Osteolysis After Unidirectional and Multidirectional Mobile-Bearing Total Knee Arthroplasty in Young Patients

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 586-593

  Kim, Young Hoo ^a   Kim, Jun Shik ^a   Choi, Yoowang ^a  

^a Ewha Womans University School of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

osteolysis; polyethylene wear; uni and multidirectional TKA

Indexed keywords

POLYETHYLENE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KNEE FUNCTION; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OSTEOARTHRITIS; OSTEOLYSIS; POSTTRAUMATIC ARTHROPATHY; PREVALENCE; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT;

ADULT; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOLYSIS; POLYETHYLENE; PREVALENCE; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 67349191913     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.02.007     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Oakeshott R.D., Komistek R.D., and Stiel J.B. The A/P-glide knee prosthesis-rationales, kinematics and results. In: Hamelynck K.J., and Stiehl J.B. (Eds). LCS Mobile bearing knee arthroplasty: a 25 year worldwide review (2002), Springer, Berlin, Germany P313
2. Jones V.C., Barton D.C., Fitzpatrick D.P., et al. An experimental model of tibial counter face polyethylene wear in mobile bearing knees: the influence of design and kinematics. Biomed Mater Eng 9 (1999) 189
3. Engh G.A., and Ammeen D.J. Periprosthetic osteolysis with total knee arthroplasty. Instr Course Lec 50 (2001) 391
4. Kim Y.H., and Kim J.S. Comparison of anterior-posterior-glide and rotating-platform low contact stress mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86 (2004) 1239
5. Callaghan J.J., Squire M.W., Goetz D.D., et al. Cemented rotating-platform total knee replacement: a nine to twelve-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82 (2000) 705
6. Insall J.N., Ranawat C.S., Aglietti P., et al. A comparison of four models of total knee-replacement prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Am 58 (1976) 754
7. Insall J.N., Dorr L.D., Scott R.D., et al. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop 248 (1989) 13
8. Kaplan E.L., and Meier R. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 53 (1958) 457
9. Rand J.A., and Ilstrup D.M. Survivorship analysis of total knee arthroplasty: cumulative rates of survival of 9200 total knee arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am 73 (1991) 397
10. Stiehl J.B., Dennis D.A., Komistek R.K., et al. Kinematic analysis of a mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 345 (1997) 60
11. Stiehl J.B., Komistek R.D., and Dennis D.A. In vivo kinematic comparison of posterior cruciate retention or sacrifice with a mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty. Am J Knee Surg 13 (2000) 13
12. Kop A.M., and Swarts E. Quantification of polyethylene degradation in mobile bearing knees: a retrieval analysis of the anterior-posterior-glide (APG) and rotating platform (RP) low contact stress (LCS) knee. Acta Orthop 78 (2007) 364
13. Wasielewski R.C., Parks N., Williams I., et al. Tibial insert surface as a contributing source of polyethylene wear in mobile-bearing knees: the influence of design and kinematics. Biomed Mater Eng 9 (1999) 189
14. Sorrells R.B. The rotating platform mobile bearing TKA. Orthopedics 19 (1996) 793
15. Buechel Sr. F.F. Long-term followup after mobile-bearing total knee replacement. Clin Orthop 404 (2002) 40
16. Kaper B.P., Smith P.N., Bourne R.B., et al. Medium term results of a mobile bearing total knee replacement. Clin Orthop 367 (1999) 201
17. Collier M.B., Engh Jr. C.A., McAuley J.P., et al. Osteolysis after total knee arthroplasty: influence of tibial baseplate surface finish and sterilization of polyethylene inert. Findings at five to ten years postoperatively. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87 (2005) 2702
18. Schmalzried T.P., Jasty M., and Harris W.H. Periprosthetic bone loss in total hip arthroplasty: polyethylene wear debris and the concept of the effective joint space. J Bone Joint Surg Am 74 (1992) 849
19. Buechel Sr. F.F., Buechel Jr. F.F., Pappas M.J., et al. Twenty-year evaluation of meniscal bearing and rotating platform knee replacements. Clin Orthop 388 (2001) 41
20. Goodfellow J.W., and O'Connor J. Clinical results of the Oxford knee: surface arthroplasty of the tibiofemoral joint with a meniscal bearing prosthesis. Clin Orthop 205 (1986) 21
21. Kim Y.H., Kook H.K., and Kim J.S. Comparison of fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop 392 (2001) 101
22. Stiehl J.B., Voorhorst P.E., Keblish P., et al. Comparison of range of motion after posterior cruciate ligament retention or sacrifice with a mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty. Am J Knee Surg 10 (1997) 216
23. Aigner C., Windhager R., Pechmann M., et al. The influence of an anterior-posterior gliding mobile-bearing on range of motion after total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86 (2004) 2257
24. Komistek R.D., Scott R.D., Dennis D.A., et al. In vivo comparison of femorotibial contact positions for press-fit posterior stabilized and posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 17 (2002) 209
25. Dennis D.A., Komistek R.D., Hoff W.A., et al. In vivo knee kinematics derived using an inverse perspective technique. Clin Orthop 331 (1996) 107
26. Dennis D.A., Komistek R.D., Stiehl J.B., et al. Range of motion after total knee arthroplasty: the effect of implant design and weight-bearing conditions. J Arthroplasty 13 (1998) 748
27. Banks S., Bellemans J., Nojaki H., et al. Knee motions during maximum flexion in fixed and mobile-bearing arthroplasties. Clin Orthop 410 (2003) 131