using an inverse perspective technique. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;331:107-17. (Pubitemid 26357694)
9. Ahlbäck S. Osteoarthrosis of the knee. A radiographic investigation. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh) 1968;Suppl 277:7-72.
10. Arima J, Whiteside LA, McCarthy DS, White SE. Femoral rotational alignment, based on the anteroposterior axis, in total knee arthroplasty in a valgus knee. A technical note. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;77:1331-4.
11. Ewald FC. The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;248:9-12. (Pubitemid 20204774)
12. Insall JN, Ranawat CS, Aglietti P, Shine J. A comparison of four models of total knee-replacement prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976;58:754-65.
13. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159-74. (Pubitemid 8054849)
14. Bach CM, Biedermann R, Goebel G, Mayer E, Rachbauer F. Reproducible assessment of radiolucent lines in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;434:183-8. (Pubitemid 40617514)
15. Tegner Y, Lysholm J. Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985;198:43-9. (Pubitemid 16248241)
16. Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc. 1958;53:457-81.
17. Sorrells RB, Voorhorst PE, Murphy JA, Bauschka MP, Greenwald AS. Uncemented rotating-platform total knee replacement: a five to twelve-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:2156-62. (Pubitemid 39349948)
18. Kim YH, Kim JS, Choi Y. Osteolysis after unidirectional and multidirectional mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty in young patients. J Arthroplasty 2009;24:586-93.
19. Hooper G, Rothwell A, Frampton C. The low contact stress mobile-bearing total knee replacement: a prospective study with aminimum follow-up of ten years. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91:58-63.
20. Kim YH, Kim JS. Prevalence of osteolysis after simultaneous bilateral fixed- and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasties in young patients. J Arthroplasty 2009;24:932-40.
21. Kim YH, Kook HK, Kim JS. Comparison of fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;392:101-15.
22. Kim YH, Kim JS. Comparison of anterior-posterior-glide and rotating-platform low contact stress mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:1239-47.
23. Ranawat AS, Rossi R, Loreti I, Rasquinha VJ, Rodriguez JA, Ranawat CS. Comparison of the PFC Sigma fixed-bearing and rotating-platform total knee arthroplasty in the same patient: short-term results. J Arthroplasty 2004;19:35-9. (Pubitemid 38112330)
24. Gioe TJ, Glynn J, Sembrano J, Suthers K, Santos ER, Singh J. Mobile and fixed-bearing (all-polyethylene tibial component) total knee arthroplasty designs. A prospective randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:2104-12.
25. Luring C, Bathis H, Oczipka F, Trepte C, Lufen H, Perlick L, Grifka J. Two-year follow-up on joint stability and muscular function comparing rotating versus fixed bearing TKR. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2006;14:605-11. (Pubitemid 44000070)
26. Kim YH, Kim DY, Kim JS. Simultaneous mobile- and fixed-bearing total knee replacement in the same patients. A prospective comparison of mid-term outcomes using a similar design of prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89:904-10.
27. Thompson NW, Wilson DS, Cran GW, Beverland DE, Stiehl JB. Dislocation of the rotating platform after low contact stress total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;425:207-11. (Pubitemid 39062771)
28. Bert JM. Dislocation/subluxation of meniscal bearing elements after New Jersey low-contact stress total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;254:211-5. (Pubitemid 20145905)
29. Weaver JK, Derkash RS, Greenwald AS. Difficulties with bearing dislocation and breakage using a movable bearing total knee replacement system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;290:244-52. (Pubitemid 23139605)
30. Beverland D. Management of the severe varus and valgus knee using the low contact stress rotating platform. Orthopedics 2006;29(9 Suppl):S60-3. (Pubitemid 44468691)