Framing the economy: Effects of journalistic news frames

Doing News Framing Analysis: Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 187-214

  De Vreese, Claes H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84870603913     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203864463     Document Type: Chapter

References (83)

1. Asher, H. B. (1983). Causal modeling. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
2. Baden, C., & de Vreese, C. H. (2008). Making sense: A reconstruction of people's understandings of the European constitutional referendum in the Netherlands. Communications: The European Journal of Communication, 33, 117-146.
3. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
4. Bennett, W. L. (1996). News: The politics of illusion. New York: Longman.
5. Cappella, J. N., & Jamieson, K. H. (1997). Spiral of cynicism: The press and the public good. New York: Oxford University Press.
6. Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007a). A theory of framing and opinion formation in competitive elite environments. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 99-118.
7. Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007b). Framing theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 10, 103-126.
8. D'Angelo, P. (2002). News framing as a multiparadigmatic research program: A response to Entman. Journal of Communication, 52(4), 870-888.
9. Delli Carpini, M. X. (2005). News from somewhere: Journalistic frames and the debate over "public journalism." In K. Callaghan & F. Schnell (Eds.), Framing American politics (pp. 21-53). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
10. De Vreese, C. H. (2002). Framing Europe: Television news and European integration. Amsterdam: Aksant Academic/Transaction.
11. De Vreese, C. H. (2004). The effects of frames in political television news on audience perceptions of routine political news. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 81, 36-52.
12. De Vreese, C. H. (2005). The spiral of cynicism reconsidered: The mobilizing function of news. European Journal of Communication, 20(3), 283-301.
13. De Vreese, C. H., & Boomgaarden, H. (2003). Valenced news frames and public support for the EU. Communications, 28(4), 361-381.
14. De Vreese, C. H., & Boomgaarden, H. (2005). Projecting EU referendums: Fear of immigration and support for European integration. European Union Politics, 6(1), 59-82.
15. De Vreese, C.H., & Boomgaarden, H. (2006). Media effects on public opinion about the enlargement of the European Union. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 44(2), 419-439.
16. De Vreese, C. H., Boomgaarden, H. G., & Semetko, H. A. (2006). Effects of issue news framing on public support for Turkish membership in the EU. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the International Communication Association, Dresden, Germany.
17. De Vreese, C. H., Boomgaarden, H. G., & Semetko, H. A. (2008). Hard and soft: Public support for Turkish membership in the EU. European Union Politics, 9, 511-530.
18. De Vreese, C. H., Peter, J., & Semetko, H. A. (2001). Framing politics at the launch of the euro: A cross-national comparative study of frames in the news. Political Communication, 18, 107-122.
19. Druckman, J. N. (2001a). The implication of framing effects for citizen competence. Political Behavior, 23, 225-256.
20. Druckman, J. N. (2001b). On the limits of framing effects: Who can frame? Journal of Politics, 63, 1041-1066.
21. Druckman, J. N., & Nelson, T. E. (2003). Framing and deliberation: How citizens' conversations limit elite influence. American Journal of Political Science, 47(4), 729-745.
22. Edelman, M. (1983). Contestable categories and public opinion. Political Communication, 10, 231-242.
23. Edwards, G. C., & Swenson, T. (1997). Who rallies? The anatomy of a rally event. Journal of Politics 59, 200-212.
24. Entman, R. M. (1991). Framing U.S. coverage of international news: Contrasts in narratives of the KAL and Iran Air incidents. Journal of Communication, 41(4), 6-27.
25. European Commission. (2004). Eurobarometer: Public opinion in the European union. (Reps. No. 59-70). Brussels, Belgium: Directorate-General X.
26. Gabel, M. (1998). Public support for European integration: An empirical test of five theories. Journal of Politics, 60, 333-354.
27. Gabel, M., & Palmer, H. (1995). Understanding variation in public support for European integration. European Journal of Political Research, 27, 3-19.
28. Gamson, W. A. (1992). Talking politics. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
29. Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology, 95(1), 1-37.
30. Graber, D. A. (1997). Mass media in American politics. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
31. Gross, K., & Brewer, P. R. (2007). Sore losers: News frames, policy debates and emotions. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 12, 122-133.
32. Hetherington, M. J. (1996). The media's role in forming voters' national economic evaluations in 1992. American Journal of Political Science 40, 372-395.
33. Huckfeldt, R., Johnson, P. E., & Sprague, J. (2004). Political disagreement: The survival of diverse opinions within communication networks. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
34. Iyengar, S. (1991). Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
35. Iyengar, S. (1996). Framing responsibility for political issues. Annals of the American Academy, 59-70.
36. Iyengar, S., & Kinder, D. R. (1987). News that matters. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
37. Jasperson, A. E., Shah, D. V., Watts, M., Faber, R. J., & Fan, D. P. (1998). Framing the public agenda: Media effects on the importance of the federal budget deficit. Political Communication, 15, 205-224.
38. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1984). Choice, values, and frames. American Psychologist, 39, 341-350.
39. Kevin, D. (2001). Coverage of the European Parliament elections of 1999:National public spheres and European debates. Javnost/The Public, 8(1), 21-38.
40. Kinder, D. R. (2003). Communication and politics in the age of information. In D. O. Sears, L. Huddy, & R. Jervis (Eds.), Oxford handbook of political psychology (pp. 357-393). New York: Oxford University Press.
41. Kinder, D. R. (2007). Curmudgeonly advice. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 155-162.
42. Kinder, D. R., & Palfrey, T. (Eds.). (1993). Experimental foundations of political science. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
43. Kinder, D. R., & Sanders, L. M. (1990). Mimicking political debate with survey questions: The case of white opinion on affirmative action for blacks. Social Cognition, 8(1), 73-103.
44. Krosnick, J. A., & Brannon, L. A. (1993). The impact of the Gulf War on the ingredients of presidential evaluations: Multidimensional effects of political involvement. American Political Science Review, 87(4), 963-997.
45. Lecheler, S., de Vreese, C. H., & Slothuus, R. (2009). Issue importance as a moderator of framing effects. Communication Research, 36(3), 400-425.
46. Lodge, M., McGraw, K., & Stroh, P. (1989). Inside the mental voting booth: An impression-driven model of candidate evaluation. American Political Science Review, 87, 399-419.
47. Lodge, M., Steenbergen, M. R., & Brau, S. (1995). The responsive voter: Campaign information and the dynamics of candidate evaluation. American Political Science Review, 89, 309-326.
48. Matthes, J., Wirth, W., & Schemer, C. (2007). Measuring the unmeasurable? Toward operationalizing on-line and memory-based political judgments in surveys. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 19(2), 247-257.
49. McManus, J. H. (1994). Market-driven journalism: Let the citizen beware. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
50. Miller, J. M., & Krosnick, J. A. (2000). News media impact on the ingredients of presidential evaluations: Politically knowledgeable citizens are guided by a trusted source. American Journal of Political Science, 44, 301-315.
51. Mutz, D. C., & Reeves, B. (2005). The new video malaise: Effects of televised incivility on political trust. American Political Science Review 99(1), 1-15.
52. Nelson, T. E. (2004). Policy goals, public rhetoric, and political attitudes. Journal of Politics, 66, 581-605.
53. Nelson, T. E., Clawson, R. A., & Oxley, Z. M (1997). Media framing of a civil liberties conflict and its effect on tolerance. American Political Science Review, 91, 567-584.
54. Nelson, T. E., & Kinder, D. R. (1996). Issue frames and group-centrism in American public opinion. Journal of Politics, 58, 1055-1078.
55. Nelson, T. E., & Oxley, Z. M. (1999). Issue framing effects on belief importance and opinion. Journal of Politics, 61, 1040-1061.
56. Neuman, W. R., Just, M. R., & Crigler, A. N. (1992). Common knowledge:News and the construction of political meaning. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
57. Norris, P. (2000). A virtuous circle. Political communications in postindustrial societies. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
58. Patterson, T. E. (1993). Out of order. New York: Knopf.
59. Peter, J. (2003). Country characteristics as contingent conditions of agendasetting. Communication Research, 30(6), 683-712.
60. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879-891.
61. Price, V., & Tewksbury, D. (1997). News values and public opinion: A theoretical account of media priming and framing. In G. Barnett & F. J. Boster (Eds.), Progress in communication science (pp. 173-212). Greenwich, CT:Ablex.
62. Price, V., Tewksbury, D., & Powers, E. (1997). Switching trains of thought:The impact of news frames on readers' cognitive responses. Communication Research, 24, 481-506.
63. Rhee, J. (1997). Strategy and issue frames in election campaign coverage: A social cognitive account of framing effects. Journal of Communication, 47(3), 26-48.
64. Scheufele, D. A. (1999). Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication, 49(1), 103-122.
65. Scheufele, D. A. (2000). Agenda-setting, priming, and framing revisited: Another look at cognitive effects of political communication. Mass Communication & Society, 3, 297-316.
66. Schneider, T. R., Salovey, P., Apanovitch, A. M., Pizarro, J., McCarthy, D., Zullo, J., et al. (2001). The effects of message framing and ethnic targeting on mammography use among low-income women. Health Psychology, 20, 256-266.
67. Schuck, A. R. T., & de Vreese, C. H. (2006). Between risk and opportunity:News framing and its effects on public support for EU enlargement. European Journal of Communication, 21(1), 5-32.
68. Schuck, A. R. T., & de Vreese, C. H. (2009). Reversed mobilization in referendum campaigns: How positive news framing can mobilize the skeptics. International Journal of Press/Politics, 14(1), 40-66.
69. Semetko, H. A., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2000). Framing European politics: A content analysis of press and television news. Journal of Communication, 50(2), 93-109.
70. Shah, D. V., Kwak, N., Schmierbach, M., & Zubric, J. (2004). The interplay of news frames on cognitive complexity. Human Communication Research, 30, 102-120.
71. Shah, D., Watts, M. D., Domke, D., & Fan, D. (2002). News framing and cueing of issue regimes: Explaining Clinton's public approval in spite of scandal. Public Opinion Quarterly, 66, 339-370.
72. Shen, F., & Edwards, H. H. (2005). Economic individualism, humanitarianism and welfare reform: A value-based account of framing effects. Journal of Communication, 55(4), 795-809.
73. Slothuus, R. (2007). Framing deservingness to win support for welfare state retrenchment. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30(3), 323-344.
74. Slothuus, R. (2008). More than weighting cognitive importance: A dual-process model of issue framing effects. Political Psychology, 29(1), 1-28.
75. Sniderman, P. M., & Theriault, S. M. (2004). The dynamics of political argument and the logic of issue framing. In W. E. Saris & P. Sniderman (Eds.), Attitudes, nonattitudes, measurement error, and change (pp. 133-165). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
76. Tankard, J. W. (2001). The empirical approach to the study of media framing. In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy, & A. E. Grant (Eds.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (pp. 95-106). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
77. Tewksbury, D., Jones, J., Peske, M. W., Raymond, A., & Vig, W. (2000). The interaction of news and advocate frames: Manipulating audience perceptions of a local policy issue. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 77, 804-830.
78. Valentino, N. A., Beckmann, M. N., & Buhr, T. A. (2001). A spiral for of cynicism for some: The contingent effects of campaign news frames on participation and confidence in government. Political Communication, 18, 347-367.
79. Valentino, N. A., Buhr, T. A., & Beckmann, M. N. (2001). When the frame is the game: Revisiting the impact of "strategic" campaign coverage on citizen's information retention. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 78, 93-112.
80. Valentino, N. A., Hutchings, V. L., & White, I. K. (2002). Cues that matter:How political ads prime racial attitudes during campaigns. American Political Science Review, 96, 75-90.
81. Valkenburg, P. M., Semetko, H. A., & de Vreese, C. H. (1999). The effects of news frames on readers' thoughts and recall. Communication Research, 26, 550-568.
82. van Dijk, T. A. (1988). News as discourse. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
83. Zaller, J. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.