The significant others of subjective norm - A scientometric study of subjective norm in is top-journals over two decades

17th European Conference on Information Systems, ECIS 2009

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages

  Eckhardt, Andreas ^a  

^a GOETHE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Meta analysis; Scientometric study; Social influence; Subjective norm

Indexed keywords

CONCEPTUAL RESEARCH; META-ANALYSIS; NEGATIVE CORRELATION; SCIENTOMETRICS; SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS; SOCIAL INFLUENCE; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; SUBJECTIVE NORM;

IMPACT STRENGTH; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; RESEARCH;

ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS;

EID: 84870720466     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (49)

1. Agarwal, R. (2000). Individual Acceptance of Information Technologies, in R.W. Zmud, (ed.) Framing the Domains of IT Management: Projecting the Future through the Past, Cincinnati, OH: Pinnaflex Education Resources, 85-104.
2. Ahtola, O.T. (1976). Toward a Vector Model of Intentions. Advances in Consumer Research, 3, Anderson, Arbor. MI: Association for Consumer Research, 48 1-484.
3. Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behaviour. In J. Kuhl and J. Beckmann, (eds.) Action Control: From Cognition to Behavior, New York: Springer, 11-39.
4. Asch, S.E. (1951). Effects of group pressure on the modification and distortion of judgments, Groups, leadership, men.
5. Austin, L.C., Liker, J.K. and McLeod, P.L. (1993). Who controls the technology in group support systems? Determinants and consequences. Human-Computer Interaction, 8, 217-236.
6. Benbasat, I. and Barki, H. (2007). Quo vadis, TAM?. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8 (4), 211-218.
7. Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P. and Warshaw, P.R. (1989). User Acceptance of Computer-Technology - a Comparison of Two Theoretical-Models. Management Science 35 (8), 982-1003.
8. Davis, M. (2001). ISSI-2001 in Australia in July 2001: A report of the 8th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics. Library Hi Tech News 18 (10), 3-4.
9. Dishaw, M.T. and Strong, D.M. (1999) Extending the technology acceptance model with tasktechnology fit constructs. Information and Management 36 (1), 9-21.
10. Dwivedi Y.K., Williams M.D., Lal B. and Schwarz A. (2008). Profiling Adoption, Acceptance and Diffusion Research in the Information Systems Discipline. In: Proceeding of the 16th ECIS (Galway, Ireland).
11. Eckhardt, A., Laumer, S. and Weitzel, T. (2008). Reconsidering Subjective Norm - A Multilayer- Framework for Modeling Normative Beliefs in IT Adoption. In: Proceedings of the 14th AMCIS (Toronto, Canada).
12. Eckhardt, A., Laumer, S. and Weitzel, T. (2009). Who influences whom? Analyzing workplace Referents' social influence on IT adoption and non-adoption. Journal of Information Technology 24(1), pp. 11-24.
13. Festinger, L. (1954). A Theory of Social Comparison Processes. Human Relations 7(117).
14. Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
15. Fulk, J., Schmitz, J. and Steinfield, C. (1990). A social influence model of technology use. In J. Fulk and C. Steinfield (Ed.), Organizations and communication technology Newbury Park, CA: Sage, pp. 117-140.
16. Ha, I., Yoon, Y. and Choi, M. (2007). Determinants of adoption of mobile games under mobile broadband wireless access environment. Information and Management 44 (2007), 276-286.
17. Hsieh, J.J.P.-A., Rai, A. and Keil, M. (2008). Understanding Digital Inequality: Comparing Continued Use Behavioral Models of the Socio-Economically Advantaged and Disadvantaged. MIS Quarterly, 32 (1), 97 -126.
18. Hunter, J.E., Schmidt, F.L. and Jackson, G. B. (1982). Meta Analysis: Cumulating Research Findings Across Studies. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
19. Karahanna, E., Straub, D.W. and Chervany N.L. (1999). Information technology adoption across time: A cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption beliefs. MIS Quarterly 23 (2).
20. Kim, C., Jahng, J. and Lee, J. (2007). An empirical investigation into the utilization-based information technology success model: integrating task-performance and social influence perspective, Journal of Information Technology (22), 152-160.
21. King, W.R. and He, J. (2006). A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model. Information and Management, 43 (6), 740-755.
22. Lee, Y., Lee, J. and Lee, Z. (2006). Social Influence on Technology Acceptance Behavior: Self- Identity Theory Perspective. DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems, 37 (2&3), 60-75.
23. nd International Conference on Information Systems (New Orleans, USA).
24. Lee, P.C.B. (2002). The Social Context of Turnover Among Information Technology Professionals. In: ACM SIGMIS CPR 2002 Conference, Kristiansand, Norway.
25. Lewis, W., Agarwal, R. and Sambamurthy, V. (2003). Sources of influence on beliefs about information technology use: an empirical study of knowledge workers, MIS Quarterly 27 (4).
26. Lewin, K. (1952). Group decision and social change. Readings in social psychology.
27. Lowry, P.B., Romans, D. and Curtis, A. (2004). Global Journal Prestige and Supporting Disciplines: A Scientometric Study of Information Systems Journals. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 5 (2), 29-77.
28. Liska, A.E. (1984) Contact Hypothesis and Inter-Age Attitudes: A Field Study of Cross-Age Contact. Social Psychology Quarterly, 47 (1), 74-80.
29. Lu, J., Yao, J. E. and Yu, C. (2005). Personal innovativeness, social influences and adoption of wireless Internet services via mobile technology. Journal of Strategic Information Systems (14).
30. Ma, Q. and Liu, L. (2004) The technology acceptance model: A meta-analysis of empirical findings. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 16 (1), 59-72.
31. Mathieson, K. (1991). Predicting User Intentions: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with the Theory of Planned Behavior. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 173-191.
32. Mbarika V, Okoli C, Byrd T and Datta P (2005). The neglected continent of IS research: A research agenda for sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 6 (5), 130-170.
33. Miniard, P.W. and Cohen, J.B. (1983). Modeling Personal and Normative Influences on Behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 10, 169- 180.
34. Rafaeli, S. and Noy, A. (2005). Social presence: influence on bidders in internet auctions. Electronic Markets, 15(2).
35. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations, Fifth Edition, Free Press, Simon & Schuster, New York, NY.
36. Salancik, G. R. and Pfeffer, J. (1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 224-243.
37. Schepers, J.J.L. and Wetzels, M.G.M. (2007). A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model: investigating subjective norm and moderation effects. Information & Management, 44 (1), 90-103.
38. Schmitz, J. and Fulk, J. (1991). Organizational colleagues, media richness, and electronic mail.Communication Research 18 (4), 487-523.
39. Short, J., Williams, E. and Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.
40. Srite, M. and Karahanna, E. (2006). The Role of Espoused National Cultural Values in Technology Acceptance. MIS Quarterly, 30 (3), 679-704.
41. Straub, D. (2006). The value of scientometric studies: an introduction to a debate on IS as a reference discipline. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 7 (5), pp. 241-246.
42. Taylor, S.A. and Todd, P.A. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research, 6, 144-176.
43. Thompson, R.L., Higgins, C.A. and Howell, J.M. (1991). Personal Computing: Toward a Conceptual Model of Utilization. MIS Quarterly 15 (1), 125-142.
44. Triandis, H.C. (1971). Attitude and Attitude Change, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, NY.
45. Triandis, H.C. (1980). Values, Attitudes, and Interpersonal Behavior. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1979: University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, NE, 1980, 195-259.
46. Venkatesh, V. and Brown, S.A. (2001). A Longitudinal Investigation of Personal Computers in Homes: Adoption Determinants and Emerging Challenges. MIS Quarterly, 71-102.
47. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B. and Davis, F.D. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View, MIS Quarterly 27 (3), 425-478.
48. Wolfberg, D. (2008) Said What? Peer Pressure Quotes, [WWW document], (accessed 299th November 2008), http://www.saidwhat.co.uk/research/peerpressure.
49. Yang, H. and Yoo, Y (2004). It's All About Attitude: Revisiting the Technology Acceptance Model. Decision Support Systems 38 (1), 19-31.