Social Influence on Technology Acceptance Behavior: Self-Identity Theory Perspective

Data Base for Advances in Information Systems

Volumn 37, Issue , 2006, Pages 60-75

  Lee, Younghwa ^a   Lee, Jintae ^b   Lee, Zoonky ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^c Yonsei University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

and Technology Acceptance Model; Self Identity; Social Influence; Subjective Norm

Indexed keywords

EID: 84952961214     PISSN: 00950033     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/1161345.1161355     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Ashforth, B. and Mael, F. (1989), “Social Identity Theory and the Organisation”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 14 No. 1, pp. 20–39.
2. Barclay, D., Higgins, C., and Thompson, R. (1995). “The Partial Least Squares (PLS) Approach to Causal Modeling: Personal Computer Adoption and Use as an Illustration,” Technology Studies, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 285–324.
3. Berger, P.L. (1966). The Social Construction of Reality, Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
4. Boomsma, A. (1982). “The Robustness of LISREL against Small Sample Sizes in Factor Analysis,” in Joreskog, K.G., and Wold, H. (Eds.), Systems under Indirect Observation: Causality - Structure - Prediction, Part I, Amsterdam:North-Holland, pp. 143–173.
5. Charng, H.W., Piliavin, J.A., and Callero, P.L. (1988). “Role Identity and Reasoned Action in the Prediction of Repeated Behavior,” Social Psychology Quarterly, Vol. 51, pp. 303–317.
6. Compeau, D.R., and Higgins, C.A. (1995). “Application of Social Cognitive Theory to Training for Computer Skills,” Information Systems Research, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 118–143.
7. Conner, M. and Armitage, C.J. (1998). “Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior: A Review and Avenues for Further Research,” Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 28 No. 15, pp. 1429–1464.
8. Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P., and Warshaw, P.R. (1989). “User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models,” Management Science, Vol. 35, No. 8, pp. 982–1003.
9. DeBono, K.G. and Snyder, M. (1995). “Acting on One's Attitudes: The Role of a History of Choosing Situations,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 21, pp. 629–636.
10. Deci, E.L. (1972). “Intrinsic Motivation, Extrinsic Reinforcement, and Inequity,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 22, pp. 113–120.
11. Fekadu, Z., and Kraft, P. (2001). “Self-identity in Planned Behavior Perspective: Past Behavior and Its Moderating Effects on Self-identity-intention Relations,” Social Behavior and Personality, Vol. 29, pp. 671–686.
12. Fishbein, M., and Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
13. Fornell, C. and Larcker, V.F. (1981). “Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 18, pp. 39–50.
14. Granberg, D. and Holmberg, S. (1990). “The Intention-Behavior Relationship among U.S. and Swedish Voters,” Social Psychology Quarterly, Vol. 53, No. 1, pp. 44–54.
15. Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., and Black, W.C. (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis, (5th ed.), Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
16. Harrision, D.A., Mykytyn, P.P., and Riemenschneider, C.K. (1997). “Executive Decisions about Adoption of Information Technology in Small Business: Theory and Empirical Tests,” Information Systems Research, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 171–195.
17. Hartwick, J. and Barki, H. (1994). “Explaining the Role of User Participation in Information System Use,” Management Science, Vol. 40, No. 4, pp. 440–465.
18. Hogg, M.A. and Terry, D.J. (2000). “Social Identity and Self-categorization Processes in Organizational Contexts,” Academy of Management Review, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 121–140.
19. Igbaria, M., Parasuraman, S., and Baroudi, J.J. (1996). “A Motivational Model of Microcomputer Usage,” Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 127–143.
20. Joreskog, K.G., and Sorbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural Equation Modeling with the SIMPLIS Command Language, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
21. Karahanna, E. and Limayem, M. (2000). “E-mail and V-mail Usage: Generalizing across Technologies,” Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 49–66.
22. Karahanna, E., Straub, D.W., and Chervany, N.L. (1999). “Information Technology Adoption across Time: A Cross-sectional Comparison of Pre adoption and Post-adoption Beliefs,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 183–213.
23. Lucas, H.C. and Spitler, V.K. (1999). “Technology Use and Performance: A Field Study of Broker Workstations,” Decision Science, Vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 291–331.
24. Mathieson, K. (1991). “Predicting User Intentions: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with the Theory of Planned Behavior,” Information Systems Research, Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 173–191.
25. McCall, G.J., and Simmons, J.L. (1978). Identities and Interactions, New York: Free Press.
26. Segars, A.H. (1997). “Assessing the Unidimensionality of Measurement: A Paradigm and Illustration Within the Context of Information Systems Research,” Omega, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 107–121.
27. Segars, A. H. and Grover, V. (1993). “Re-examining Perceived Ease of Use and Usefulness: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 517–525.
28. Sparks, P. (2000). “Subjective Expected Utility-based Attitude-Behavior Models: The Utility of Self identity,” in Terry, D.J., and Hogg, M.A. (Eds.), Attitudes, Behaviour and Social Context: The Role of Norms and Group Membership, Mahwah, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 11–30.
29. Sparks, P. and Guthrie, C.A. (1998). “Self-identity and the Theory of Planned Behavior: A Useful Addition or an Unhelpful Artifice?” Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 28, pp. 398–1410.
30. Sparks, P. and Shepherd, R. (1992). “Self-identity and the Theory of Planned Behavior: Assessing the Role of Identification with Green Consumerism,” Social Psychology Quarterly, Vol. 55, No. 4, pp. 388–399.
31. Sparks, P., Shepherd, R., and Frewer, L.J. (1995). “Assessing and Structuring Attitudes toward the Use of Gene Technology in Food Production: The Role of Perceived Ethical Obligation,” Basic and Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 16, pp. 267–285.
32. Straub, D.W. (1989). “Validating Instruments in MIS Research,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 147 169.
33. Stryker, S. and Burke, P.J. (2000). “The Past, Present, and Future of an Identity Theory,” Social Psychology Quarterly, Vol. 63, pp. 284–297.
34. Taylor, S.P. and Todd, P.A. (1995a). “Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models,” Information Systems Research, Vol. 6, pp. 144–176.
35. Taylor, S.P. and Todd, P.A. (1995b). “Assessing IT Usage: The Role of Prior Experience,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 561–570.
36. Terry, D.J., and Hogg, M.A. (2000). Attitudes, Behavior and Social Context: The Role of Norms and Group Membership, Mahwah, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum Associates.
37. Terry, D.J., Hogg, M.A., and White, K.M. (1999). “The Theory of Planned Behavior: Self-identity, Social Identity, and Group Norms,” British Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 38, pp. 225–244.
38. Thoits, P.A. and Virshup, L. (1997). “Me's and We's: Forms and Functions of Social Identities,” in Ashmore, R.D., and Jussim, L. (Eds.), Self and Identity: Fundamental Issues, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 106–133.
39. Thompson, R.L., Higgins, C.A., and Howell, J.M. (1994). “Influence of Experience on Personal Computer Utilization: Testing a Conceptual Model,” Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 167–187.
40. Venkatesh, V. (2000). “Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model,” Information Systems Research, Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 342–365.
41. Venkatesh, V. and Brown, S. (2001). “A Longitudinal Investigation of Personal Computers in Home: Adoption Determinants and Emerging Challenges,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 71 102.
42. Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F.D. (2000). “A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies,” Management Science, Vol. 46, No. 2, pp. 186–204.
43. Venkatesh, V. and Morris, M.G. (2000). “Why Don’t Men Ever Stop to Ask for Directions? Gender, Social Influence, and Their Role in Technology Acceptance and User Behavior,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 24, pp. 115–139.
44. Venkatesh, V., Morris M.G., Davis G.B., and Davis, F.D. (2003). “User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 425–478.
45. Venkatesh, V. and Speier, C. (2000). “Creating an Effective Training Environment for Enhancing Telework,” International Journal of Human Computer Studies, Vol. 52, No. 6, pp. 991–1005.