Long-Term Comparison of Mobile-Bearing vs Fixed-Bearing Total Knee Arthroplasty

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 26, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 1219-1223

  Woolson, Steven T ^a   Epstein, Noah J ^a   Huddleston, James I ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Fixed bearing; Long term; Mobile bearing; Outcomes; Total knee arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL EVALUATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FIXED BEARING; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; KNEE FUNCTION; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MOBILE BEARING; OSTEOLYSIS; PAIN ASSESSMENT; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SCORING SYSTEM; TIBIA SHAFT FRACTURE; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WEIGHT BEARING;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHRALGIA; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; KNEE JOINT; KNEE PROSTHESIS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MIDDLE AGED; POLYETHYLENE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 80755140641     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: 15328406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.01.014     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Woolson S.T., Northrup G.D. Mobile- vs fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty: a clinical and radiologic study. J Arthroplasty 2004, 19:135.
2. Landis J.R., Koch G.G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977, 33:159.
3. Posner K.L., Sampson P.D., Caplan R.A., et al. Measuring interrater reliability among multiple raters: an example of methods for nominal data. Stat Med 1990, 9:1103. Erratum in: Stat Med. 1992;11:401.
4. Insall J.N., Dorr L.D., Scott W.N. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989, 248:13.
5. Kim Y.H., Kook H.K., Kim J.S. Comparison of fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001, 392:101.
6. Kim Y.H., Kim J.S. Prevalence of osteolysis after simultaneous bilateral fixed- and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasties in young patients. J Arthroplasty 2009, 24:932.
7. Bhan S., Malhotra R., Kiran E.K., et al. A comparison of fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty at a minimum follow-up of 4.5 years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005, 87:2290.
8. Ladermann A., Lubbeke A., Stern R., et al. Fixed-bearing versus mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized, clinical and radiological study with mid-term results at 7 years. Knee 2008, 15:206.
9. Aglietti P., Baldini A., Buzzi R., et al. Comparison of mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized study. J Arthroplasty 2005, 20:145.
10. Price A.J., Rees J.L., Beard D., et al. A mobile-bearing total knee prosthesis compared with a fixed-bearing prosthesis: a multicentre single-blind randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2003, 85:62.
11. Beard D., Pandit H., Price A.J., et al. Introduction of a new mobile-bearing total knee prosthesis: minimum three year follow-up of an RCT comparing it with a fixed-bearing device. Knee 2007, 14:448.
12. Wylde V., Learmonth I., Potter A., et al. Patient-reported outcomes after fixed- versus mobile-bearing total knee replacement: a multi-centre randomized controlled trial using the Kinemax total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008, 90:1172.
13. Oh K.J., Pandher D.S., Lee S.H., et al. Meta-analysis comparing outcomes of fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing prostheses in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2009, 24:873.
14. Kim Y.H., Yoon S.H., Kim S.H. The long-term results of simultaneous fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing total knee replacements performed in the same patient. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007, 89:1317.
15. Tibrewal S.B., Grant K.A., Goodfellow J.W. The radiolucent line beneath the tibial components of the Oxford meniscal knee. J Bone and Joint Surg Br 1984, 523.